ChaoticMusings

Maddog · Go Outside

News

Date: May 3 5:18 PM, 2025

Maddog wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Magica wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Magica wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Magica wrote:

Horrible, nasty, selfish man. We don't want him or megaliar here. As for the kids....what kids?
Do you think they don't have children? How about the pics that have been published?
Of course they have kids.
Just curious to know what was meant by the 'what kids?' bit.
The children change. One minute Archie got brown hair, then red, then brown. Lili has red hair, then brown.
I don't think they are their children at all. If they are, she never birthed them, surrogate. That means they should have no titles, they must come from her.
Her pregnancy was a sham. What bump sways from side to side, fell down to her knees, she was able to crouch down, bump went in.
It's a tricks and mirrors. It will be revealed oneday.
Ah, okay, I hadn't realised that. So it's been faked, and they're not really their own children?
I don't think so, unless as I said they are surrogate. Which means she never birthed them so they can't have titles. Hence the moon bumps.
No.one has ever seen them. They only show back of heads, and the queen never saw them not Charles. Strange eh?

I’ve no time for the pair but I doubt the RF Establishment would have two kids born through surrogacy in the official Royal “blood line” thus in the succession queue.
Too many people would have to be involved with such a “secret”.
Why would surrogacy matter as long as Harry's reptilian bloodline is flowing through those kids?

“heir of the body“, adoption etc

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Can you imagine how this will be told in the history books?

Two brothers, one born to be king, responsible and kind, with a beautiful dedicated wife.
The other, a spoiled weak-minded man, lured into a life of victimhood, by a social climbing, power hungry wife.

It'll make a great film one day.

Digger · Admin

Syl wrote:
Can you imagine how this will be told in the history books?

Two brothers, one born to be king, responsible and kind, with a beautiful dedicated wife.
The other, a spoiled weak-minded man, lured into a life of victimhood, by a social climbing, power hungry wife.

It'll make a great film one day.

It's already been done.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Can you imagine how this will be told in the history books?

Two brothers, one born to be king, responsible and kind, with a beautiful dedicated wife.
The other, a spoiled weak-minded man, lured into a life of victimhood, by a social climbing, power hungry wife.

It'll make a great film one day.
It's already been done.

Has it?

Date: May 4 1:00 AM, 2025

“Royal biographer and historian AN Wilson said: 'You keep thinking, 'Meghan and Harry can't get any worse.' And then they do.'

He added that since Meghan's arrival, Harry, 'a largely popular, merry prince who served his country in Afghanistan with courage and good humour, has become estranged from the British public.

'Now, he is a humourless whinger, adrift from his former friends and speaks in the Californian psychobabble that Meghan has picked up among her ghastly Montecito neighbours.'

'It cannot continue. The King should strip them of the right to dignify themselves by their royal titles.

'Not just the HRH, but their Duke and Duchess of Sussex titles. They should become simply Mr and Mrs Windsor, free to sink into their pathetic, unloved, sunlit exile, and the decades of pointless boredom that stretch ahead – a hell entirely of their own making.' “. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14675925/strip-Harry-Meghan-HRH-titles-bombshell-interview-backlash-grows.html

Straight for the jugular, love it

Vam · Musing at the Chaos

Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Can you imagine how this will be told in the history books?

Two brothers, one born to be king, responsible and kind, with a beautiful dedicated wife.
The other, a spoiled weak-minded man, lured into a life of victimhood, by a social climbing, power hungry wife.

It'll make a great film one day.
It's already been done.
Has it?

🤷🏻‍♀️ Maybe the Edward VIII abdication/Wallis Simpson hoopla?

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Vam wrote:
Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Can you imagine how this will be told in the history books?

Two brothers, one born to be king, responsible and kind, with a beautiful dedicated wife.
The other, a spoiled weak-minded man, lured into a life of victimhood, by a social climbing, power hungry wife.

It'll make a great film one day.
It's already been done.
Has it?
🤷🏻‍♀️ Maybe the Edward VIII abdication/Wallis Simpson hoopla?

True, but it's not been made with the present characters....and I think time will have to pass, see how it all pans out, before anyone can make a good portrayal of this lot.

It would be fascinating to see how they are written about in a couple of hundred years.

I always thought Markle looked very much like Wallis Simpson, and Harry has turned into a version of his great, great uncle. It is a bit like history repeating itself.

Vita · Know It All

That was some interview Harry gave the BBC, he's clearly off his head and outraged he's no longer regarded as special and needs armed police.

I can't believe the nerve of him.

Causes all the bad feeling and trouble and can't understand why the King won't talk to him.

Magica · Go Outside

Vita wrote:
That was some interview Harry gave the BBC, he's clearly off his head and outraged he's no longer regarded as special and needs armed police.
I can't believe the nerve of him.
Causes all the bad feeling and trouble and can't understand why the King won't talk to him.

Exactly, a ginger whinger! Blames everyone else, but never looks at himself. I can't stand him!

Digger · Admin

Vita wrote:
That was some interview Harry gave the BBC, he's clearly off his head and outraged he's no longer regarded as special and needs armed police.
I can't believe the nerve of him.
Causes all the bad feeling and trouble and can't understand why the King won't talk to him.

He's thick as a whale omelette. Here is a fully grown man bleating on about 'reconciliation' with the family he accused of abuse, racism, how history was going to repeat itself alluding to Diana's death and the safety of Meghan and his family etc. Why on earth would you want anything to do such an awful family? I know I wouldn't.

Then we've got the ginger clown saying he gave 35 years service to this country therefore he's deserving of the tax payer forking out for his security. Well, his entire childhood right up until 18 included no public duties. From 18 to 30 he spent his time on drugs and booze and his military 'career' was minimal. He wasn't even allowed to fly a helicopter without an instructor with him and his deployment to Afghanistan totalled 25 weeks.

How about this little snippet regarding Harry.

Princess Diana’s former protection officer Ken Wharfe: “It’s unbelievable that such a high-profile person, who considers themself to be such a high-security risk, would allow themselves to have a Deliveroo driver arrive at a house with no idea of who they are and what they might be carrying in their bag. “It’s just unthinkable.” He added: “If he is still able to go to friends’ houses and allow Deliveroo to turn up at the door and then have the audacity to moan about his lack of security that is a very unintelligent thing to do.”

Magica · Go Outside

He's an imbecile. The royal's have had enough of him. They need to strip him, her, and the invisible kids titles. 😡

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Magica wrote:
He's an imbecile. The royal's have had enough of him. They need to strip him, her, and the invisible kids titles. 😡

Harry and Meghan: First picture of couple's daughter Lilibet is ...

Magica · Go Outside

Syl wrote:
Magica wrote:
He's an imbecile. The royal's have had enough of him. They need to strip him, her, and the invisible kids titles. 😡

Not all pictures are real.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Magica wrote:
Syl wrote:
Magica wrote:
He's an imbecile. The royal's have had enough of him. They need to strip him, her, and the invisible kids titles. 😡

Not all pictures are real.

True, the ones where her bump disappeared or grew massive on the same day...were photoshopped.

Magica · Go Outside

Syl wrote:
Magica wrote:
Syl wrote:
Magica wrote:
He's an imbecile. The royal's have had enough of him. They need to strip him, her, and the invisible kids titles. 😡

Not all pictures are real.
True, the ones where her bump disappeared or grew massive on the same day...were photoshopped.

If you say so

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Here you go Mags, the latest picture of Archie.

Silhouette of child watching sunset over ocean.

Maddog · Go Outside

Syl wrote:

Here you go Mags, the latest picture of Archie.

Do the Reptilian tails fall off the royals naturally or is there a ceremonial removal process?

Magica · Go Outside

Syl wrote:

Here you go Mags, the latest picture of Archie.

Never a face one, even if it was we dont.know what they look like. Could be anyone tbh.

Date: May 6 9:49 PM, 2025

I don’t know anyone irl interested in knowing what their kids look like, it’s beyond me why some would be.

If you were genuinely scared for your safety why play cat & mouse using your kids pics like this? I wouldn’t be uploading pics of my kids, even from behind, if their safety concerns were true. Then again I wouldn’t visit war torn Ukraine when God knows who is out there, allegedly, waiting to take pot-shots.

In some ways these pics remind me of Michael Jackson masking and veiling his kids.