Sneaking illegal undocumented men in at the dead of night sums this government up.
Then take amenities away where army cadets trained, to house them,...depriving what benefits British citizens and give it to people who have no right to be here.
After the 540 men move in and crime rises, when parents are scared to let their kids out of their house and women are being hassled, abused and worse, not only there, but eventually in a town near you, I wonder how many will still be shouting racist?
Another video mentions 2000 sites are also earmarked for similar. I live very close to a garrison town, and I'm dreading the possible/probable influx.
Why should MPs worry about crime increasing, women/girls being abused (and yeah, worse), strained NHS resources moreso, natives unable to get housing etc when it doesn't affect them in any shape or form...angry emails, a tad of heckling, street protests...not a problem. As long as these illegals aren't housed anywhere near them, it's of no concern to them.
It's clear Starmer has no intention whatsoever of stopping these illegals, suffice to say he never did. Your feelings and mine on the matter don't matter a jot.
Red Okktober said
Jan 23 2:30 PM, 2026
We can't be too far away from saturation point now.
We can't just keep taking these people in indefinitely until the next election in 2029
There is going to be more of a migrant presence practically everywhere, even out in the sticks.
Our culture is being irreversibly changed, and is going down the toilet before our very eyes
Anonymous said
Jan 23 3:28 PM, 2026
Red Okktober wrote:
We can't be too far away from saturation point now.
We can't just keep taking these people in indefinitely until the next election in 2029
There is going to be more of a migrant presence practically everywhere, even out in the sticks.
Our culture is being irreversibly changed, and is going down the toilet before our very eyes
If the current trend continues...
Average number of illegals per month arriving via boat = 4000 x 12 = 48,000 x 3yrs + 6months = 144,000 + 24,000 = 168,000
168,000 - that's just the ones we know of. Others come by other means, others overstay their visas etc etc.
Each one of those 168,000 to be fed, housed, clothed, and then financially supported. Even if two bunk together that's still 84,000 accommodations to be found.
168,000 is just 10,000 short of the total number of residents of my hometown. To put it another way...every street/home in my town would be housing illegals.
And to think this Govt wanted to take away my Winter Fuel Payment. Bastards. God, it all makes me so angry.
Digger said
Jan 23 4:37 PM, 2026
Red Okktober wrote:
We can't be too far away from saturation point now.
We can't just keep taking these people in indefinitely until the next election in 2029
There is going to be more of a migrant presence practically everywhere, even out in the sticks.
Our culture is being irreversibly changed, and is going down the toilet before our very eyes
It's scary. More and more rapes and sexual attacks. I'd hate to be growing up in the England of today. I might have mentioned this before but a friend of mine has a friend in the army, and she asked her what would happen if there were sleeping soldiers among the migrants and if the call came for them to attack us how long would it take to be overwhelmed. She said 24 hours. We haven't the resources in either the police nor the army to fight them off.
Magica said
Jan 23 7:18 PM, 2026
Digger wrote:
Red Okktober wrote:
We can't be too far away from saturation point now.
We can't just keep taking these people in indefinitely until the next election in 2029
There is going to be more of a migrant presence practically everywhere, even out in the sticks.
Our culture is being irreversibly changed, and is going down the toilet before our very eyes
It's scary. More and more rapes and sexual attacks. I'd hate to be growing up in the England of today. I might have mentioned this before but a friend of mine has a friend in the army, and she asked her what would happen if there were sleeping soldiers among the migrants and if the call came for them to attack us how long would it take to be overwhelmed. She said 24 hours. We haven't the resources in either the police nor the army to fight them off.
I've said this for a long time. Now if our troops are stuck in Ukraine, we have no army here. The police are rubbish woke! We are on our own!
They will take over!
-- Edited by Magica on Friday 23rd of January 2026 07:20:17 PM
-- Edited by Magica on Friday 23rd of January 2026 07:27:25 PM
Digger said
Jan 24 8:57 PM, 2026
It kicked off last night in Manchester.
Red Okktober said
Jan 27 7:42 PM, 2026
6 months on......so how is that 'flagship' 'one in one out' deal Starmer made with Macron coming along? It was such a good deal for us that he gave away our fishing rights in gratitude.
Out of 41,000 illegals arriving from France, we have sent back........281 - making it a 0.5% chance of a migrant being sent back.
You would think after all noise they made about it, they would of at least made the in/out numbers match, but the number of migrants coming here in exchange is.....350
The government has blamed an "operational complication on the French side" for the difference between the two figures.
/\....is that sponsored by the reform party by any chance.
Maddog said
Jan 29 3:37 PM, 2026
Syl wrote:
/\....is that sponsored by the reform party by any chance.
I have no idea.
Because of you silly people I read a lot of UK news. My Facebook algorithm picks up on that and all sorts of shit like that winds up on my feed..🤷
Syl said
Jan 29 4:25 PM, 2026
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:
/\....is that sponsored by the reform party by any chance.
I have no idea.
Because of you silly people I read a lot of UK news. My Facebook algorithm picks up on that and all sorts of shit like that winds up on my feed..🤷
We are silly? yet you are the country that voted in a misogynistic, megalomaniac, warmongering twat.
Magica said
Jan 29 7:39 PM, 2026
Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:
/\....is that sponsored by the reform party by any chance.
I have no idea.
Because of you silly people I read a lot of UK news. My Facebook algorithm picks up on that and all sorts of shit like that winds up on my feed..🤷
We are silly? yet you are the country that voted in a misogynistic, megalomaniac, warmongering twat.
Maddog said
Jan 29 8:12 PM, 2026
Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:
/\....is that sponsored by the reform party by any chance.
I have no idea.
Because of you silly people I read a lot of UK news. My Facebook algorithm picks up on that and all sorts of shit like that winds up on my feed..🤷
We are silly? yet you are the country that voted in a misogynistic, megalomaniac, warmongering twat.
Silly in an affectionate way..😉
I'm not sure I would. trade leaders with you anyway.
Syl said
Jan 29 11:43 PM, 2026
Starmer is none of the above, he is just spineless, ingratiating and useless....I wouldn't swap him for yours though.
Maddog said
Jan 30 12:55 AM, 2026
Syl wrote:
Starmer is none of the above, he is just spineless, ingratiating and useless....I wouldn't swap him for yours though.
I didn't say they were anything alike.
It's hard to determine what's worse. A pompous prick or a useless weasel.
One thing is for certain. The pompous prick gives zero fucks about what other countries think about his country, while a useless weasel will throw his country under a bus..
Syl said
Jan 30 1:23 AM, 2026
One is alienating lots of countries, one butters them up.
I think the overall opinion, without trying to score points, is that neither are fit to be leaders.
Maddog said
Jan 30 1:50 AM, 2026
Syl wrote:
One is alienating lots of countries, one butters them up. I think the overall opinion, without trying to score points, is that neither are fit to be leaders.
I don't disagree.
Heck, they are both alienating a lot of people in their own countries..
But, if I was sitting in an embassy in Kenya and a bunch of lunatics were about to overrun the place, I know which one I would want to be my leader
Now, if I was a Somalian in Minnesota with an expired visa, I'd choose the other..
Another video mentions 2000 sites are also earmarked for similar. I live very close to a garrison town, and I'm dreading the possible/probable influx.
Why should MPs worry about crime increasing, women/girls being abused (and yeah, worse), strained NHS resources moreso, natives unable to get housing etc when it doesn't affect them in any shape or form...angry emails, a tad of heckling, street protests...not a problem. As long as these illegals aren't housed anywhere near them, it's of no concern to them.
It's clear Starmer has no intention whatsoever of stopping these illegals, suffice to say he never did. Your feelings and mine on the matter don't matter a jot.
We can't be too far away from saturation point now.
We can't just keep taking these people in indefinitely until the next election in 2029
There is going to be more of a migrant presence practically everywhere, even out in the sticks.
Our culture is being irreversibly changed, and is going down the toilet before our very eyes
If the current trend continues...
Average number of illegals per month arriving via boat = 4000 x 12 = 48,000 x 3yrs + 6months = 144,000 + 24,000 = 168,000
168,000 - that's just the ones we know of. Others come by other means, others overstay their visas etc etc.
Each one of those 168,000 to be fed, housed, clothed, and then financially supported. Even if two bunk together that's still 84,000 accommodations to be found.
168,000 is just 10,000 short of the total number of residents of my hometown. To put it another way...every street/home in my town would be housing illegals.
And to think this Govt wanted to take away my Winter Fuel Payment. Bastards. God, it all makes me so angry.
It's scary. More and more rapes and sexual attacks. I'd hate to be growing up in the England of today. I might have mentioned this before but a friend of mine has a friend in the army, and she asked her what would happen if there were sleeping soldiers among the migrants and if the call came for them to attack us how long would it take to be overwhelmed. She said 24 hours. We haven't the resources in either the police nor the army to fight them off.
I've said this for a long time. Now if our troops are stuck in Ukraine, we have no army here. The police are rubbish woke! We are on our own!
They will take over!
-- Edited by Magica on Friday 23rd of January 2026 07:20:17 PM
-- Edited by Magica on Friday 23rd of January 2026 07:27:25 PM
It kicked off last night in Manchester.
Out of 41,000 illegals arriving from France, we have sent back........281 - making it a 0.5% chance of a migrant being sent back.
You would think after all noise they made about it, they would of at least made the in/out numbers match, but the number of migrants coming here in exchange is.....350
The government has blamed an "operational complication on the French side" for the difference between the two figures.
/\....is that sponsored by the reform party by any chance.
I have no idea.
Because of you silly people I read a lot of UK news. My Facebook algorithm picks up on that and all sorts of shit like that winds up on my feed..🤷
We are silly? yet you are the country that voted in a misogynistic, megalomaniac, warmongering twat.
Silly in an affectionate way..😉
I'm not sure I would. trade leaders with you anyway.
I didn't say they were anything alike.
It's hard to determine what's worse. A pompous prick or a useless weasel.
One thing is for certain. The pompous prick gives zero fucks about what other countries think about his country, while a useless weasel will throw his country under a bus..
I think the overall opinion, without trying to score points, is that neither are fit to be leaders.
I don't disagree.
Heck, they are both alienating a lot of people in their own countries..
But, if I was sitting in an embassy in Kenya and a bunch of lunatics were about to overrun the place, I know which one I would want to be my leader
Now, if I was a Somalian in Minnesota with an expired visa, I'd choose the other..
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1DavjQw2p1/