ChaoticMusings

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

RE: I am fed up with the Sleeping Dogs Forum - it is turning into an echo chamber

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Aside. I find that lamp interesting and pretty much harmless. It forms an optical illusion one in which there is a shift between positive and negative space or foreground and background. An effect that can be seen in some of the works of Salvador Dali as well as Wassily Kandinsky. It tells us something about how the human brain processes visual information.
Yes , it's like a Gestalt optical illusion, I. E the well known candlestick and two Faces picture. But there people are able to see both images simultaneously.
Here it has to be said the thong (that does not exist! ) because it is in the forefront is what the eyes are drawn to first and then what we perceive to be legs. I had to search to find the lamp at first upon being told I thought it was a novelty er humorous lamp 😀
I think it's actually quite brilliant.
The illusion of the black gloved hand caressing the milky thigh added another dimension on the whole I thought.
But...not any more!!! The orange lamp is one I made recently and just sold.

That one looks like a Burlesque dancers fan....sticking with the stripper theme I see.

Digger · Admin

Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Aside. I find that lamp interesting and pretty much harmless. It forms an optical illusion one in which there is a shift between positive and negative space or foreground and background. An effect that can be seen in some of the works of Salvador Dali as well as Wassily Kandinsky. It tells us something about how the human brain processes visual information.
Yes , it's like a Gestalt optical illusion, I. E the well known candlestick and two Faces picture. But there people are able to see both images simultaneously.
Here it has to be said the thong (that does not exist! ) because it is in the forefront is what the eyes are drawn to first and then what we perceive to be legs. I had to search to find the lamp at first upon being told I thought it was a novelty er humorous lamp 😀
I think it's actually quite brilliant.
The illusion of the black gloved hand caressing the milky thigh added another dimension on the whole I thought.
But...not any more!!! The orange lamp is one I made recently and just sold.
That one looks like a Burlesque dancers fan....sticking with the stripper theme I see.

You're never fucking happy!!!!

Date: Jan 8 2:57 PM, 2020

Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Has Syl flounced?
I couldn't stand the criticism of my lamp.

I now have one of the lamps I really love as my avi…...any criticism of this one will be met with scorn because I KNOW my Tiffanys lamps are beyond disdain.
Oh thank god!
God has nothing to do with it, it's entirely my own choice.

Oh thank Tiffany then.

John Doe · Still Here!

Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Aside. I find that lamp interesting and pretty much harmless. It forms an optical illusion one in which there is a shift between positive and negative space or foreground and background. An effect that can be seen in some of the works of Salvador Dali as well as Wassily Kandinsky. It tells us something about how the human brain processes visual information.
Yes , it's like a Gestalt optical illusion, I. E the well known candlestick and two Faces picture. But there people are able to see both images simultaneously.
Here it has to be said the thong (that does not exist! ) because it is in the forefront is what the eyes are drawn to first and then what we perceive to be legs. I had to search to find the lamp at first upon being told I thought it was a novelty er humorous lamp 😀
I think it's actually quite brilliant.
The illusion of the black gloved hand caressing the milky thigh added another dimension on the whole I thought.
But...not any more!!! The orange lamp is one I made recently and just sold.

Looks like a Peacock showing off it's arse!

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

John Doe wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Aside. I find that lamp interesting and pretty much harmless. It forms an optical illusion one in which there is a shift between positive and negative space or foreground and background. An effect that can be seen in some of the works of Salvador Dali as well as Wassily Kandinsky. It tells us something about how the human brain processes visual information.
Yes , it's like a Gestalt optical illusion, I. E the well known candlestick and two Faces picture. But there people are able to see both images simultaneously.
Here it has to be said the thong (that does not exist! ) because it is in the forefront is what the eyes are drawn to first and then what we perceive to be legs. I had to search to find the lamp at first upon being told I thought it was a novelty er humorous lamp 😀
I think it's actually quite brilliant.
The illusion of the black gloved hand caressing the milky thigh added another dimension on the whole I thought.
But...not any more!!! The orange lamp is one I made recently and just sold.
Looks like a Peacock showing off it's arse!

Here's the Tiffany version....beautiful.

parrot-lamp-peacock-tiffany-lamp-purple-lampshade-student-lamp[2].jpg

Digger · Admin

John Doe wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Aside. I find that lamp interesting and pretty much harmless. It forms an optical illusion one in which there is a shift between positive and negative space or foreground and background. An effect that can be seen in some of the works of Salvador Dali as well as Wassily Kandinsky. It tells us something about how the human brain processes visual information.
Yes , it's like a Gestalt optical illusion, I. E the well known candlestick and two Faces picture. But there people are able to see both images simultaneously.
Here it has to be said the thong (that does not exist! ) because it is in the forefront is what the eyes are drawn to first and then what we perceive to be legs. I had to search to find the lamp at first upon being told I thought it was a novelty er humorous lamp 😀
I think it's actually quite brilliant.
The illusion of the black gloved hand caressing the milky thigh added another dimension on the whole I thought.
But...not any more!!! The orange lamp is one I made recently and just sold.
Looks like a Peacock showing off it's arse!

Yes, a wonderful thing to behold!!!

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Digger wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Aside. I find that lamp interesting and pretty much harmless. It forms an optical illusion one in which there is a shift between positive and negative space or foreground and background. An effect that can be seen in some of the works of Salvador Dali as well as Wassily Kandinsky. It tells us something about how the human brain processes visual information.
Yes , it's like a Gestalt optical illusion, I. E the well known candlestick and two Faces picture. But there people are able to see both images simultaneously.
Here it has to be said the thong (that does not exist! ) because it is in the forefront is what the eyes are drawn to first and then what we perceive to be legs. I had to search to find the lamp at first upon being told I thought it was a novelty er humorous lamp 😀
I think it's actually quite brilliant.
The illusion of the black gloved hand caressing the milky thigh added another dimension on the whole I thought.
But...not any more!!! The orange lamp is one I made recently and just sold.
Looks like a Peacock showing off it's arse!
Yes, a wonderful thing to behold!!!

John Doe · Still Here!

Digger wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Aside. I find that lamp interesting and pretty much harmless. It forms an optical illusion one in which there is a shift between positive and negative space or foreground and background. An effect that can be seen in some of the works of Salvador Dali as well as Wassily Kandinsky. It tells us something about how the human brain processes visual information.
Yes , it's like a Gestalt optical illusion, I. E the well known candlestick and two Faces picture. But there people are able to see both images simultaneously.
Here it has to be said the thong (that does not exist! ) because it is in the forefront is what the eyes are drawn to first and then what we perceive to be legs. I had to search to find the lamp at first upon being told I thought it was a novelty er humorous lamp 😀
I think it's actually quite brilliant.
The illusion of the black gloved hand caressing the milky thigh added another dimension on the whole I thought.
But...not any more!!! The orange lamp is one I made recently and just sold.
Looks like a Peacock showing off it's arse!
Yes, a wonderful thing to behold!!!

Do you spend your time studying Peacocks arses then?

Bit of a strange hobby.

Georgia x · Musing at the Chaos

Syl wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Aside. I find that lamp interesting and pretty much harmless. It forms an optical illusion one in which there is a shift between positive and negative space or foreground and background. An effect that can be seen in some of the works of Salvador Dali as well as Wassily Kandinsky. It tells us something about how the human brain processes visual information.
Yes , it's like a Gestalt optical illusion, I. E the well known candlestick and two Faces picture. But there people are able to see both images simultaneously.
Here it has to be said the thong (that does not exist! ) because it is in the forefront is what the eyes are drawn to first and then what we perceive to be legs. I had to search to find the lamp at first upon being told I thought it was a novelty er humorous lamp 😀
I think it's actually quite brilliant.
The illusion of the black gloved hand caressing the milky thigh added another dimension on the whole I thought.
But...not any more!!! The orange lamp is one I made recently and just sold.
Looks like a Peacock showing off it's arse!
Here's the Tiffany version....beautiful.

That's beautiful😍😍 !! A tad out of my price range I should imagine ...😢

How many do you own Syl?

Georgia x · Musing at the Chaos

John Doe wrote:
Digger wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Aside. I find that lamp interesting and pretty much harmless. It forms an optical illusion one in which there is a shift between positive and negative space or foreground and background. An effect that can be seen in some of the works of Salvador Dali as well as Wassily Kandinsky. It tells us something about how the human brain processes visual information.
Yes , it's like a Gestalt optical illusion, I. E the well known candlestick and two Faces picture. But there people are able to see both images simultaneously.
Here it has to be said the thong (that does not exist! ) because it is in the forefront is what the eyes are drawn to first and then what we perceive to be legs. I had to search to find the lamp at first upon being told I thought it was a novelty er humorous lamp 😀
I think it's actually quite brilliant.
The illusion of the black gloved hand caressing the milky thigh added another dimension on the whole I thought.
But...not any more!!! The orange lamp is one I made recently and just sold.
Looks like a Peacock showing off it's arse!
Yes, a wonderful thing to behold!!!
Do you spend your time studying Peacocks arses then?
Bit of a strange hobby.

No, it isn't. I do it all the time

Date: Jan 8 8:49 PM, 2020

Why is Azzwipe never offline? What a way to spend your retirement ...24/7 trolling.

John Doe · Still Here!

Georgia x wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Digger wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Aside. I find that lamp interesting and pretty much harmless. It forms an optical illusion one in which there is a shift between positive and negative space or foreground and background. An effect that can be seen in some of the works of Salvador Dali as well as Wassily Kandinsky. It tells us something about how the human brain processes visual information.
Yes , it's like a Gestalt optical illusion, I. E the well known candlestick and two Faces picture. But there people are able to see both images simultaneously.
Here it has to be said the thong (that does not exist! ) because it is in the forefront is what the eyes are drawn to first and then what we perceive to be legs. I had to search to find the lamp at first upon being told I thought it was a novelty er humorous lamp 😀
I think it's actually quite brilliant.
The illusion of the black gloved hand caressing the milky thigh added another dimension on the whole I thought.
But...not any more!!! The orange lamp is one I made recently and just sold.
Looks like a Peacock showing off it's arse!
Yes, a wonderful thing to behold!!!
Do you spend your time studying Peacocks arses then?
Bit of a strange hobby.
No, it isn't. I do it all the time

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Georgia x wrote:
Syl wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Aside. I find that lamp interesting and pretty much harmless. It forms an optical illusion one in which there is a shift between positive and negative space or foreground and background. An effect that can be seen in some of the works of Salvador Dali as well as Wassily Kandinsky. It tells us something about how the human brain processes visual information.
Yes , it's like a Gestalt optical illusion, I. E the well known candlestick and two Faces picture. But there people are able to see both images simultaneously.
Here it has to be said the thong (that does not exist! ) because it is in the forefront is what the eyes are drawn to first and then what we perceive to be legs. I had to search to find the lamp at first upon being told I thought it was a novelty er humorous lamp 😀
I think it's actually quite brilliant.
The illusion of the black gloved hand caressing the milky thigh added another dimension on the whole I thought.
But...not any more!!! The orange lamp is one I made recently and just sold.
Looks like a Peacock showing off it's arse!
Here's the Tiffany version....beautiful.

That's beautiful😍😍 !! A tad out of my price range I should imagine ...😢
How many do you own Syl?

About 14 now Georgia, I gave my son a couple when he moved house.

I dont own the peacock sadly, I just saw the pic and thought it was beautiful.

Digger · Admin

Syl wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
Syl wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Aside. I find that lamp interesting and pretty much harmless. It forms an optical illusion one in which there is a shift between positive and negative space or foreground and background. An effect that can be seen in some of the works of Salvador Dali as well as Wassily Kandinsky. It tells us something about how the human brain processes visual information.
Yes , it's like a Gestalt optical illusion, I. E the well known candlestick and two Faces picture. But there people are able to see both images simultaneously.
Here it has to be said the thong (that does not exist! ) because it is in the forefront is what the eyes are drawn to first and then what we perceive to be legs. I had to search to find the lamp at first upon being told I thought it was a novelty er humorous lamp 😀
I think it's actually quite brilliant.
The illusion of the black gloved hand caressing the milky thigh added another dimension on the whole I thought.
But...not any more!!! The orange lamp is one I made recently and just sold.
Looks like a Peacock showing off it's arse!
Here's the Tiffany version....beautiful.

That's beautiful😍😍 !! A tad out of my price range I should imagine ...😢
How many do you own Syl?
About 14 now Georgia, I gave my son a couple when he moved house.
I dont own the peacock sadly, I just saw the pic and thought it was beautiful.

I don't actually like it. It looks like something you'd find in an Indian restaurant or amusement arcade.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Well each to their own....I think it's gorgeous.

rollup · Forum Eeyore

Popped in to dogs for a read and Lordy hasn't changed in his nonsense.

Re: I do wish Corbyn would STFU
Postby LordRaven » Wed Jan 08, 2020 8:11 pm

Aw Bless! I feel as though I'm in LoserVille listening to excuses for Losing, when there is no-one to blame but themselves backing a fucking dangerous idiot.
User avatar
LordRaven

Posts: 37488
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:39 pm
Location: Enceladus

Next post he makes he says he would have voted Labour at the election .....

You missed earlier today didn't you? I personally would have voted Labour, and I have no doubt millions more would have too, had they not got a dangerous fruitcake in charge.

So after everything he said leading up to the election he really didn't have a problem with their policies of privatisation etc.

He kept saying it was commie but .... he'd have voted for it.

I think all that sugar and medication is turning his blood to syrup.

Funny thing is the Boris Johnson party which no one seems to have mentioned is now going to carry out a mix of Ed Milliband and Corbyn's economic policies for ending austerity and borrowing money to pour into infrastructure.

It was going to be the end of the world now it's going to save it it!

British democracy is some kind of circus act.

-- Edited by rollup on Thursday 9th of January 2020 01:17:55 AM

Georgia x · Musing at the Chaos

If you read Dogs you want a forum war, didn't you know that?

Forgetting fantasyland, I know very little about LordRaven except he argues with McAz alot and they accuse each other of trolling.

British democracy is a tragedy but we might aswell laugh or we would cry

The post you made on another thread was very illuminating though in that far more individuals did vote Labour than the media spin on the results suggest.

Ignorant bigots made our bed and we all have to lie in it.

Georgia x · Musing at the Chaos

Syl wrote:
Well each to their own....I think it's gorgeous.

So do I

Georgia x · Musing at the Chaos

I'm off to bed now, thankyou Digger for your new avi! ! 😨