ChaoticMusings

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Labour vows to make misgendering a jailable offence
Syl


FIRM BUT FAIR.

Posts: 24035
Date:
Labour vows to make misgendering a jailable offence
Permalink   
 


Rapists and robbers can walk free, but if someone refers to a born man as an actual man...he can be jailed.

The world has gone mad.

 

"A person who purposely calls someone by the wrong gender pronoun could be jailed for a hate crime under a Labour government.

The opposition would make attacks motivated by hatred of the victim's gender identity into “'aggravated offences”. 

This would bring transphobic abuse into line with assault and harassment motivated by hatred on the grounds of race or religion, which are punishable by up to two years in prison."

 

 

 

 

Labour to jail people who use wrong gender pronouns on purpose under crime law | Politics | News | Express.co.uk



__________________

How wonderful life is while you're in the world.



Go Outside

Posts: 8449
Date:
Permalink   
 

Oh sticks and stones may break my bones, but rape doesn't hurt you!

Sick of this country! 😠

__________________

  Peace 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Syl


FIRM BUT FAIR.

Posts: 24035
Date:
Permalink   
 

How would deliberately misgendering be defined in court I wonder.
If a man in a frock still looks like a man, it could be an easy mistake to make.


__________________

How wonderful life is while you're in the world.



Admin

Posts: 16885
Date:
Permalink   
 

Another reason not to vote Labour

__________________

 [04-10, 20:41] xtras:i dont think anyone in their right mind would have a crush on stoo

 

Syl


FIRM BUT FAIR.

Posts: 24035
Date:
Permalink   
 

Digger wrote:

Another reason not to vote Labour


 Labour or Conservative?....one is really spoilt for choice.lol



__________________

How wonderful life is while you're in the world.



Admin

Posts: 16885
Date:
Permalink   
 

Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:

Another reason not to vote Labour


 Labour or Conservative?....one is really spoilt for choice.lol


 Not fit for purpose



__________________

 [04-10, 20:41] xtras:i dont think anyone in their right mind would have a crush on stoo

 



Musing at the Chaos

Posts: 747
Date:
Permalink   
 

... eddieflag2.jpeg



-- Edited by jackthelad on Tuesday 17th of October 2023 12:23:41 AM

Attachments
__________________
Syl


FIRM BUT FAIR.

Posts: 24035
Date:
Permalink   
 

Ahh, but #ddie Izzard, unlike whinger Sam Smith, doesn't get offended when people refer to him as a man. wink



__________________

How wonderful life is while you're in the world.

Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

It has always been an offence to cause someone distress or alarm or fear by using offensive or threatening words or behaviour in a public place. If there's a racially motivated element to it, it's considered to be 'aggravated' and therefore  a bit more serious. This proposal seems to be around making transphobic-motivated public order a similarly aggravated offence. It's nothing to do with being sent to jail simply for calling someone the wrong gender, that's simply Daily Express exaggeration.



__________________
Syl


FIRM BUT FAIR.

Posts: 24035
Date:
Permalink   
 

All papers want to grab the headlines, nothing new there either.

What is new is the influx of gender confusion, a minority of them will be actively seeking out confrontation, and they will have the law on their sides to actually send people to prison.

__________________

How wonderful life is while you're in the world.

Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

Syl wrote:

All papers want to grab the headlines, nothing new there either.

What is new is the influx of gender confusion, a minority of them will be actively seeking out confrontation, and they will have the law on their sides to actually send people to prison.


 That's true. Certainly now in cases of racially or religiously aggravated public order offences (aka hate crime) t's enough to treat it that way if the victim perceives it as racially motivated, and it will be treated that way even if the police don't agree. If laws are extended to include homophobic/ transgender etc as aggravating factors then the same would apply. I's worth adding that public order offences don't necessarily end up with the suspect in court, the police can dispose of them in other ways like a community resolution or a caution. And also to add that although currently in law there's no such thing as an aggravated homophobic/ transphobic hate crime, courts will still take into account those aggravating elements if they get flagged up.



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.