some of us remember Dean mocking and tormenting piglet he was relentless wonder if he feels guilty now
What does that mean? Has Piglet done something to herself, why would Dean feel guilty now?
RingyDingy said
Jun 24 3:56 PM, 2018
Claire being petty, no surprise.
Today at 15:49
NN wrote:
Is it just my PMs that have been disabled?
Claire wrote:
For now. When you post more than you pm you'll get them back.
Don't slag my forum off constantly, then use it as a bizarre form of snap chat.
xtras wrote:
To be fair Claire that is a bit petty... don't become like micky or stoo.
You know what forums are like, at the end of the day we have all been through it. Relax the pm thingy.
Budgie you’d love it there.
Digger said
Jun 24 3:59 PM, 2018
RingyDingy wrote:
Claire being petty, no surprise.
Today at 15:49
NN wrote: Is it just my PMs that have been disabled?
Claire wrote: For now. When you post more than you pm you'll get them back.
Don't slag my forum off constantly, then use it as a bizarre form of snap chat.
xtras wrote: To be fair Claire that is a bit petty... don't become like micky or stoo.
You know what forums are like, at the end of the day we have all been through it. Relax the pm thingy.
Budgie you’d love it there.
Autonomy...that beloved of forum admins with delusions of grandeur.
RingyDingy said
Jun 24 4:07 PM, 2018
She is doing everything she had criticised Dogs for. Self-awareness not her strongest asset. Likes to throw the word hypocrite around. Dumb bint.
Shell said
Jun 24 4:41 PM, 2018
Oh good God, is she running a forum for 4 yr olds? Go sit in the corner you naughty girl.
Anonymous said
Jun 24 5:17 PM, 2018
RingyDingy wrote:
She is doing everything she had criticised Dogs for. Self-awareness not her strongest asset. Likes to throw the word hypocrite around. Dumb bint.
She’s really not. If someone had spoken back to Hobbit like NN did there would be cries of abuse of admins and an instant ban with some name calling thrown in. All she’s done is call NN a hypocrite. Which she is.
Not sure how NN can complain about pile ons considering the way she acts with Vam and Hobbit.
RingyDingy said
Jun 24 5:39 PM, 2018
Claire and Vicky also banned a poster for referring to Scottish people as turds.
Anonymous said
Jun 24 5:58 PM, 2018
RingyDingy wrote:
Claire being petty, no surprise.
Today at 15:49
NN wrote: Is it just my PMs that have been disabled?
Claire wrote: For now. When you post more than you pm you'll get them back.
Don't slag my forum off constantly, then use it as a bizarre form of snap chat.
xtras wrote: To be fair Claire that is a bit petty... don't become like micky or stoo.
You know what forums are like, at the end of the day we have all been through it. Relax the pm thingy.
Budgie you’d love it there.
NN is probably spilling her guts to Dean and Hobbit about what goes on there
That's the thing about having feet in every camp and wanting to keep everyone onside - you end up with no fucker trusting you MG is a perfect example of that.
Digger said
Jun 24 6:20 PM, 2018
Shell wrote:
Oh good God, is she running a forum for 4 yr olds? Go sit in the corner you naughty girl.
Why did the original Toasted go tits up?
Anonymous said
Jun 24 7:21 PM, 2018
Anonymous wrote:
RingyDingy wrote:
She is doing everything she had criticised Dogs for. Self-awareness not her strongest asset. Likes to throw the word hypocrite around. Dumb bint.
She’s really not. If someone had spoken back to Hobbit like NN did there would be cries of abuse of admins and an instant ban with some name calling thrown in. All she’s done is call NN a hypocrite. Which she is.
Not sure how NN can complain about pile ons considering the way she acts with Vam and Hobbit.
Exactly. She can’t go on to RT and expect to be treated the same as everyone else considering her history. She’s a coven suck up. Nasty as fuck.
Having her PMs taken away is the least she deserves.
Anonymous said
Jun 24 7:33 PM, 2018
Digger wrote:
Shell wrote:
Oh good God, is she running a forum for 4 yr olds? Go sit in the corner you naughty girl.
Why did the original Toasted go tits up?
Old man Morningstarr* got into the database and flung her out,he set it up for her and kept the log-in details.
Anonymous said
Jun 24 7:48 PM, 2018
Yes, I think you're correct, there wasn't any doxing. My mistake, I was confusing it with somewhere else. He certainly banned people at the drop of a hat though!
Didn't he fuck up the password function and nobody could log in to their account for a while, then have to ask for help to fix it? That's such a Micky thing to do!
Anonymous said
Jun 24 8:08 PM, 2018
Shell wrote:
Oh good God, is she running a forum for 4 yr olds? Go sit in the corner you naughty girl.
From Guest to NN on Dogs:
You shouldn’t have spoken back to Claire then, should you.
RingyDingy said
Jun 24 9:06 PM, 2018
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
RingyDingy wrote:
She is doing everything she had criticised Dogs for. Self-awareness not her strongest asset. Likes to throw the word hypocrite around. Dumb bint.
She’s really not. If someone had spoken back to Hobbit like NN did there would be cries of abuse of admins and an instant ban with some name calling thrown in. All she’s done is call NN a hypocrite. Which she is.
Not sure how NN can complain about pile ons considering the way she acts with Vam and Hobbit.
Exactly. She can’t go on to RT and expect to be treated the same as everyone else considering her history. She’s a coven suck up. Nasty as fuck.
Having her PMs taken away is the least she deserves.
What kind of insecure and immature control freak cares whether their members are using PMs?
RingyDingy said
Jun 24 9:08 PM, 2018
Anonymous wrote:
Shell wrote:
Oh good God, is she running a forum for 4 yr olds? Go sit in the corner you naughty girl.
From Guest to NN on Dogs:
You shouldn’t have spoken back to Claire then, should you.
Turning into a bunch of ’how high?’ followers and they don’t even see it. The flock has merely started eating from another pasture.
Anonymous said
Jun 24 9:13 PM, 2018
RingyDingy wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Shell wrote:
Oh good God, is she running a forum for 4 yr olds? Go sit in the corner you naughty girl.
From Guest to NN on Dogs:
You shouldn’t have spoken back to Claire then, should you.
Turning into a bunch of ’how high?’ followers and they don’t even see it. The flock has merely started eating from another pasture.
Why do you care so much where people post?
Anonymous said
Jun 24 9:41 PM, 2018
It's creepy the way Claire's just sitting and watching who is PM'ing.
Shell said
Jun 24 10:11 PM, 2018
RingyDingy wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Shell wrote:
Oh good God, is she running a forum for 4 yr olds? Go sit in the corner you naughty girl.
From Guest to NN on Dogs:
You shouldn’t have spoken back to Claire then, should you.
Turning into a bunch of ’how high?’ followers and they don’t even see it. The flock has merely started eating from another pasture.
I find this all quite hilarious. Especially when Cliar was a member here and I was in charge, she didn't ever show me any type of respect
Tee said
Jun 24 10:15 PM, 2018
When Claire accuses NN of slagging off Retoasted does she mean by pm or some place else? Can a forum owner or mod read a member's private messages?
Shell said
Jun 24 10:20 PM, 2018
Tee wrote:
When Claire accuses NN of slagging off Retoasted does she mean by pm or some place else? Can a forum owner or mod read a member's private messages?
Most likely she can. I know here you had to sign in as the member to do it. Which meant you would have to go in and change their password and then they would have known because they wouldn't be able to sign in with their own password. It's possible but not easily done because you cannot see a members password, all you can see is ''**********'' so you cannot sneak onto their private messages.
Does that make sense? I tried to explain it best I could.
What does that mean? Has Piglet done something to herself, why would Dean feel guilty now?
Today at 15:49
NN wrote:
Is it just my PMs that have been disabled?
Claire wrote:
For now. When you post more than you pm you'll get them back.
Don't slag my forum off constantly, then use it as a bizarre form of snap chat.
xtras wrote:
To be fair Claire that is a bit petty... don't become like micky or stoo.
You know what forums are like, at the end of the day we have all been through it. Relax the pm thingy.
Budgie you’d love it there.
Autonomy...that beloved of forum admins with delusions of grandeur.
Oh good God, is she running a forum for 4 yr olds? Go sit in the corner you naughty girl.
She’s really not. If someone had spoken back to Hobbit like NN did there would be cries of abuse of admins and an instant ban with some name calling thrown in. All she’s done is call NN a hypocrite. Which she is.
Not sure how NN can complain about pile ons considering the way she acts with Vam and Hobbit.
Claire and Vicky also banned a poster for referring to Scottish people as turds.
NN is probably spilling her guts to Dean and Hobbit about what goes on there
That's the thing about having feet in every camp and wanting to keep everyone onside - you end up with no fucker trusting you
MG is a perfect example of that.
Why did the original Toasted go tits up?
Exactly. She can’t go on to RT and expect to be treated the same as everyone else considering her history. She’s a coven suck up. Nasty as fuck.
Having her PMs taken away is the least she deserves.
Old man Morningstarr* got into the database and flung her out,he set it up for her and kept the log-in details.
Yes, I think you're correct, there wasn't any doxing. My mistake, I was confusing it with somewhere else. He certainly banned people at the drop of a hat though!
Didn't he fuck up the password function and nobody could log in to their account for a while, then have to ask for help to fix it? That's such a Micky thing to do!
From Guest to NN on Dogs:
You shouldn’t have spoken back to Claire then, should you.
What kind of insecure and immature control freak cares whether their members are using PMs?
Turning into a bunch of ’how high?’ followers and they don’t even see it. The flock has merely started eating from another pasture.
Why do you care so much where people post?
It's creepy the way Claire's just sitting and watching who is PM'ing.
I find this all quite hilarious. Especially when Cliar was a member here and I was in charge, she didn't ever show me any type of respect
Most likely she can. I know here you had to sign in as the member to do it. Which meant you would have to go in and change their password and then they would have known because they wouldn't be able to sign in with their own password. It's possible but not easily done because you cannot see a members password, all you can see is ''**********'' so you cannot sneak onto their private messages.
Does that make sense? I tried to explain it best I could.