And no, I never read any pm's of anyone, not even after the big migration to emaul.
pm's are not accessible here. I don't know about other forums but definitely not this one. I should think that's the same all along the line for most forums. They are private and should be.
Oh good God, is she running a forum for 4 yr olds? Go sit in the corner you naughty girl.
From Guest to NN on Dogs:
You shouldn’t have spoken back to Claire then, should you.
Turning into a bunch of ’how high?’ followers and they don’t even see it. The flock has merely started eating from another pasture.
NastyNickers is a sycophantic twat. She's desperate for attention and tries to play people off against each other. Nobody is going to trust her just the same as nobody trusts the two faced bitch MG.
Oh good God, is she running a forum for 4 yr olds? Go sit in the corner you naughty girl.
From Guest to NN on Dogs:
You shouldn’t have spoken back to Claire then, should you.
Turning into a bunch of ’how high?’ followers and they don’t even see it. The flock has merely started eating from another pasture.
NastyNickers is a sycophantic twat. She's desperate for attention and tries to play people off against each other. Nobody is going to trust her just the same as nobody trusts the two faced bitch MG.
If NN had done any bitching on there you can bet your ass Claire herself would have posted the grabs. I’m only surprised Cliar managed to keep the pretence up so long. She’ll be spewing all her pent up frustration now the mask has slipped.
As with the chat thread, I would say that the PMs on ANY forumotion/phpbb-based site are not safe and secure.
Today's friend is tomorrow's erm, "enemy" on the friends merry-go-round.
There were rumours even the PMs on Sun Online (SOL) were being looked at by DanielJ and his chums. After the phone-hacking scandal I can believe it.
Well I haven't a clue how to access that on here. So far as I know there is no means to do that.
The Cage and ShowerOfPlenty were phpBB based boards like this one. Speaking from experience, if you're an admin it's quite easy to reset other member's passwords then log into their account.
I could have done so quite easily, but the cage had personal friends of mine on it so I wouldn't take a shite on them. I don't want to know what they think of me. I'm sure they love me like a brother etc etc.
On the other hand, cunts like Northern - I wouldn't have given a fuck. I'd have printed all of them if I cared enough.
The fact I've not posted Northern's PMs anywhere shows I didn't even log in as her!
Edit: just checked, this isn't phpBB3 derived. It looks like it, but it's not. But its still possible to do it with Activeboard:
No shock there. As long as her members stick to light and fluffy stuff and don’t disagree with her, they’ll be safe. Claire was never really going to allow anyone who likes Hobbit to post on her forum. Can’t even find what NN supposedly said that was sooooooooo offensive and nasty. Did she say Claire was just like Hobbit?
I didn't say you were about to be banned. I'm waiting for Vicks. I want to ban you but we all make decisions like that as a team. If the other two admin don't want to ban you, then you won't get banned.
I'm not banning you for having an opinion. I'm banning you for the post about this forum which was, quite frankly, nasty and without foundation as you know fuck all.
-- Edited by RingyDingy on Monday 25th of June 2018 01:06:29 PM
I didn't say you were about to be banned. I'm waiting for Vicks. I want to ban you but we all make decisions like that as a team. If the other two admin don't want to ban you, then you won't get banned.
I'm not banning you for having an opinion. I'm banning you for the post about this forum which was, quite frankly, nasty and without foundation as you know fuck all.
-- Edited by RingyDingy on Monday 25th of June 2018 01:06:29 PM
Murasaki wrote:Gotto agree that cybering gossip is distasteful but I can see why NN is being criticised for being so selective about what she finds distasteful. It does smack of blatant bias.
But yeah malicious gossip about cybering is really off. And rarely true.
TBH, I think all the stuff about Hobbit cybering came from the whispers from CM which were posted in public. That's what this thread was about - the whispers.
I didn't mention her cybering in the OP. In fact the first person to mention it in this thread, therefore starting the malicious gossip, was MG.
So it's really her NN should have ranted at and not me.
I didn’t rant. I stated an opinion.
And I was taking about all the references to Hobbit cybering Stooo and the cybering for power and the gossiping about her being jealous and the “what will Ragga think” comments.
I didn’t say anything at first, I was going to ignore it, but it has been going on for ages and was getting progressively more malicious so I thought I’d give a bit of balance and state my opinion.
I'm only waiting for Vicks before banning you.
Again this seems unfair. NN made one comment in response to a guest post on dogs. She made some other points here, is that really a bannable offence to disagree with admin? It's a shame it's become this way.
You'll be next if the others agree. I'm sick of the pair of you and your amateur dramatics.