Her entering the race changes everything for the democrats.
First female president will energise a lot of the disinterested surely.
First female black president too.
Young versus ancient?
Poor old Stoo and Irish on the wrong side of history as usual with their never wavering support for him and total denial there was anything wrong with him the last few years.
Despite what the whole world couls see.
Who would you put your money on...him or her?
Its finally gotten interesting.
Place your bets place your bets.
Syl said
Jul 22 12:01 PM, 2024
I would put my money on almost anyone but him.
jackb said
Jul 22 12:19 PM, 2024
Syl wrote:
I would put my money on almost anyone but him.
That sounds more like what you want to happen not what you think will happen.
Syl said
Jul 22 12:41 PM, 2024
jackb wrote:
Syl wrote:
I would put my money on almost anyone but him.
That sounds more like what you want to happen not what you think will happen.
If I was betting with real money, it would obviously be placed on him getting in...missing a bullet (allegedly) has ensured his place at the top again.
Anonymous said
Jul 22 1:02 PM, 2024
jackb wrote:
Syl wrote:
I would put my money on almost anyone but him.
That sounds more like what you want to happen not what you think will happen.
In my case, why not both?
If she’s the nominee — and with grass roots donations of almost 50million raised within 24hrs of Biden stepping away — it’s gonna be her. Unquestionably her.
jackb said
Jul 22 2:12 PM, 2024
Syl wrote:
jackb wrote:
Syl wrote:
I would put my money on almost anyone but him.
That sounds more like what you want to happen not what you think will happen.
If I was betting with real money, it would obviously be placed on him getting in...missing a bullet (allegedly) has ensured his place at the top again.
Yes that bullet did wonders fore him but the switch to her might have been a great move.
I was convinced Biden had little chance and then no chance once blood was spilt now I'm undecided because putting her in changes everything!
Magica said
Jul 22 2:23 PM, 2024
It's the Don hopefully 😀
Vita said
Jul 22 3:26 PM, 2024
Magica wrote:
It's the Don hopefully 😀
🇱🇷 I hope Donald wins!! 🇱🇷
Maddog said
Jul 22 3:32 PM, 2024
Your bookies are still picking Don.
Kamala was a terrible candidate in 2020. She's been hidden away as VP as she doesn't do well when pressed with questions.
She was picked as VP because she was brown and a female. It's a prerequisite now for the Dems to have someone on the ticket who isn't a white male. She would shut up and do what she was told, making her perfect for VP.
Problem is, the perfect VP, is often not what you want for president..
Anonymous said
Jul 22 9:17 PM, 2024
Kamala Harris + ??? will win. In 2020 Biden- Harris got a record number of votes 81.3 million. They just need to get those voters out again and they will win. This time round the vote should be higher because the younger generation are more anti-Trump than the older generation are pro-Trump. To be fair America deserves to have Kamala as President. It would be the culmination of the Diversity Equity Inclusion program. Yet if she was in power she would consider it only a start. The mainstream media would laud it as America coming out of a dark age of Male Dominated White Colonialistic Injustice.
Meanwhile watch out for Joe Biden he has five more months to complete his project of nuclear annihilation over Russia and China.
Anonymous said
Jul 23 12:49 PM, 2024
Vita and Maggs, I'm curious why you support Trump strongly when he is so anti women?
Digger said
Jul 23 7:09 PM, 2024
Anonymous wrote:
Vita and Maggs, I'm curious why you support Trump strongly when he is so anti women?
Would it be better if he was a womanising lech like JFK or Clinton? Or perhaps a lying toad like Tricky Dicky? He's got a bad track record for mouthing off and calling some women nasty names. If I was voting I'd rather have someone with a spine and enough money not to be bought, quite frankly. I don't care if the POTUS has been caught with his dick out, or has kinky sexual peccadilloes. What is needed is someone who doesn't give a fuck what others think, isn't a flip flopping crowd pleaser and who can get the country by its balls and sort it out.
-- Edited by Digger on Tuesday 23rd of July 2024 07:10:16 PM
Magica said
Jul 23 7:13 PM, 2024
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Vita and Maggs, I'm curious why you support Trump strongly when he is so anti women?
Would it be better if he was a womanising lech like JFK or Clinton? Or perhaps a lying toad like Tricky Dicky? He's got a bad track record for mouthing off and calling some women nasty names. If I was voting I'd rather have someone with a spine and enough money not to be bought, quite frankly. I don't care if the POTUS has been caught with his dick out, or has kinky sexual peccadilloes. What is needed is someone who doesn't give a fuck what others think, isn't a flip flopping crowd pleaser and who can get the country by its balls and sort it out.
-- Edited by Digger on Tuesday 23rd of July 2024 07:10:16 PM
Totally agree Digs.
Anonymous said
Jul 23 9:16 PM, 2024
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Vita and Maggs, I'm curious why you support Trump strongly when he is so anti women?
Would it be better if he was a womanising lech like JFK or Clinton? Or perhaps a lying toad like Tricky Dicky? He's got a bad track record for mouthing off and calling some women nasty names. If I was voting I'd rather have someone with a spine and enough money not to be bought, quite frankly. I don't care if the POTUS has been caught with his dick out, or has kinky sexual peccadilloes. What is needed is someone who doesn't give a fuck what others think, isn't a flip flopping crowd pleaser and who can get the country by its balls and sort it out.
-- Edited by Digger on Tuesday 23rd of July 2024 07:10:16 PM
I meant him making abortion unlawful, denying women the right to control their own bodies and make their own decisions.
Magica said
Jul 23 11:55 PM, 2024
Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Vita and Maggs, I'm curious why you support Trump strongly when he is so anti women?
Would it be better if he was a womanising lech like JFK or Clinton? Or perhaps a lying toad like Tricky Dicky? He's got a bad track record for mouthing off and calling some women nasty names. If I was voting I'd rather have someone with a spine and enough money not to be bought, quite frankly. I don't care if the POTUS has been caught with his dick out, or has kinky sexual peccadilloes. What is needed is someone who doesn't give a fuck what others think, isn't a flip flopping crowd pleaser and who can get the country by its balls and sort it out.
-- Edited by Digger on Tuesday 23rd of July 2024 07:10:16 PM
I meant him making abortion unlawful, denying women the right to control their own bodies and make their own decisions.
I'm anti abortion in some cases.. I hate that it's used as a form of birth control. Or because it's not convenient at that time. Babies are spirit formed, a life.
If a girl or a women is raped, or the baby will be born with serious disabilities or life-threatening illness,then that I understand. It is no life for the baby.
Digger said
Jul 24 12:07 AM, 2024
Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Vita and Maggs, I'm curious why you support Trump strongly when he is so anti women?
Would it be better if he was a womanising lech like JFK or Clinton? Or perhaps a lying toad like Tricky Dicky? He's got a bad track record for mouthing off and calling some women nasty names. If I was voting I'd rather have someone with a spine and enough money not to be bought, quite frankly. I don't care if the POTUS has been caught with his dick out, or has kinky sexual peccadilloes. What is needed is someone who doesn't give a fuck what others think, isn't a flip flopping crowd pleaser and who can get the country by its balls and sort it out.
-- Edited by Digger on Tuesday 23rd of July 2024 07:10:16 PM
I meant him making abortion unlawful, denying women the right to control their own bodies and make their own decisions.
Ah...like that bastion of holiness, and God's vicar on Earth, the Pope?
Trump suggested a limit on abortions after 15 weeks. Not a ban.
I personally find it abhorrent that a woman would terminate a pregnancy at a very late stage. At 15 weeks the foetus can hear, and the eyes are sensitive to light. In the UK the abortion cut off point is 24 weeks.
Perhaps the 15 week limit is due to what they do to destroy the foetus. My sister in law was a midwife and it's pretty gruesome. There was a documentary about this some time ago where they filmed the faces of the student doctors watching a medical abortion. It said it all, really. Up until 12 weeks a woman can have a chemical abortion. After 15 weeks that's not possible. And remember that exceptions are made with the 15 week ruling for victims of rape and incest or if the woman's life is at risk. So, I don't think it's unreasonable to have a cut off point.
jackb said
Jul 24 12:42 AM, 2024
The one thing so far I remember about Trump that I agreed with was his energy policy.
Every nation that uses natural resources such as coal oil gas wood grows it's nations wealth and its populations wealth health and lifespan.
Those that don't don't.
How can a nation not have an energy policy?
Under Biden America goes from stuffed with resources to abandoning those resources and becoming energy dependant on other nations often hostile nations.
How can that make sense?
So on one policy I can back Trump.
Maddog said
Jul 24 12:42 AM, 2024
Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Vita and Maggs, I'm curious why you support Trump strongly when he is so anti women?
Would it be better if he was a womanising lech like JFK or Clinton? Or perhaps a lying toad like Tricky Dicky? He's got a bad track record for mouthing off and calling some women nasty names. If I was voting I'd rather have someone with a spine and enough money not to be bought, quite frankly. I don't care if the POTUS has been caught with his dick out, or has kinky sexual peccadilloes. What is needed is someone who doesn't give a fuck what others think, isn't a flip flopping crowd pleaser and who can get the country by its balls and sort it out.
-- Edited by Digger on Tuesday 23rd of July 2024 07:10:16 PM
I meant him making abortion unlawful, denying women the right to control their own bodies and make their own decisions.
Abortion is not unlawful. It's readily available in many states based on the laws of that individual state.
The Supreme Court ruled that the 14th Amendment, written to make sure we eradicated slavery, did not grant a woman a right to an abortion, and therefore with the absence of a federal law addressing abortion, it fell to the states to determine when life begins.
Anonymous said
Jul 24 11:17 AM, 2024
jackb wrote:
The one thing so far I remember about Trump that I agreed with was his energy policy. Every nation that uses natural resources such as coal oil gas wood grows it's nations wealth and its populations wealth health and lifespan. Those that don't don't. How can a nation not have an energy policy? Under Biden America goes from stuffed with resources to abandoning those resources and becoming energy dependant on other nations often hostile nations. How can that make sense? So on one policy I can back Trump.
OK, but the oil’s still bountifully flowing under Biden’s watch too!
‘The United States produced more crude oil than any nation at any time, according to our International Energy Statistic, for the past six years in a row...The crude oil production in the United States in 2023 is unlikely to be broken in any other country in the near term.’
Source: www.eia.gov
Syl said
Jul 24 4:19 PM, 2024
Maddog wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Vita and Maggs, I'm curious why you support Trump strongly when he is so anti women?
Would it be better if he was a womanising lech like JFK or Clinton? Or perhaps a lying toad like Tricky Dicky? He's got a bad track record for mouthing off and calling some women nasty names. If I was voting I'd rather have someone with a spine and enough money not to be bought, quite frankly. I don't care if the POTUS has been caught with his dick out, or has kinky sexual peccadilloes. What is needed is someone who doesn't give a fuck what others think, isn't a flip flopping crowd pleaser and who can get the country by its balls and sort it out.
-- Edited by Digger on Tuesday 23rd of July 2024 07:10:16 PM
I meant him making abortion unlawful, denying women the right to control their own bodies and make their own decisions.
Abortion is not unlawful. It's readily available in many states based on the laws of that individual state.
The Supreme Court ruled that the 14th Amendment, written to make sure we eradicated slavery, did not grant a woman a right to an abortion, and therefore with the absence of a federal law addressing abortion, it fell to the states to determine when life begins.
If a certain State bans abortion, does Trump go along with that without attempting to bring their antiquated laws into the 21st century?
According to this chart below, at least 15 States have banned it, some make exceptions, but nine don't...even if the pregnancy is a result of incest or rape.
Her or him for president?
It has all changed in the blink of an eye.
An attempted assassination boosted his ratings.
Her entering the race changes everything for the democrats.
First female president will energise a lot of the disinterested surely.
First female black president too.
Young versus ancient?
Poor old Stoo and Irish on the wrong side of history as usual with their never wavering support for him and total denial there was anything wrong with him the last few years.
Despite what the whole world couls see.
Who would you put your money on...him or her?
Its finally gotten interesting.
Place your bets place your bets.
That sounds more like what you want to happen not what you think will happen.
If I was betting with real money, it would obviously be placed on him getting in...missing a bullet (allegedly) has ensured his place at the top again.
In my case, why not both?
If she’s the nominee — and with grass roots donations of almost 50million raised within 24hrs of Biden stepping away — it’s gonna be her. Unquestionably her.
Yes that bullet did wonders fore him but the switch to her might have been a great move.
I was convinced Biden had little chance and then no chance once blood was spilt now I'm undecided because putting her in changes everything!
🇱🇷 I hope Donald wins!! 🇱🇷
Kamala was a terrible candidate in 2020. She's been hidden away as VP as she doesn't do well when pressed with questions.
She was picked as VP because she was brown and a female. It's a prerequisite now for the Dems to have someone on the ticket who isn't a white male. She would shut up and do what she was told, making her perfect for VP.
Problem is, the perfect VP, is often not what you want for president..
Kamala Harris + ??? will win. In 2020 Biden- Harris got a record number of votes 81.3 million. They just need to get those voters out again and they will win. This time round the vote should be higher because the younger generation are more anti-Trump than the older generation are pro-Trump. To be fair America deserves to have Kamala as President. It would be the culmination of the Diversity Equity Inclusion program. Yet if she was in power she would consider it only a start. The mainstream media would laud it as America coming out of a dark age of Male Dominated White Colonialistic Injustice.
Meanwhile watch out for Joe Biden he has five more months to complete his project of nuclear annihilation over Russia and China.
Vita and Maggs, I'm curious why you support Trump strongly when he is so anti women?
Would it be better if he was a womanising lech like JFK or Clinton? Or perhaps a lying toad like Tricky Dicky? He's got a bad track record for mouthing off and calling some women nasty names. If I was voting I'd rather have someone with a spine and enough money not to be bought, quite frankly. I don't care if the POTUS has been caught with his dick out, or has kinky sexual peccadilloes. What is needed is someone who doesn't give a fuck what others think, isn't a flip flopping crowd pleaser and who can get the country by its balls and sort it out.
-- Edited by Digger on Tuesday 23rd of July 2024 07:10:16 PM
Totally agree Digs.
I'm anti abortion in some cases.. I hate that it's used as a form of birth control. Or because it's not convenient at that time. Babies are spirit formed, a life.
If a girl or a women is raped, or the baby will be born with serious disabilities or life-threatening illness,then that I understand. It is no life for the baby.
Ah...like that bastion of holiness, and God's vicar on Earth, the Pope?
Trump suggested a limit on abortions after 15 weeks. Not a ban.
I personally find it abhorrent that a woman would terminate a pregnancy at a very late stage. At 15 weeks the foetus can hear, and the eyes are sensitive to light. In the UK the abortion cut off point is 24 weeks.
Perhaps the 15 week limit is due to what they do to destroy the foetus. My sister in law was a midwife and it's pretty gruesome. There was a documentary about this some time ago where they filmed the faces of the student doctors watching a medical abortion. It said it all, really. Up until 12 weeks a woman can have a chemical abortion. After 15 weeks that's not possible. And remember that exceptions are made with the 15 week ruling for victims of rape and incest or if the woman's life is at risk. So, I don't think it's unreasonable to have a cut off point.
Every nation that uses natural resources such as coal oil gas wood grows it's nations wealth and its populations wealth health and lifespan.
Those that don't don't.
How can a nation not have an energy policy?
Under Biden America goes from stuffed with resources to abandoning those resources and becoming energy dependant on other nations often hostile nations.
How can that make sense?
So on one policy I can back Trump.
Abortion is not unlawful. It's readily available in many states based on the laws of that individual state.
The Supreme Court ruled that the 14th Amendment, written to make sure we eradicated slavery, did not grant a woman a right to an abortion, and therefore with the absence of a federal law addressing abortion, it fell to the states to determine when life begins.
OK, but the oil’s still bountifully flowing under Biden’s watch too!
‘The United States produced more crude oil than any nation at any time, according to our International Energy Statistic, for the past six years in a row...The crude oil production in the United States in 2023 is unlikely to be broken in any other country in the near term.’
Source: www.eia.gov
If a certain State bans abortion, does Trump go along with that without attempting to bring their antiquated laws into the 21st century?
According to this chart below, at least 15 States have banned it, some make exceptions, but nine don't...even if the pregnancy is a result of incest or rape.
Abortion law state map: See where abortions are legal or banned | CNN