ChaoticMusings

JP · Burning up the forum

RE: Dogs dildos.

Twizzler · Burning up the forum

JP wrote:
Little bit of that bloke^^ and Rumplestiltskin going on in this thread.

The way things are going it’s going to be a lonely Christmas on dogs.

Date: Dec 12 4:56 PM, 2019

Victoria wrote:
Text wrote:
@ Georgia, I beg to differ. The worst thing that I have seen on forums is watching pictures of your home in wales being beamed live for every dangerous murderous stalking nutter in the world to see and imo that is worse than words. It happened here(not under Digger I hasten to add). I won't even comment on the morality of the whisper revelations where people trustingly posted stuff and their intimate words were splashed for everyone to see. And I will leave it there too.

------------------------------------------
Yeah and Purr posted a photo of my house on BF with her approval, you were posting there at the time but no doubt you "didn't see it" like you "didn't notice" Purr had an avatar of Stooo's recently deceased father as his avatar in that disgusting photo.
Now stop trying to sook in with her, it's giving me the dry boak.

Didn't you say it wasn't your house (actually your parents as you still live with them for some reason) at the time?

You had nothing to say about convict Stooo's numerous post about Edna's dead brother. You just held your nose just to stay in an admin role, you hypocrite.

rollup · Forum Eeyore

I've always liked Fletch but if you don't stick to msm type stuff then you're up for ridicule.
Dogs is very very conformist which might come as a surprise to many.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

rollup wrote:
I've always liked Fletch but if you don't stick to msm type stuff then you're up for ridicule.
Dogs is very very conformist which might come as a surprise to many.

I agree, you conform to the Stepford way of following the leaders or you don't fit it. It's always been like that, free spirits are not welcomed there.

Georgia x · Musing at the Chaos

rollup wrote:
I've always liked Fletch but if you don't stick to msm type stuff then you're up for ridicule.
Dogs is very very conformist which might come as a surprise to many.

It certainly did me!

When I read it I expected a very "anything goes" type forum, Creamy had a woman in a bikini for his avi, the conversations were very er forthright for want of a better word. TJ's ahem, political views enraged me and I couldn't wait to chat to him!

I thought it would be a welcome contrast to the rules and regulations of DS. Now I realise rules are necessary due to human nature.

The problem with Dogs is one of inconsistency. The rules don't apply to all. Having said that when I first got there Mods would just outright lie to give people bans, I don't think they do that now.

It was once a scene of bustling activity, now it's very quiet. But since that's evident I suspect that's what the owner wants. He sounds weary of moaning members and cares more about politics. I don't think he would care if Dogs vanished tomorrow .

John Doe · Still Here!

Syl wrote:
rollup wrote:
I've always liked Fletch but if you don't stick to msm type stuff then you're up for ridicule.
Dogs is very very conformist which might come as a surprise to many.
I agree, you conform to the Stepford way of following the leaders or you don't fit it. It's always been like that, free spirits are not welcomed there.

I got slagged off for starting a science and nature thread.

It did no harm but some people only wanted to tear those not in the clique to shreds - No Hands even changed the name of the thread just to be an utter bitch after I had posted on it for two years once she became mod.

Felch was also a nasty little bastard hiding behind bigger boys like Stooo and Dean.

FFS.

-- Edited by John Doe on Thursday 12th of December 2019 07:45:38 PM

Georgia x · Musing at the Chaos

Anonymous wrote:
The poster Dean aka Banjo. He can be cutting, nasty, vile but he can have a nice side to him and I feel he does the nasty stuff to be noticed and does not realise the hurt he may cause.
He won't leave but I am aware he wants to change his ways and come here but has been rejected. IMO, he should be allowed a chance and if CM makes him a better man, then
it is credit to the Admin and posters here. I he misbehaves ban him.

I would have liked Dean to join too, simply because I have never posted with him previously and the 'live and let live' post he made here surprised me. I think it's possible he does have a nice side.

However Syl is Mod and it would be unfair to expect her to post alongside someone who has shown her blatant disrespect. Women being cruel to each other on forums is cringe worthy to witness but as a woman you sort of understand the motivation even if you don't agree.

When men are overtly cruel to women it feels all wrong to me, especially if the woman in question has said nothing to offend them. Maybe I'm being too old fashioned...

Georgia x · Musing at the Chaos

John Doe wrote:
Syl wrote:
rollup wrote:
I've always liked Fletch but if you don't stick to msm type stuff then you're up for ridicule.
Dogs is very very conformist which might come as a surprise to many.
I agree, you conform to the Stepford way of following the leaders or you don't fit it. It's always been like that, free spirits are not welcomed there.
I got slagged off for starting a science and nature thread.
It did no harm but some people only wanted to tear those not in the clique to shreds - No Hands even changed the name of the thread just to be an utter bitch after I had posted on it for two years once she became mod.
Felch was also a nasty little bastard hiding behind bigger boys like Stooo and Dean.
FFS.

-- Edited by John Doe on Thursday 12th of December 2019 07:45:38 PM

I'm sorry to hear that JD, apparently he joined the pile on against Jra aswell. That was pretty pointless as there was a whole forum ganging up against Jra when I left forums for a bit.

Maybe it was nice to feel some camaraderie for a change as Fletch is often excluded for daring to speak out against the gang pile on's that are all too common on Dogs. But it's difficult to understand him joining in if he could see you had several posters on your case. If he didn't wish to speak up against the poor treatment you were receiving he could of at least not joined in.

It's out of character is what I will say.

-- Edited by Georgia x on Thursday 12th of December 2019 08:59:05 PM

John Doe · Still Here!

Georgia x wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Syl wrote:
rollup wrote:
I've always liked Fletch but if you don't stick to msm type stuff then you're up for ridicule.
Dogs is very very conformist which might come as a surprise to many.
I agree, you conform to the Stepford way of following the leaders or you don't fit it. It's always been like that, free spirits are not welcomed there.
I got slagged off for starting a science and nature thread.
It did no harm but some people only wanted to tear those not in the clique to shreds - No Hands even changed the name of the thread just to be an utter bitch after I had posted on it for two years once she became mod.
Felch was also a nasty little bastard hiding behind bigger boys like Stooo and Dean.
FFS.

-- Edited by John Doe on Thursday 12th of December 2019 07:45:38 PM
I'm sorry to hear that JD, apparently he joined the pile on against Jra aswell. That was pretty pointless as there was a whole forum ganging up against Jra when I left
Maybe it was nice to feel some camaraderie for a change as Fletch is often excluded for daring to speak out against the gang pile on's that are all too common on Dogs. But it's difficult to understand him joining in if he could see you had several posters on your case. If he didn't wish to speak up against the poor treatment you were receiving he could of at least not joined in.
It's out of character is what I will say.

Well we can't all get along with the same people Georgia, thanks anyway. X

by **Dean** » Thu Dec 12, 2019 6:09 pm