There are pics of them and their children all over the internet.
But if someone is convinced she hasn't had kids, some will still insist they are not hers...or they have been photoshopped in.
Vita said
Apr 10 2:12 AM, 2024
Magica wrote:
Vita wrote:
Magica wrote:
Vita wrote:
Who knows but Something is not right.
Been strange from the start, tbh.
I've never known such secrecy over any child before. From a famous actress, pop star or member of the Royal Family.
We see plenty of Prince George who is a future King, Madonna never hid her children and the Kardashian's are always posting photos of their children.
Maybe she didn't give birth, a surrogate? Or not hers, no one sees them. It will all come out soon, wait and see.
There has been suggestions she had to have a hysterectomy when she was younger.
If that was the case, people would be sympathetic.
Anonymous said
Apr 10 9:39 AM, 2024
Vita wrote:
Magica wrote:
Vita wrote:
Who knows but Something is not right.
Been strange from the start, tbh.
I've never known such secrecy over any child before. From a famous actress, pop star or member of the Royal Family.
We see plenty of Prince George who is a future King, Madonna never hid her children and the Kardashian's are always posting photos of their children.
I think it's understandable they prefer to keep their kids out of the spotlight given the amount of flak they themselves get. Maybe Madonna and the Kardashians aren't exactly the best examples to follow when it comes to parenting. The royal family do trot out pictures of their kids but that is and always has been part of their PR machine.
Magica said
Apr 10 9:39 AM, 2024
Vita wrote:
Magica wrote:
Vita wrote:
Magica wrote:
Vita wrote:
Who knows but Something is not right.
Been strange from the start, tbh.
I've never known such secrecy over any child before. From a famous actress, pop star or member of the Royal Family.
We see plenty of Prince George who is a future King, Madonna never hid her children and the Kardashian's are always posting photos of their children.
Maybe she didn't give birth, a surrogate? Or not hers, no one sees them. It will all come out soon, wait and see.
There has been suggestions she had to have a hysterectomy when she was younger.
If that was the case, people would be sympathetic.
If she never gave birth, the children would be taken off the list of succession and lose their titles. They must be birthed from her.
Thing is they never brought them to see the queen, or Charles. All smoke and.mirrors with them. I couldn't careless tbh, can't stand either of them.
Syl said
Apr 10 12:28 PM, 2024
And again....
"There are pics of them and their children all over the internet. But if someone is convinced she hasn't had kids, some will still insist they are not hers...or they have been photoshopped in."
Magica said
Apr 10 2:08 PM, 2024
Syl wrote:
And again....
"There are pics of them and their children all over the internet. But if someone is convinced she hasn't had kids, some will still insist they are not hers...or they have been photoshopped in."
Never brought them to see the queen though.
Also they could be anyone's kids.
Syl said
Apr 10 2:53 PM, 2024
Magica wrote:
Syl wrote:
And again....
"There are pics of them and their children all over the internet. But if someone is convinced she hasn't had kids, some will still insist they are not hers...or they have been photoshopped in."
Never brought them to see the queen though.
Also they could be anyone's kids.
Syl said
Apr 10 2:58 PM, 2024
Seriously, love them or loathe them, would you blame anyone for keeping their kids out of the news, especially in America.
William and Kate's kids are in the news, they are relevant,as being the future of the monarchy. They also have paid security,
a 50 strong staff to look after them
Anonymous said
Apr 10 3:20 PM, 2024
Syl wrote:
There are pics of them and their children all over the internet. But if someone is convinced she hasn't had kids, some will still insist they are not hers...or they have been photoshopped in.
There are images of the children's birth certificates online, with Meghan as their natural mother, her name would not appear on the certificate if she was not their natural mother.
It's an offense to falsify a legal document such as a birth certificate. Given the fact these people are very much in the public eye it would be a bit daft to claim Meghan is their natural mother if she isn't, plus it would make the Royal family complicit in fraud.
Magica said
Apr 10 4:34 PM, 2024
Syl wrote:
Seriously, love them or loathe them, would you blame anyone for keeping their kids out of the news, especially in America.
William and Kate's kids are in the news, they are relevant,as being the future of the monarchy. They also have paid security, a 50 strong staff to look after them
No I don't get them hiding them. They want all the titles for their kids, yet live in America and ran away from royalty. They are all entitled to nothing. Should.lose Sussex title aswell.
Syl said
Apr 10 6:42 PM, 2024
I definitely think she should lose her title, she just uses it to promote her businesses ...she is nothing but a social climber..
He should keep his Prince title...he was born with it, it's his entitlement..
Magica said
Apr 10 6:45 PM, 2024
Syl wrote:
I definitely think she should lose her title, she just uses it to promote her businesses ...she is nothing but a social climber..
He should keep his Prince title...he was born with it, it's his entitlement..
He's entitled to nothing imo, but he won't lose it unfortunately.
But if someone is convinced she hasn't had kids, some will still insist they are not hers...or they have been photoshopped in.
There has been suggestions she had to have a hysterectomy when she was younger.
If that was the case, people would be sympathetic.
I think it's understandable they prefer to keep their kids out of the spotlight given the amount of flak they themselves get. Maybe Madonna and the Kardashians aren't exactly the best examples to follow when it comes to parenting. The royal family do trot out pictures of their kids but that is and always has been part of their PR machine.
If she never gave birth, the children would be taken off the list of succession and lose their titles. They must be birthed from her.
Thing is they never brought them to see the queen, or Charles. All smoke and.mirrors with them. I couldn't careless tbh, can't stand either of them.
And again....
"There are pics of them and their children all over the internet.
But if someone is convinced she hasn't had kids, some will still insist they are not hers...or they have been photoshopped in."
Never brought them to see the queen though.
Also they could be anyone's kids.
William and Kate's kids are in the news, they are relevant,as being the future of the monarchy. They also have paid security,
a 50 strong staff to look after them
There are images of the children's birth certificates online, with Meghan as their natural mother, her name would not appear on the certificate if she was not their natural mother.
It's an offense to falsify a legal document such as a birth certificate. Given the fact these people are very much in the public eye it would be a bit daft to claim Meghan is their natural mother if she isn't, plus it would make the Royal family complicit in fraud.
No I don't get them hiding them. They want all the titles for their kids, yet live in America and ran away from royalty. They are all entitled to nothing. Should.lose Sussex title aswell.
He should keep his Prince title...he was born with it, it's his entitlement..
He's entitled to nothing imo, but he won't lose it unfortunately.
Her teeth don't look right tbh. Wouldn't be surprised if false.
They look too big, they put me in mind of Methadone Mick from Still Game.
The finished product is very amateurish looking.
For a start, all the labels are falling off the jars.
No doubt attached with her own spittle
Yuk! She thinks she's invented making jam 🙄
She probably didn't even make the jam.
It's long been rumoured, Victoria Beckham doesn't design the clothes she flogs.