Please ignore the anons that are just baiting. They give all of us a bad name. However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention.
Anonymous said
Dec 3 10:46 AM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
Please ignore the anons that are just baiting. They give all of us a bad name. However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention.
Don't worry, I'm sure your own reputation here will remain unblemished.
dr synne said
Dec 3 11:19 AM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
Please ignore the anons that are just baiting. They give all of us a bad name. However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention.
But of course. They're only human.
Syl said
Dec 3 11:24 AM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
Please ignore the anons that are just baiting. They give all of us a bad name. However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention.
Digger said
Dec 3 2:08 PM, 2020
dr synne wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Please ignore the anons that are just baiting. They give all of us a bad name. However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention.
But of course. They're only human.
One would hope
Anonymous said
Dec 3 2:38 PM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Please ignore the anons that are just baiting. They give all of us a bad name. However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention.
Don't worry, I'm sure your own reputation here will remain unblemished.
That is not the issue. I would like people to read what is written rather than to just reject it because they have been conditioned to believe anything that comes from an Anon is corrupt (baiting, trolling, ulterior motive other than to engage discussion etc).
dr synne said
Dec 3 3:45 PM, 2020
Digger wrote:
dr synne wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Please ignore the anons that are just baiting. They give all of us a bad name. However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention.
But of course. They're only human.
One would hope
John Doe said
Dec 3 4:36 PM, 2020
dr synne wrote:
Digger wrote:
dr synne wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Please ignore the anons that are just baiting. They give all of us a bad name. However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention.
But of course. They're only human.
One would hope
To prove you are genuine you should post a photo of you parading in skimpy black lingerie and high heels.
Bitch.
-- Edited by John Doe on Thursday 3rd of December 2020 04:37:09 PM
dr synne said
Dec 5 5:09 PM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Please ignore the anons that are just baiting. They give all of us a bad name. However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention.
Don't worry, I'm sure your own reputation here will remain unblemished.
That is not the issue. I would like people to read what is written rather than to just reject it because they have been conditioned to believe anything that comes from an Anon is corrupt (baiting, trolling, ulterior motive other than to engage discussion etc).
That is a fair enough point, but, given the abuses the anon label can engender, is it not reasonable to at least expect an anon to give their name when they are genuine.
Syl said
Dec 5 5:16 PM, 2020
A couple of 'Anons' are obviously cautious that their posts won't be approved if they put their usual usernames on.
JP said
Dec 5 6:06 PM, 2020
dr synne wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Please ignore the anons that are just baiting. They give all of us a bad name. However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention.
Don't worry, I'm sure your own reputation here will remain unblemished.
That is not the issue. I would like people to read what is written rather than to just reject it because they have been conditioned to believe anything that comes from an Anon is corrupt (baiting, trolling, ulterior motive other than to engage discussion etc).
That is a fair enough point, but, given the abuses the anon label can engender, is it not reasonable to at least expect an anon to give their name when they are genuine.
I'm fond of any singular anon who may play at, good cop, bad cop. ;)
Syl said
Dec 5 7:19 PM, 2020
Most anon posts get through no matter who they are, as long as they are not too pathetic.
Digger said
Dec 5 7:30 PM, 2020
Syl wrote:
Most anon posts get through no matter who they are, as long as they are not too pathetic.
They're not that 'anon' either. They just think they are.
Syl said
Dec 5 7:38 PM, 2020
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Most anon posts get through no matter who they are, as long as they are not too pathetic.
They're not that 'anon' either. They just think they are.
I know, bless em.
dr synne said
Dec 6 10:08 AM, 2020
John Doe wrote:
dr synne wrote:
Digger wrote:
dr synne wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Please ignore the anons that are just baiting. They give all of us a bad name. However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention.
But of course. They're only human.
One would hope
To prove you are genuine you should post a photo of you parading in skimpy black lingerie and high heels.
Bitch.
-- Edited by John Doe on Thursday 3rd of December 2020 04:37:09 PM
I see the bromide trials weren't a success JD
dr synne said
Dec 6 10:09 AM, 2020
JP wrote:
dr synne wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Please ignore the anons that are just baiting. They give all of us a bad name. However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention.
Don't worry, I'm sure your own reputation here will remain unblemished.
That is not the issue. I would like people to read what is written rather than to just reject it because they have been conditioned to believe anything that comes from an Anon is corrupt (baiting, trolling, ulterior motive other than to engage discussion etc).
That is a fair enough point, but, given the abuses the anon label can engender, is it not reasonable to at least expect an anon to give their name when they are genuine.
I'm fond of any singular anon who may play at, good cop, bad cop. ;)
Oooh roleplay....I'm game
John Doe said
Dec 6 5:55 PM, 2020
dr synne wrote:
John Doe wrote:
dr synne wrote:
Digger wrote:
dr synne wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Please ignore the anons that are just baiting. They give all of us a bad name. However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention.
But of course. They're only human.
One would hope
To prove you are genuine you should post a photo of you parading in skimpy black lingerie and high heels.
Bitch.
-- Edited by John Doe on Thursday 3rd of December 2020 04:37:09 PM
I see the bromide trials weren't a success JD
JP said
Dec 6 6:01 PM, 2020
dr synne wrote:
JP wrote:
dr synne wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Please ignore the anons that are just baiting. They give all of us a bad name. However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention.
Don't worry, I'm sure your own reputation here will remain unblemished.
That is not the issue. I would like people to read what is written rather than to just reject it because they have been conditioned to believe anything that comes from an Anon is corrupt (baiting, trolling, ulterior motive other than to engage discussion etc).
That is a fair enough point, but, given the abuses the anon label can engender, is it not reasonable to at least expect an anon to give their name when they are genuine.
I'm fond of any singular anon who may play at, good cop, bad cop. ;)
Oooh roleplay....I'm game
Oh deer....
Oh venison.. wouldn't have worked so well
dr synne said
Dec 7 11:06 AM, 2020
JP wrote:
dr synne wrote:
JP wrote:
dr synne wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Please ignore the anons that are just baiting. They give all of us a bad name. However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention.
Don't worry, I'm sure your own reputation here will remain unblemished.
That is not the issue. I would like people to read what is written rather than to just reject it because they have been conditioned to believe anything that comes from an Anon is corrupt (baiting, trolling, ulterior motive other than to engage discussion etc).
That is a fair enough point, but, given the abuses the anon label can engender, is it not reasonable to at least expect an anon to give their name when they are genuine.
I'm fond of any singular anon who may play at, good cop, bad cop. ;)
Oooh roleplay....I'm game
Oh deer....
Oh venison.. wouldn't have worked so well
Nothing that looks like Bambi should be involved in such shenanigens
Please ignore the anons that are just baiting. They give all of us a bad name. However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention.
Don't worry, I'm sure your own reputation here will remain unblemished.
But of course. They're only human.
One would hope
That is not the issue. I would like people to read what is written rather than to just reject it because they have been conditioned to believe anything that comes from an Anon is corrupt (baiting, trolling, ulterior motive other than to engage discussion etc).
To prove you are genuine you should post a photo of you parading in skimpy black lingerie and high heels.
Bitch.
-- Edited by John Doe on Thursday 3rd of December 2020 04:37:09 PM
That is a fair enough point, but, given the abuses the anon label can engender, is it not reasonable to at least expect an anon to give their name when they are genuine.
A couple of 'Anons' are obviously cautious that their posts won't be approved if they put their usual usernames on.
I'm fond of any singular anon who may play at, good cop, bad cop. ;)
They're not that 'anon' either. They just think they are.
I know, bless em.
I see the bromide trials weren't a success JD
Oooh roleplay....I'm game
Oh deer....
Oh venison.. wouldn't have worked so well
Nothing that looks like Bambi should be involved in such shenanigens