It shouldn't be up to the victims, if the FBI have the documents, they should act on them.
Virginia Guiffres life was threatened on more than one occasion, she had to be taken to a safe house for weeks because the threats were considered genuine. Why should the victims have to be the ones to name names?
That! 🎯 👏🏻👏🏻
I wouldn’t count on trump’s FBI to do it, though. You should see the inexperienced clueless clown he appointed to lead it.
👇🏻 This guy’s only qualifying expertise is a blind unquestioning subservience to Trump.
Blimey, he would have made a good lead for the little known film The Stepford Husbands'.
Magica said
Oct 27 1:19 PM, 2025
I'm going to buy her book. She was definitely topped!
Anonymous said
Oct 27 1:38 PM, 2025
Magica wrote:
I'm going to buy her book. She was definitely topped!
What caused her death? I thought it was ruled a suicide, with no suspicious circumstances?
Maddog said
Oct 27 3:25 PM, 2025
Vam wrote:
Syl wrote:
It shouldn't be up to the victims, if the FBI have the documents, they should act on them.
Virginia Guiffres life was threatened on more than one occasion, she had to be taken to a safe house for weeks because the threats were considered genuine. Why should the victims have to be the ones to name names?
That! 🎯 👏🏻👏🏻
I wouldn’t count on trump’s FBI to do it, though. You should see the inexperienced clueless clown he appointed to lead it.
👇🏻 This guy’s only qualifying expertise is a blind unquestioning subservience to Trump.
Did the FBI just get those records January 20, 2025?.
The FBI raided Epstein's properties in 2019..
So they raided under Trump, prosecuted no one but Maxwell under Biden and now here we are.
Spewing unfounded and unproven conspiracies that change like the wind..
Syl said
Oct 27 5:30 PM, 2025
Neither unproven nor unfounded. The files/documents are there, what they contain is the issue.
It shouldn't be up to the victims, if the FBI have the documents, they should act on them.
Virginia Guiffres life was threatened on more than one occasion, she had to be taken to a safe house for weeks because the threats were considered genuine. Why should the victims have to be the ones to name names?
That! 🎯 👏🏻👏🏻
I wouldn’t count on trump’s FBI to do it, though. You should see the inexperienced clueless clown he appointed to lead it.
👇🏻 This guy’s only qualifying expertise is a blind unquestioning subservience to Trump.
Did the FBI just get those records January 20, 2025?.
The FBI raided Epstein's properties in 2019..
So they raided under Trump, prosecuted no one but Maxwell under Biden and now here we are.
Spewing unfounded and unproven conspiracies that change like the wind..
Fair point, and nope. A lid has been kept on it all, throughout several administrations since the early 2000’s.
(here comes the ‘but’)….BUT trump spent much of his entire campaign last year solemnly promising to release the entire Epstein files. His base were all fired up about it.
Patel on various Right Wing podcasts had been loudly criticising the years-long coverup. Now, as FBI Director, the slimy little weasel is banging on about there being ”no credible evidence“.
Go figure, huh…
Vam said
Oct 27 5:50 PM, 2025
Syl wrote:
Vam wrote:
Syl wrote:
It shouldn't be up to the victims, if the FBI have the documents, they should act on them.
Virginia Guiffres life was threatened on more than one occasion, she had to be taken to a safe house for weeks because the threats were considered genuine. Why should the victims have to be the ones to name names?
That! 🎯 👏🏻👏🏻
I wouldn’t count on trump’s FBI to do it, though. You should see the inexperienced clueless clown he appointed to lead it.
👇🏻 This guy’s only qualifying expertise is a blind unquestioning subservience to Trump.
Blimey, he would have made a good lead for the little known film The Stepford Husbands'.
During trump’s first term, Patel was something relatively minor in national security. During the Biden years, this sketchy as fuck, bottom-feeding grifter earned his keep on extreme Right Wing podcasts, and hawking things like boots (note his very own ‘K$H’logo 🙄).
Did the Stepford Husbands dress like this? 🤣
-- Edited by Vam on Monday 27th of October 2025 05:51:37 PM
It's all covered up imo. Khan has covered up the London grooming gangs. Police are now going to reinvestgate. There's over 600 cases to reopen.
Syl said
Oct 27 6:16 PM, 2025
Vam wrote:
Syl wrote:
Vam wrote:
Syl wrote:
It shouldn't be up to the victims, if the FBI have the documents, they should act on them.
Virginia Guiffres life was threatened on more than one occasion, she had to be taken to a safe house for weeks because the threats were considered genuine. Why should the victims have to be the ones to name names?
That! 🎯 👏🏻👏🏻
I wouldn’t count on trump’s FBI to do it, though. You should see the inexperienced clueless clown he appointed to lead it.
👇🏻 This guy’s only qualifying expertise is a blind unquestioning subservience to Trump.
Blimey, he would have made a good lead for the little known film The Stepford Husbands'.
During trump’s first term, Patel was something relatively minor in national security. During the Biden years, this sketchy as fuck, bottom-feeding grifter earned his keep on extreme Right Wing podcasts, and hawking things like boots (note his very own ‘K$H’logo 🙄).
Did the Stepford Husbands dress like this? 🤣
-- Edited by Vam on Monday 27th of October 2025 05:51:37 PM
OMG.
Syl said
Oct 27 6:22 PM, 2025
Magica wrote:
Vam wrote:
This is who the Epstein victims have been relying on 🙄 Patel, promising to release everything “On day 1”.
It shouldn't be up to the victims, if the FBI have the documents, they should act on them.
Virginia Guiffres life was threatened on more than one occasion, she had to be taken to a safe house for weeks because the threats were considered genuine. Why should the victims have to be the ones to name names?
That! 🎯 👏🏻👏🏻
I wouldn’t count on trump’s FBI to do it, though. You should see the inexperienced clueless clown he appointed to lead it.
👇🏻 This guy’s only qualifying expertise is a blind unquestioning subservience to Trump.
Did the FBI just get those records January 20, 2025?.
The FBI raided Epstein's properties in 2019..
So they raided under Trump, prosecuted no one but Maxwell under Biden and now here we are.
Spewing unfounded and unproven conspiracies that change like the wind..
Fair point, and nope. A lid has been kept on it all, throughout several administrations since the early 2000’s.
(here comes the ‘but’)….BUT trump spent much of his entire campaign last year solemnly promising to release the entire Epstein files. His base were all fired up about it.
Patel on various Right Wing podcasts had been loudly criticising the years-long coverup. Now, as FBI Director, the slimy little weasel is banging on about there being ”no credible evidence“.
Go figure, huh…
Trump lied.
Are you shocked?
Syl said
Oct 27 6:36 PM, 2025
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:
Neither unproven nor unfounded. The files/documents are there, what they contain is the issue.
According to many people, including Guiffre, the ghost writer of 'Nobody's Girl', and people who were around at the time Epstein and Maxwell were grooming the girls for clients, there were lists of names, who went where, who visited the island, who went on he private plane....lots of lists of lots of names.
Maddog said
Oct 27 7:52 PM, 2025
Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:
Neither unproven nor unfounded. The files/documents are there, what they contain is the issue.
According to many people, including Guiffre, the ghost writer of 'Nobody's Girl', and people who were around at the time Epstein and Maxwell were grooming the girls for clients, there were lists of names, who went where, who visited the island, who went on he private plane....lots of lists of lots of names.
There are flight logs..
I doubt Guiffre was in a position to know about any list.
She did know who she was trafficked to, yet chose to not reveal them.
Why?
She named Andrew.
Magica said
Oct 27 10:21 PM, 2025
Syl wrote:
Magica wrote:
Vam wrote:
This is who the Epstein victims have been relying on 🙄 Patel, promising to release everything “On day 1”.
According to many people, including Guiffre, the ghost writer of 'Nobody's Girl', and people who were around at the time Epstein and Maxwell were grooming the girls for clients, there were lists of names, who went where, who visited the island, who went on he private plane....lots of lists of lots of names.
There are flight logs..
I doubt Guiffre was in a position to know about any list.
She did know who she was trafficked to, yet chose to not reveal them.
Why?
She named Andrew.
She was probably scared to name some powerful people. It's all conjecture now though, unless she has left behind more disclosures, she can't tell us can she.
She said Epstein threatened he would harm her young brother if she spoke about what happened.
Maddog said
Oct 27 11:40 PM, 2025
Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:
Neither unproven nor unfounded. The files/documents are there, what they contain is the issue.
According to many people, including Guiffre, the ghost writer of 'Nobody's Girl', and people who were around at the time Epstein and Maxwell were grooming the girls for clients, there were lists of names, who went where, who visited the island, who went on he private plane....lots of lists of lots of names.
There are flight logs..
I doubt Guiffre was in a position to know about any list.
She did know who she was trafficked to, yet chose to not reveal them.
Why?
She named Andrew.
She was probably scared to name some powerful people. It's all conjecture now though, unless she has left behind more disclosures, she can't tell us can she.
She said Epstein threatened he would harm her young brother if she spoke about what happened.
If she wasn't afraid of the Royal family then she shouldn't be afraid of a professor at some US college.
Syl said
Oct 28 12:37 AM, 2025
Well it was only Andrew...I doubt anyone would be assassinated because of him.
Blimey, he would have made a good lead for the little known film The Stepford Husbands'.
What caused her death? I thought it was ruled a suicide, with no suspicious circumstances?
Did the FBI just get those records January 20, 2025?.
The FBI raided Epstein's properties in 2019..
So they raided under Trump, prosecuted no one but Maxwell under Biden and now here we are.
Spewing unfounded and unproven conspiracies that change like the wind..
Neither unproven nor unfounded.
The files/documents are there, what they contain is the issue.
What do we know about the Jeffrey Epstein files? - BBC News
Fair point, and nope. A lid has been kept on it all, throughout several administrations since the early 2000’s.
(here comes the ‘but’)….BUT trump spent much of his entire campaign last year solemnly promising to release the entire Epstein files. His base were all fired up about it.
Patel on various Right Wing podcasts had been loudly criticising the years-long coverup. Now, as FBI Director, the slimy little weasel is banging on about there being ”no credible evidence“.
Go figure, huh…
During trump’s first term, Patel was something relatively minor in national security. During the Biden years, this sketchy as fuck, bottom-feeding grifter earned his keep on extreme Right Wing podcasts, and hawking things like boots (note his very own ‘K$H’logo 🙄).
Did the Stepford Husbands dress like this? 🤣
-- Edited by Vam on Monday 27th of October 2025 05:51:37 PM
This is who the Epstein victims have been relying on 🙄 Patel, promising to release everything “On day 1”.
https://x.com/ultrafrog17/status/1892639387407568937?s=61
I don't think we know, was it a hanging??
It's all covered up imo. Khan has covered up the London grooming gangs. Police are now going to reinvestgate. There's over 600 cases to reopen.
OMG.
Did you see the video, I think Red posted it, of Khan refusing to answer a woman who kept asking him if London had had any grooming gangs?
Of course their are files.
Tens of thousands of pages.
That's different then the "Epstein List".
Trump lied.
Are you shocked?
According to many people, including Guiffre, the ghost writer of 'Nobody's Girl', and people who were around at the time Epstein and Maxwell were grooming the girls for clients, there were lists of names, who went where, who visited the island, who went on he private plane....lots of lists of lots of names.
There are flight logs..
I doubt Guiffre was in a position to know about any list.
She did know who she was trafficked to, yet chose to not reveal them.
Why?
She named Andrew.
No I never saw it, but heard about it.
Khan's up to his neck in this coverup. I hope he gets kicked.out. He's not for the Londoners just he.Muslims and making money on cars. Hate him
She was probably scared to name some powerful people. It's all conjecture now though, unless she has left behind more disclosures, she can't tell us can she.
She said Epstein threatened he would harm her young brother if she spoke about what happened.
If she wasn't afraid of the Royal family then she shouldn't be afraid of a professor at some US college.