My take on this is that she's not going to murder anyone else and it's a waste of money keeping her prison. Better she's out and has to run the gauntlet of public hate and derision than sit in luxury in prison like Rose West.
Syl said
Nov 30 12:38 AM, 2020
She should rot in jail for life. The origional sentence was pathetic, but to let her out at the earliest date possible is a travesty. She will be given a new identity, every benefit going, and I doubt she will suffer one minute of remorse.
-- Edited by Syl on Monday 30th of November 2020 12:39:50 AM
Digger said
Nov 30 1:14 AM, 2020
Syl wrote:
She should rot in jail for life. The origional sentence was pathetic, but to let her out at the earliest date possible is a travesty. She will be given a new identity, every benefit going, and I doubt she will suffer one minute of remorse.
-- Edited by Syl on Monday 30th of November 2020 12:39:50 AM
They don't rot in jail. They live in care and comfort, and are looked after. Rose West has a computer, a TV, books, she's well fed, etc. If they'd have let her out, someone would have had her.
Syl said
Nov 30 1:17 AM, 2020
Philpott was 'delighted' to get out.
She will make a new life for herself, is still young enough to have more children...perish the thought.
Anonymous said
Nov 30 3:20 AM, 2020
Anonymous wrote:
... He is paralysed from the waist down from fighting in Libya against the forces of Gaddafi and therefore should be treated as a war hero given Britain's overseas action to overthrow Gaddafi in bombing Libya.
I wasn't opining that this individual was a war hero I gave an argument that in the context of Britain's overseas actions above he can be treated as a war hero. The implication was that if you agreed with Britain's actions to overthrow Gaddafi it could be hypocritical to deny that this individual was a war hero. Was this one of the mitigating factors for his release? I don't know.
Magica said
Dec 1 5:39 PM, 2020
Syl wrote:
Philpott was 'delighted' to get out. She will make a new life for herself, is still young enough to have more children...perish the thought.
She will live her life into the future, but still six children are dead. I despise her!
dr synne said
Dec 2 10:36 AM, 2020
That's the problem, once you get past all the rationalisation as to why it's better to release her - whatever they may be - the underlying message is that the taking of life/lives comes with a sell by date, and thus those lives are not that big a deal.
Syl said
Dec 2 12:58 PM, 2020
Seems not, as she was released at the first opportunity....just over a year served in jail for each child killed by her actions is pathetic whichever way you look at it.
Magica said
Dec 2 2:53 PM, 2020
Syl wrote:
Seems not, as she was released at the first opportunity....just over a year served in jail for each child killed by her actions is pathetic whichever way you look at it.
I agree, she should never have been released! She's as evil as Myra Hindley!
John Doe said
Dec 2 4:15 PM, 2020
Magica wrote:
Syl wrote:
Seems not, as she was released at the first opportunity....just over a year served in jail for each child killed by her actions is pathetic whichever way you look at it.
I agree, she should never have been released! She's as evil as Myra Hindley!
She will have an army of social workers looking after her.
It makes you sick.
Syl said
Dec 2 6:44 PM, 2020
John Doe wrote:
Magica wrote:
Syl wrote:
Seems not, as she was released at the first opportunity....just over a year served in jail for each child killed by her actions is pathetic whichever way you look at it.
I agree, she should never have been released! She's as evil as Myra Hindley!
She will have an army of social workers looking after her.
It makes you sick.
Women like her should be forcibly sterilised as soon as they are released from prison.
Magica said
Dec 2 6:54 PM, 2020
She should also be watched, God forbid she has more children!
John Doe said
Dec 17 2:28 AM, 2020
Another preposterous decision - our justice system cares far more about the rights of evil scum like this than the victims.
-- Edited by John Doe on Thursday 17th of December 2020 02:30:37 AM
From the article...."Cole and Bowers launched separate appeals against their convictions for manslaughter, which were also rejected."
Given the way the rights of the criminal often seem to override the rights of the victims, I suppose people should be thankful some ridiculous do-gooder didn't convince the appeal board that said scum had suffered enough.
Jobless Oddball said
Dec 18 7:20 PM, 2020
Syl wrote:
Women like her should be forcibly sterilised
You should really say that out loud so you can hear how ridiculous you sound!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Syl said
Dec 18 7:47 PM, 2020
Oh do shut up you boring twat.
Jobless Oddball said
Dec 18 10:36 PM, 2020
Syl wrote:
Oh do shut up you boring twat.
Says the one spouting the twat talk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Magica said
Dec 19 3:30 PM, 2020
Jobless Oddball wrote:
Syl wrote:
Oh do shut up you boring twat.
Says the one spouting the twat talk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
My take on this is that she's not going to murder anyone else and it's a waste of money keeping her prison. Better she's out and has to run the gauntlet of public hate and derision than sit in luxury in prison like Rose West.
She should rot in jail for life.
The origional sentence was pathetic, but to let her out at the earliest date possible is a travesty.
She will be given a new identity, every benefit going, and I doubt she will suffer one minute of remorse.
-- Edited by Syl on Monday 30th of November 2020 12:39:50 AM
They don't rot in jail. They live in care and comfort, and are looked after. Rose West has a computer, a TV, books, she's well fed, etc. If they'd have let her out, someone would have had her.
She will make a new life for herself, is still young enough to have more children...perish the thought.
I wasn't opining that this individual was a war hero I gave an argument that in the context of Britain's overseas actions above he can be treated as a war hero. The implication was that if you agreed with Britain's actions to overthrow Gaddafi it could be hypocritical to deny that this individual was a war hero. Was this one of the mitigating factors for his release? I don't know.
She will live her life into the future, but still six children are dead. I despise her!
That's the problem, once you get past all the rationalisation as to why it's better to release her - whatever they may be - the underlying message is that the taking of life/lives comes with a sell by date, and thus those lives are not that big a deal.
I agree, she should never have been released! She's as evil as Myra Hindley!
She will have an army of social workers looking after her.
It makes you sick.
Women like her should be forcibly sterilised as soon as they are released from prison.
She should also be watched, God forbid she has more children!
Another preposterous decision - our justice system cares far more about the rights of evil scum like this than the victims.
It makes me sick.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-berkshire-55331692
-- Edited by John Doe on Thursday 17th of December 2020 02:30:37 AM
From the article...."Cole and Bowers launched separate appeals against their convictions for manslaughter, which were also rejected."
Given the way the rights of the criminal often seem to override the rights of the victims, I suppose people should be thankful some ridiculous do-gooder didn't convince the appeal board that said scum had suffered enough.
You should really say that out loud so you can hear how ridiculous you sound!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh do shut up you boring twat.
Says the one spouting the twat talk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Be nice Jo, it's Christmas