This is probably the most qualified person you'll hear on the climate change story.
jackb said
Jan 17 2:40 PM, 2025
If the whole world stopped burning fossil fuels tomorrow it would take about 300 years to be able to measure the effect.
Anonymous said
Jan 17 4:07 PM, 2025
jackb wrote:
This is probably the most qualified person you'll hear on the climate change story.
Unlikely, as he's not a climate scientist.
jackb said
Jan 21 12:30 PM, 2025
Anonymous wrote:
jackb wrote:
This is probably the most qualified person you'll hear on the climate change story.
Unlikely, as he's not a climate scientist.
Which means he doesn't have to go with the agenda or lose his job or funding for speaking out.
jackb said
Jan 21 12:31 PM, 2025
BRAVO! Trump EXITS Paris Agreement and VOWS to end EV mandates
jackb said
Jan 21 10:53 PM, 2025
While we have the idiotic Miliband disciple of net zero for another 4 years or will the change in America force change here?
Anonymous said
Jan 29 7:03 AM, 2025
Anonymous wrote:
It is not a hoax but it is a a) wild exaggeration and b) the solutions offered will have no significant effect and will often make matters worse in terms of pollution, decreasing biodiversity and massive inequality.
Point to note: there is natural as well as anthropogenic climate "change". The climate changes naturally it is not a fixed entity.
It is a hoax that it's MM.
Climate changes always has done always will do.
The Thames used to freeze over enough so they could have winter fairs on them.
The Thames also dried up when we had prolonged hot temperatures reaching 48c it's why they finally sorted out sewers because of cholera outbreaks
jackb said
Feb 17 5:40 PM, 2025
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
It is not a hoax but it is a a) wild exaggeration and b) the solutions offered will have no significant effect and will often make matters worse in terms of pollution, decreasing biodiversity and massive inequality.
Point to note: there is natural as well as anthropogenic climate "change". The climate changes naturally it is not a fixed entity.
It is a hoax that it's MM.
Climate changes always has done always will do.
The Thames used to freeze over enough so they could have winter fairs on them.
The Thames also dried up when we had prolonged hot temperatures reaching 48c it's why they finally sorted out sewers because of cholera outbreaks
Over the last few years the expert in everything Bill Gates was ranting about the
need to save the world getting ever more desperate!
We're running out of time so he plans on blocking out the sun by filling your sky with chemicals
and forcing us to eat beetle soup and bluebottle pie but now... it's not really that bad after all
he and his ilk were exaggerating a bit...
Listen Closely to Hear Bill Gates' Stunning Climate Reversal
jackb said
Feb 25 6:36 PM, 2025
"Inefficient, Unreliable and Hideous" | Ed Miliband ROASTED Over Net-Zero Policies At Drax
It's about DRAX power station in Yorkshire.
Huge place.
Used to burn coal that was mined 20 miles away.
Now it burns wood pellets from 3,000 miles away.
Ed Miliband can boast about the power station now using renewables!
jackb said
Mar 13 12:35 PM, 2025
Is the story most people believed these last few years starting to unravel?
Get ready to believe something else?
Over 30 pieces of evidence on how ‘the climate scam is collapsing’
The climate scam is imploding right now. Of course there are still plenty of remaining pockets of climate cultism, but the whole movement is crumbling.
It’s the most massive scientific fraud in human history, and it will take significant time to completely die, but make no mistake: It IS dying.
In no particular order, here are some updates on the climate scam implosion. Please keep scrolling.
I wonder if this has something to do with Just Stop Oil suddenly backing off?
A North Dakota jury has found Greenpeace liable for defamation, ordering it to pay more than $660m (£507m) in damages to an oil company for the environmental group's role in one of the largest anti-fossil fuel protests in US history.
Texas-based Energy Transfer also accused Greenpeace of trespass, nuisance and civil conspiracy over the demonstrations nearly a decade ago against the Dakota Access Pipeline.
The lawsuit, filed in state court, argued that Greenpeace was behind an "unlawful and violent scheme to cause financial harm to Energy Transfer".
Greenpeace, which vowed to appeal, said last month it could be forced into bankruptcy because of the case, ending over 50 years of activism.
Protests against the pipeline near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation drew thousands, but Greenpeace argued it did not lead the demonstration and that the lawsuit threatened free speech. Instead, it said the protests were led by local indigenous leaders who were opposed to the pipeline.
The nine-person jury reached a verdict on Wednesday after about two days of deliberating.
The case was heard at a court in Mandan, about 100 miles (160km) north of where the protests took place.
Trey Cox, a lawyer for Energy Transfer, said during closing arguments that Greenpeace's actions caused between $265m to $340m in damages. He asked the jury to award the company that amount, plus additional damages.
Construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline gained international attention during President Donald Trump's first term, as Native American groups set up an encampment trying to block it from passing near Standing Rock.
The protests, which saw acts of violence and vandalism, started in April 2016 and ended in February 2017, when the National Guard and police cleared away the demonstrators.
At the peak, over 10,000 protesters were on site. The group included more than 200 Native American tribes, hundreds of US military veterans, actors and political leaders - including current US Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy, Jr.
The 1,172-mile pipeline has been operating since 2017. However, it still lacks a key permit to operate under Lake Oahe in South Dakota, and local tribes have pushed for an extensive environmental review of the project.
During the three-week trial, jurors heard from Energy Transfer's co-founder and board chairman Kelcy Warren, who said in a video deposition that protesters had created "a total false narrative" about his company.
"It was time to fight back," he said.
Energy Transfer's lawyer Mr Cox told the court that Greenpeace had exploited the Dakota Access Pipeline to "promote its own selfish agenda".
Attorneys for Greenpeace argued that the group did not lead the protests, but merely helped support "nonviolent, direct-action training".
In response to the verdict, Greenpeace International's general counsel Kristin Casper said "Energy Transfer hasn't heard the last of us in this fight".
"We will not back down, we will not be silenced," she said.
Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond in Virginia, said he believes "the verdict's magnitude will have a chilling effect on environmental and other public interest litigation".
"It may encourage litigants in other states to file similar lawsuits," he told the BBC.
Energy Transfer's legal action named Greenpeace USA, as well as its Washington DC-based funding arm Greenpeace Fund Inc and its Amsterdam-based parent group Greenpeace International.
Greenpeace has counter-sued Energy Transfer in Dutch court, claiming the oil firm is attempting to unfairly use the legal system to silence critics.
The lawsuit, filed earlier this month, seeks to recover all damages and costs.
This is probably the most qualified person you'll hear on the climate change story.
Unlikely, as he's not a climate scientist.
Which means he doesn't have to go with the agenda or lose his job or funding for speaking out.
BRAVO! Trump EXITS Paris Agreement and VOWS to end EV mandates
It is a hoax that it's MM.
Climate changes always has done always will do.
The Thames used to freeze over enough so they could have winter fairs on them.
The Thames also dried up when we had prolonged hot temperatures reaching 48c
it's why they finally sorted out sewers because of cholera outbreaks
Over the last few years the expert in everything Bill Gates was ranting about the
need to save the world getting ever more desperate!
We're running out of time so he plans on blocking out the sun by filling your sky with chemicals
and forcing us to eat beetle soup and bluebottle pie but now... it's not really that bad after all
he and his ilk were exaggerating a bit...
Listen Closely to Hear Bill Gates' Stunning Climate Reversal
"Inefficient, Unreliable and Hideous" | Ed Miliband ROASTED Over Net-Zero Policies At Drax
It's about DRAX power station in Yorkshire.
Huge place.
Used to burn coal that was mined 20 miles away.
Now it burns wood pellets from 3,000 miles away.
Ed Miliband can boast about the power station now using renewables!
Get ready to believe something else?
Could Climate Change Be Reversing Itself? A Look at the Latest Findings
©Jet Stream Patterns and Global Weather (image credits: unsplash)
Climate change is a topic that has been discussed and debated for decades. It’s a subject that evokes strong emotions and opinions, yet it remains a mystery to many. Could it be that the planet is changing course and reversing the effects of climate change? Recent studies and findings suggest there might be a glimmer of hope. This article delves into the latest discoveries and examines whether the tide is indeed turning.
Over 30 pieces of evidence on how ‘the climate scam is collapsing’
www.climatedepot.com/2025/04/09/over-30-pieces-of-evidence-on-how-the-climate-scam-is-collapsing/
A North Dakota jury has found Greenpeace liable for defamation, ordering it to pay more than $660m (£507m) in damages to an oil company for the environmental group's role in one of the largest anti-fossil fuel protests in US history.
Texas-based Energy Transfer also accused Greenpeace of trespass, nuisance and civil conspiracy over the demonstrations nearly a decade ago against the Dakota Access Pipeline.
The lawsuit, filed in state court, argued that Greenpeace was behind an "unlawful and violent scheme to cause financial harm to Energy Transfer".
Greenpeace, which vowed to appeal, said last month it could be forced into bankruptcy because of the case, ending over 50 years of activism.
Protests against the pipeline near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation drew thousands, but Greenpeace argued it did not lead the demonstration and that the lawsuit threatened free speech. Instead, it said the protests were led by local indigenous leaders who were opposed to the pipeline.
The nine-person jury reached a verdict on Wednesday after about two days of deliberating.
The case was heard at a court in Mandan, about 100 miles (160km) north of where the protests took place.
Trey Cox, a lawyer for Energy Transfer, said during closing arguments that Greenpeace's actions caused between $265m to $340m in damages. He asked the jury to award the company that amount, plus additional damages.
Construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline gained international attention during President Donald Trump's first term, as Native American groups set up an encampment trying to block it from passing near Standing Rock.
The protests, which saw acts of violence and vandalism, started in April 2016 and ended in February 2017, when the National Guard and police cleared away the demonstrators.
At the peak, over 10,000 protesters were on site. The group included more than 200 Native American tribes, hundreds of US military veterans, actors and political leaders - including current US Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy, Jr.
The 1,172-mile pipeline has been operating since 2017. However, it still lacks a key permit to operate under Lake Oahe in South Dakota, and local tribes have pushed for an extensive environmental review of the project.
During the three-week trial, jurors heard from Energy Transfer's co-founder and board chairman Kelcy Warren, who said in a video deposition that protesters had created "a total false narrative" about his company.
"It was time to fight back," he said.
Energy Transfer's lawyer Mr Cox told the court that Greenpeace had exploited the Dakota Access Pipeline to "promote its own selfish agenda".
Attorneys for Greenpeace argued that the group did not lead the protests, but merely helped support "nonviolent, direct-action training".
In response to the verdict, Greenpeace International's general counsel Kristin Casper said "Energy Transfer hasn't heard the last of us in this fight".
"We will not back down, we will not be silenced," she said.
Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond in Virginia, said he believes "the verdict's magnitude will have a chilling effect on environmental and other public interest litigation".
"It may encourage litigants in other states to file similar lawsuits," he told the BBC.
Energy Transfer's legal action named Greenpeace USA, as well as its Washington DC-based funding arm Greenpeace Fund Inc and its Amsterdam-based parent group Greenpeace International.
Greenpeace has counter-sued Energy Transfer in Dutch court, claiming the oil firm is attempting to unfairly use the legal system to silence critics.
The lawsuit, filed earlier this month, seeks to recover all damages and costs.