She‘s finally come out of the fascist-curious right wing closet I’ve often sensed she was hiding in, and seems to be plunging deeper and deeper into the Q rabbit holes, located in the bowels of the www.
Maddog said
Sep 20 9:55 PM, 2022
Vam wrote:
Has Holly joined QAnon?
I think she's just right of center and thinks many on the left are a fucked up in the head..
Problem is, she's not very good at staking out a position without getting lumped into the Trump camp.
The choice isn't binary, but snarky posters can make it appear that way. Holly gets caught in that paradigm a lot.
Unless there is something she has posted I haven't seen.
Anonymous said
Sep 21 8:33 AM, 2022
Maddog wrote:
Vam wrote:
Has Holly joined QAnon?
I think she's just right of center and thinks many on the left are a fucked up in the head..
Problem is, she's not very good at staking out a position without getting lumped into the Trump camp.
The choice isn't binary, but snarky posters can make it appear that way. Holly gets caught in that paradigm a lot.
Unless there is something she has posted I haven't seen.
most of the time she just repeats what she reads on conspiracy sites then gets abusive when she's questioned about it
Anonymous said
Sep 21 3:22 PM, 2022
Anonymous wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Vam wrote:
Has Holly joined QAnon?
I think she's just right of center and thinks many on the left are a fucked up in the head..
Problem is, she's not very good at staking out a position without getting lumped into the Trump camp.
The choice isn't binary, but snarky posters can make it appear that way. Holly gets caught in that paradigm a lot.
Unless there is something she has posted I haven't seen.
most of the time she just repeats what she reads on conspiracy sites then gets abusive when she's questioned about it
Oh give it a rest, who do I abuse? Why do you always have to exaggerate? This obsession you have with me is ridiculous. It's been going on for years. The thing is, I have absolutely no idea of why? What made you latch on to me? But anyway, I have an opinions, so what? That's what forums are about, we have different opinions, it would be pretty boring if everyone agrees with each other. Different opinions create debate. I don't abuse anyone over it though. Do I get angry sometimes? Of course I do, so does everyone else, especially when it comes to politics. The thing is, everyone can read Dogs just like you do, so...yeah...don't make up stories.
Maddog said
Sep 21 3:54 PM, 2022
Anonymous wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Vam wrote:
Has Holly joined QAnon?
I think she's just right of center and thinks many on the left are a fucked up in the head..
Problem is, she's not very good at staking out a position without getting lumped into the Trump camp.
The choice isn't binary, but snarky posters can make it appear that way. Holly gets caught in that paradigm a lot.
Unless there is something she has posted I haven't seen.
most of the time she just repeats what she reads on conspiracy sites then gets abusive when she's questioned about it
Like Sky News?
I haven't seen her post anything from a conspiracy site..
The only active thread in the news section is the one she started with a yahoo news link..
Hardly a CT site.
Her problem is she is trying to engage with sub humans on that thread and she's not cut out for that.
Anonymous said
Sep 21 7:23 PM, 2022
Anonymous wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Vam wrote:
Has Holly joined QAnon?
I think she's just right of center and thinks many on the left are a fucked up in the head..
Problem is, she's not very good at staking out a position without getting lumped into the Trump camp.
The choice isn't binary, but snarky posters can make it appear that way. Holly gets caught in that paradigm a lot.
Unless there is something she has posted I haven't seen.
most of the time she just repeats what she reads on conspiracy sites then gets abusive when she's questioned about it
Or she deletes the posts that she dont like these days and gives out bans.Its very controlling narcissist behaviour
Syl said
Sep 21 7:49 PM, 2022
I just had a look on Dogs. Holly has only banned 2 people in the last year, and one of them was for just a couple of days.
Take a look at the 'If the cap fits' thread...you may recognise yourself.
Anonymous said
Sep 22 12:29 AM, 2022
Syl wrote:
I just had a look on Dogs. Holly has only banned 2 people in the last year, and one of them was for just a couple of days.
Take a look at the 'If the cap fits' thread...you may recognise yourself.
As there aren't that many posting on there she has less of an oppurtunity to carry out her narrcissist ways.No that thread doesn't represent myself
Maddog said
Sep 22 1:15 AM, 2022
If she was a narcissist, that weirdo CJ would have been banned every other day.
Anonymous said
Sep 22 2:15 AM, 2022
Maddog wrote:
If she was a narcissist, that weirdo CJ would have been banned every other day.
With the lack of posters stuoo has reigned her in a bit. Most have moved to twitter and very few seem to be contributing to forums now?
Anonymous said
Sep 22 1:42 PM, 2022
Syl wrote:
I just had a look on Dogs. Holly has only banned 2 people in the last year, and one of them was for just a couple of days.
Take a look at the 'If the cap fits' thread...you may recognise yourself.
Slim pickings, Syl! There’s only been around half a dozen regular posters there over the last year.
She takes offence (where none exists) and does threaten to ban though, if anyone challenges her views too much. Then there’s her go-to ‘Please do not engage with me/Do not address me or my posts’ schtick.
Also, when the realisation hits that she’s made a complete dick of herself, she’ll routinely delete posts (even from the Banned thread, imo).
Anonymous said
Sep 22 2:59 PM, 2022
Maddog wrote:
Vam wrote:
Has Holly joined QAnon?
I think she's just right of center and thinks many on the left are a fucked up in the head..
Problem is, she's not very good at staking out a position without getting lumped into the Trump camp.
The choice isn't binary, but snarky posters can make it appear that way. Holly gets caught in that paradigm a lot.
Unless there is something she has posted I haven't seen.
You wanna talk ‘snarky’? OK….… check out how snarky she can get when she demeans and belittles anyone (except the persona known as Stooo) who delves a little deeper, to question/challenge her kooky theories.
Oops - my bad! You probably can’t check it out, cos she probably deleted the posts
i mostly read there and her snark passes right by me. But I’ve been triggered by something she posted a few days back - when she was questioning what “harm“ your kleptomaniac 45th prez will have caused by thieving those SCIF documents/materials.
I’m pretty sure undercover US operatives the whole world over must be wondering the same thing. On the assumption their or their families’ physical safety hasn’t already been compromised, of course…
Anonymous said
Sep 22 3:33 PM, 2022
On the whole Holly appears to Guest as nice and centre left, who questions certain narratives rather than accepting them hook line and stootinker. However I have noticed some mild comments getting blocked that are harmless, informative and sometimes ironic. But who am I to judge as I am one of those cowardly anonymi.
Syl said
Sep 22 7:10 PM, 2022
Vam wrote:
Syl wrote:
I just had a look on Dogs. Holly has only banned 2 people in the last year, and one of them was for just a couple of days.
Take a look at the 'If the cap fits' thread...you may recognise yourself.
Slim pickings, Syl! There’s only been around half a dozen regular posters there over the last year.
She takes offence (where none exists) and does threaten to ban though, if anyone challenges her views too much. Then there’s her go-to ‘Please do not engage with me/Do not address me or my posts’ schtick.
Also, when the realisation hits that she’s made a complete dick of herself, she’ll routinely delete posts (even from the Banned thread, imo).
I don't remember her like that. To be honest, when I posted on Dogs, I hardly had any dealings with Holly...she more or less kept out of my postings, even when many others (including you) certainly didn't.
Anonymous said
Sep 23 2:13 AM, 2022
Vam wrote:
Syl wrote:
I just had a look on Dogs. Holly has only banned 2 people in the last year, and one of them was for just a couple of days.
Take a look at the 'If the cap fits' thread...you may recognise yourself.
Slim pickings, Syl! There’s only been around half a dozen regular posters there over the last year.
She takes offence (where none exists) and does threaten to ban though, if anyone challenges her views too much. Then there’s her go-to ‘Please do not engage with me/Do not address me or my posts’ schtick.
Also, when the realisation hits that she’s made a complete dick of herself, she’ll routinely delete posts (even from the Banned thread, imo).
Most of her angst seems to be about Donald Trump and Bidens laptop and negative things said about Trump but much more about Meghan Markle who she really has an unhinged hate for.
Anonymous said
Sep 23 9:32 AM, 2022
Syl wrote:
Vam wrote:
Syl wrote:
I just had a look on Dogs. Holly has only banned 2 people in the last year, and one of them was for just a couple of days.
Take a look at the 'If the cap fits' thread...you may recognise yourself.
Slim pickings, Syl! There’s only been around half a dozen regular posters there over the last year.
She takes offence (where none exists) and does threaten to ban though, if anyone challenges her views too much. Then there’s her go-to ‘Please do not engage with me/Do not address me or my posts’ schtick.
Also, when the realisation hits that she’s made a complete dick of herself, she’ll routinely delete posts (even from the Banned thread, imo).
I don't remember her like that. To be honest, when I posted on Dogs, I hardly had any dealings with Holly...she more or less kept out of my postings, even when many others (including you) certainly didn't.
That‘s fair enough, Syl. We can only speak as we find. And sure, back in the day she was rational and could be a laugh.
As I said, I mostly just scroll past her posts these days without comment. But tbh, the brainless ‘what’s the big deal??’ tone when posting about the theft of highly sensitive classified documents really did trigger me.
Anonymous said
Sep 23 4:05 PM, 2022
Vam wrote:
Syl wrote:
Vam wrote:
Syl wrote:
I just had a look on Dogs. Holly has only banned 2 people in the last year, and one of them was for just a couple of days.
Take a look at the 'If the cap fits' thread...you may recognise yourself.
Slim pickings, Syl! There’s only been around half a dozen regular posters there over the last year.
She takes offence (where none exists) and does threaten to ban though, if anyone challenges her views too much. Then there’s her go-to ‘Please do not engage with me/Do not address me or my posts’ schtick.
Also, when the realisation hits that she’s made a complete dick of herself, she’ll routinely delete posts (even from the Banned thread, imo).
I don't remember her like that. To be honest, when I posted on Dogs, I hardly had any dealings with Holly...she more or less kept out of my postings, even when many others (including you) certainly didn't.
That‘s fair enough, Syl. We can only speak as we find. And sure, back in the day she was rational and could be a laugh.
As I said, I mostly just scroll past her posts these days without comment. But tbh, the brainless ‘what’s the big deal??’ tone when posting about the theft of highly sensitive classified documents really did trigger me.
Funny how you back down when Syl reminds you of how you acted on dogs. Then claim that you hardly read hollys posts. But yet always seem to manage to read the posts that trigger you.
Still vam, still fake as fuck.
HF was right about you
Anonymous said
Sep 23 4:22 PM, 2022
Vam wrote:
That‘s fair enough, Syl. We can only speak as we find. And sure, back in the day she was rational and could be a laugh.
As I said, I mostly just scroll past her posts these days without comment. But tbh, the brainless ‘what’s the big deal??’ tone when posting about the theft of highly sensitive classified documents really did trigger me.
In terms of the poster / posters that you find most difficult to interact with on comatose canines where would you rank the poster known as Holly? I find that other posters far more difficult to interact with - that spew fellow and that grafenwuppen person would be on top of the list if it were I that were constructing the list.
Has Holly joined QAnon?
She's a fully paid-up member...
She‘s finally come out of the fascist-curious right wing closet I’ve often sensed she was hiding in, and seems to be plunging deeper and deeper into the Q rabbit holes, located in the bowels of the www.
I think she's just right of center and thinks many on the left are a fucked up in the head..
Problem is, she's not very good at staking out a position without getting lumped into the Trump camp.
The choice isn't binary, but snarky posters can make it appear that way. Holly gets caught in that paradigm a lot.
Unless there is something she has posted I haven't seen.
most of the time she just repeats what she reads on conspiracy sites then gets abusive when she's questioned about it
Oh give it a rest, who do I abuse? Why do you always have to exaggerate? This obsession you have with me is ridiculous. It's been going on for years. The thing is, I have absolutely no idea of why? What made you latch on to me? But anyway, I have an opinions, so what? That's what forums are about, we have different opinions, it would be pretty boring if everyone agrees with each other. Different opinions create debate. I don't abuse anyone over it though. Do I get angry sometimes? Of course I do, so does everyone else, especially when it comes to politics. The thing is, everyone can read Dogs just like you do, so...yeah...don't make up stories.
Like Sky News?
I haven't seen her post anything from a conspiracy site..
The only active thread in the news section is the one she started with a yahoo news link..
Hardly a CT site.
Her problem is she is trying to engage with sub humans on that thread and she's not cut out for that.
Or she deletes the posts that she dont like these days and gives out bans.Its very controlling narcissist behaviour
I just had a look on Dogs.
Holly has only banned 2 people in the last year, and one of them was for just a couple of days.
Take a look at the 'If the cap fits' thread...you may recognise yourself.
As there aren't that many posting on there she has less of an oppurtunity to carry out her narrcissist ways.No that thread doesn't represent myself
With the lack of posters stuoo has reigned her in a bit. Most have moved to twitter and very few seem to be contributing to forums now?
Slim pickings, Syl! There’s only been around half a dozen regular posters there over the last year.
She takes offence (where none exists) and does threaten to ban though, if anyone challenges her views too much. Then there’s her go-to
‘Please do not engage with me/Do not address me or my posts’ 
schtick.
Also, when the realisation hits that she’s made a complete dick of herself, she’ll routinely delete posts (even from the Banned thread, imo).
You wanna talk ‘snarky’? OK….… check out how snarky she can get when she demeans and belittles anyone (except the persona known as Stooo) who delves a little deeper, to question/challenge her kooky theories.
Oops - my bad! You probably can’t check it out, cos she probably deleted the posts
i mostly read there and her snark passes right by me. But I’ve been triggered by something she posted a few days back - when she was questioning what “harm“ your kleptomaniac 45th prez will have caused by thieving those SCIF documents/materials.
I’m pretty sure undercover US operatives the whole world over must be wondering the same thing. On the assumption their or their families’ physical safety hasn’t already been compromised, of course…
On the whole Holly appears to Guest as nice and centre left, who questions certain narratives rather than accepting them hook line and stootinker. However I have noticed some mild comments getting blocked that are harmless, informative and sometimes ironic. But who am I to judge as I am one of those cowardly anonymi.
I don't remember her like that. To be honest, when I posted on Dogs, I hardly had any dealings with Holly...she more or less kept out of my postings, even when many others (including you) certainly didn't.
Most of her angst seems to be about Donald Trump and Bidens laptop and negative things said about Trump but much more about Meghan Markle who she really has an unhinged hate for.
As I said, I mostly just scroll past her posts these days without comment. But tbh, the brainless ‘what’s the big deal??’ tone when posting about the theft of highly sensitive classified documents really did trigger me.
Funny how you back down when Syl reminds you of how you acted on dogs. Then claim that you hardly read hollys posts. But yet always seem to manage to read the posts that trigger you.
Still vam, still fake as fuck.
HF was right about you
In terms of the poster / posters that you find most difficult to interact with on comatose canines where would you rank the poster known as Holly? I find that other posters far more difficult to interact with - that spew fellow and that grafenwuppen person would be on top of the list if it were I that were constructing the list.