I mean it has to be since your site hosts have strict Ts and Cs which you're pissing over as it is. MG was fine when dox were posted on CM, Tribal even posted pretending to be someone's GP and Ali the Lump is a known doxxer, as is Les. Let's not forget it has to be one of you guys who dropped Diggers' dox since the regulars here wouldn't have known anything about her.
Edna, had we wanted to be a doxing site, it is quite simple, we would have looked for a host such as the one CM and others use. Or, have moved, just like CM did for that very reason. We have no wish to be a doxing forum, there are enough out there already. Yes I was involved in stuff with Fluffy, the modwest stuff was genuinely totally over my head when it went up. I knew very little about digger other than the spiritual stuff. And while people may have been involved with doxing in the past that is no sure thing that they wish to keep at it. Some actually learn by their mistakes.
Here's the thing though, you cannot see it because you are intractable and have to be right at all times.
Science has explained nothing; the more we know the more fantastic the world becomes and the profounder the surrounding darkness. ~ Aldous Huxley
That's funny MG, Vass says in the whispers, he made EM, just to see if he could do it. He wasn't looking for anything specific, you even said that yourself in the chat.
Also, I didn't know that Digs made soap or had videos. ONE person knew that, and it was Ali.
That's right. And only Ali knew about my You Tube account.
MG wrote: Good point, Ali. Wouldn't have been difficult after all for anyone who has ever posted with her.
Exactly and to be honest, she is all over the internet.
Everyone on forums knows you search trawl and dox, you raving bull dyke!
just shot yourself in the foot there
All over the internet? Not been searching much then, have you? I suspect that you do a lot of skulking around trying to find info on people. It wouldn't surprise me if you were Queenie. You don't do things in the open, you slither around in the background, and try to hide what you do or skim underneath others.
Digger has in the past used pictures of soaps she has made as avatars and she has talked quite a lot about her reiki etc and the fact she comes from Manchester.
Doubt it took a lot to find a reiki practitioner soap maker from Manchester
You've absolutely no high ground to take when it comes to dishing out who doxes or not. You're one of the worst.
Shell said
Jul 16 6:05 PM, 2015
Ali has doxed you right there!
Digger said
Jul 16 10:32 PM, 2015
Shell wrote:
Ali has doxed you right there!
I know, silly cow. Also, if, as MG says, she knew fuck all about me, that leaves Ali as the main doxer.
Anonymous said
Jul 17 12:30 PM, 2015
Cliar must have been gutted not to be on the list of 56 Cybernat Trolls. Fuck me she tried hard enough. Then she got cold feet and deleted a raft of her tweets off and she clears them down every night now, has she never heard of screen grabs then? I guess she has to pretend she's all sweetness and light considering.
I bet JK Rowling is still ignoring the annoying little fucker despite Cliar's constant attempts to be-little her. What's the problem Cliar' is it because she's mega rich and you are not?
Fat Budgeh said
Jul 18 3:58 PM, 2015
Anonymous wrote:
Cliar must have been gutted not to be on the list of 56 Cybernat Trolls. Fuck me she tried hard enough. Then she got cold feet and deleted a raft of her tweets off and she clears them down every night now, has she never heard of screen grabs then? I guess she has to pretend she's all sweetness and light considering.
I bet JK Rowling is still ignoring the annoying little fucker despite Cliar's constant attempts to be-little her. What's the problem Cliar' is it because she's mega rich and you are not?
Deleting tweets doesn't remove them - there's websites that take snapshots of tweets and let you find them later.
Is Claire shitting herself at someone threatening the cops????
And yet, I can't but help love Claire <3 - she is so fucking mental how could anyone take her seriously???
Anyway, going back to the title of this thread - I don't think Shell's the biggest cunt on forums by any stretch of the imagination. As for making private information public, she certainly doesn't have a monopoly on that. I doubt very much any of the recent influx to BF are anything other than loose lipped, given that they certainly were when they were falling over themselves on a daily basis to tell me the slightest little bit of gossip they'd gleaned in (and often from) their own chatroom.
Let's face it, what exactly do you imagine MG & Purr talk about?
Not the weather that's for sure
Snuffs said
Jul 19 2:59 PM, 2015
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
have Dergs forgotten the fake that is Hollydog dialling Snuffs number to stalk and harass her? And on more than one occasion? ------------------------------ You won't let anyone forget, will you Snuffs? Prove she phoned you more than once. Liar.
I am not Snuffs. Why should Hollydog the fake model's stalking and harassment of Snuffs be brushed under the carpet?
Been catching up - was away for a while, so no, that certainly wasn't me, the facts speak for themselves though. Imagine the uproar if I had been phoning New Zealand.
I see Holly is still lurking here, Dregs must be quiet.
Oh and while we're on the subject of making people's private business public, wasn't it MG who discovered whispers could be read and wasn't she the one who showed Shell how to do it, after sharing her find with her cyberlover?
Kind of set herself up for a fall there, and how exactly does one accidentally discover that one can extract another's private conversations from a database? Through perseverance?
Ninj wrote:You haven't offended me at all; just confused me with your mixed messages.
Anybody who read Modwest at the time saw that my number was posted and I had only passed it on via Emaul. The onus really isn't on me to prove that it happened when half the forums saw it.
Obviously I have since changed numbers.
You say it's not a contest but seem to suggest that Shell's doxing is worse than doxing done by others. I don't really understand that or why you reference Ray of Sunshine. Shell also made public private things I had said about myself and my partner. Fair enough, she didn't post chatlogs but she most definitely referenced them. Emaul members did the same, oddly enough. Again, where's the difference? As far as I can see, you're the only one implying that there is a difference, and that is precisely where you turn it into a contest.
I reference Ray for the simple reason that Shell decided to publish all his private conversations, which we can both agree is a malicious action. She didn't know him and he had not argued with her in any way so she had no motivation to do it either. You cited thats Shell was "far from the biggest cunt on these forums" and I disagree based on the fact she was willing to humiliate someone she barely knew for reasons known only to her. Usually people have arguments that escalate and personal info may/ may not be revealed out of spite.
As I repeated earlier Shell needs no motivation to reveal private info and does it to people who she barely knows and who have not said a bad word to her. That's abnormal behaviour.
Posters from DS who don't know this Shell doesn't adhere to social norms had no idea she would do something like that. They thought the CM chat box was just that, a place to chat otherwise no body would have revealed any personal info. They didn't know Shell's character or history.
I don't know this Modwest and I am sorry that your number was posted but a number is not the same as someone's personal private life being splashed over forums for seemingly no reason. Your grudge with members from another forum does not make Shell's actions any less creepy or immoral.
Sigh.
I wasn't aware that I'd suggested Shell's actions weren't creepy or immoral. I was kind of under the impression I was saying she wasn't the only creepy immoral one.
In your opinion Shell's actions are somehow worse than those of others because she published detsils of someone she barely knew. I'm not sure which is worse - revealing information about a stranger or revealing information about somebody who trusts you and considers you a friend. Or maybe there's not really any difference at all.
Oh and while we're on the subject of making people's private business public, wasn't it MG who discovered whispers could be read and wasn't she the one who showed Shell how to do it, after sharing her find with her cyberlover?
Kind of set herself up for a fall there, and how exactly does one accidentally discover that one can extract another's private conversations from a database? Through perseverance?
Yes, I believe MG was reading the whispers for quite some time before she was caught out. She tends to plead ignorance when it comes to the 'technologies' of running a forum.
Ninj wrote:You haven't offended me at all; just confused me with your mixed messages.
Anybody who read Modwest at the time saw that my number was posted and I had only passed it on via Emaul. The onus really isn't on me to prove that it happened when half the forums saw it.
Obviously I have since changed numbers.
You say it's not a contest but seem to suggest that Shell's doxing is worse than doxing done by others. I don't really understand that or why you reference Ray of Sunshine. Shell also made public private things I had said about myself and my partner. Fair enough, she didn't post chatlogs but she most definitely referenced them. Emaul members did the same, oddly enough. Again, where's the difference? As far as I can see, you're the only one implying that there is a difference, and that is precisely where you turn it into a contest.
I reference Ray for the simple reason that Shell decided to publish all his private conversations, which we can both agree is a malicious action. She didn't know him and he had not argued with her in any way so she had no motivation to do it either. You cited thats Shell was "far from the biggest cunt on these forums" and I disagree based on the fact she was willing to humiliate someone she barely knew for reasons known only to her. Usually people have arguments that escalate and personal info may/ may not be revealed out of spite.
As I repeated earlier Shell needs no motivation to reveal private info and does it to people who she barely knows and who have not said a bad word to her. That's abnormal behaviour.
Posters from DS who don't know this Shell doesn't adhere to social norms had no idea she would do something like that. They thought the CM chat box was just that, a place to chat otherwise no body would have revealed any personal info. They didn't know Shell's character or history.
I don't know this Modwest and I am sorry that your number was posted but a number is not the same as someone's personal private life being splashed over forums for seemingly no reason. Your grudge with members from another forum does not make Shell's actions any less creepy or immoral.
Sigh.
I wasn't aware that I'd suggested Shell's actions weren't creepy or immoral. I was kind of under the impression I was saying she wasn't the only creepy immoral one.
In your opinion Shell's actions are somehow worse than those of others because she published detsils of someone she barely knew. I'm not sure which is worse - revealing information about a stranger or revealing information about somebody who trusts you and considers you a friend. Or maybe there's not really any difference at all.
I guess we'll have to agree to differ.
I love it when posters start their post off with "Sigh".
It always makes me think of smelling salts and flouncy underskirts....not sure why.
Anonymous said
Jul 20 3:25 PM, 2015
Fat Budgeh wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Cliar must have been gutted not to be on the list of 56 Cybernat Trolls. Fuck me she tried hard enough. Then she got cold feet and deleted a raft of her tweets off and she clears them down every night now, has she never heard of screen grabs then? I guess she has to pretend she's all sweetness and light considering.
I bet JK Rowling is still ignoring the annoying little fucker despite Cliar's constant attempts to be-little her. What's the problem Cliar' is it because she's mega rich and you are not?
Deleting tweets doesn't remove them - there's websites that take snapshots of tweets and let you find them later.
Is Claire shitting herself at someone threatening the cops????
And yet, I can't but help love Claire <3 - she is so fucking mental how could anyone take her seriously???
Today has been cracking, she's busy telling her followers fo fuck off.
Loads of them have blocked her and they are calling her a sekrit Unionist troll. I got some great grabs of her meltdown.
Fat Budgeh said
Jul 20 5:21 PM, 2015
Post them guest, post them ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anonymous said
Jul 20 7:14 PM, 2015
Fat Budgeh wrote:
Post them guest, post them ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ok later on then.
Anonymous said
Jul 21 12:49 AM, 2015
Anonymous wrote:
Fat Budgeh wrote:
Post them guest, post them ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ninj wrote:You haven't offended me at all; just confused me with your mixed messages.
Anybody who read Modwest at the time saw that my number was posted and I had only passed it on via Emaul. The onus really isn't on me to prove that it happened when half the forums saw it.
Obviously I have since changed numbers.
You say it's not a contest but seem to suggest that Shell's doxing is worse than doxing done by others. I don't really understand that or why you reference Ray of Sunshine. Shell also made public private things I had said about myself and my partner. Fair enough, she didn't post chatlogs but she most definitely referenced them. Emaul members did the same, oddly enough. Again, where's the difference? As far as I can see, you're the only one implying that there is a difference, and that is precisely where you turn it into a contest.
I reference Ray for the simple reason that Shell decided to publish all his private conversations, which we can both agree is a malicious action. She didn't know him and he had not argued with her in any way so she had no motivation to do it either. You cited thats Shell was "far from the biggest cunt on these forums" and I disagree based on the fact she was willing to humiliate someone she barely knew for reasons known only to her. Usually people have arguments that escalate and personal info may/ may not be revealed out of spite.
As I repeated earlier Shell needs no motivation to reveal private info and does it to people who she barely knows and who have not said a bad word to her. That's abnormal behaviour.
Posters from DS who don't know this Shell doesn't adhere to social norms had no idea she would do something like that. They thought the CM chat box was just that, a place to chat otherwise no body would have revealed any personal info. They didn't know Shell's character or history.
I don't know this Modwest and I am sorry that your number was posted but a number is not the same as someone's personal private life being splashed over forums for seemingly no reason. Your grudge with members from another forum does not make Shell's actions any less creepy or immoral.
Sigh.
I wasn't aware that I'd suggested Shell's actions weren't creepy or immoral. I was kind of under the impression I was saying she wasn't the only creepy immoral one.
In your opinion Shell's actions are somehow worse than those of others because she published detsils of someone she barely knew. I'm not sure which is worse - revealing information about a stranger or revealing information about somebody who trusts you and considers you a friend. Or maybe there's not really any difference at all.
I guess we'll have to agree to differ.
Hmpf! I'm neither 'creepy' or 'immoral'
Anonymous said
Jul 21 7:31 AM, 2015
W
-- Edited by Digger on Tuesday 21st of July 2015 09:30:51 AM
Anonymous said
Jul 21 7:37 AM, 2015
-- Edited by Digger on Tuesday 21st of July 2015 09:31:36 AM
That's right. And only Ali knew about my You Tube account.
All over the internet? Not been searching much then, have you? I suspect that you do a lot of skulking around trying to find info on people. It wouldn't surprise me if you were Queenie. You don't do things in the open, you slither around in the background, and try to hide what you do or skim underneath others.
You've absolutely no high ground to take when it comes to dishing out who doxes or not. You're one of the worst.
I know, silly cow. Also, if, as MG says, she knew fuck all about me, that leaves Ali as the main doxer.
Cliar must have been gutted not to be on the list of 56 Cybernat Trolls.
Fuck me she tried hard enough. Then she got cold feet and deleted a raft of her tweets off and she clears them down every night now, has she never heard of screen grabs then? I guess she has to pretend she's all sweetness and light considering. 
I bet JK Rowling is still ignoring the annoying little fucker despite Cliar's constant attempts to be-little her. What's the problem Cliar' is it because she's mega rich and you are not?
Deleting tweets doesn't remove them - there's websites that take snapshots of tweets and let you find them later.
Is Claire shitting herself at someone threatening the cops????
And yet, I can't but help love Claire <3 - she is so fucking mental how could anyone take her seriously???
Been catching up - was away for a while, so no, that certainly wasn't me, the facts speak for themselves though. Imagine the uproar if I had been phoning New Zealand.
I see Holly is still lurking here, Dregs must be quiet.
Re: Shell - STILL The Biggest Cunt On Forums. Part Three
Kind of set herself up for a fall there, and how exactly does one accidentally discover that one can extract another's private conversations from a database? Through perseverance?
Ninj
Re: Shell - STILL The Biggest Cunt On Forums. Part Three
Sigh.
I wasn't aware that I'd suggested Shell's actions weren't creepy or immoral. I was kind of under the impression I was saying she wasn't the only creepy immoral one.
In your opinion Shell's actions are somehow worse than those of others because she published detsils of someone she barely knew. I'm not sure which is worse - revealing information about a stranger or revealing information about somebody who trusts you and considers you a friend. Or maybe there's not really any difference at all.
I guess we'll have to agree to differ.
Yes, I believe MG was reading the whispers for quite some time before she was caught out. She tends to plead ignorance when it comes to the 'technologies' of running a forum.
I love it when posters start their post off with "Sigh".
It always makes me think of smelling salts and flouncy underskirts....not sure why.
Today has been cracking, she's busy telling her followers fo fuck off.
Loads of them have blocked her and they are calling her a sekrit Unionist troll. I got some great grabs of her meltdown.
Post them guest, post them ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ok later on then.
it will be morning now je suis trop fatigue...
Hmpf! I'm neither 'creepy' or 'immoral'
-- Edited by Digger on Tuesday 21st of July 2015 09:30:51 AM
-- Edited by Digger on Tuesday 21st of July 2015 09:31:36 AM