I'm sick of them getting away with terrible crimes and English are jailed for nothing. Why are they so protected?
I think those in authority are terrified of being called racist.
However...
It's not racist to state the obvious, these rape gangs were predominantly Pakistani Muslims who abused white girls.
It's not racist either to say our little Island cannot cope with all the boat people arriving.
People are genuinely concerned about things and calling us 'right wing' is asking for trouble.
Magica said
Jan 7 10:48 AM, 2025
Vita wrote:
Magica wrote:
Vita wrote:
I'm sick of them getting away with terrible crimes and English are jailed for nothing. Why are they so protected?
I think those in authority are terrified of being called racist.
However...
It's not racist to state the obvious, these rape gangs were predominantly Pakistani Muslims who abused white girls.
It's not racist either to say our little Island cannot cope with all the boat people arriving.
People are genuinely concerned about things and calling us 'right wing' is asking for trouble.
Totally agree V. We will all kick back, civil unrest iis coming.
Syl said
Jan 7 12:30 PM, 2025
Vita wrote:
Syl wrote:
Vita wrote:
There has to be a public inquiry.
More and more will be coming out, the men who performed an abortion on a young girl, using a coat hanger, she later died, is only the tip of the iceberg.
And so far, on mainstream TV (not the BBC obviously) only ONE reporter has named these gangs as predominately Pakistani men....he refused to use the blanket term Asian.
Good for him.
Now that scumbag Starmer is saying all those who are outraged are 'far right'
That was his response when the three wee girl's were murdered in Southport.
He clearly doesn't want a public inquiry because it will show up his failings when he was head of the CPS.
He is using the term 'far right' as a means to brand people racist, but the word has no power anymore. It's used simply to stop debate and hoodwink people who are easily fooled.
We only have to see the way it's used on forums as soon as anyone mentions certain races and religions.
Starmer is grasping at straws, he was head of CPS when all the Pakistani grooming gangs were rife in the UK. He refused to prosecute the Rochdale gang, this only came to light when this decision was overturned, thanks to the brilliant Nazir Fazal, when he later overturned Starmers decision after he was appointed CPS chief prosecutor for NW England.
Magica said
Jan 7 2:35 PM, 2025
Syl wrote:
Vita wrote:
Syl wrote:
Vita wrote:
There has to be a public inquiry.
More and more will be coming out, the men who performed an abortion on a young girl, using a coat hanger, she later died, is only the tip of the iceberg.
And so far, on mainstream TV (not the BBC obviously) only ONE reporter has named these gangs as predominately Pakistani men....he refused to use the blanket term Asian.
Good for him.
Now that scumbag Starmer is saying all those who are outraged are 'far right'
That was his response when the three wee girl's were murdered in Southport.
He clearly doesn't want a public inquiry because it will show up his failings when he was head of the CPS.
He is using the term 'far right' as a means to brand people racist, but the word has no power anymore. It's used simply to stop debate and hoodwink people who are easily fooled.
We only have to see the way it's used on forums as soon as anyone mentions certain races and religions.
Starmer is grasping at straws, he was head of CPS when all the Pakistani grooming gangs were rife in the UK. He refused to prosecute the Rochdale gang, this only came to light when this decision was overturned, thanks to the brilliant Nazir Fazal, when he later overturned Starmers decision after he was appointed CPS chief prosecutor for NW England.
Just heard one of the men who served time for this, was meant to be deported 10 yrs ago. Still here living the life of riley!
Magica said
Jan 7 2:37 PM, 2025
Magica wrote:
Syl wrote:
Vita wrote:
Syl wrote:
Vita wrote:
There has to be a public inquiry.
More and more will be coming out, the men who performed an abortion on a young girl, using a coat hanger, she later died, is only the tip of the iceberg.
And so far, on mainstream TV (not the BBC obviously) only ONE reporter has named these gangs as predominately Pakistani men....he refused to use the blanket term Asian.
Good for him.
Now that scumbag Starmer is saying all those who are outraged are 'far right'
That was his response when the three wee girl's were murdered in Southport.
He clearly doesn't want a public inquiry because it will show up his failings when he was head of the CPS.
He is using the term 'far right' as a means to brand people racist, but the word has no power anymore. It's used simply to stop debate and hoodwink people who are easily fooled.
We only have to see the way it's used on forums as soon as anyone mentions certain races and religions.
Starmer is grasping at straws, he was head of CPS when all the Pakistani grooming gangs were rife in the UK. He refused to prosecute the Rochdale gang, this only came to light when this decision was overturned, thanks to the brilliant Nazir Fazal, when he later overturned Starmers decision after he was appointed CPS chief prosecutor for NW England.
Just heard one of the men who served time for this, was meant to be deported 10 yrs ago. Still here living the life of riley! Starker thinks by labelling us all right wingers will shut us up, he's very wrong. If everyone who speaks out is a far right, well that's me and.most of the country!
Anonymous said
Jan 8 4:36 AM, 2025
"Children as old as eight are not fully toilet trained and missing lessons as a result, a union leader has said.
Blaenau Gwent council has said teachers will no longer change pupils who have wet or soiled themselves, with parents being called in to school instead.
The council said it had introduced this policy due to "very high levels of pupils coming to school in nappies".
One charity said it was "tantamount to abuse" to force or allow a child to sit in wet or soiled underwear until a parent or guardian can come in and change them.
Meanwhile, education bosses said there had been an increase in school-age children not being able to use the bathroom independently since the Covid-19 pandemic.
In a statement, Blaenau Gwent council said it should be the parent or carer's responsibility to ensure their child is toilet trained before starting school.
"The policy states that parents will be expected to go to school to change their child's nappies/pull ups," it added." https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c74x23yw71yo
What the hell are the parents doing if they can't take the time to toilet-train their kids? Or is it a case of won't spend the time? If anything all that time spent at home, stuck in with their kids during Covid should mean no kids going to school in nappies/are fully toilet trained, right? 8 years old and not fully toilet trained, beggars belief.
I'd be fuming if my child's education was being interrupted umpteen times per day due to the teacher having to take time out to change nappies. Teachers are there to teach kids the 3 R's.
Seems the council's stance is not popular with everyone...
"Grandfather Gavin Wise said the policy was "unfair".
"If the kid's in school, that's what they're there for, to be looked after.
If they employed someone else to come in and do that for them, it shouldn't be a problem. I'd say it's part of the job." " (his pic says it all).
Perhaps the council should interrupt his working day (if he has one) to change numerous shitty nappies...isn't that "part of a grandfather's job" after all? But hey, why bother buying much-needed school equipment when that money should be better spent on a nappy changer eh.
Anonymous said
Jan 8 10:39 AM, 2025
Magica wrote:
Magica wrote:
Syl wrote:
Vita wrote:
Syl wrote:
Vita wrote:
There has to be a public inquiry.
More and more will be coming out, the men who performed an abortion on a young girl, using a coat hanger, she later died, is only the tip of the iceberg.
And so far, on mainstream TV (not the BBC obviously) only ONE reporter has named these gangs as predominately Pakistani men....he refused to use the blanket term Asian.
Good for him.
Now that scumbag Starmer is saying all those who are outraged are 'far right'
That was his response when the three wee girl's were murdered in Southport.
He clearly doesn't want a public inquiry because it will show up his failings when he was head of the CPS.
He is using the term 'far right' as a means to brand people racist, but the word has no power anymore. It's used simply to stop debate and hoodwink people who are easily fooled.
We only have to see the way it's used on forums as soon as anyone mentions certain races and religions.
Starmer is grasping at straws, he was head of CPS when all the Pakistani grooming gangs were rife in the UK. He refused to prosecute the Rochdale gang, this only came to light when this decision was overturned, thanks to the brilliant Nazir Fazal, when he later overturned Starmers decision after he was appointed CPS chief prosecutor for NW England.
Just heard one of the men who served time for this, was meant to be deported 10 yrs ago. Still here living the life of riley! Starker thinks by labelling us all right wingers will shut us up, he's very wrong. If everyone who speaks out is a far right, well that's me and.most of the country!
if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck - guess what it is!
Anonymous said
Jan 8 11:13 PM, 2025
"Ryanair is pursuing legal action against a passenger who allegedly caused a major disruption on a flight from Dublin to Lanzarote.
The airline is seeking £12,500 in damages to cover expenses incurred when the plane had to divert to Porto, Portugal.
On Wednesday, the airline announced it had filed proceedings against the passenger, whose behaviour on the flight last April was described as "inexcusable" and "completely unacceptable".
Ryanair stated that it will "continue to take decisive action to combat unruly passenger behaviour on aircraft" in an effort to ensure the safety and comfort of all passengers." https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1kekvzdvw9o
Good, about time. Hope other airlines follow suit.
Syl said
Jan 9 12:38 AM, 2025
Anonymous wrote:
"Ryanair is pursuing legal action against a passenger who allegedly caused a major disruption on a flight from Dublin to Lanzarote.
The airline is seeking £12,500 in damages to cover expenses incurred when the plane had to divert to Porto, Portugal.
On Wednesday, the airline announced it had filed proceedings against the passenger, whose behaviour on the flight last April was described as "inexcusable" and "completely unacceptable".
Ryanair stated that it will "continue to take decisive action to combat unruly passenger behaviour on aircraft" in an effort to ensure the safety and comfort of all passengers." https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1kekvzdvw9o
Good, about time. Hope other airlines follow suit.
Yes, too many people make a flight horrible for others with the way they act.
Having been on a flight once where an idiot was threatening to attack other passengers, and he was treated with kid gloves instead of restrained, I am all for airlines bringing in harsher punishments.
Syl said
Jan 9 12:27 PM, 2025
One thing Elon Musk has done, he has forced the hand of the authorities and the press here to refer to the nationwide grooming gangs as 'predominately Pakistani'...even the bravest adding in the word 'Muslim'.
For too long they have just been referred to as the 'grooming gangs'. The BBC were very reluctant even to add 'Asian grooming gangs', which was an insult to every Asian who's origins were not Pakistan.
Andy Burnham, Mayor of greater Manchester, has just spoken out about the Labour government's decision not to hold a national enquiry re the grooming, rape, and horrendous sexual abuse of underage predominately white girls, abuse that has been going on for decades.
He believes there should be a national enquiry.
Magica said
Jan 9 1:54 PM, 2025
Syl wrote:
One thing Elon Musk has done, he has forced the hand of the authorities and the press here to refer to the nationwide grooming gangs as 'predominately Pakistani'...even the bravest adding in the word 'Muslim'. For too long they have just been referred to as the 'grooming gangs'. The BBC were very reluctant even to add 'Asian grooming gangs', which was an insult to every Asian who's origins were not Pakistan.
Andy Burnham, Mayor of greater Manchester, has just spoken out about the Labour government's decision not to hold a national enquiry re the grooming, rape, and horrendous sexual abuse of underage predominately white girls, abuse that has been going on for decades. He believes there should be a national enquiry.
Kemi was heckled by Labour for daring to speak out. The Speaker had to intervene.
This is the worst Labour party ever! We need another election. Won't Get it unless Charles, can't call him King, closes parliament, and he's as far left as you go, so that won't happen!
-- Edited by Magica on Thursday 9th of January 2025 01:56:16 PM
Syl said
Jan 9 11:52 PM, 2025
Why won't you call Charles King, Mags?
He waited long enough to get the job he was destined to inherit.
Vita said
Jan 10 12:15 AM, 2025
Syl wrote:
One thing Elon Musk has done, he has forced the hand of the authorities and the press here to refer to the nationwide grooming gangs as 'predominately Pakistani'...even the bravest adding in the word 'Muslim'. For too long they have just been referred to as the 'grooming gangs'. The BBC were very reluctant even to add 'Asian grooming gangs', which was an insult to every Asian who's origins were not Pakistan.
Andy Burnham, Mayor of greater Manchester, has just spoken out about the Labour government's decision not to hold a national enquiry re the grooming, rape, and horrendous sexual abuse of underage predominately white girls, abuse that has been going on for decades. He believes there should be a national enquiry.
I think it all comes back to Starmer and his time as head of the CPS.
He obviously doesn't want certain things to come out, why else would he ordered his MP's to vote against an inquiry.
Vita said
Jan 10 12:18 AM, 2025
Another good thing Elon Musk did was draw attention to Humza Yousaf and his hate of white people.
Yousaf went on a rant about too many white faces in Scotland, well in a population that's 96% white, what did he expect?
Yousaf was going to sue Musk but changed his mind when Elon hinted at the comments Bawheid had made in messages on Twitter.
Magica said
Jan 10 1:09 AM, 2025
Syl wrote:
Why won't you call Charles King, Mags? He waited long enough to get the job he was destined to inherit.
He made Camilla queen, not queen consort. Should never be known as queen imo.
I've lost it for him, in fact since the queen died, I've no interest in the royal family.now.
Magica said
Jan 10 1:10 AM, 2025
Vita wrote:
Another good thing Elon Musk did was draw attention to Humza Yousaf and his hate of white people.
Yousaf went on a rant about too many white faces in Scotland, well in a population that's 96% white, what did he expect?
Yousaf was going to sue Musk but changed his mind when Elon hinted at the comments Bawheid had made in messages on Twitter.
Yes, bloody racist Yousaf. What does he expect it's Scotland a white country!
Anonymous said
Jan 10 1:37 AM, 2025
Vita wrote:
Another good thing Elon Musk did was draw attention to Humza Yousaf and his hate of white people.
Yousaf went on a rant about too many white faces in Scotland, well in a population that's 96% white, what did he expect?
Yousaf was going to sue Musk but changed his mind when Elon hinted at the comments Bawheid had made in messages on Twitter.
Like too many brown faces in Africa?
I don't know much about this bloke I'll admit, is he the one who asked some Ukranian women where all the Ukranian men where?
Syl said
Jan 10 11:34 AM, 2025
Vita wrote:
Syl wrote:
One thing Elon Musk has done, he has forced the hand of the authorities and the press here to refer to the nationwide grooming gangs as 'predominately Pakistani'...even the bravest adding in the word 'Muslim'. For too long they have just been referred to as the 'grooming gangs'. The BBC were very reluctant even to add 'Asian grooming gangs', which was an insult to every Asian who's origins were not Pakistan.
Andy Burnham, Mayor of greater Manchester, has just spoken out about the Labour government's decision not to hold a national enquiry re the grooming, rape, and horrendous sexual abuse of underage predominately white girls, abuse that has been going on for decades. He believes there should be a national enquiry.
I think it all comes back to Starmer and his time as head of the CPS.
He obviously doesn't want certain things to come out, why else would he ordered his MP's to vote against an inquiry.
Head of the CPS, yet two of the most horrendous cases of sexual abuse ever known in the UK, carried out whilst he was in charge "Didn't cross his desk"...and the nationwide ongoing cases of child grooming and rape, he decided there was not enough evidence to prosecute.
Anonymous said
Jan 11 5:33 AM, 2025
"The government should consider repatriating British members of the Islamic State group (IS) who are being held in Syrian detention camps, the government's independent terrorism legislation reviewer Jonathan Hall KC has said.
Mr Hall's comments come after Donald Trump's incoming counter-terrorism chief, Sebastian Gorka, said that if the UK wanted to be seen as a "serious ally" of the US it should take back its citizens who joined IS."
As expected the usual suspect's name rears its ugly head...
"Speaking to BBC Radio 4's The World Tonight, Mr Hall said that while Ms Begum's story is a compelling one, politicians should look to the bigger picture about the balance of national security.
"Repatriation would not be moral absolution, if someone came back it wouldn't prevent them from potentially being prosecuted for what they've done," he said.
"It could be quite a pragmatic decision in the overall interests of national security to bring someone back.
"There is obviously some national security benefit of leaving people there because you don't have to monitor them," he told the programme.
"On the other hand, there haven't yet been any attacks in Europe by anyone who has been repatriated in this way and if they are left there... and then they escape, they would be much more dangerous, actually, to the UK." "
Begum, remember, is the one who felt the Manchester bombing was a "fair justification"; she was aware and was "okay" with the executions and beheadings in fact her first sighting of a severed head "didn't faze me at all" (her own words). Again, in her own words she had no regrets going out there and only seemed to want to return when ISIS was going belly up in Eastern Syria and, being pregnant returning to UK would mean - "That's why I really want to get back to Britain because I know it will be taken care of - health-wise, at least," she said. "... if the UK are willing to take me back and help me start a new life again."
I doubt she has changed over the years. Anyone who claimed an 8-year-old child being blown up is "fair justification" has no place in society. Rot away.
Magica said
Jan 11 12:40 PM, 2025
Anonymous wrote:
"The government should consider repatriating British members of the Islamic State group (IS) who are being held in Syrian detention camps, the government's independent terrorism legislation reviewer Jonathan Hall KC has said.
Mr Hall's comments come after Donald Trump's incoming counter-terrorism chief, Sebastian Gorka, said that if the UK wanted to be seen as a "serious ally" of the US it should take back its citizens who joined IS."
As expected the usual suspect's name rears its ugly head...
"Speaking to BBC Radio 4's The World Tonight, Mr Hall said that while Ms Begum's story is a compelling one, politicians should look to the bigger picture about the balance of national security.
"Repatriation would not be moral absolution, if someone came back it wouldn't prevent them from potentially being prosecuted for what they've done," he said.
"It could be quite a pragmatic decision in the overall interests of national security to bring someone back.
"There is obviously some national security benefit of leaving people there because you don't have to monitor them," he told the programme.
"On the other hand, there haven't yet been any attacks in Europe by anyone who has been repatriated in this way and if they are left there... and then they escape, they would be much more dangerous, actually, to the UK." "
Begum, remember, is the one who felt the Manchester bombing was a "fair justification"; she was aware and was "okay" with the executions and beheadings in fact her first sighting of a severed head "didn't faze me at all" (her own words). Again, in her own words she had no regrets going out there and only seemed to want to return when ISIS was going belly up in Eastern Syria and, being pregnant returning to UK would mean - "That's why I really want to get back to Britain because I know it will be taken care of - health-wise, at least," she said. "... if the UK are willing to take me back and help me start a new life again."
I doubt she has changed over the years. Anyone who claimed an 8-year-old child being blown up is "fair justification" has no place in society. Rot away.
So right anon.
She's a terrorist, and can't be trusted. No way can she come back. Lamm y has said no aswell.
She stays there, we don't want this nasty woman who never blinked at heads in buckets!
I think those in authority are terrified of being called racist.
However...
It's not racist to state the obvious, these rape gangs were predominantly Pakistani Muslims who abused white girls.
It's not racist either to say our little Island cannot cope with all the boat people arriving.
People are genuinely concerned about things and calling us 'right wing' is asking for trouble.
Totally agree V. We will all kick back, civil unrest iis coming.
He is using the term 'far right' as a means to brand people racist, but the word has no power anymore. It's used simply to stop debate and hoodwink people who are easily fooled.
We only have to see the way it's used on forums as soon as anyone mentions certain races and religions.
Starmer is grasping at straws, he was head of CPS when all the Pakistani grooming gangs were rife in the UK. He refused to prosecute the Rochdale gang, this only came to light when this decision was overturned, thanks to the brilliant Nazir Fazal, when he later overturned Starmers decision after he was appointed CPS chief prosecutor for NW England.
Just heard one of the men who served time for this, was meant to be deported 10 yrs ago. Still here living the life of riley!
"Children as old as eight are not fully toilet trained and missing lessons as a result, a union leader has said.
Blaenau Gwent council has said teachers will no longer change pupils who have wet or soiled themselves, with parents being called in to school instead.
The council said it had introduced this policy due to "very high levels of pupils coming to school in nappies".
One charity said it was "tantamount to abuse" to force or allow a child to sit in wet or soiled underwear until a parent or guardian can come in and change them.
About one in four children are not toilet trained when they start school in Wales and England, according to recent figures.
Meanwhile, education bosses said there had been an increase in school-age children not being able to use the bathroom independently since the Covid-19 pandemic.
In a statement, Blaenau Gwent council said it should be the parent or carer's responsibility to ensure their child is toilet trained before starting school.
"The policy states that parents will be expected to go to school to change their child's nappies/pull ups," it added." https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c74x23yw71yo
What the hell are the parents doing if they can't take the time to toilet-train their kids? Or is it a case of won't spend the time? If anything all that time spent at home, stuck in with their kids during Covid should mean no kids going to school in nappies/are fully toilet trained, right? 8 years old and not fully toilet trained, beggars belief.
I'd be fuming if my child's education was being interrupted umpteen times per day due to the teacher having to take time out to change nappies. Teachers are there to teach kids the 3 R's.
Seems the council's stance is not popular with everyone...
"Grandfather Gavin Wise said the policy was "unfair".
"If the kid's in school, that's what they're there for, to be looked after.
If they employed someone else to come in and do that for them, it shouldn't be a problem. I'd say it's part of the job." " (his pic says it all).
Perhaps the council should interrupt his working day (if he has one) to change numerous shitty nappies...isn't that "part of a grandfather's job" after all? But hey, why bother buying much-needed school equipment when that money should be better spent on a nappy changer eh.
if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck - guess what it is!
"Ryanair is pursuing legal action against a passenger who allegedly caused a major disruption on a flight from Dublin to Lanzarote.
The airline is seeking £12,500 in damages to cover expenses incurred when the plane had to divert to Porto, Portugal.
On Wednesday, the airline announced it had filed proceedings against the passenger, whose behaviour on the flight last April was described as "inexcusable" and "completely unacceptable".
Ryanair stated that it will "continue to take decisive action to combat unruly passenger behaviour on aircraft" in an effort to ensure the safety and comfort of all passengers." https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1kekvzdvw9o
Good, about time. Hope other airlines follow suit.
Yes, too many people make a flight horrible for others with the way they act.
Having been on a flight once where an idiot was threatening to attack other passengers, and he was treated with kid gloves instead of restrained, I am all for airlines bringing in harsher punishments.
For too long they have just been referred to as the 'grooming gangs'. The BBC were very reluctant even to add 'Asian grooming gangs', which was an insult to every Asian who's origins were not Pakistan.
Andy Burnham, Mayor of greater Manchester, has just spoken out about the Labour government's decision not to hold a national enquiry re the grooming, rape, and horrendous sexual abuse of underage predominately white girls, abuse that has been going on for decades.
He believes there should be a national enquiry.
Kemi was heckled by Labour for daring to speak out. The Speaker had to intervene.
This is the worst Labour party ever! We need another election. Won't Get it unless Charles, can't call him King, closes parliament, and he's as far left as you go, so that won't happen!
-- Edited by Magica on Thursday 9th of January 2025 01:56:16 PM
He waited long enough to get the job he was destined to inherit.
I think it all comes back to Starmer and his time as head of the CPS.
He obviously doesn't want certain things to come out, why else would he ordered his MP's to vote against an inquiry.
Another good thing Elon Musk did was draw attention to Humza Yousaf and his hate of white people.
Yousaf went on a rant about too many white faces in Scotland, well in a population that's 96% white, what did he expect?
Yousaf was going to sue Musk but changed his mind when Elon hinted at the comments Bawheid had made in messages on Twitter.
He made Camilla queen, not queen consort. Should never be known as queen imo.
I've lost it for him, in fact since the queen died, I've no interest in the royal family.now.
Yes, bloody racist Yousaf. What does he expect it's Scotland a white country!
Like too many brown faces in Africa?
I don't know much about this bloke I'll admit, is he the one who asked some Ukranian women where all the Ukranian men where?
Head of the CPS, yet two of the most horrendous cases of sexual abuse ever known in the UK, carried out whilst he was in charge "Didn't cross his desk"...and the nationwide ongoing cases of child grooming and rape, he decided there was not enough evidence to prosecute.
"The government should consider repatriating British members of the Islamic State group (IS) who are being held in Syrian detention camps, the government's independent terrorism legislation reviewer Jonathan Hall KC has said.
Mr Hall's comments come after Donald Trump's incoming counter-terrorism chief, Sebastian Gorka, said that if the UK wanted to be seen as a "serious ally" of the US it should take back its citizens who joined IS."
As expected the usual suspect's name rears its ugly head...
"Speaking to BBC Radio 4's The World Tonight, Mr Hall said that while Ms Begum's story is a compelling one, politicians should look to the bigger picture about the balance of national security.
"Repatriation would not be moral absolution, if someone came back it wouldn't prevent them from potentially being prosecuted for what they've done," he said.
"It could be quite a pragmatic decision in the overall interests of national security to bring someone back.
"There is obviously some national security benefit of leaving people there because you don't have to monitor them," he told the programme.
"On the other hand, there haven't yet been any attacks in Europe by anyone who has been repatriated in this way and if they are left there... and then they escape, they would be much more dangerous, actually, to the UK." "
Begum, remember, is the one who felt the Manchester bombing was a "fair justification"; she was aware and was "okay" with the executions and beheadings in fact her first sighting of a severed head "didn't faze me at all" (her own words). Again, in her own words she had no regrets going out there and only seemed to want to return when ISIS was going belly up in Eastern Syria and, being pregnant returning to UK would mean - "That's why I really want to get back to Britain because I know it will be taken care of - health-wise, at least," she said. "... if the UK are willing to take me back and help me start a new life again."
I doubt she has changed over the years. Anyone who claimed an 8-year-old child being blown up is "fair justification" has no place in society. Rot away.
So right anon.
She's a terrorist, and can't be trusted. No way can she come back. Lamm y has said no aswell.
She stays there, we don't want this nasty woman who never blinked at heads in buckets!