Probably the same as your protesters are doing. Difference is ours would not be attending protests legally armed.
Maddog said
Feb 1 6:22 PM, 2026
Syl wrote:
Probably the same as your protesters are doing. Difference is ours would not be attending protests legally armed.
So they would interfere with the arrests and prevent them from happening?
I think you are right, which is why its easier for the government to just turn a blind eye to the problem..
It's not with the hassle nor the blowback.
Red Okktober said
Feb 2 12:42 AM, 2026
"Mandelson 'has no recollection' of Epstein giving him $75,000" LoL
The Epstein files also show a pic of him in a pair of Y fronts with a 'mystery woman' that he also says he has no recollection of.
Also new pics of Andrew, formerly known as Prince, on all fours over what appears to be a teenage girl.
Andrew must be close to breaking point by now, it just gets worse and worse for him and his ghastly ex-wife. It wouldn't surprise me if he were to top himself at some point.
"Mandelson 'has no recollection' of Epstein giving him $75,000" LoL
The Epstein files also show a pic of him in a pair of Y fronts with a 'mystery woman' that he also says he has no recollection of.
Also new pics of Andrew, formerly known as Prince, on all fours over what appears to be a teenage girl.
Andrew must be close to breaking point by now, it just gets worse and worse for him and his ghastly ex-wife. It wouldn't surprise me if he were to top himself at some point.
"Mandelson 'has no recollection' of Epstein giving him $75,000" LoL
The Epstein files also show a pic of him in a pair of Y fronts with a 'mystery woman' that he also says he has no recollection of.
It was the photo I found the most bizarre. Aside from what the hell was he doing, why on earth let someone (who?) take a picture of you in your underpants?
Anonymous said
Feb 3 5:25 PM, 2026
Red Okktober wrote:
"Mandelson 'has no recollection' of Epstein giving him $75,000" LoL
The Epstein files also show a pic of him in a pair of Y fronts with a 'mystery woman' that he also says he has no recollection of.
Also new pics of Andrew, formerly known as Prince, on all fours over what appears to be a teenage girl.
Andrew must be close to breaking point by now, it just gets worse and worse for him and his ghastly ex-wife. It wouldn't surprise me if he were to top himself at some point.
Nah, I can't see him doing that, he'll still have some sycophants around him, still be waited on hand and foot, still have a standard of living that us mere plebs can only dream of... No mummy's skirt to hide behind though
As for his ex, just as much of a sleaze as he is. She's barefaced enough to tough it out...remember the toe-sucking, the £500,000(?) sting, being ostracised by the RF - neither stopped her grifting. I'm just wondering what fool is going to give her a roof over her head.
Red Okktober said
Feb 3 8:56 PM, 2026
Anonymous wrote:
Re
It was the photo I found the most bizarre. Aside from what the hell was he doing, why on earth let someone (who?) take a picture of you in your underpants?
In the old days Mandelson would have been chained up at Traitors Gate and drowned.
He's got one of those faces that you just want to punch
Magica said
Feb 3 11:47 PM, 2026
Red Okktober wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Re
It was the photo I found the most bizarre. Aside from what the hell was he doing, why on earth let someone (who?) take a picture of you in your underpants?
In the old days Mandelson would have been chained up at Traitors Gate and drowned.
He's got one of those faces that you just want to punch
Red Okktober said
Feb 4 7:31 PM, 2026
I'm hoping this Mandelson scandal will be one too many for Starmer, and it willl be this that sees him resign. Lots of angry MPs today, across all parties including Labour.
I haven't seen PMQs yet today - usually his front bench are like a row of noddy dogs whenever he speaks, with random hear hears thrown in.
Apparently, today was tumbleweed though. Someone described Rachel Reeves as 'trying to keep perfectly still and trying to hide behind her fringe'
Syl said
Feb 4 11:33 PM, 2026
Starmer lurches from one disaster to another.
I just saw Peston interview Kemi Badenoch, she repeated what she had said to him today on PMQ's.
She was recorded from a sitting room inWestminster. Very distracting when a rat ran behind her in the background.
Digger said
Feb 5 12:53 AM, 2026
Syl wrote:
Starmer lurches from one disaster to another.
I just saw Peston interview Kemi Badenoch, she repeated what she had said to him today on PMQ's. She was recorded from a sitting room inWestminster. Very distracting when a rat ran behind her in the background.
Mandelson?
Syl said
Feb 5 1:06 AM, 2026
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Starmer lurches from one disaster to another.
I just saw Peston interview Kemi Badenoch, she repeated what she had said to him today on PMQ's. She was recorded from a sitting room inWestminster. Very distracting when a rat ran behind her in the background.
Mandelson?
Lol, who knows.
Syl said
Feb 5 12:03 PM, 2026
Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Starmer lurches from one disaster to another.
I just saw Peston interview Kemi Badenoch, she repeated what she had said to him today on PMQ's. She was recorded from a sitting room inWestminster. Very distracting when a rat ran behind her in the background.
I just saw Peston interview Kemi Badenoch, she repeated what she had said to him today on PMQ's. She was recorded from a sitting room inWestminster. Very distracting when a rat ran behind her in the background.
Mandelson?
Lol, who knows.
Well, you know...rats, sinking ships etc
Syl said
Feb 5 1:22 PM, 2026
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Starmer lurches from one disaster to another.
I just saw Peston interview Kemi Badenoch, she repeated what she had said to him today on PMQ's. She was recorded from a sitting room inWestminster. Very distracting when a rat ran behind her in the background.
Mandelson?
Lol, who knows.
Well, you know...rats, sinking ships etc
Possibly Starmer is shape-shifting.
Magica said
Feb 5 4:21 PM, 2026
Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Starmer lurches from one disaster to another.
I just saw Peston interview Kemi Badenoch, she repeated what she had said to him today on PMQ's. She was recorded from a sitting room inWestminster. Very distracting when a rat ran behind her in the background.
Mandelson?
Lol, who knows.
Well, you know...rats, sinking ships etc
Possibly Starmer is shape-shifting.
Saying he didn't know, don't believe him, but the buck stops with him. Hope he goes. Rayner putting the boot in, but we don't want her for PM, she's as bad. Hope we get a G.E.
Syl said
Feb 5 7:55 PM, 2026
Magica wrote:
Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Starmer lurches from one disaster to another.
I just saw Peston interview Kemi Badenoch, she repeated what she had said to him today on PMQ's. She was recorded from a sitting room inWestminster. Very distracting when a rat ran behind her in the background.
Mandelson?
Lol, who knows.
Well, you know...rats, sinking ships etc
Possibly Starmer is shape-shifting.
Saying he didn't know, don't believe him, but the buck stops with him. Hope he goes. Rayner putting the boot in, but we don't want her for PM, she's as bad. Hope we get a G.E.
We won't get a GE, but we might get a new PM before too long, I think Starmer has used up his 9 lives by now.
Pity Andy Burnham was blocked from re-entering politics as an MP...as far as I can see, he is the only one who could have had a hope in hell of salvaging Labour in the time they have left.
Red Okktober said
Feb 5 8:44 PM, 2026
Magica wrote:
Saying he didn't know, don't believe him, but the buck stops with him. Hope he goes. Rayner putting the boot in, but we don't want her for PM, she's as bad. Hope we get a G.E.
It's not out of the question that we will get a snap GE before 2029. A vote of no confidence will trigger a GE if it succeeds just by one vote, MPs across all parties can vote on it, and Kemi is currently calling Labour MPs to join her in putting the vote of NC forward. It's not straightforward though because many of them will be risking their own seats. If it does happen, a GE can take place as quickly as 6 weeks from the vote.
It's more likely though that a new PM will take over rather than a GE. It shouldn't be tax dodger Rayner (how are those 1.5 million new homes you promised coming along Angela?), I would think it's more likely to be Streeting.
Red Okktober said
Feb 5 8:52 PM, 2026
Syl wrote:
We won't get a GE, but we might get a new PM before too long, I think Starmer has used up his 9 lives by now.
Pity Andy Burnham was blocked from re-entering politics as an MP...as far as I can see, he is the only one who could have had a hope in hell of salvaging Labour in the time they have left.
No one can save Labour now, but I do think that Burnham has played a blinder by heaping more pressure on Starmer.
Labour have to be very careful about the timing of appointing a new leader. There is the upcoming by-election which is now massive, and the May local elections will be a bloodbath. Ideally, they would want a new leader to come in after May, when they can start afresh and try to 'pick up the pieces', but I don't see how Starmer can possibly last until then. Imagine coming in as the new leader now and knowing what May is going to bring you!
Magica said
Feb 5 9:54 PM, 2026
Red Okktober wrote:
Magica wrote:
Saying he didn't know, don't believe him, but the buck stops with him. Hope he goes. Rayner putting the boot in, but we don't want her for PM, she's as bad. Hope we get a G.E.
It's not out of the question that we will get a snap GE before 2029. A vote of no confidence will trigger a GE if it succeeds just by one vote, MPs across all parties can vote on it, and Kemi is currently calling Labour MPs to join her in putting the vote of NC forward. It's not straightforward though because many of them will be risking their own seats. If it does happen, a GE can take place as quickly as 6 weeks from the vote.
It's more likely though that a new PM will take over rather than a GE. It shouldn't be tax dodger Rayner (how are those 1.5 million new homes you promised coming along Angela?), I would think it's more likely to be Streeting.
I read lots saying he was shaking when he apologised over Mandelson. When it came on the news, I turned it over, can't watch the lying hypocrite. He knew!
So they would interfere with the arrests and prevent them from happening?
I think you are right, which is why its easier for the government to just turn a blind eye to the problem..
It's not with the hassle nor the blowback.
The Epstein files also show a pic of him in a pair of Y fronts with a 'mystery woman' that he also says he has no recollection of.
Also new pics of Andrew, formerly known as Prince, on all fours over what appears to be a teenage girl.
Andrew must be close to breaking point by now, it just gets worse and worse for him and his ghastly ex-wife. It wouldn't surprise me if he were to top himself at some point.
news.sky.com/story/pressure-grows-on-mandelson-to-testify-over-epstein-as-peer-is-told-this-is-the-end-13501842
Selective memory every single time.
It was the photo I found the most bizarre. Aside from what the hell was he doing, why on earth let someone (who?) take a picture of you in your underpants?
Nah, I can't see him doing that, he'll still have some sycophants around him, still be waited on hand and foot, still have a standard of living that us mere plebs can only dream of... No mummy's skirt to hide behind though
As for his ex, just as much of a sleaze as he is. She's barefaced enough to tough it out...remember the toe-sucking, the £500,000(?) sting, being ostracised by the RF - neither stopped her grifting. I'm just wondering what fool is going to give her a roof over her head.
In the old days Mandelson would have been chained up at Traitors Gate and drowned.
He's got one of those faces that you just want to punch
I haven't seen PMQs yet today - usually his front bench are like a row of noddy dogs whenever he speaks, with random hear hears thrown in.
Apparently, today was tumbleweed though. Someone described Rachel Reeves as 'trying to keep perfectly still and trying to hide behind her fringe'
I just saw Peston interview Kemi Badenoch, she repeated what she had said to him today on PMQ's.
She was recorded from a sitting room inWestminster. Very distracting when a rat ran behind her in the background.
Mandelson?
Lol, who knows.
It's even made the news.
Are the mice panicking at Parliament too? Hilarious moment rodent scurries past Kemi Badenoch on TV
Well, you know...rats, sinking ships etc
Possibly Starmer is shape-shifting.
Saying he didn't know, don't believe him, but the buck stops with him. Hope he goes. Rayner putting the boot in, but we don't want her for PM, she's as bad. Hope we get a G.E.
We won't get a GE, but we might get a new PM before too long, I think Starmer has used up his 9 lives by now.
Pity Andy Burnham was blocked from re-entering politics as an MP...as far as I can see, he is the only one who could have had a hope in hell of salvaging Labour in the time they have left.
It's not out of the question that we will get a snap GE before 2029. A vote of no confidence will trigger a GE if it succeeds just by one vote, MPs across all parties can vote on it, and Kemi is currently calling Labour MPs to join her in putting the vote of NC forward. It's not straightforward though because many of them will be risking their own seats. If it does happen, a GE can take place as quickly as 6 weeks from the vote.
It's more likely though that a new PM will take over rather than a GE. It shouldn't be tax dodger Rayner (how are those 1.5 million new homes you promised coming along Angela?), I would think it's more likely to be Streeting.
No one can save Labour now, but I do think that Burnham has played a blinder by heaping more pressure on Starmer.
Labour have to be very careful about the timing of appointing a new leader. There is the upcoming by-election which is now massive, and the May local elections will be a bloodbath. Ideally, they would want a new leader to come in after May, when they can start afresh and try to 'pick up the pieces', but I don't see how Starmer can possibly last until then. Imagine coming in as the new leader now and knowing what May is going to bring you!
I read lots saying he was shaking when he apologised over Mandelson. When it came on the news, I turned it over, can't watch the lying hypocrite. He knew!
The games up. He must go now, surely!