Serial sexist posters are abound on a forum or two. Over at the Dogs, many put up with the serial abuse dished out be a couple of male posters there but I will never understand why. The site is usually controlled by women and that is even more disappointing as they refuse to perma ban serial, sexist posters. Looking at this site, looks nice here in the Whine section and it must be wonderful on the main bit of the forum. A forum is what the owner wants it to be with the help of their Admin, in my underestimation.
Yes, you will get the odd woman or two that hits back and may even get the better of the sexist poster and at times be just as nasty. On the whole, the Dogs is not a place for me other than to out pour my dissatisfaction about DS and a few idiots on there..
That explanation doesn't seem good enough for the anons posting criticism of CM however but hey ho.
Look at the anon thread where a poster just pointed out not all Anons were trolling. Not an aggressive post.
Then look at the response. Both forums have decent posters but there is also power mad nutters. You called Stooo out on his shit because he was out of order. I wish non members would quit posting.. If anon posting is allowed it is not hypocrisy to be anon. It's hypocritical to have a go at anons after allowing them on the forum.
That explanation doesn't seem good enough for the anons posting criticism of CM however but hey ho.
Look at the anon thread where a poster just pointed out not all Anons were trolling. Not an aggressive post.
Then look at the response. Both forums have decent posters but there is also power mad nutters. You called Stooo out on his shit because he was out of order. I wish non members would quit posting.. If anon posting is allowed it is not hypocrisy to be anon. It's hypocritical to have a go at anons after allowing them on the forum.
No one's saying it's hypocricy as such. Anyone is allowed to post and the response stands on the content of the post IMO.
Calling anons out when they criticise other posters is fair do's because they could be the biggest double standard merchants going.
Why not put a name to a post just to differentiate from other anons.
Not sure what Anons expect members here to do about the misogynistic arseholes that frequent Dogs forum.
Let them clear up their own rubbish....it's nothing to do with this forum.
The worst of the bunch are either not welcome as members here or have been booted off...and that's how it'll stay.
That explanation doesn't seem good enough for the anons posting criticism of CM however but hey ho.
I suspect a lot of the abuse is tongue in cheek, OTT shitposting. Although a small number over there seem genuinly disturbed.
Legendary and Dean.
Apart from that kerffuffle with LM I've never really seen legendary behave like that.
His attitude towards ladies was shown up again yesterday.
Oh dear. Well not over there now so can't comment.
So just like Keyser you pretend you don't read what's going on there. As if a gossipping busybody like you could keep away from the place!
I have not read a single post on the place since I was booted off by Hobbit for daring to suggest she had double standards in moderation - nor do I have any desire to, it's you comatose canine members who keep coming here anonymously and babbling on endlessly about things.
__________________
Simple. You, you're the threads. But me, I'm the rope.