ChaoticMusings

Text · Getting Gobby

RE: Another racist thread?

Date: Jan 23 12:10 PM, 2020

Georgia x wrote:
Yes we can.
Sorry but some things are simply inexcusable.
I said that he was uneducated but what knowledge is there to learn about not hating people because of something they cannot change, the way they look. Such hatred is illogical and as such innate to such individuals.
I am a bit hardcore with bigots who are so extreme but I don't understand why someone being a different colour makes them seemingly inferior in the eyes of racists.
I thought BPhee was skating on thin ice stating people of the same ethnic group are more likely to consider each other attractive or that she didn't find an entire colour physically attractive to behold. Is that not the way ethnic cleansing lies?
A multicultural society can only bring diversity into the genepool and society alike which surely can only be healthy.
You remarked, I believe, that if people grew up surrounded only by their own race that may explain BPhee's personal preference. Not so. I grew up with only two black boys in the secondary school and one was a very handsome, if deviant😄, lad and the other plain looking. The first had no shortage of admirers, myself being one! BPhee's opinion is hers alone, not a phenomena that could be considered.
Black people, like er, everyone(!)are individual with unique genetic attributes. They share the same skin colour only, possibly the same hair type. But they don't all look like one person...I was genuinely baffled to hear such a view upheld. Denzel Washington does not resemble Snoop Dogg for example. One was very attractive in his youth, the other (imo at least) never.
If someone wants to say another individual is inferior because they are of a different skin colour that person is not uneducated but simply a nasty piece of work.
Major says he doesn't like black people. Replace the word "black "with "disabled". It then sounds as chilling as the illogical hatred of the racist truly is, without all the window dressing and flimsy fairweather excuses.
The term "people of colour" annoys me deeply too. No. They are not people of colour, just people. Who happen to be black not "dark skinned" or any other unnecessary adjective making an issue of something where no issue needs to exist. The term might be considered politically correct but Infact it only serves to promote division.
I just find it both perplexing and tbh sickening that someone could harbour hatred for another individual due to the colour of their skin in the year 2020.
Sorry for the rant Dr, and if you found my parallel above offensive but I consider some of the views presented on Dogs currently as hate speech to put it mildly, and it does not warrant a discussion, no matter how well meaning the intention.
Such people are being given too much respect for their blatant bigotry, and I find it highly irregular that they are continually given a platform for their repulsive rhetoric.

A bloody marvellous post that describes this racist beast to the letter. I yearn for your intellect and the incredible ability to slap down

racists like this moron. I utterly deplore racists and those that hide behind the,

Do you post on The Dogs? I often post as a Guest about the FM's

on DS.

R

Date: Jan 23 12:14 PM, 2020

Text wrote:
Twizzler wrote:
Avon is a good egg for putting out that thread.
I knew Starbuck would be all over it like a rash.
It looks like a thread that has been split off. Whoever's post is at the top of such a thread, is designated as the author.
Even if he was just breezing thru to make a one-off 'hello' post and had zero interest in the actual subject, LMAO.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well done to Georgia & others for speaking out against Starbold. I often did, myself. Nearly all his threads are agenda-driven.
Has anyone noticed how he ensures that his name is always on the Dogs homepage by posting inanities repeatedly in all the subforums? Egotistical turd!
What astonishes me is that several well known outspoken, confrontational types on Dogs forum who have posted alongside him for years, have never uttered a single word of condemnation of him. They are quick to pounce on anyone they consider a WUM, but curiously they never speak out against Starbold. [You know who you are].

Another super post. I too have noted that not just the FM's put up with his bile but those that run the site. This may be possibly due to the fact that much worse is spouted there

and I will reconsider my guesty posts there. In fact, I did complain the other day but the posts remain.

R (No, not Rollup)

Date: Jan 23 12:19 PM, 2020

Text wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
No one would dare say the word "unwhite" in polite company. It's the year 2020.
They would be viewed as a bigot with issues if they said it in impolite company now I consider it.
I don't know anything about this poster, the fates have kindly allowed me to avoid posting with the gentleman but his views are hopelessly woefully abhorrent .

It makes me laugh that both you and the author of this thread are outraged by Starbold's use of the word "unwhite". If you see some of the similar bigoted descriptions he uses for black and mixed raced people and gays and gypsies, you'd be speechless. He also uses vicious terms for women who have babies with darker men, even if it's within marriage he calls them sluts & slags. Good job he has never heard of the kardashians - he'd have a series of strokes,

Here is a selection of the terms he uses: >
"swabs, pongos, chogies, frisbees
turd burglar, shirtlifter, ponthook, limpo, carpet muncher,chinks, muziz, wogs, nignogs, coons, pakis,
liquorice all sorts, half-breeds, ********, picaninnies, gyppos, ghettowallahs."

-- Edited by Text on Thursday 23rd of January 2020 11:25:59 AM

Almost as bad as the foul-mouthed stuff you come out with!

Text · Getting Gobby

Georgia x wrote:
Text wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
No one would dare say the word "unwhite" in polite company. It's the year 2020.
They would be viewed as a bigot with issues if they said it in impolite company now I consider it.
I don't know anything about this poster, the fates have kindly allowed me to avoid posting with the gentleman but his views are hopelessly woefully abhorrent .

It makes me laugh that both you and the author of this thread are outraged by Starbold's use of the word "unwhite". If you see some of the similar bigoted descriptions he uses for black and mixed raced people and gays and gypsies, you'd be speechless. He also uses vicious terms for women who have babies with darker men, even if it's within marriage he calls them sluts & slags. Good job he has never heard of the kardashians - he'd have a series of strokes,

Here is a selection of the terms he uses: >
"swabs, pongos, chogies, frisbees
turd burglar, shirtlifter, ponthook, limpo, carpet muncher,chinks, muziz, wogs, nignogs, coons, pakis,
liquorice all sorts, half-breeds, ********, picaninnies, gyppos, ghettowallahs."

-- Edited by Text on Thursday 23rd of January 2020 11:25:59 AM
I'm saddened it makes you laugh but the term shocked me tbh Text. The people I know would be aghast at such blatant racism. I stated previously I do not have much knowledge of the poster and was rather content in my ignorance, although I was not aware of it!
Those other terms you have highlighted in bold are beyond despicable and obviously the word and I concur the term "unwhite" is tame in comparison..!
If those are the terms he freely uses on Dogs then he should be perma banned in no uncertain terms.
I'm speechless in all honesty..imagine the disgust and hurt if that language was used on the standard social media platforms. Such language learning if one can call it so, is so cruel and needlessly vicious..it defies belief.

I was being ironic, luv!! I was trying to say that term is nothing compared to many of the other nastier terms he likes to use.

The worst thing about him is that he likes to blame others when he gets banned. He refuses take responsibilty for his own bans cos he sees nowt wrong with the terms he uses.

I have NEVER asked any forum owner to ban him. He gets bans for his own actions, no one FORCES him to make hate speeches all day long.

Imagine the chats he had with his mother when he was small.

"mummy mummy mummy when I grow up, will i be a big brave soldier who takes responsibility for all the hate speeches I make?"

"no dear, you will grow up to be a spineless coward who blames everyone but yourself, for your own actions"

Date: Jan 23 12:32 PM, 2020

Text wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
Text wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
No one would dare say the word "unwhite" in polite company. It's the year 2020.
They would be viewed as a bigot with issues if they said it in impolite company now I consider it.
I don't know anything about this poster, the fates have kindly allowed me to avoid posting with the gentleman but his views are hopelessly woefully abhorrent .

It makes me laugh that both you and the author of this thread are outraged by Starbold's use of the word "unwhite". If you see some of the similar bigoted descriptions he uses for black and mixed raced people and gays and gypsies, you'd be speechless. He also uses vicious terms for women who have babies with darker men, even if it's within marriage he calls them sluts & slags. Good job he has never heard of the kardashians - he'd have a series of strokes,

Here is a selection of the terms he uses: >
"swabs, pongos, chogies, frisbees
turd burglar, shirtlifter, ponthook, limpo, carpet muncher,chinks, muziz, wogs, nignogs, coons, pakis,
liquorice all sorts, half-breeds, ********, picaninnies, gyppos, ghettowallahs."

-- Edited by Text on Thursday 23rd of January 2020 11:25:59 AM
I'm saddened it makes you laugh but the term shocked me tbh Text. The people I know would be aghast at such blatant racism. I stated previously I do not have much knowledge of the poster and was rather content in my ignorance, although I was not aware of it!
Those other terms you have highlighted in bold are beyond despicable and obviously the word and I concur the term "unwhite" is tame in comparison..!
If those are the terms he freely uses on Dogs then he should be perma banned in no uncertain terms.
I'm speechless in all honesty..imagine the disgust and hurt if that language was used on the standard social media platforms. Such language learning if one can call it so, is so cruel and needlessly vicious..it defies belief.
I was being ironic, luv!! I was trying to say that term is nothing compared to many of the other nastier terms he likes to use.
The worst thing about him is that he likes to blame others when he gets banned. He refuses take responsibilty for his own bans cos he sees nowt wrong with the terms he uses.
I have NEVER asked any forum owner to ban him. He gets bans for his own actions, no one FORCES him to make hate speeches all day long.

Imagine the chats he had with his mother when he was small.
"mummy mummy mummy when I grow up, will i be a big brave soldier who takes responsibility for all the hate speeches I make?"
"no dear, you will grow up to be a spineless coward who blames everyone but yourself, for your own actions"

He’s no different to Legendary then. Have you noticed none of the female posters want to post alongside him either?

Georgia x · Musing at the Chaos

Text wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
BackGammon wrote:
Twizzler wrote:
Avon is a good egg for putting out that thread.
I knew Starbuck would be all over it like a rash.
Covered himself in glory by slagging Avon. Stooo still hasn't banned him for the guests though.
You told the Guest he /she should not be discussing that thread here as it has nothing to do with this forum. So may I ask why it's one rule for the Guest and the other for you?
You discussed Stooo fairly often in the Whine prior to my joining I noted..
Why did you do that if you consider topics not related to CM to be unsuitable for discourse in the Whine?
That is a view upheld by your good self alone by the way as the Whine is the only thread where it IS perminted to discuss other forums.

Correct. The Whine is the designated area for discussing other forums. So the OP of this thread has done nowt wrong as such. But imo there was no need to make a separate thread about it, I think there is a Dogs thread around and the OP have attached his comments on there, instead of making a fresh thread. Generally speaking I also think it's best to post in your own username if making a thread like this, or making accusations. But hey - just my opinion.

Well quite, the OP had done nothing wrong at all hence why it passed moderation.So we are in agreement there Text 😊

But are you saying because there was already an existing thread concerning racism on Dogs the OP should have posted their thoughts there instead of creating a thread here?

I confess I am a tad confused, though that happens often! 😄

Members and Guests alike have always created threads in the Whine regarding the threads on Dogs, this is evident just by looking at recent threads alone, Jack's complaint of the "dildo avi's" for example.

Possibly the Guests opinions did not pass Moderation on Dogs but alas, I must confess I fail to see how the OP has deviated from the norm at all.

Georgia x · Musing at the Chaos

Yes Text, I looked back at the first page and it appears the OP was denied the opportunity to voice their view as it were, hence they created this thread. So in their defence they did try to post on Dogs first and foremost.

But I still don't quite understand why this Anon creating this thread in the Whine is deemed in any way different from all the other threads.

-- Edited by Georgia x on Thursday 23rd of January 2020 01:54:57 PM

Georgia x · Musing at the Chaos

Text wrote:
Twizzler wrote:
Avon is a good egg for putting out that thread.
I knew Starbuck would be all over it like a rash.
It looks like a thread that has been split off. Whoever's post is at the top of such a thread, is designated as the author.
Even if he was just breezing thru to make a one-off 'hello' post and had zero interest in the actual subject, LMAO.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well done to Georgia & others for speaking out against Starbold. I often did, myself. Nearly all his threads are agenda-driven.
Has anyone noticed how he ensures that his name is always on the Dogs homepage by posting inanities repeatedly in all the subforums? Egotistical turd!
What astonishes me is that several well known outspoken, confrontational types on Dogs forum who have posted alongside him for years, have never uttered a single word of condemnation of him. They are quick to pounce on anyone they consider a WUM, but curiously they never speak out against Starbold. [You know who you are].

I can't understand why anybody would fail to speak out against Major. Apologies Text ,I didn't see this post earlier.

I am glad you too have openly objected to the depraved cruelty he is allowed to post. He is posting hate speech , some of which can only get described as very hurtful sinister muck. There is no place for extreme racist rhetoric in modern multicultural Britain. Or anywhere!

If he is indeed a troll and does not actually believe what he is typing, although he seems too passionate and persistent for that to be so imo, then I still consider him to be an odious individual.

A bit of light hearted wummery is one thing, using the most offensive and graphic racist terms possible knowing you are posting alongside the people who may be the most hurt by it is inexcusable and certainly doesn't fall under the umbrella of "harmless banter".

He should be banned from any forums he currently frequents seeking a platform to air his bigotry, or at the very very least he should be prevented from using racist language and attempting to create threads that provide the opportunity for him to pursue his twisted agenda.

Has he been reprimanded on Dogs at all, issued even an hour's ban?? The place never ceases to appall and amaze!

-- Edited by Georgia x on Thursday 23rd of January 2020 02:18:45 PM

Date: Jan 23 2:26 PM, 2020

Georgia x wrote:

... I'm speechless in all honesty... I really am speechless...

No you're not.

Georgia x · Musing at the Chaos

Anonymous wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
Yes we can.
Sorry but some things are simply inexcusable.
I said that he was uneducated but what knowledge is there to learn about not hating people because of something they cannot change, the way they look. Such hatred is illogical and as such innate to such individuals.
I am a bit hardcore with bigots who are so extreme but I don't understand why someone being a different colour makes them seemingly inferior in the eyes of racists.
I thought BPhee was skating on thin ice stating people of the same ethnic group are more likely to consider each other attractive or that she didn't find an entire colour physically attractive to behold. Is that not the way ethnic cleansing lies?
A multicultural society can only bring diversity into the genepool and society alike which surely can only be healthy.
You remarked, I believe, that if people grew up surrounded only by their own race that may explain BPhee's personal preference. Not so. I grew up with only two black boys in the secondary school and one was a very handsome, if deviant😄, lad and the other plain looking. The first had no shortage of admirers, myself being one! BPhee's opinion is hers alone, not a phenomena that could be considered.
Black people, like er, everyone(!)are individual with unique genetic attributes. They share the same skin colour only, possibly the same hair type. But they don't all look like one person...I was genuinely baffled to hear such a view upheld. Denzel Washington does not resemble Snoop Dogg for example. One was very attractive in his youth, the other (imo at least) never.
If someone wants to say another individual is inferior because they are of a different skin colour that person is not uneducated but simply a nasty piece of work.
Major says he doesn't like black people. Replace the word "black "with "disabled". It then sounds as chilling as the illogical hatred of the racist truly is, without all the window dressing and flimsy fairweather excuses.
The term "people of colour" annoys me deeply too. No. They are not people of colour, just people. Who happen to be black not "dark skinned" or any other unnecessary adjective making an issue of something where no issue needs to exist. The term might be considered politically correct but Infact it only serves to promote division.
I just find it both perplexing and tbh sickening that someone could harbour hatred for another individual due to the colour of their skin in the year 2020.
Sorry for the rant Dr, and if you found my parallel above offensive but I consider some of the views presented on Dogs currently as hate speech to put it mildly, and it does not warrant a discussion, no matter how well meaning the intention.
Such people are being given too much respect for their blatant bigotry, and I find it highly irregular that they are continually given a platform for their repulsive rhetoric.

A bloody marvellous post that describes this racist beast to the letter. I yearn for your intellect and the incredible ability to slap down
racists like this moron. I utterly deplore racists and those that hide behind the,
Do you post on The Dogs? I often post as a Guest about the FM's
on DS.
R

I am perma banned from Dogs, Anon. The Admin insisted it was nothing to do with my original avi's which were in hindsight, deeply disrespectful to the ladies posting. But I'm not entirely sure why I was banned as although I was outspoken, there were far ruder and more obnoxious posters to Admin than I.

I cannot post as a Guest either, no.

I am accused of entering an incorrect confirmation code every time..! I think this has been done as a deliberate measure to ensure I cannot guest post which I do not begrudge at all, I am banned after all. I just am unsure why.

That being said, I actually don't care. I wouldn't wish to post there in a million years, it has descended into a rather Intimidating insult driven place hence why so many posters have opted to leave. The sense of fun that did once exist regarding the piss taking , has evaporated.

Sadly also a rather misogynistic element has insidiously permeated the platform of late.

Again, it's all down to what the owner and moderation allow.

Date: Jan 23 2:46 PM, 2020

Anonymous wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
... I thought BPhee was skating on thin ice stating people of the same ethnic group are more likely to consider each other attractive or that she didn't find an entire colour physically attractive to behold. Is that not the way ethnic cleansing lies? ... Black people...
The term "people of colour" annoys me deeply too...
You are so full of shit it's embarrassing. Who you are attracted too has nothing to do with racism. I have many white friends and never felt sexually attracted to any of them. I am black and I am sexually attracted to a certain type of black women. I love the sassiness and the shape of them, the way they walk that confidence. Others might like certain eye colour, hair colour, slim (shudder, not for me) fat, tall and the list is endless
Stop trying to make people feel bad over something they have no control over.
Stop being offended over racism that does not affect you. You can hate racism as everyone should but stop telling black people what they should be offended over. There is a new breed of white people who spend their time apologising to blacks about things they had no control over. You are being played. Stop it. It's clear you don't actually know anything. as its black people wanting to be called people of colour. and no not all of them but those who do have a right to do so.
You are very controlling and I expect a nightmare to live with. you berate people for things you do all the time, you try to control things and dictate to others. just stop it.

No-one has responded to this post by Anon. There's a lot of truth in it. I can understand why this comment appears to have been otherwise ignored. But I wouldn't necessarily single G-X out over it - because it is common amongst a certain crowd of yes white people. I recall seeing a youtube video of a group of white students haranguing a black police officer - accusing him of being an uncle Tom because he worked for the police and was trying to keep order during some student protest on campus (this was in the US and possibly in LA). He kept his composure and spoke with reason and dignity while they yelled at him.

dr synne · Musing at the Chaos

Anonymous wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
Yes we can.
Sorry but some things are simply inexcusable.
I said that he was uneducated but what knowledge is there to learn about not hating people because of something they cannot change, the way they look. Such hatred is illogical and as such innate to such individuals.
I am a bit hardcore with bigots who are so extreme but I don't understand why someone being a different colour makes them seemingly inferior in the eyes of racists.
I thought BPhee was skating on thin ice stating people of the same ethnic group are more likely to consider each other attractive or that she didn't find an entire colour physically attractive to behold. Is that not the way ethnic cleansing lies?
A multicultural society can only bring diversity into the genepool and society alike which surely can only be healthy.
You remarked, I believe, that if people grew up surrounded only by their own race that may explain BPhee's personal preference. Not so. I grew up with only two black boys in the secondary school and one was a very handsome, if deviant😄, lad and the other plain looking. The first had no shortage of admirers, myself being one! BPhee's opinion is hers alone, not a phenomena that could be considered.
Black people, like er, everyone(!)are individual with unique genetic attributes. They share the same skin colour only, possibly the same hair type. But they don't all look like one person...I was genuinely baffled to hear such a view upheld. Denzel Washington does not resemble Snoop Dogg for example. One was very attractive in his youth, the other (imo at least) never.
If someone wants to say another individual is inferior because they are of a different skin colour that person is not uneducated but simply a nasty piece of work.
Major says he doesn't like black people. Replace the word "black "with "disabled". It then sounds as chilling as the illogical hatred of the racist truly is, without all the window dressing and flimsy fairweather excuses.
The term "people of colour" annoys me deeply too. No. They are not people of colour, just people. Who happen to be black not "dark skinned" or any other unnecessary adjective making an issue of something where no issue needs to exist. The term might be considered politically correct but Infact it only serves to promote division.
I just find it both perplexing and tbh sickening that someone could harbour hatred for another individual due to the colour of their skin in the year 2020.
Sorry for the rant Dr, and if you found my parallel above offensive but I consider some of the views presented on Dogs currently as hate speech to put it mildly, and it does not warrant a discussion, no matter how well meaning the intention.
Such people are being given too much respect for their blatant bigotry, and I find it highly irregular that they are continually given a platform for their repulsive rhetoric.
One.... it's not for you to be annoyed or not at what people of colour want to call themselves. Its nothing to do with you.
Two... bib isn't that what backgammon said and you jump on him for a number of pages over it?

No need to aspologise. I understand what and why you are saying it.

One thing I would disagree with though re BPhee and not finding other ethnicities attractive. I don't think that was meant as inflammatory, just an honest observation. We cannot help who we are attracted to for the most part but that doesn't mean we object to what others do find attractive. In this day and age there is enough appreciation for other ethnicities that it's not a problem. IMHO

God knows we don't want to go down any road where people are pressured to be with anyone on ideological grounds. And I say that as a red headed male which is the bottom of any attractiveness ladder. (Although I'm a magnificent sonuvvabitch)

Georgia x · Musing at the Chaos

Anonymous wrote:
Text wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
No one would dare say the word "unwhite" in polite company. It's the year 2020.
They would be viewed as a bigot with issues if they said it in impolite company now I consider it.
I don't know anything about this poster, the fates have kindly allowed me to avoid posting with the gentleman but his views are hopelessly woefully abhorrent .

It makes me laugh that both you and the author of this thread are outraged by Starbold's use of the word "unwhite". If you see some of the similar bigoted descriptions he uses for black and mixed raced people and gays and gypsies, you'd be speechless. He also uses vicious terms for women who have babies with darker men, even if it's within marriage he calls them sluts & slags. Good job he has never heard of the kardashians - he'd have a series of strokes,

Here is a selection of the terms he uses: >
"swabs, pongos, chogies, frisbees
turd burglar, shirtlifter, ponthook, limpo, carpet muncher,chinks, muziz, wogs, nignogs, coons, pakis,
liquorice all sorts, half-breeds, ********, picaninnies, gyppos, ghettowallahs."

-- Edited by Text on Thursday 23rd of January 2020 11:25:59 AM
Almost as bad as the foul-mouthed stuff you come out with!

It's very sad that any grudge you harbour with Text would allow you to attempt to make her look bad when you must be perfectly aware of the sinister muck this poster Starbold is posting.

It is the petty and immature 'Mean Girls' type of post like yours that actually detract from the more important issues, thus allowing the truly toxic agenda's and posters to thrive.

Date: Jan 23 2:58 PM, 2020

Georgia x wrote:
I am perma banned from Dogs...
I cannot post as a Guest either, no.
I am accused of entering an incorrect confirmation code every time...!

I don't think it works like that. It often takes several goes to get the confirmation code because it is difficult to work out whether a D is an O or a Q or a 1 is an L etcetera. Some people complain it takes up to 8 goes to get the correct code. Experience helps. Only after you pass the confirmation code will your message get sent to the moderators for approval. It is at that point they will intervene.

Date: Jan 23 3:04 PM, 2020

Anonymous wrote:
Text wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
I'm saddened it makes you laugh but the term shocked me tbh Text. The people I know would be aghast at such blatant racism. I stated previously I do not have much knowledge of the poster and was rather content in my ignorance, although I was not aware of it!

Those other terms you have highlighted in bold are beyond despicable and obviously the word and I concur the term "unwhite" is tame in comparison..!
If those are the terms he freely uses on Dogs then he should be perma banned in no uncertain terms.
I'm speechless in all honesty..imagine the disgust and hurt if that language was used on the standard social media platforms. Such language learning if one can call it so, is so cruel and needlessly vicious..it defies belief.
I was being ironic, luv!! I was trying to say that term is nothing compared to many of the other nastier terms he likes to use.
The worst thing about him is that he likes to blame others when he gets banned. He refuses take responsibilty for his own bans cos he sees nowt wrong with the terms he uses.
I have NEVER asked any forum owner to ban him. He gets bans for his own actions, no one FORCES him to make hate speeches all day long.
Imagine the chats he had with his mother when he was small.
"mummy mummy mummy when I grow up, will i be a big brave soldier who takes responsibility for all the hate speeches I make?"
"no dear, you will grow up to be a spineless coward who blames everyone but yourself, for your own actions"
He’s no different to Legendary then. Have you noticed none of the female posters want to post alongside him either?

Even HobbitFeet avoids him. What he wrote about sleeping with lots of women and attending numerous abortion clinics was sickening.

Georgia x · Musing at the Chaos

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
... I thought BPhee was skating on thin ice stating people of the same ethnic group are more likely to consider each other attractive or that she didn't find an entire colour physically attractive to behold. Is that not the way ethnic cleansing lies? ... Black people...
The term "people of colour" annoys me deeply too...
You are so full of shit it's embarrassing. Who you are attracted too has nothing to do with racism. I have many white friends and never felt sexually attracted to any of them. I am black and I am sexually attracted to a certain type of black women. I love the sassiness and the shape of them, the way they walk that confidence. Others might like certain eye colour, hair colour, slim (shudder, not for me) fat, tall and the list is endless
Stop trying to make people feel bad over something they have no control over.
Stop being offended over racism that does not affect you. You can hate racism as everyone should but stop telling black people what they should be offended over. There is a new breed of white people who spend their time apologising to blacks about things they had no control over. You are being played. Stop it. It's clear you don't actually know anything. as its black people wanting to be called people of colour. and no not all of them but those who do have a right to do so.
You are very controlling and I expect a nightmare to live with. you berate people for things you do all the time, you try to control things and dictate to others. just stop it.
No-one has responded to this post by Anon. There's a lot of truth in it. I can understand why this comment appears to have been otherwise ignored. But I wouldn't necessarily single G-X out over it - because it is common amongst a certain crowd of yes white people. I recall seeing a youtube video of a group of white students haranguing a black police officer - accusing him of being an uncle Tom because he worked for the police and was trying to keep order during some student protest on campus (this was in the US and possibly in LA). He kept his composure and spoke with reason and dignity while they yelled at him.

I didn't ignore it Anon, I didn't see it!

I think if folk stop being offended by things that hurt other people all empathy will be eventually lost. So all I can say is that I don't agree with that BIB in particular because I fear it is rather a selfish viewpoint. If people only considered things that offended them, then society would of failed to move forward at all.

I am not telling black people what to be offended over, either. Not once have I done so.

But after seeing some of the adjectives this Major poster has attributed to black people I'm sure that of course some of them would be hurt and actually despair that men like that are still apparently tolerated and that society has not progressed anywhere near as far as it appears to.

I'm sorry Guesty but I tend to disagree, this poster is seemingly annoyed with er,me ..and not apparently, the deeply unsettling dialogue which has been deemed to be hate speech (at its most base) and illegal.

That is indicative of petty forum grievances sadly, especially as the Anon's post totally loses its way and just ends up sounding childish as the poster strives in vain to insult me personally.

-- Edited by Georgia x on Thursday 23rd of January 2020 03:16:02 PM

Date: Jan 23 3:24 PM, 2020

Georgia x wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
Yes we can.
Sorry but some things are simply inexcusable.
I said that he was uneducated but what knowledge is there to learn about not hating people because of something they cannot change, the way they look. Such hatred is illogical and as such innate to such individuals.
I am a bit hardcore with bigots who are so extreme but I don't understand why someone being a different colour makes them seemingly inferior in the eyes of racists.
I thought BPhee was skating on thin ice stating people of the same ethnic group are more likely to consider each other attractive or that she didn't find an entire colour physically attractive to behold. Is that not the way ethnic cleansing lies?
A multicultural society can only bring diversity into the genepool and society alike which surely can only be healthy.
You remarked, I believe, that if people grew up surrounded only by their own race that may explain BPhee's personal preference. Not so. I grew up with only two black boys in the secondary school and one was a very handsome, if deviant😄, lad and the other plain looking. The first had no shortage of admirers, myself being one! BPhee's opinion is hers alone, not a phenomena that could be considered.
Black people, like er, everyone(!)are individual with unique genetic attributes. They share the same skin colour only, possibly the same hair type. But they don't all look like one person...I was genuinely baffled to hear such a view upheld. Denzel Washington does not resemble Snoop Dogg for example. One was very attractive in his youth, the other (imo at least) never.
If someone wants to say another individual is inferior because they are of a different skin colour that person is not uneducated but simply a nasty piece of work.
Major says he doesn't like black people. Replace the word "black "with "disabled". It then sounds as chilling as the illogical hatred of the racist truly is, without all the window dressing and flimsy fairweather excuses.
The term "people of colour" annoys me deeply too. No. They are not people of colour, just people. Who happen to be black not "dark skinned" or any other unnecessary adjective making an issue of something where no issue needs to exist. The term might be considered politically correct but Infact it only serves to promote division.
I just find it both perplexing and tbh sickening that someone could harbour hatred for another individual due to the colour of their skin in the year 2020.
Sorry for the rant Dr, and if you found my parallel above offensive but I consider some of the views presented on Dogs currently as hate speech to put it mildly, and it does not warrant a discussion, no matter how well meaning the intention.
Such people are being given too much respect for their blatant bigotry, and I find it highly irregular that they are continually given a platform for their repulsive rhetoric.

A bloody marvellous post that describes this racist beast to the letter. I yearn for your intellect and the incredible ability to slap down
racists like this moron. I utterly deplore racists and those that hide behind the,
Do you post on The Dogs? I often post as a Guest about the FM's
on DS.
R
I am perma banned from Dogs, Anon. The Admin insisted it was nothing to do with my original avi's which were in hindsight, deeply disrespectful to the ladies posting. But I'm not entirely sure why I was banned as although I was outspoken, there were far ruder and more obnoxious posters to Admin than I.
I cannot post as a Guest either, no.
I am accused of entering an incorrect confirmation code every time..! I think this has been done as a deliberate measure to ensure I cannot guest post which I do not begrudge at all, I am banned after all. I just am unsure why.
That being said, I actually don't care. I wouldn't wish to post there in a million years, it has descended into a rather Intimidating insult driven place hence why so many posters have opted to leave. The sense of fun that did once exist regarding the piss taking , has evaporated.
Sadly also a rather misogynistic element has insidiously permeated the platform of late.
Again, it's all down to what the owner and moderation allow.

Nothing you say stands up to even a tiny bit of scrutiny.

Date: Jan 23 3:37 PM, 2020

Georgia x wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Text wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
No one would dare say the word "unwhite" in polite company. It's the year 2020.
They would be viewed as a bigot with issues if they said it in impolite company now I consider it.
I don't know anything about this poster, the fates have kindly allowed me to avoid posting with the gentleman but his views are hopelessly woefully abhorrent .

It makes me laugh that both you and the author of this thread are outraged by Starbold's use of the word "unwhite". If you see some of the similar bigoted descriptions he uses for black and mixed raced people and gays and gypsies, you'd be speechless. He also uses vicious terms for women who have babies with darker men, even if it's within marriage he calls them sluts & slags. Good job he has never heard of the kardashians - he'd have a series of strokes,

Here is a selection of the terms he uses: >
"swabs, pongos, chogies, frisbees
turd burglar, shirtlifter, ponthook, limpo, carpet muncher,chinks, muziz, wogs, nignogs, coons, pakis,
liquorice all sorts, half-breeds, ********, picaninnies, gyppos, ghettowallahs."

-- Edited by Text on Thursday 23rd of January 2020 11:25:59 AM
Almost as bad as the foul-mouthed stuff you come out with!
It's very sad that any grudge you harbour with Text would allow you to attempt to make her look bad when you must be perfectly aware of the sinister muck this poster Starbold is posting.
It is the petty and immature 'Mean Girls' type of post like yours that actually detract from the more important issues, thus allowing the truly toxic agenda's and posters to thrive.

The reason he thrives is because he's posting to get a reaction, and the walls of text you've been spouting about him the last three days is giving him exactly what he wants.

John Doe · Still Here!

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Text wrote:
Georgia x wrote:
I'm saddened it makes you laugh but the term shocked me tbh Text. The people I know would be aghast at such blatant racism. I stated previously I do not have much knowledge of the poster and was rather content in my ignorance, although I was not aware of it!
Those other terms you have highlighted in bold are beyond despicable and obviously the word and I concur the term "unwhite" is tame in comparison..!
If those are the terms he freely uses on Dogs then he should be perma banned in no uncertain terms.
I'm speechless in all honesty..imagine the disgust and hurt if that language was used on the standard social media platforms. Such language learning if one can call it so, is so cruel and needlessly vicious..it defies belief.
I was being ironic, luv!! I was trying to say that term is nothing compared to many of the other nastier terms he likes to use.
The worst thing about him is that he likes to blame others when he gets banned. He refuses take responsibilty for his own bans cos he sees nowt wrong with the terms he uses.
I have NEVER asked any forum owner to ban him. He gets bans for his own actions, no one FORCES him to make hate speeches all day long.
Imagine the chats he had with his mother when he was small.
"mummy mummy mummy when I grow up, will i be a big brave soldier who takes responsibility for all the hate speeches I make?"
"no dear, you will grow up to be a spineless coward who blames everyone but yourself, for your own actions"
He’s no different to Legendary then. Have you noticed none of the female posters want to post alongside him either?
Even HobbitFeet avoids him. What he wrote about sleeping with lots of women and attending numerous abortion clinics was sickening.

Yet apparently allows him to post on there - what a fair and unbiased mod she really is (dare to say differently and you will have your IP address blocked - but only if she does not like you).

Hypocrisy of the highest order by Miss Chernobyl.