It involves a phone call, I will send you my number if you wish to continue.
All that drama and he wasn’t asking for her number!
Poor old Xtras. She gets enough stick for being a poster. I wonder if she's still best buddies with Ali?
I think the anon is laughing at the drama on here.
The only drama on here is from thwarted Dogs posters.
Funny how disgruntled DS posters go to Dogs to air their grievances because they can't do it on DS, yet in the same way Dogs posters come here to do the same. You can perhaps thank a bait-and-ban Dogs moderator for that, and for getting you a bit more traffic on here.
We would do OK without the Dogs rejects though. The Whine would be a lot quieter, but the rest of the forum where the grown ups post would stay the same.
Yeaaaaaaah riiiiiiiiiiiight!
Not sure what you are disagreeing with.
Anonymous said
Apr 20 7:22 PM, 2020
Blaming the male posters at the dogs and women taking a lot of abuse is how the FM feels that posts here and not at the Dogs otherwise they'd leave ASAP, wouldn't they? The bottom line is we do not know their gender other than possibly Stooo. If someone is really offended, would they not leave, i would and I can safely assume you would too. Hearsay about cyber sex, meetings, and f knows what, who gives a F. Look at it like this, if you felt you was being abused, insulted, taken advantage of, how long would it take you leave a shit forum like that? I must admit that I do not know a lot about Stooo or Holly other than Stooo can be very funny, witty, sensible and a bit agitated after a hard day at work. Holly is fine and merry and does not have anything nasty to say about anyone and is Stooo's right hand admin. HF, rarely seen her posts but I can add that she does appear to be a nice admin. I won't mention which site but it close down a long while ago but if you want to see a nasty admin, they are the ones that will lie about you when you have left or been banned and worse still, their new mate/s will join in. Don't share stuff if you don't want it blasted on the forums or thrown back in your face and those that do use it to undermine you are the evilest, snidey little b's around.
Anonymous said
Apr 20 7:25 PM, 2020
Syl wrote:
We would do OK without the Dogs rejects though. The Whine would be a lot quieter, but the rest of the forum where the grown ups post would stay the same.
Dogs rejects, FYI I've never registered there and post as a Guest on the DS thread at times only. Rejects
Syl said
Apr 20 7:36 PM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
We would do OK without the Dogs rejects though. The Whine would be a lot quieter, but the rest of the forum where the grown ups post would stay the same.
Dogs rejects, FYI I've never registered there and post as a Guest on the DS thread at times only. Rejects
It's a logical matter of elimination my dear.
The majority of anonymous guest posters on here complain about Dogs, know everything there is to know about what happens on Dogs, and seemingly hate various posters on Dogs but don't have the balls to post their gripes to the people who they are moaning about.
I think 'rejects' is an apt description.
Anonymous said
Apr 20 8:31 PM, 2020
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
We would do OK without the Dogs rejects though. The Whine would be a lot quieter, but the rest of the forum where the grown ups post would stay the same.
Dogs rejects, FYI I've never registered there and post as a Guest on the DS thread at times only. Rejects
It's a logical matter of elimination my dear.
The majority of anonymous guest posters on here complain about Dogs, know everything there is to know about what happens on Dogs, and seemingly hate various posters on Dogs but don't have the balls to post their gripes to the people who they are moaning about.
I think 'rejects' is an apt description.
Ok, I am a reject as what you said makes sense. At least I'm not registered there. Registered, that sounds like some kind of mad house.
Anonymous said
Apr 20 8:32 PM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Regardless of all the cyber-romance and hypocrisy discussed here Hobbit is a terribly unfair mod - and why does Stooo always have three women as mods on there anyway and why does he have to talk to them on the phone/meet up for them to moderate on a relatively small forum like Dogs ?
Genuine question.
I always liked Xtras for what it's worth, she always seemed friendly enough and did not get involved in cliques IIRC.
Yeah but we'll forgive ya for that..newbie lol
Xtras always attaches herself to the admin on any site and does join in with cliques , trop on FH, for example. She isn't nasty to posters but if the clique doesn't like someone neither will she. She will be very loyal to Stooo. I mean Stooo spoke in a really seedy way about her with budgie not long ago and she was mute as a lamb.
Your first question, control. Les was a mod but he was a beta allowing someone like Stooo to be alpha male for ffs! That's also why Dean will never be made mod , his trolling shit has nothing to do with it.
Xtras has reinvented herself as an anti-racist. Some of us have very long memories and remember her *paki* *chinkie* and *nword* posts with cyber squeeze Chelseaboy. Lmfao, pmsl, roffpmsl, lololol etc.
she agrees and disagrees with whoever she likes on forums or what the mods think. This changes with every forum like your racism example but fair play to Xtras , she sees forums as a game and has said so. It's a shame she went as far to using the n word to impress a forum squeeze , there's never an excuse for that.
Anonymous said
Apr 20 8:49 PM, 2020
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
We would do OK without the Dogs rejects though. The Whine would be a lot quieter, but the rest of the forum where the grown ups post would stay the same.
Dogs rejects, FYI I've never registered there and post as a Guest on the DS thread at times only. Rejects
It's a logical matter of elimination my dear.
The majority of anonymous guest posters on here complain about Dogs, know everything there is to know about what happens on Dogs, and seemingly hate various posters on Dogs but don't have the balls to post their gripes to the people who they are moaning about.
I think 'rejects' is an apt description.
I wouldn't call someone a reject unless they had mugged someone or was openly mates with a racist. That's a harsh term just for anon posting. I would say doxers were rejects.
If someone is being treated like shit on Dogs and they want to talk about it without pissing off Stooo I don't see them as human "rejects " . To each their own I guess..
Anonymous said
Apr 20 9:06 PM, 2020
Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
He actually didn't ask her for her number, he offered to send her his.
It involves a phone call, I will send you my number if you wish to continue.
That makes ALL the difference then
It does make all the difference, even though that doesn't suit a few people's agendas, the ones who dislike him. He wanted to ask her to be a mod and wanted to speak to her about it, so was in effect wanting her to call him to discuss it. Nothing at all wrong there, although asking her publically on the forum was probably not the best way of going about it, and he might be regretting that now after all the stink it has caused here.
So email her? In private. She wasn't exactly jumping up and down with enthusiasm though, was she? In fact, she seemed very wary, and who can blame her with the amount of sexual abuse she gets on there from certain members. Stooo seems to think that because she takes the punches she'd be a good mod? Maybe. But why allow that abuse in the first place. It shows an utter lack of respect not just to Xtras but to all females on that forum.
The way Xtras, Poca, Lady M and others are spoken to and about on there is disgusting. He allows it, he probably enjoys it, he is as bad as the likes of Blubber and Banjo imo.
But....if the women are prepared to be spoken down to like slappers, if they stick around for more, they are enabling the pathetic little wimps to get turned on by talking to women online like dirt.
I think you have a point but why is it worse to be called a slapper whore etc by a group of sad men rather than bitchy women? Serious question btw.
Women can be just as crude to posters they don't like. I have seen it done in graphic terms on many forums over the years, and it's just as disgusting when women do it.
Anonymous said
Apr 20 9:27 PM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
We would do OK without the Dogs rejects though. The Whine would be a lot quieter, but the rest of the forum where the grown ups post would stay the same.
Dogs rejects, FYI I've never registered there and post as a Guest on the DS thread at times only. Rejects
It's a logical matter of elimination my dear.
The majority of anonymous guest posters on here complain about Dogs, know everything there is to know about what happens on Dogs, and seemingly hate various posters on Dogs but don't have the balls to post their gripes to the people who they are moaning about.
I think 'rejects' is an apt description.
Ok, I am a reject as what you said makes sense. At least I'm not registered there. Registered, that sounds like some kind of mad house.
Syl is normally level headed so I thought that was a bit OTT. If you are a casual reader of Dogs and you make normal non trolling posts as Anon then you are absolutely not a "reject" if you don't like the way women are treated on dogs and you're a DS poster no one expects you to reveal your DS name just to make a quick post.
I think.
Anonymous said
Apr 20 9:48 PM, 2020
Syl wrote:... forums are full of nosy parkers who enjoy hashing and rehashing stuff that went on years ago.
No doubt they are the people who in the real world are forever curtain twitching and oohing and aahhing at the folk up the road who actually have a life.
Forums are full of people that have been cybering with each other for fifteen years and innocents dragged in via digital spy or elsewhere that start out in the DS thread then get picked on and dragged into the abyss by forum members wanting new blood. The innocents that survive become nosy parkers as they find dogs and its cousin CM more interesting than television soaps.
Digger said
Apr 20 9:50 PM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:... forums are full of nosy parkers who enjoy hashing and rehashing stuff that went on years ago.
No doubt they are the people who in the real world are forever curtain twitching and oohing and aahhing at the folk up the road who actually have a life.
Forums are full of people that have been cybering with each other for fifteen years and innocents dragged in via digital spy or elsewhere that start out in the DS thread then get picked on and dragged into the abyss by forum members wanting new blood. The innocents that survive become nosy parkers as they find dogs and its cousin CM more interesting than television soaps.
And here you are
Syl said
Apr 20 11:36 PM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
He actually didn't ask her for her number, he offered to send her his.
It involves a phone call, I will send you my number if you wish to continue.
That makes ALL the difference then
It does make all the difference, even though that doesn't suit a few people's agendas, the ones who dislike him. He wanted to ask her to be a mod and wanted to speak to her about it, so was in effect wanting her to call him to discuss it. Nothing at all wrong there, although asking her publically on the forum was probably not the best way of going about it, and he might be regretting that now after all the stink it has caused here.
So email her? In private. She wasn't exactly jumping up and down with enthusiasm though, was she? In fact, she seemed very wary, and who can blame her with the amount of sexual abuse she gets on there from certain members. Stooo seems to think that because she takes the punches she'd be a good mod? Maybe. But why allow that abuse in the first place. It shows an utter lack of respect not just to Xtras but to all females on that forum.
The way Xtras, Poca, Lady M and others are spoken to and about on there is disgusting. He allows it, he probably enjoys it, he is as bad as the likes of Blubber and Banjo imo.
But....if the women are prepared to be spoken down to like slappers, if they stick around for more, they are enabling the pathetic little wimps to get turned on by talking to women online like dirt.
I think you have a point but why is it worse to be called a slapper whore etc by a group of sad men rather than bitchy women? Serious question btw.
Women can be just as crude to posters they don't like. I have seen it done in graphic terms on many forums over the years, and it's just as disgusting when women do it.
I am talking about what is happening now on a regular basis where certain women are being targered and verbally sexually abused by a minority of male posters....yet oddly few people seem to speak out.
If the women were acting the same they would be just as bad.....but that's not the case is it.
Anonymous said
Apr 21 2:00 AM, 2020
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
He actually didn't ask her for her number, he offered to send her his.
It involves a phone call, I will send you my number if you wish to continue.
That makes ALL the difference then
It does make all the difference, even though that doesn't suit a few people's agendas, the ones who dislike him. He wanted to ask her to be a mod and wanted to speak to her about it, so was in effect wanting her to call him to discuss it. Nothing at all wrong there, although asking her publically on the forum was probably not the best way of going about it, and he might be regretting that now after all the stink it has caused here.
So email her? In private. She wasn't exactly jumping up and down with enthusiasm though, was she? In fact, she seemed very wary, and who can blame her with the amount of sexual abuse she gets on there from certain members. Stooo seems to think that because she takes the punches she'd be a good mod? Maybe. But why allow that abuse in the first place. It shows an utter lack of respect not just to Xtras but to all females on that forum.
The way Xtras, Poca, Lady M and others are spoken to and about on there is disgusting. He allows it, he probably enjoys it, he is as bad as the likes of Blubber and Banjo imo.
But....if the women are prepared to be spoken down to like slappers, if they stick around for more, they are enabling the pathetic little wimps to get turned on by talking to women online like dirt.
I think you have a point but why is it worse to be called a slapper whore etc by a group of sad men rather than bitchy women? Serious question btw.
Women can be just as crude to posters they don't like. I have seen it done in graphic terms on many forums over the years, and it's just as disgusting when women do it.
I am talking about what is happening now on a regular basis where certain women are being targered and verbally sexually abused by a minority of male posters....yet oddly few people seem to speak out.
If the women were acting the same they would be just as bad.....but that's not the case is it.
Gabby is being quite abusive to Xtras so it's not just the men sadly , her and Dean tag teaming calling X a slapper and a skank and Budgie making pervy put downs about Gabby and Xtras. It's going on for about twenty pages wtaf.:surprise: Gabby isn't helping her case by tag teaming with Dean , it's because she thinks she can do no better. :no:
Why does Xtras put up with it? . Stooo is letting all this happen probably because X knocked back his mod offer. She is a very private person, forums and her real life are always kept at length. It's smart of her to do that.
Anonymous said
Apr 21 6:14 AM, 2020
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
He actually didn't ask her for her number, he offered to send her his.
It involves a phone call, I will send you my number if you wish to continue.
That makes ALL the difference then
It does make all the difference, even though that doesn't suit a few people's agendas, the ones who dislike him. He wanted to ask her to be a mod and wanted to speak to her about it, so was in effect wanting her to call him to discuss it. Nothing at all wrong there, although asking her publically on the forum was probably not the best way of going about it, and he might be regretting that now after all the stink it has caused here.
So email her? In private. She wasn't exactly jumping up and down with enthusiasm though, was she? In fact, she seemed very wary, and who can blame her with the amount of sexual abuse she gets on there from certain members. Stooo seems to think that because she takes the punches she'd be a good mod? Maybe. But why allow that abuse in the first place. It shows an utter lack of respect not just to Xtras but to all females on that forum.
The way Xtras, Poca, Lady M and others are spoken to and about on there is disgusting. He allows it, he probably enjoys it, he is as bad as the likes of Blubber and Banjo imo.
But....if the women are prepared to be spoken down to like slappers, if they stick around for more, they are enabling the pathetic little wimps to get turned on by talking to women online like dirt.
I think you have a point but why is it worse to be called a slapper whore etc by a group of sad men rather than bitchy women? Serious question btw.
Women can be just as crude to posters they don't like. I have seen it done in graphic terms on many forums over the years, and it's just as disgusting when women do it.
I am talking about what is happening now on a regular basis where certain women are being targered and verbally sexually abused by a minority of male posters....yet oddly few people seem to speak out.
If the women were acting the same they would be just as bad.....but that's not the case is it.
Dean and Blubberboy? No one gives a crap about their opinions except Canny and Poca.
Anonymous said
Apr 21 7:37 AM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:... forums are full of nosy parkers who enjoy hashing and rehashing stuff that went on years ago.
No doubt they are the people who in the real world are forever curtain twitching and oohing and aahhing at the folk up the road who actually have a life.
Forums are full of people that have been cybering with each other for fifteen years and innocents dragged in via digital spy or elsewhere that start out in the DS thread then get picked on and dragged into the abyss by forum members wanting new blood. The innocents that survive become nosy parkers as they find dogs and its cousin CM more interesting than television soaps.
Fuck off Vam
Anonymous said
Apr 21 10:28 AM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
We would do OK without the Dogs rejects though. The Whine would be a lot quieter, but the rest of the forum where the grown ups post would stay the same.
Dogs rejects, FYI I've never registered there and post as a Guest on the DS thread at times only. Rejects
It's a logical matter of elimination my dear.
The majority of anonymous guest posters on here complain about Dogs, know everything there is to know about what happens on Dogs, and seemingly hate various posters on Dogs but don't have the balls to post their gripes to the people who they are moaning about.
I think 'rejects' is an apt description.
Ok, I am a reject as what you said makes sense. At least I'm not registered there. Registered, that sounds like some kind of mad house.
Syl is normally level headed so I thought that was a bit OTT. If you are a casual reader of Dogs and you make normal non trolling posts as Anon then you are absolutely not a "reject" if you don't like the way women are treated on dogs and you're a DS poster no one expects you to reveal your DS name just to make a quick post.
I think.
This is the type of thing that's normal on Dogs.
I'm glad you have big tits as I sure as fuck wouldn't want to finish on that face of yours...
Reading between the lines. You thick slag...
Twizzler said
Apr 21 11:02 AM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
He actually didn't ask her for her number, he offered to send her his.
It involves a phone call, I will send you my number if you wish to continue.
That makes ALL the difference then
It does make all the difference, even though that doesn't suit a few people's agendas, the ones who dislike him. He wanted to ask her to be a mod and wanted to speak to her about it, so was in effect wanting her to call him to discuss it. Nothing at all wrong there, although asking her publically on the forum was probably not the best way of going about it, and he might be regretting that now after all the stink it has caused here.
So email her? In private. She wasn't exactly jumping up and down with enthusiasm though, was she? In fact, she seemed very wary, and who can blame her with the amount of sexual abuse she gets on there from certain members. Stooo seems to think that because she takes the punches she'd be a good mod? Maybe. But why allow that abuse in the first place. It shows an utter lack of respect not just to Xtras but to all females on that forum.
The way Xtras, Poca, Lady M and others are spoken to and about on there is disgusting. He allows it, he probably enjoys it, he is as bad as the likes of Blubber and Banjo imo.
But....if the women are prepared to be spoken down to like slappers, if they stick around for more, they are enabling the pathetic little wimps to get turned on by talking to women online like dirt.
I think you have a point but why is it worse to be called a slapper whore etc by a group of sad men rather than bitchy women? Serious question btw.
Women can be just as crude to posters they don't like. I have seen it done in graphic terms on many forums over the years, and it's just as disgusting when women do it.
I am talking about what is happening now on a regular basis where certain women are being targered and verbally sexually abused by a minority of male posters....yet oddly few people seem to speak out.
If the women were acting the same they would be just as bad.....but that's not the case is it.
Gabby is being quite abusive to Xtras so it's not just the men sadly , her and Dean tag teaming calling X a slapper and a skank and Budgie making pervy put downs about Gabby and Xtras. It's going on for about twenty pages wtaf.:surprise: Gabby isn't helping her case by tag teaming with Dean , it's because she thinks she can do no better. :no:
Why does Xtras put up with it? . Stooo is letting all this happen probably because X knocked back his mod offer. She is a very private person, forums and her real life are always kept at length. It's smart of her to do that.
Dean and Poca have always been a team, they look out for each other. Until they fall out. Then they are a team again. Rightly or wrongly it is up to management over there to sort it.
Twizzler said
Apr 21 11:03 AM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
We would do OK without the Dogs rejects though. The Whine would be a lot quieter, but the rest of the forum where the grown ups post would stay the same.
Dogs rejects, FYI I've never registered there and post as a Guest on the DS thread at times only. Rejects
It's a logical matter of elimination my dear.
The majority of anonymous guest posters on here complain about Dogs, know everything there is to know about what happens on Dogs, and seemingly hate various posters on Dogs but don't have the balls to post their gripes to the people who they are moaning about.
I think 'rejects' is an apt description.
Ok, I am a reject as what you said makes sense. At least I'm not registered there. Registered, that sounds like some kind of mad house.
Syl is normally level headed so I thought that was a bit OTT. If you are a casual reader of Dogs and you make normal non trolling posts as Anon then you are absolutely not a "reject" if you don't like the way women are treated on dogs and you're a DS poster no one expects you to reveal your DS name just to make a quick post.
I think.
This is the type of thing that's normal on Dogs.
I'm glad you have big tits as I sure as fuck wouldn't want to finish on that face of yours...
Reading between the lines. You thick slag...
The girls must like that kind of talk because they keep replying to them!
Anonymous said
Apr 21 12:07 PM, 2020
Twizzler wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
We would do OK without the Dogs rejects though. The Whine would be a lot quieter, but the rest of the forum where the grown ups post would stay the same.
Dogs rejects, FYI I've never registered there and post as a Guest on the DS thread at times only. Rejects
It's a logical matter of elimination my dear.
The majority of anonymous guest posters on here complain about Dogs, know everything there is to know about what happens on Dogs, and seemingly hate various posters on Dogs but don't have the balls to post their gripes to the people who they are moaning about.
I think 'rejects' is an apt description.
Ok, I am a reject as what you said makes sense. At least I'm not registered there. Registered, that sounds like some kind of mad house.
Syl is normally level headed so I thought that was a bit OTT. If you are a casual reader of Dogs and you make normal non trolling posts as Anon then you are absolutely not a "reject" if you don't like the way women are treated on dogs and you're a DS poster no one expects you to reveal your DS name just to make a quick post.
I think.
This is the type of thing that's normal on Dogs.
I'm glad you have big tits as I sure as fuck wouldn't want to finish on that face of yours...
Reading between the lines. You thick slag...
The girls must like that kind of talk because they keep replying to them!
Talking about girls, don't forget that a male may own the site but girls as you put it run the site and they have the power to ban posters but why they don't I will never understand. IMO, it's all banter and this is why those that banter about stuff like that don't get banned but I rarely am there 24/7.
Syl said
Apr 21 12:12 PM, 2020
Twizzler wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
We would do OK without the Dogs rejects though. The Whine would be a lot quieter, but the rest of the forum where the grown ups post would stay the same.
Dogs rejects, FYI I've never registered there and post as a Guest on the DS thread at times only. Rejects
It's a logical matter of elimination my dear.
The majority of anonymous guest posters on here complain about Dogs, know everything there is to know about what happens on Dogs, and seemingly hate various posters on Dogs but don't have the balls to post their gripes to the people who they are moaning about.
I think 'rejects' is an apt description.
Ok, I am a reject as what you said makes sense. At least I'm not registered there. Registered, that sounds like some kind of mad house.
Syl is normally level headed so I thought that was a bit OTT. If you are a casual reader of Dogs and you make normal non trolling posts as Anon then you are absolutely not a "reject" if you don't like the way women are treated on dogs and you're a DS poster no one expects you to reveal your DS name just to make a quick post.
I think.
This is the type of thing that's normal on Dogs.
I'm glad you have big tits as I sure as fuck wouldn't want to finish on that face of yours...
Reading between the lines. You thick slag...
The girls must like that kind of talk because they keep replying to them!
It's obviously up to them what they are prepared to put up with, none of my business, but as forums would be dead without people offering their own opinions I will just say this.
If I was the mum, sister, friend of one of those women I would tell them they deserve respect and don't need to put up with some ugly creep hiding behind a computer getting turned on because he gets away with talking to women online as if they were dirt....with no apparent comeback.
Obviously in the real world they wouldn't dare do it, and if they did they would face consequences.j
Not sure what you are disagreeing with.
Blaming the male posters at the dogs and women taking a lot of abuse is how the FM feels that posts here and not at the Dogs otherwise they'd leave ASAP, wouldn't they? The bottom line is we do not know their gender other than possibly Stooo. If someone is really offended, would they not leave, i would and I can safely assume you would too. Hearsay about cyber sex, meetings, and f knows what, who gives a F. Look at it like this, if you felt you was being abused, insulted, taken advantage of, how long would it take you leave a shit forum like that? I must admit that I do not know a lot about Stooo or Holly other than Stooo can be very funny, witty, sensible and a bit agitated after a hard day at work. Holly is fine and merry and does not have anything nasty to say about anyone and is Stooo's right hand admin. HF, rarely seen her posts but I can add that she does appear to be a nice admin. I won't mention which site but it close down a long while ago but if you want to see a nasty admin, they are the ones that will lie about you when you have left or been banned and worse still, their new mate/s will join in. Don't share stuff if you don't want it blasted on the forums or thrown back in your face and those that do use it to undermine you are the evilest, snidey little b's around.
It's a logical matter of elimination my dear.
The majority of anonymous guest posters on here complain about Dogs, know everything there is to know about what happens on Dogs, and seemingly hate various posters on Dogs but don't have the balls to post their gripes to the people who they are moaning about.
I think 'rejects' is an apt description.
Ok, I am a reject as what you said makes sense. At least I'm not registered there. Registered, that sounds like some kind of mad house.
she agrees and disagrees with whoever she likes on forums or what the mods think. This changes with every forum like your racism example but fair play to Xtras , she sees forums as a game and has said so. It's a shame she went as far to using the n word to impress a forum squeeze , there's never an excuse for that.
I wouldn't call someone a reject unless they had mugged someone or was openly mates with a racist. That's a harsh term just for anon posting. I would say doxers were rejects.
If someone is being treated like shit on Dogs and they want to talk about it without pissing off Stooo I don't see them as human "rejects "
. To each their own I guess..
I think you have a point but why is it worse to be called a slapper whore etc by a group of sad men rather than bitchy women? Serious question btw.
Women can be just as crude to posters they don't like. I have seen it done in graphic terms on many forums over the years, and it's just as disgusting when women do it.
Syl is normally level headed so I thought that was a bit OTT. If you are a casual reader of Dogs and you make normal non trolling posts as Anon then you are absolutely not a "reject"
if you don't like the way women are treated on dogs and you're a DS poster no one expects you to reveal your DS name just to make a quick post.
I think.
Forums are full of people that have been cybering with each other for fifteen years and innocents dragged in via digital spy or elsewhere that start out in the DS thread then get picked on and dragged into the abyss by forum members wanting new blood. The innocents that survive become nosy parkers as they find dogs and its cousin CM more interesting than television soaps.
And here you are
I am talking about what is happening now on a regular basis where certain women are being targered and verbally sexually abused by a minority of male posters....yet oddly few people seem to speak out.
If the women were acting the same they would be just as bad.....but that's not the case is it.
Gabby is being quite abusive to Xtras so it's not just the men sadly , her and Dean tag teaming calling X a slapper and a skank and Budgie making pervy put downs about Gabby and Xtras. It's going on for about twenty pages wtaf.:surprise: Gabby isn't helping her case by tag teaming with Dean , it's because she thinks she can do no better. :no:
Why does Xtras put up with it? . Stooo is letting all this happen probably because X knocked back his mod offer. She is a very private person, forums and her real life are always kept at length. It's smart of her to do that.
Dean and Blubberboy? No one gives a crap about their opinions except Canny and Poca.
Fuck off Vam
This is the type of thing that's normal on Dogs.
I'm glad you have big tits as I sure as fuck wouldn't want to finish on that face of yours...
Reading between the lines. You thick slag...
Dean and Poca have always been a team, they look out for each other. Until they fall out.
Then they are a team again. Rightly or wrongly it is up to management over there to sort it.
The girls must like that kind of talk because they keep replying to them!
Talking about girls, don't forget that a male may own the site but girls as you put it run the site and they have the power to ban posters but why they don't I will never understand. IMO, it's all banter and this is why those that banter about stuff like that don't get banned but I rarely am there 24/7.
It's obviously up to them what they are prepared to put up with, none of my business, but as forums would be dead without people offering their own opinions I will just say this.
If I was the mum, sister, friend of one of those women I would tell them they deserve respect and don't need to put up with some ugly creep hiding behind a computer getting turned on because he gets away with talking to women online as if they were dirt....with no apparent comeback.
Obviously in the real world they wouldn't dare do it, and if they did they would face consequences.j