Saying I never had him down as a conspiracy theorist is down to him saying Trump had Epstein murdered.
That's a conspiracy theory devoid of any pointers toward any evidence.
After all that anti CT ranting too.
He's not very consistent.
jackthelad said
Feb 7 5:48 PM, 2024
Anonymous wrote:
You have to smile. Holly accusing stoo of being a conspiracy theorist, and in the same breath claiming that Epstein is still alive but if he is dead it was the Clintons wot done it.
But you seem to think it's ok for Stoo to say Trump had Epstein murdered... why is that?
Anonymous said
Feb 7 6:37 PM, 2024
Probably his Ozzie fwiend. Can't think of anyone else that would bk him up Jack
Maddog said
Feb 8 12:55 AM, 2024
jackthelad wrote:
Saying I never had him down as a conspiracy theorist is down to him saying Trump had Epstein murdered. That's a conspiracy theory devoid of any pointers toward any evidence. After all that anti CT ranting too. He's not very consistent.
This guy has more reason to off Epstein than the Orange One.
You have to smile. Holly accusing stoo of being a conspiracy theorist, and in the same breath claiming that Epstein is still alive but if he is dead it was the Clintons wot done it.
I never accused the persona known as the persona known as the persona known as Stooo of being a conspiracy theorist, nor did I say Epstein's alive, idiot
"It would be intelligence agencies not presidents who made such decisions. My money is on him still being alive anyway. Never had you down as a conspiracy theorist Stoo. Almost flat earther stuff too."
"If (and I say if) anyone had him murdered, than the likelihood would be the Clinton's..."
Can't you read?
This is exactly what I said
"If (and I say if) anyone had him murdered, than the likelihood would be the Clinton's, some other very influential personality, or the CIA. Of course it wasn't Trump. What else you want to blame him for? Are 100+ charges not enough?
The post above mine was made by Rollup FFS.
Feel like a fool now?
Anonymous said
Feb 8 5:57 AM, 2024
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
You have to smile. Holly accusing stoo of being a conspiracy theorist, and in the same breath claiming that Epstein is still alive but if he is dead it was the Clintons wot done it.
Nobody cares. Those that have previously interacted with Holly knows she is one of the few sensible people over there.
Thank you, I appreciate that, although many won't agree with you
Syl said
Feb 8 12:30 PM, 2024
Holly wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
You have to smile. Holly accusing stoo of being a conspiracy theorist, and in the same breath claiming that Epstein is still alive but if he is dead it was the Clintons wot done it.
Nobody cares. Those that have previously interacted with Holly knows she is one of the few sensible people over there.
Thank you, I appreciate that, although many won't agree with you
It's easier all round if you log in Holly. Saves me or Digger finding/sorting through guest posts, and saves you waiting hours for your posts to be admitted.
You have to smile. Holly accusing stoo of being a conspiracy theorist, and in the same breath claiming that Epstein is still alive but if he is dead it was the Clintons wot done it.
Nobody cares. Those that have previously interacted with Holly knows she is one of the few sensible people over there.
Who are the others?
SF said
Feb 8 10:05 PM, 2024
Don’t get him going !
Holly said
Feb 9 2:52 AM, 2024
Syl wrote:
Holly wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
You have to smile. Holly accusing stoo of being a conspiracy theorist, and in the same breath claiming that Epstein is still alive but if he is dead it was the Clintons wot done it.
Nobody cares. Those that have previously interacted with Holly knows she is one of the few sensible people over there.
Thank you, I appreciate that, although many won't agree with you
It's easier all round if you log in Holly. Saves me or Digger finding/sorting through guest posts, and saves you waiting hours for your posts to be admitted.
Yes I understand, it makes sense, I'll do that from now on
Holly said
Feb 9 2:59 AM, 2024
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
You have to smile. Holly accusing stoo of being a conspiracy theorist, and in the same breath claiming that Epstein is still alive but if he is dead it was the Clintons wot done it.
Nobody cares. Those that have previously interacted with Holly knows she is one of the few sensible people over there.
Who are the others?
Doesn't look like you've got a huge fan base
You've probably been banned from here and dogs, or you'd log in rather than doing your shit stirring behind anonymity, right?
Anonymous said
Feb 9 8:58 AM, 2024
The moron who owns the sleepy mutts forum claims most of his contributors are a bit spesh due to old age...isn't he in his 60s???
Anonymous said
Feb 9 9:03 AM, 2024
Holly wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
You have to smile. Holly accusing stoo of being a conspiracy theorist, and in the same breath claiming that Epstein is still alive but if he is dead it was the Clintons wot done it.
Nobody cares. Those that have previously interacted with Holly knows she is one of the few sensible people over there.
Who are the others?
Doesn't look like you've got a huge fan base
You've probably been banned from here and dogs, or you'd log in rather than doing your shit stirring behind anonymity, right?
Just wondering who the few sensible people are. The choice seems to be between stoo, Cactus Jack, Rolluplostinspace, Lord Raven not logged in, Rockstar, Jungle Jayne, Red Okktober, Snookerballs and Text as they're the only ones left. Which ones get your vote?
Syl said
Feb 9 12:01 PM, 2024
Holly wrote:
Syl wrote:
Holly wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
You have to smile. Holly accusing stoo of being a conspiracy theorist, and in the same breath claiming that Epstein is still alive but if he is dead it was the Clintons wot done it.
Nobody cares. Those that have previously interacted with Holly knows she is one of the few sensible people over there.
Thank you, I appreciate that, although many won't agree with you
It's easier all round if you log in Holly. Saves me or Digger finding/sorting through guest posts, and saves you waiting hours for your posts to be admitted.
Yes I understand, it makes sense, I'll do that from now on
Much appreciated. x
Anonymous said
Feb 9 7:22 PM, 2024
With regard Stoo I would say he has many commendable qualities in him. However on-line his political views tend to be overwhelming, boorish, lacking in nuance and tend to dominate many of his interactions - and that is a put-off for many. However in periods of calm he does make some fair points. Away from the aggressive politicking which can be nasty and unfair he seems like a nice chap. The forum itself has a good level of activity compared to others.
Anonymous said
Feb 10 1:41 AM, 2024
Anonymous wrote:
With regard Stoo I would say he has many commendable qualities in him. However on-line his political views tend to be overwhelming, boorish, lacking in nuance and tend to dominate many of his interactions - and that is a put-off for many. However in periods of calm he does make some fair points. Away from the aggressive politicking which can be nasty and unfair he seems like a nice chap. The forum itself has a good level of activity compared to others.
He has commendable qualities/ seems like a nice chap?
He terrorised women on forums for years and if you believe some of the stories about him. He wasn't nice to female customers in his parents pub. You know, the one he used to lie about owning
-- Edited by Digger on Saturday 10th of February 2024 10:43:24 AM
Anonymous said
Feb 10 6:24 AM, 2024
Anonymous wrote:
With regard Stoo I would say he has many commendable qualities in him. However on-line his political views tend to be overwhelming, boorish, lacking in nuance and tend to dominate many of his interactions - and that is a put-off for many. However in periods of calm he does make some fair points. Away from the aggressive politicking which can be nasty and unfair he seems like a nice chap. The forum itself has a good level of activity compared to others.
Nice chap???Tell us 3 nice qualities about him???
Anonymous said
Feb 10 11:20 AM, 2024
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
With regard Stoo I would say he has many commendable qualities in him. However on-line his political views tend to be overwhelming, boorish, lacking in nuance and tend to dominate many of his interactions - and that is a put-off for many. However in periods of calm he does make some fair points. Away from the aggressive politicking which can be nasty and unfair he seems like a nice chap. The forum itself has a good level of activity compared to others.
Nice chap???Tell us 3 nice qualities about him???
His recent comments about Charles' cancer diagnosis show his complete lack of concern and empathy towards anyone reading it who might also be suffering or who has a relative who might be. It could be down to his ADHD or whatever condition he claims to have that's affecting his behaviour, but that's no excuse really. There are times he should keep his thoughts to himself and just zip it.
Anonymous said
Feb 10 11:46 AM, 2024
1) Created, runs, maintains a forum for others to use free of charge where they can chat about whatever they want to chat.
2) Allows guest posting with all the extra effort that entails. (Something shared with the good folk of this platform).
3) Has genuine concerns for prejudice against others and a wealth of experience and is willing to share it when asked.
4) Is knowledgeable on various matters and is willing to discuss it and explain when asked kindly.
That's a conspiracy theory devoid of any pointers toward any evidence.
After all that anti CT ranting too.
He's not very consistent.
But you seem to think it's ok for Stoo to say Trump had Epstein murdered... why is that?
This guy has more reason to off Epstein than the Orange One.
Can't you read?
This is exactly what I said
"If (and I say if) anyone had him murdered, than the likelihood would be the Clinton's, some other very influential personality, or the CIA.
Of course it wasn't Trump.
What else you want to blame him for?
Are 100+ charges not enough?
The post above mine was made by Rollup FFS.
Feel like a fool now?
Thank you, I appreciate that, although many won't agree with you
It's easier all round if you log in Holly. Saves me or Digger finding/sorting through guest posts, and saves you waiting hours for your posts to be admitted.
I guess I'm missed. ❤️❤️
Who are the others?
Don’t get him going !
Yes I understand, it makes sense, I'll do that from now on
Doesn't look like you've got a huge fan base
You've probably been banned from here and dogs, or you'd log in rather than doing your shit stirring behind anonymity, right?
The moron who owns the sleepy mutts forum claims most of his contributors are a bit spesh due to old age...isn't he in his 60s???
Just wondering who the few sensible people are. The choice seems to be between stoo, Cactus Jack, Rolluplostinspace, Lord Raven not logged in, Rockstar, Jungle Jayne, Red Okktober, Snookerballs and Text as they're the only ones left. Which ones get your vote?
Much appreciated. x
With regard Stoo I would say he has many commendable qualities in him. However on-line his political views tend to be overwhelming, boorish, lacking in nuance and tend to dominate many of his interactions - and that is a put-off for many. However in periods of calm he does make some fair points. Away from the aggressive politicking which can be nasty and unfair he seems like a nice chap. The forum itself has a good level of activity compared to others.
He has commendable qualities/ seems like a nice chap?
He terrorised women on forums for years and if you believe some of the stories about him. He wasn't nice to female customers in his parents pub. You know, the one he used to lie about owning
-- Edited by Digger on Saturday 10th of February 2024 10:43:24 AM
Nice chap???Tell us 3 nice qualities about him???
His recent comments about Charles' cancer diagnosis show his complete lack of concern and empathy towards anyone reading it who might also be suffering or who has a relative who might be. It could be down to his ADHD or whatever condition he claims to have that's affecting his behaviour, but that's no excuse really. There are times he should keep his thoughts to himself and just zip it.
1) Created, runs, maintains a forum for others to use free of charge where they can chat about whatever they want to chat.
2) Allows guest posting with all the extra effort that entails. (Something shared with the good folk of this platform).
3) Has genuine concerns for prejudice against others and a wealth of experience and is willing to share it when asked.
4) Is knowledgeable on various matters and is willing to discuss it and explain when asked kindly.