Major Starbold is playing into their hands, I have posted with him on and off for years and under all the racist crap he is a kind family man who has friends of every nationality....he is playing a part. Just as Micky plays a part, others on there play a part....and people lap it up year in year out..
People keep extreme posters on their sites because it's good for business, Outraged from Oxford will break their necks to log in and condemn every last word they utter....year after year after year.
Syl I agree. We posted for years and although we dont agree with the racism, I really think it's an act.
Yes he is a family man who has never said anything rude or nasty to us. He cares more than he lets on. Major is just a character. He winds them up and they fall for it everytime.
Anonymous said
Jan 20 8:51 PM, 2020
Magica wrote:
Syl wrote:
Major Starbold is playing into their hands, I have posted with him on and off for years and under all the racist crap he is a kind family man who has friends of every nationality....he is playing a part. Just as Micky plays a part, others on there play a part....and people lap it up year in year out..
People keep extreme posters on their sites because it's good for business, Outraged from Oxford will break their necks to log in and condemn every last word they utter....year after year after year.
Syl I agree. We posted for years and although we dont agree with the racism, I really think it's an act.
Yes he is a family man who has never said anything rude or nasty to us. He cares more than he lets on. Major is just a character. He winds them up and they fall for it everytime.
There's strange, the newbie, toke n gesture, asked him today if he's playing a role. Looks like he's seen through his act.
Georgia x said
Jan 20 10:21 PM, 2020
BackGammon wrote:
Twizzler wrote:
Avon is a good egg for putting out that thread.
I knew Starbuck would be all over it like a rash.
Covered himself in glory by slagging Avon. Stooo still hasn't banned him for the guests though.
You told the Guest he /she should not be discussing that thread here as it has nothing to do with this forum. So may I ask why it's one rule for the Guest and the other for you?
You discussed Stooo fairly often in the Whine prior to my joining I noted..
Why did you do that if you consider topics not related to CM to be unsuitable for discourse in the Whine?
That is a view upheld by your good self alone by the way as the Whine is the only thread where it IS perminted to discuss other forums.
Georgia x said
Jan 20 10:24 PM, 2020
BackGammon wrote:
Why have you dragged this over here? Starbold and his racism has got fuck all to do with this forum.
Neither has Budgie's physique or beverage preferences but they are still your signature.
Maybe you should alter it based on the belief stated above as it appears to be a direct contradiction, non? :lesson:
Georgia x said
Jan 20 10:37 PM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
BackGammon wrote:
Why have you dragged this over here? Starbold and his racism has got fuck all to do with this forum.
In case you hadn't noticed a lot of what happens on Dogs get dragged over here - by guests and members alike.
Guest, I am inclined to agree. .Dr Synne and I were discussing Dogs in the Whine a few days ago and BackGammon did not rush over to chastise us.
It is, to put it mildly, a confusing comment.
I can only think as he later happily discusses the thread and Dogs members in a seemingly cheery manner he must mean that Guests should not discuss other forums in the Whine. ..but again, that contrasts my knowledge of the Whine.
If a Guest post makes the board it has been deemed suitable..!
Twizzler said
Jan 20 10:46 PM, 2020
Georgia x wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
BackGammon wrote:
Why have you dragged this over here? Starbold and his racism has got fuck all to do with this forum.
In case you hadn't noticed a lot of what happens on Dogs get dragged over here - by guests and members alike.
Guest, I am inclined to agree. .Dr Synne and I were discussing Dogs in the Whine a few days ago and BackGammon did not rush over to chastise us.
It is, to put it mildly, a confusing comment.
I can only think as he later happily discusses the thread and Dogs members in a seemingly cheery manner he must mean that Guests should not discuss other forums in the Whine. ..but again, that contrasts my knowledge of the Whine.
If a Guest post makes the board it has been deemed suitable..!
Probably because he was on holiday.
Twizzler said
Jan 20 10:48 PM, 2020
Georgia x wrote:
BackGammon wrote:
Twizzler wrote:
Avon is a good egg for putting out that thread.
I knew Starbuck would be all over it like a rash.
Covered himself in glory by slagging Avon. Stooo still hasn't banned him for the guests though.
You told the Guest he /she should not be discussing that thread here as it has nothing to do with this forum. So may I ask why it's one rule for the Guest and the other for you?
You discussed Stooo fairly often in the Whine prior to my joining I noted..
Why did you do that if you consider topics not related to CM to be unsuitable for discourse in the Whine?
That is a view upheld by your good self alone by the way as the Whine is the only thread where it IS perminted to discuss other forums.
When you joined you mentioned Hobbit et el, we had about 3 pages of you so called
putting the past to bed.
Georgia x said
Jan 20 10:53 PM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
No one would dare say the word "unwhite" in polite company. It's the year 2020.
They would be viewed as a bigot with issues if they said it in impolite company now I consider it.
I don't know anything about this poster, the fates have kindly allowed me to avoid posting with the gentleman but his views are hopelessly woefully abhorrent .
Yes, at best they are abhorrent as you put it but those that run the site allow it, so it goes on and on...... You get some complaining and others either support it or go along with it.
If he means what he says he should be banned. No if's or but's. Major hasn't even received an hour's ban ..yet others have been perma banned for much much less..! :re:
He is proudly declaring hate speech and I can think of no other platform except Dogs that would allow it to continue
Avon was the only one to directly object to the Golliwog avatar, and Im not surprised he deemed it offensive! So something was eventually muttered amongst Admin and it was removed...after Goodness knows how long.
Georgia x said
Jan 20 10:57 PM, 2020
Twizzler wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
BackGammon wrote:
Twizzler wrote:
Avon is a good egg for putting out that thread.
I knew Starbuck would be all over it like a rash.
Covered himself in glory by slagging Avon. Stooo still hasn't banned him for the guests though.
You told the Guest he /she should not be discussing that thread here as it has nothing to do with this forum. So may I ask why it's one rule for the Guest and the other for you?
You discussed Stooo fairly often in the Whine prior to my joining I noted..
Why did you do that if you consider topics not related to CM to be unsuitable for discourse in the Whine?
That is a view upheld by your good self alone by the way as the Whine is the only thread where it IS perminted to discuss other forums.
When you joined you mentioned Hobbit et el, we had about 3 pages of you so called
putting the past to bed.
That's because I was lied about on the aforementioned apparently "should not be mentioned "forum , so I responded to lies that were written regarding the past. I myself did not bring it back up, someone else chose to.
But..it's an incorrect comparison in any event. He is factually incorrect and you know it methinks 😉
Many posters who are both members and Guests discuss Dogs posters and threads,it happened literally everyday ffs prior to my arrival!
It's nonsense isn't it.
-- Edited by Georgia x on Monday 20th of January 2020 11:04:01 PM
Georgia x said
Jan 20 11:01 PM, 2020
Twizzler wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
BackGammon wrote:
Why have you dragged this over here? Starbold and his racism has got fuck all to do with this forum.
In case you hadn't noticed a lot of what happens on Dogs get dragged over here - by guests and members alike.
Guest, I am inclined to agree. .Dr Synne and I were discussing Dogs in the Whine a few days ago and BackGammon did not rush over to chastise us.
It is, to put it mildly, a confusing comment.
I can only think as he later happily discusses the thread and Dogs members in a seemingly cheery manner he must mean that Guests should not discuss other forums in the Whine. ..but again, that contrasts my knowledge of the Whine.
If a Guest post makes the board it has been deemed suitable..!
Probably because he was on holiday.
Twizzler, don't be daft. That was but one example .
When BackGammon was not on holiday he didn't comment when folk discussed Dogs..he often discussed it himself!
Are you saying if BackGammon had not been sipping sangria he would have waded over to tell Dr Synne and I not to discuss Dogs?
With all due respect , that's just silly..!!😄
Anonymous said
Jan 20 11:01 PM, 2020
Georgia x wrote:
BackGammon wrote:
Twizzler wrote:
Avon is a good egg for putting out that thread.
I knew Starbuck would be all over it like a rash.
Covered himself in glory by slagging Avon. Stooo still hasn't banned him for the guests though.
You told the Guest he /she should not be discussing that thread here as it has nothing to do with this forum. So may I ask why it's one rule for the Guest and the other for you?
You discussed Stooo fairly often in the Whine prior to my joining I noted..
Why did you do that if you consider topics not related to CM to be unsuitable for discourse in the Whine?
That is a view upheld by your good self alone by the way as the Whine is the only thread where it IS perminted to discuss other forums.
Thank you, Georgia. Hopefully he will respond to you as he avoided that question when I put it to him.
Anonymous said
Jan 20 11:09 PM, 2020
Georgia x wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
No one would dare say the word "unwhite" in polite company. It's the year 2020.
They would be viewed as a bigot with issues if they said it in impolite company now I consider it.
I don't know anything about this poster, the fates have kindly allowed me to avoid posting with the gentleman but his views are hopelessly woefully abhorrent .
Yes, at best they are abhorrent as you put it but those that run the site allow it, so it goes on and on...... You get some complaining and others either support it or go along with it.
If he means what he says he should be banned. No if's or but's. Major hasn't even received an hour's ban ..yet others have been perma banned for much much less..! :re:
He is proudly declaring hate speech and I can think of no other platform except Dogs that would allow it to continue
Avon was the only one to directly object to the Golliwog avatar, and Im not surprised he deemed it offensive! So something was eventually muttered amongst Admin and it was removed...after Goodness knows how long.
As I said, it's do to those that run the forum that allow that kind of thing. Avon objected to the Gw avatar and SF, I think, every one else put up with or even openly supported it.
You get homo[hobic posts as well as well as much more rubbish usually by Dean and Starbold. When I posted on Micky's forum, at least he knew what was wrong.
Georgia x said
Jan 20 11:23 PM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
BackGammon wrote:
Twizzler wrote:
Avon is a good egg for putting out that thread.
I knew Starbuck would be all over it like a rash.
Covered himself in glory by slagging Avon. Stooo still hasn't banned him for the guests though.
You told the Guest he /she should not be discussing that thread here as it has nothing to do with this forum. So may I ask why it's one rule for the Guest and the other for you?
You discussed Stooo fairly often in the Whine prior to my joining I noted..
Why did you do that if you consider topics not related to CM to be unsuitable for discourse in the Whine?
That is a view upheld by your good self alone by the way as the Whine is the only thread where it IS perminted to discuss other forums.
Thank you, Georgia. Hopefully he will respond to you as he avoided that question when I put it to him.
I too would be interested in his answer but sadly I suspect that instead of a simple "sorry, that was a tad daft" he will become defensive and like Twizzler, (who I have no problem with and did not refer to..!) mention my thread to Hobbit which I explained in detail the rationale for in great detail about a hundred times already.
What's wrong with admitting it was a bit stupid to say? We all get our silly moments..it's no biggie.
Anonymous said
Jan 20 11:24 PM, 2020
Twizzler wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
BackGammon wrote:
Twizzler wrote:
Avon is a good egg for putting out that thread.
I knew Starbuck would be all over it like a rash.
Covered himself in glory by slagging Avon. Stooo still hasn't banned him for the guests though.
You told the Guest he /she should not be discussing that thread here as it has nothing to do with this forum. So may I ask why it's one rule for the Guest and the other for you?
You discussed Stooo fairly often in the Whine prior to my joining I noted..
Why did you do that if you consider topics not related to CM to be unsuitable for discourse in the Whine?
That is a view upheld by your good self alone by the way as the Whine is the only thread where it IS perminted to discuss other forums.
When you joined you mentioned Hobbit et el, we had about 3 pages of you so called
putting the past to bed.
Twizzler, do you support Starbolds vile comments? If you don't, then please stop making this into a personal battle as the subject matter is racist posts.
Anonymous said
Jan 20 11:30 PM, 2020
Georgia x wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
BackGammon wrote:
Twizzler wrote:
Avon is a good egg for putting out that thread.
I knew Starbuck would be all over it like a rash.
Covered himself in glory by slagging Avon. Stooo still hasn't banned him for the guests though.
You told the Guest he /she should not be discussing that thread here as it has nothing to do with this forum. So may I ask why it's one rule for the Guest and the other for you?
You discussed Stooo fairly often in the Whine prior to my joining I noted..
Why did you do that if you consider topics not related to CM to be unsuitable for discourse in the Whine?
That is a view upheld by your good self alone by the way as the Whine is the only thread where it IS perminted to discuss other forums.
Thank you, Georgia. Hopefully he will respond to you as he avoided that question when I put it to him.
I too would be interested in his answer but sadly I suspect that instead of a simple "sorry, that was a tad daft" he will become defensive and like Twizzler, (who I have no problem with and did not refer to..!) mention my thread to Hobbit which I explained in detail the rationale for in great detail about a hundred times already.
What's wrong with admitting it was a bit stupid to say? We all get our silly moments..it's no biggie.
I heard about that Georgia and if I was in your shoes, I could see my self explaining away as I have nothing to hide.
Starbold has rarely been banned and last night he wanted to post Deans or another posters picture but someone said to him that the pictures of both had already been posted. I will try and find the post if you want me too. I think Dean or someone said that Dean had posted his picture but I've never seen anyone's as I'm not there or here daily.
BackGammon said
Jan 20 11:32 PM, 2020
Twizzler wrote:
BackGammon wrote:
Twizzler wrote:
Avon is a good egg for putting out that thread.
I knew Starbuck would be all over it like a rash.
Covered himself in glory by slagging Avon. Stooo still hasn't banned him for the guests though.
Avon should join here. Maybe Admin have just been lurking behind the curtain.
it would be good if he did join.
if anon ond Georgia think I'll respond to her they are in for a bloody long long wait.
Anonymous said
Jan 20 11:33 PM, 2020
I went to look for the posts where Starbold said he was going to post pictures of Dean and another but found this, see copy below. Did he not know what he was going back to?
This place has become a new kind of shithole and a pretty desperate one to allow Starbold to continue his racist shite while banning Fletch for being Fletch.
Syl I agree. We posted for years and although we dont agree with the racism, I really think it's an act.
Yes he is a family man who has never said anything rude or nasty to us. He cares more than he lets on. Major is just a character. He winds them up and they fall for it everytime.
There's strange, the newbie, toke n gesture, asked him today if he's playing a role. Looks like he's seen through his act.
You told the Guest he /she should not be discussing that thread here as it has nothing to do with this forum. So may I ask why it's one rule for the Guest and the other for you?
You discussed Stooo fairly often in the Whine prior to my joining I noted..
Why did you do that if you consider topics not related to CM to be unsuitable for discourse in the Whine?
That is a view upheld by your good self alone by the way as the Whine is the only thread where it IS perminted to discuss other forums.
Neither has Budgie's physique or beverage preferences but they are still your signature.
Maybe you should alter it based on the belief stated above as it appears to be a direct contradiction, non? :lesson:
Guest, I am inclined to agree. .Dr Synne and I were discussing Dogs in the Whine a few days ago and BackGammon did not rush over to chastise us.
It is, to put it mildly, a confusing comment.
I can only think as he later happily discusses the thread and Dogs members in a seemingly cheery manner he must mean that Guests should not discuss other forums in the Whine. ..but again, that contrasts my knowledge of the Whine.
If a Guest post makes the board it has been deemed suitable..!
Probably because he was on holiday.
When you joined you mentioned Hobbit et el, we had about 3 pages of you so called
putting the past to bed.
If he means what he says he should be banned. No if's or but's. Major hasn't even received an hour's ban ..yet others have been perma banned for much much less..!
:re:
He is proudly declaring hate speech and I can think of no other platform except Dogs that would allow it to continue
Avon was the only one to directly object to the Golliwog avatar, and Im not surprised he deemed it offensive! So something was eventually muttered amongst Admin and it was removed...after Goodness knows how long.
That's because I was lied about on the aforementioned apparently "should not be mentioned "forum , so I responded to lies that were written regarding the past. I myself did not bring it back up, someone else chose to.
But..it's an incorrect comparison in any event. He is factually incorrect and you know it methinks 😉
Many posters who are both members and Guests discuss Dogs posters and threads,it happened literally everyday ffs prior to my arrival!
It's nonsense isn't it.
-- Edited by Georgia x on Monday 20th of January 2020 11:04:01 PM
Twizzler, don't be daft. That was but one example .
When BackGammon was not on holiday he didn't comment when folk discussed Dogs..he often discussed it himself!
Are you saying if BackGammon had not been sipping sangria he would have waded over to tell Dr Synne and I not to discuss Dogs?
With all due respect , that's just silly..!!😄
Thank you, Georgia. Hopefully he will respond to you as he avoided that question when I put it to him.
As I said, it's do to those that run the forum that allow that kind of thing. Avon objected to the Gw avatar and SF, I think, every one else put up with or even openly supported it.
You get homo[hobic posts as well as well as much more rubbish usually by Dean and Starbold. When I posted on Micky's forum, at least he knew what was wrong.
I too would be interested in his answer but sadly I suspect that instead of a simple "sorry, that was a tad daft" he will become defensive and like Twizzler, (who I have no problem with and did not refer to..!) mention my thread to Hobbit which I explained in detail the rationale for in great detail about a hundred times already.
What's wrong with admitting it was a bit stupid to say? We all get our silly moments..it's no biggie.
Twizzler, do you support Starbolds vile comments? If you don't, then please stop making this into a personal battle as the subject matter is racist posts.
I heard about that Georgia and if I was in your shoes, I could see my self explaining away as I have nothing to hide.
Starbold has rarely been banned and last night he wanted to post Deans or another posters picture but someone said to him that the pictures of both had already been posted. I will try and find the post if you want me too. I think Dean or someone said that Dean had posted his picture but I've never seen anyone's as I'm not there or here daily.
it would be good if he did join.
if anon ond Georgia think I'll respond to her they are in for a bloody long long wait.
I went to look for the posts where Starbold said he was going to post pictures of Dean and another but
found this, see copy below. Did he not know what he was going back to?
Random Stuff # 31
Re: Random Stuff # 31
Rolluplostinspace
He always seemed to be a very level headed and fair poster.
Probably because he was on holiday.
Sangria! SHUDDER.
Nice man, one of the best.