It looked like it to me but I said nothing. Then some others asked why Starbold was given a platform for his kind of postings and this seemed to have woken up Admin.
It is on the Dogs in the general trolling, main forum. "Unwhite" WTF does that mean? Of course, Starbold will explain but was there any need for that kind of comment?
Or am I being too sensitive? I looked it up and to my surprise it's a real word but I still felt the term was unnecessary and inappropriate and alternative language should have been used. I'm sure those that like Starbold will support him over there.
It's very true what they say about forums, they are what their Admin want them to be.
Postings that include the word unwhite or the existence of the word unwhite or that the person Starbold has a wider vocabulary than you?
Anonymous said
Jan 19 6:46 PM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
What are you whining about?
Postings that include the word unwhite or the existence of the word unwhite or that the person Starbold has a wider vocabulary than you?
Go and read the thread and maybe then you will appreciate what I'm saying as well as others. Starbold has a history of posting threads like that.
Anonymous said
Jan 19 7:03 PM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
What are you whining about?
Postings that include the word unwhite or the existence of the word unwhite or that the person Starbold has a wider vocabulary than you?
Go and read the thread and maybe then you will appreciate what I'm saying as well as others. Starbold has a history of posting threads like that.
Okay. Starbold is a nobody. I am more worried about the stupid description given out by the Leicestershire Police "a light-skinned Asian man". What do they mean by light-skinned, what do they mean by Asian, how do they know he is Asian. It makes no sense.
Georgia x said
Jan 19 7:17 PM, 2020
No one would dare say the word "unwhite" in polite company. It's the year 2020.
They would be viewed as a bigot with issues if they said it in impolite company now I consider it.
I don't know anything about this poster, the fates have kindly allowed me to avoid posting with the gentleman but his views are hopelessly woefully abhorrent .
Anonymous said
Jan 19 8:55 PM, 2020
Georgia x wrote:
No one would dare say the word "unwhite" in polite company. It's the year 2020.
They would be viewed as a bigot with issues if they said it in impolite company now I consider it.
I don't know anything about this poster, the fates have kindly allowed me to avoid posting with the gentleman but his views are hopelessly woefully abhorrent .
Yes, at best they are abhorrent as you put it but those that run the site allow it, so it goes on and on...... You get some complaining and others either support it or go along with it.
Anonymous said
Jan 19 9:03 PM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
What are you whining about?
Postings that include the word unwhite or the existence of the word unwhite or that the person Starbold has a wider vocabulary than you?
Go and read the thread and maybe then you will appreciate what I'm saying as well as others. Starbold has a history of posting threads like that.
Okay. Starbold is a nobody. I am more worried about the stupid description given out by the Leicestershire Police "a light-skinned Asian man". What do they mean by light-skinned, what do they mean by Asian, how do they know he is Asian. It makes no sense.
About the police. They have described it well as you you can get varying colour of Asians and when we went to Goa, many of the locals were very, very dark skinned
and those living in Shimla were very pale coloured skin and you get the same variations in Pakistan. If you really knew what you was talking about, you'd say that Starbold was wrong but not his fault as he is allowed to get away with it. This thread of his is nothing compared to the rubbish he usually posts, racist rubbish that is. HE's got his following, so he stays and has stayed for many, many years from what I have seen. I think a bit more pressure about his posts may just get him a ban. On the Dogs you can easily get banned for disagreeing with the Admin but it looks as though it's OK to post stuff like, Starbolds, rubbish.
Anonymous said
Jan 19 10:43 PM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
What are you whining about?
Postings that include the word unwhite or the existence of the word unwhite or that the person Starbold has a wider vocabulary than you?
Go and read the thread and maybe then you will appreciate what I'm saying as well as others. Starbold has a history of posting threads like that.
If it offends you then maybe dogs is not the place for you. Who do you think you are that you can censor others and decide what should be allowed and disallowed. Start your own forum and then you can choose who posts what there.
BackGammon said
Jan 20 8:33 AM, 2020
Why have you dragged this over here? Starbold and his racism has got fuck all to do with this forum.
Anonymous said
Jan 20 8:59 AM, 2020
BackGammon wrote:
Why have you dragged this over here? Starbold and his racism has got fuck all to do with this forum.
In case you hadn't noticed a lot of what happens on Dogs get dragged over here - by guests and members alike.
Anonymous said
Jan 20 11:02 AM, 2020
BackGammon wrote:
Why have you dragged this over here? Starbold and his racism has got fuck all to do with this forum.
You would have a point if the other forum was never or rarely mentioned here. Is that the case in you view? I contributed twice to the thread yesterday as a guest and both posts were not posted. A bit earlier today I noted a thread about "Colour" started by a poster called Avon Barksdale or something like that and guess who is posting the same trip as before? Those that run, manage the forum allow Starbolds posts and this encourages him to go further as I see it. I will quote Starbolds contribution to Avon's thread from this morning. The forum I ran for a while, no way would something like that be left on it for more than a moment and those that were not registered on my forum did not get through if their posts were racist, etc. Do you agree with, Starbold?
Major wrote: I think we should cherry pick, take advantage to suit ourselves and sod the rest.
Do you mean cherry pick from the existing population or do you mean immigration policy or both?
I don't think many people object to controlled / well managed immigration.
I simply mean cherry pick for the best of the best but they will have to swear TOTAL allegiance to our sovereign, government, OUR laws and fit into our way of life and not make religious demands from us by build bleeding mosques/temples n and the like.
WE MUST control OUR OWN destiny.
BackGammon said
Jan 20 12:17 PM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
BackGammon wrote:
Why have you dragged this over here? Starbold and his racism has got fuck all to do with this forum.
You would have a point if the other forum was never or rarely mentioned here. Is that the case in you view? I contributed twice to the thread yesterday as a guest and both posts were not posted. A bit earlier today I noted a thread about "Colour" started by a poster called Avon Barksdale or something like that and guess who is posting the same trip as before? Those that run, manage the forum allow Starbolds posts and this encourages him to go further as I see it. I will quote Starbolds contribution to Avon's thread from this morning. The forum I ran for a while, no way would something like that be left on it for more than a moment and those that were not registered on my forum did not get through if their posts were racist, etc. Do you agree with, Starbold?
Major wrote: I think we should cherry pick, take advantage to suit ourselves and sod the rest.
Do you mean cherry pick from the existing population or do you mean immigration policy or both?
I don't think many people object to controlled / well managed immigration.
I simply mean cherry pick for the best of the best but they will have to swear TOTAL allegiance to our sovereign, government, OUR laws and fit into our way of life and not make religious demands from us by build bleeding mosques/temples n and the like.
WE MUST control OUR OWN destiny.
Do I fuck agree with Starbold. It's up to the owner of Dogs forum to sort out the racism on there, not the admin on here.
-- Edited by BackGammon on Monday 20th of January 2020 12:18:07 PM
-- Edited by BackGammon on Monday 20th of January 2020 12:19:15 PM
Anonymous said
Jan 20 12:27 PM, 2020
BackGammon wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
BackGammon wrote:
Why have you dragged this over here? Starbold and his racism has got fuck all to do with this forum.
You would have a point if the other forum was never or rarely mentioned here. Is that the case in you view? I contributed twice to the thread yesterday as a guest and both posts were not posted. A bit earlier today I noted a thread about "Colour" started by a poster called Avon Barksdale or something like that and guess who is posting the same trip as before? Those that run, manage the forum allow Starbolds posts and this encourages him to go further as I see it. I will quote Starbolds contribution to Avon's thread from this morning. The forum I ran for a while, no way would something like that be left on it for more than a moment and those that were not registered on my forum did not get through if their posts were racist, etc. Do you agree with, Starbold?
Major wrote: I think we should cherry pick, take advantage to suit ourselves and sod the rest.
Do you mean cherry pick from the existing population or do you mean immigration policy or both?
I don't think many people object to controlled / well managed immigration.
I simply mean cherry pick for the best of the best but they will have to swear TOTAL allegiance to our sovereign, government, OUR laws and fit into our way of life and not make religious demands from us by build bleeding mosques/temples n and the like.
WE MUST control OUR OWN destiny.
Do I fuck agree with Starbold. It's up to the owner of Dogs forum to sort out the racism on there, not the admin on here.
-- Edited by BackGammon on Monday 20th of January 2020 12:18:07 PM
-- Edited by BackGammon on Monday 20th of January 2020 12:19:15 PM
Where the "fuck" (I too can swear) did I blame the admin here?
You asked me why I posted about the Dogs, here. Was that a serious question? Do you agree with Starbolds comments?
Anonymous said
Jan 20 12:46 PM, 2020
With regard Starbold - he is more concerned with preserving traditional British culture than preserving "British racial purity". He is part of an older generation that will be replaced with a more educated generation that will see Britain as just a secular - consumer - welfare society - that allows anything as long as it is within the law.
Twizzler said
Jan 20 6:23 PM, 2020
Avon is a good egg for putting out that thread.
I knew Starbuck would be all over it like a rash.
BackGammon said
Jan 20 6:37 PM, 2020
OP wrote:
BackGammon wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
BackGammon wrote:
Why have you dragged this over here? Starbold and his racism has got fuck all to do with this forum.
You would have a point if the other forum was never or rarely mentioned here. Is that the case in you view? I contributed twice to the thread yesterday as a guest and both posts were not posted. A bit earlier today I noted a thread about "Colour" started by a poster called Avon Barksdale or something like that and guess who is posting the same trip as before? Those that run, manage the forum allow Starbolds posts and this encourages him to go further as I see it. I will quote Starbolds contribution to Avon's thread from this morning. The forum I ran for a while, no way would something like that be left on it for more than a moment and those that were not registered on my forum did not get through if their posts were racist, etc. Do you agree with, Starbold?
Major wrote: I think we should cherry pick, take advantage to suit ourselves and sod the rest.
Do you mean cherry pick from the existing population or do you mean immigration policy or both?
I don't think many people object to controlled / well managed immigration.
I simply mean cherry pick for the best of the best but they will have to swear TOTAL allegiance to our sovereign, government, OUR laws and fit into our way of life and not make religious demands from us by build bleeding mosques/temples n and the like.
WE MUST control OUR OWN destiny.
Do I fuck agree with Starbold. It's up to the owner of Dogs forum to sort out the racism on there, not the admin on here.
-- Edited by BackGammon on Monday 20th of January 2020 12:18:07 PM
-- Edited by BackGammon on Monday 20th of January 2020 12:19:15 PM
Where the "fuck" (I too can swear) did I blame the admin here?
You asked me why I posted about the Dogs, here. Was that a serious question? Do you agree with Starbolds comments?
See above.
BackGammon said
Jan 20 6:40 PM, 2020
Twizzler wrote:
Avon is a good egg for putting out that thread.
I knew Starbuck would be all over it like a rash.
Covered himself in glory by slagging Avon. Stooo still hasn't banned him for the guests though.
Anonymous said
Jan 20 7:06 PM, 2020
It gets worse. I tried to ask questions but Admin won't let them through. I thendid some more research and this thread of Starbold is tame by his standards. The poster, Dean, he never hesitates to call others a "nonce" and those comments are still on the site. Post below from Starbold, he appears to be gearing up to a mega post. The post below is disgusting.
dr synne wrote:If you're asking have I ever had a racist thought, yes of course I have
You disgust me.
Rubbish , scumbag, Nazi. rat turd, you disgust me, you RACIST.
Have you been drinking?
Only twinnings Tea, the Yorkshire tea is off at mo.
Would you want people living next door to you who had tom toms blaring away every day on their rastablastuz? Would you want the smell of their cooking seeping into your home? Would you want your children mixing with those who carry knives and other weapons? Would you want undesirables in your street looking to buy drugs. Would you want the filth?
If you do not believe me ask Dean, he lives smack in the middle of it al,. FACT, unless he has lied previously
Syl said
Jan 20 7:43 PM, 2020
Major Starbold is playing into their hands, I have posted with him on and off for years and under all the racist crap he is a kind family man who has friends of every nationality....he is playing a part.
Just as Micky plays a part, others on there play a part....and people lap it up year in year out..
People keep extreme posters on their sites because it's good for business, Outraged from Oxford will break their necks to log in and condemn every last word they utter....year after year after year.
Twizzler said
Jan 20 8:09 PM, 2020
BackGammon wrote:
Twizzler wrote:
Avon is a good egg for putting out that thread.
I knew Starbuck would be all over it like a rash.
Covered himself in glory by slagging Avon. Stooo still hasn't banned him for the guests though.
Avon should join here. Maybe Admin have just been lurking behind the curtain.
It looked like it to me but I said nothing. Then some others asked why Starbold was given a platform for his kind of postings and this seemed to have woken up Admin.
It is on the Dogs in the general trolling, main forum. "Unwhite" WTF does that mean? Of course, Starbold will explain but was there any need for that kind of comment?
Or am I being too sensitive? I looked it up and to my surprise it's a real word but I still felt the term was unnecessary and inappropriate and alternative language should have been used. I'm sure those that like Starbold will support him over there.
It's very true what they say about forums, they are what their Admin want them to be.
Collins Dictionary.
n British English
Go and read the thread and maybe then you will appreciate what I'm saying as well as others. Starbold has a history of posting threads like that.
Okay. Starbold is a nobody. I am more worried about the stupid description given out by the Leicestershire Police "a light-skinned Asian man". What do they mean by light-skinned, what do they mean by Asian, how do they know he is Asian. It makes no sense.
No one would dare say the word "unwhite" in polite company. It's the year 2020.
They would be viewed as a bigot with issues if they said it in impolite company now I consider it.
I don't know anything about this poster, the fates have kindly allowed me to avoid posting with the gentleman but his views are hopelessly woefully abhorrent .
Yes, at best they are abhorrent as you put it but those that run the site allow it, so it goes on and on...... You get some complaining and others either support it or go along with it.
About the police. They have described it well as you you can get varying colour of Asians and when we went to Goa, many of the locals were very, very dark skinned
and those living in Shimla were very pale coloured skin and you get the same variations in Pakistan. If you really knew what you was talking about, you'd say that Starbold was wrong but not his fault as he is allowed to get away with it. This thread of his is nothing compared to the rubbish he usually posts, racist rubbish that is. HE's got his following, so he stays and has stayed for many, many years from what I have seen. I think a bit more pressure about his posts may just get him a ban. On the Dogs you can easily get banned for disagreeing with the Admin but it looks as though it's OK to post stuff like, Starbolds, rubbish.
If it offends you then maybe dogs is not the place for you. Who do you think you are that you can censor others and decide what should be allowed and disallowed. Start your own forum and then you can choose who posts what there.
Why have you dragged this over here? Starbold and his racism has got fuck all to do with this forum.
In case you hadn't noticed a lot of what happens on Dogs get dragged over here - by guests and members alike.
You would have a point if the other forum was never or rarely mentioned here. Is that the case in you view? I contributed twice to the thread yesterday as a guest and both posts were not posted. A bit earlier today I noted a thread about "Colour" started by a poster called Avon Barksdale or something like that and guess who is posting the same trip as before? Those that run, manage the forum allow Starbolds posts and this encourages him to go further as I see it. I will quote Starbolds contribution to Avon's thread from this morning. The forum I ran for a while, no way would something like that be left on it for more than a moment and those that were not registered on my forum did not get through if their posts were racist, etc. Do you agree with, Starbold?
Re: What do you think about People of Colour?
I simply mean cherry pick for the best of the best but they will have to swear TOTAL allegiance to our sovereign, government, OUR laws and fit into our way of life and not make religious demands from us by build bleeding mosques/temples n and the like.
WE MUST control OUR OWN destiny.
Do I fuck agree with Starbold. It's up to the owner of Dogs forum to sort out the racism on there, not the admin on here.
-- Edited by BackGammon on Monday 20th of January 2020 12:18:07 PM
-- Edited by BackGammon on Monday 20th of January 2020 12:19:15 PM
Where the "fuck" (I too can swear) did I blame the admin here?
You asked me why I posted about the Dogs, here. Was that a serious question? Do you agree with Starbolds comments?
With regard Starbold - he is more concerned with preserving traditional British culture than preserving "British racial purity". He is part of an older generation that will be replaced with a more educated generation that will see Britain as just a secular - consumer - welfare society - that allows anything as long as it is within the law.
Avon is a good egg for putting out that thread.
I knew Starbuck would be all over it like a rash.
See above.
Covered himself in glory by slagging Avon. Stooo still hasn't banned him for the guests though.
It gets worse. I tried to ask questions but Admin won't let them through. I thendid some more research and this thread of Starbold is tame by his standards. The poster, Dean, he never hesitates to call others a "nonce" and those comments are still on the site. Post below from Starbold, he appears to be gearing up to a mega post. The post below is disgusting.
Re: What do you think about People of Colour?
Only twinnings Tea, the Yorkshire tea is off at mo.
Would you want people living next door to you who had tom toms blaring away every day on their rastablastuz?
Would you want the smell of their cooking seeping into your home?
Would you want your children mixing with those who carry knives and other weapons?
Would you want undesirables in your street looking to buy drugs.
Would you want the filth?
If you do not believe me ask Dean, he lives smack in the middle of it al,. FACT, unless he has lied previously
Just as Micky plays a part, others on there play a part....and people lap it up year in year out..
People keep extreme posters on their sites because it's good for business, Outraged from Oxford will break their necks to log in and condemn every last word they utter....year after year after year.
Avon should join here.
Maybe Admin have just been lurking behind the curtain.