ChaoticMusings

The reason "he is still posting" is not that he's a nice, sensible poster or one that does not post hurtful rubbish. He is there, he has a platform because those that run, manage the site allow him to stay. Remind me why Avon has that disgusting avatar?

John Doe wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

Text wrote:

---

Georgia x wrote:

---

 I'm saddened it makes you laugh but the term shocked me tbh Text. The people I know would be aghast at such blatant racism. I stated  previously  I do not have much knowledge of the poster and was rather content in my ignorance, although I was not aware of it!

Those other terms you have highlighted in bold are beyond despicable and obviously the word and I concur the  term "unwhite" is tame in comparison..!

If those are the terms he freely uses on Dogs then he should be perma banned in no uncertain terms.

I'm speechless in all honesty..imagine the disgust and hurt if that language was used on the standard social media platforms. Such language learning if one can call it so, is so cruel and needlessly vicious..it defies belief. 

---

 I was being ironic, luv!! I was trying to say that term is nothing compared to many of the other nastier terms he likes to use.

The worst thing about him is that he likes to blame others when he gets banned. He refuses take responsibilty for his own bans cos he sees nowt wrong with the terms he uses.

I have NEVER asked any forum owner to ban him. He gets bans for his own actions, no one FORCES him to make hate speeches all day long.

Imagine the chats he had with his mother when he was small.

"mummy mummy mummy when I grow up, will i be a big brave soldier who takes responsibility for all the hate speeches  I make?"

"no dear, you will grow up to be a spineless coward who blames everyone but yourself, for your own actions" 

---

 He’s no different to Legendary then. Have you noticed none of the female posters want to post alongside him either?

---

 Even HobbitFeet avoids him. What he wrote about sleeping with lots of women and attending numerous abortion clinics was sickening. 

---

Yet apparently allows him to post on there - what a fair and unbiased mod she really is (dare to say differently and you will have your IP address blocked - but only if she does not like you).

Hypocrisy of the highest order by Miss Chernobyl.  

---

Ban IP addresses?

You mean exactly like Digger and Syl on here? 

Georgia x wrote:

---

Text wrote:

---

Twizzler wrote:

---

Avon is a good egg for putting out that thread.

I knew Starbuck would be all over it like a rash.

---

 It looks like a thread that has been split off. Whoever's post is at the top of such a thread, is designated as the author. 

Even if he was just breezing thru to make a one-off 'hello' post and had zero interest in the actual subject, LMAO. 

 

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well done to Georgia & others for speaking out against Starbold. I often did, myself. Nearly all his threads are agenda-driven.

Has anyone noticed how he ensures that his name is always on the Dogs homepage by posting inanities repeatedly in all the subforums? Egotistical turd! 

What astonishes me is that several well known outspoken, confrontational types on Dogs forum who have posted alongside him for years,  have  never uttered a single word of condemnation of him. They are quick to pounce on anyone they consider a WUM, but curiously they never speak out against Starbold. [You know who you are]. 

 

---

 I can't understand why anybody would fail to speak out against Major. Apologies Text ,I didn't see this post earlier.

I am glad you too have openly objected to the depraved cruelty he is allowed to post. He is posting hate speech , some of which can only get described as very hurtful sinister muck. There is no place for extreme racist rhetoric in modern multicultural Britain. Or anywhere! 

If he is indeed a troll and does not actually believe what he is typing, although he seems too passionate and persistent for that to be so imo, then I still consider him to be an odious individual.

A bit of light hearted wummery is one thing, using the most offensive and graphic  racist terms possible knowing you are posting alongside the people who may be the most hurt by it is inexcusable and certainly  doesn't fall under the umbrella of "harmless banter". 

He should be banned from any forums he currently frequents seeking a platform to air his bigotry, or at the very very least he should be prevented from using racist language and attempting to create threads that provide the opportunity for him to pursue his twisted agenda.

Has he been reprimanded on Dogs at all, issued even an hour's ban?? The place never ceases to appall and amaze!

---

Admin here and another member swears he isn't racist and it's all an act.  Are you falling for his act? Is he not only getting the reaction he wants over there but over here as well. 

Good job!! 

Anon I never said he's not racist I said he's a character!  I don't agree with him, he knows that, but I feel he just liked to wind others up.  It's up to Stoo to ban him, so take it up with him.  It's nothing to do with this forum or Syl or digger on here.

BG said that. 

Anonymous wrote:

---

Georgia x wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

Text wrote:

---

Georgia x wrote:

---

No one would dare say the word "unwhite" in polite company. It's the year 2020.

They would be viewed as a bigot with issues if they said it in impolite company now I consider it.

I don't know anything about this poster, the fates have kindly allowed me to avoid posting with the gentleman but his views are hopelessly woefully abhorrent .

 

 

---

 

It makes me laugh that both you and the author of this thread are outraged by Starbold's use of the word "unwhite". If you see some of the similar bigoted descriptions he uses for black and mixed raced people and gays and gypsies, you'd be speechless. He also uses vicious terms for women who have  babies with darker men, even if it's within marriage he calls them sluts & slags. Good job he has never heard of the kardashians - he'd have a series of strokes, 

 

Here is a selection of the terms he uses: >

"swabs, pongos, chogies, frisbees
turd burglar, shirtlifter, ponthook, limpo, carpet muncher,chinks, muziz, wogs, nignogs, coons, pakis,
liquorice all sorts, half-breeds, ********,  picaninnies, gyppos, ghettowallahs."

-- Edited by Text on Thursday 23rd of January 2020 11:25:59 AM

---

 Almost as bad as the foul-mouthed stuff you come out with!

---

 It's very sad that any grudge you harbour with Text would allow you to attempt to make her look bad when you must be perfectly aware of the sinister muck this poster Starbold is posting.

It is the petty and immature 'Mean Girls' type of post like yours that actually detract from the more important issues, thus allowing the truly toxic agenda's and posters to thrive.

---

 The reason he thrives is because he's posting to get a reaction, and the walls of text you've been spouting about him the last three days is giving him exactly what he wants.

---

 Oh please! That stale old psychobabbling crap won't wash.  ALL wums by definition are attention seekers anyway so you're saying nowt new here.  Yet they all get confronted by the usual confrontational types.  What is so special about Starbold that his special brand of WUMery gives him a free pass when no other WUM/troll would have got away with it? You are simply excusing him. 

I completely ignored his hate preacher posts and gave him a wide berth these past few weeks  .... till 2 days ago when i spotted him accusing me of asking for him to be banned.  The little lying fucknut actually blames others for his bans. If he'd left me alone I'd have left him alone.

Anonymous wrote:

---

Text wrote:

---

Georgia x wrote:

---

Text wrote:

---

Georgia x wrote:

---

No one would dare say the word "unwhite" in polite company. It's the year 2020.

They would be viewed as a bigot with issues if they said it in impolite company now I consider it.

I don't know anything about this poster, the fates have kindly allowed me to avoid posting with the gentleman but his views are hopelessly woefully abhorrent .

 

 

---

 

It makes me laugh that both you and the author of this thread are outraged by Starbold's use of the word "unwhite". If you see some of the similar bigoted descriptions he uses for black and mixed raced people and gays and gypsies, you'd be speechless. He also uses vicious terms for women who have  babies with darker men, even if it's within marriage he calls them sluts & slags. Good job he has never heard of the kardashians - he'd have a series of strokes, 

 

Here is a selection of the terms he uses: >

"swabs, pongos, chogies, frisbees
turd burglar, shirtlifter, ponthook, limpo, carpet muncher,chinks, muziz, wogs, nignogs, coons, pakis,
liquorice all sorts, half-breeds, ********,  picaninnies, gyppos, ghettowallahs."

-- Edited by Text on Thursday 23rd of January 2020 11:25:59 AM

---

 I'm saddened it makes you laugh but the term shocked me tbh Text. The people I know would be aghast at such blatant racism. I stated  previously  I do not have much knowledge of the poster and was rather content in my ignorance, although I was not aware of it!

Those other terms you have highlighted in bold are beyond despicable and obviously the word and I concur the  term "unwhite" is tame in comparison..!

If those are the terms he freely uses on Dogs then he should be perma banned in no uncertain terms.

I'm speechless in all honesty..imagine the disgust and hurt if that language was used on the standard social media platforms. Such language learning if one can call it so, is so cruel and needlessly vicious..it defies belief. 

---

 I was being ironic, luv!! I was trying to say that term is nothing compared to many of the other nastier terms he likes to use.

The worst thing about him is that he likes to blame others when he gets banned. He refuses take responsibilty for his own bans cos he sees nowt wrong with the terms he uses.

I have NEVER asked any forum owner to ban him. He gets bans for his own actions, no one FORCES him to make hate speeches all day long.

 

Imagine the chats he had with his mother when he was small.

"mummy mummy mummy when I grow up, will i be a big brave soldier who takes responsibility for all the hate speeches  I make?"

"no dear, you will grow up to be a spineless coward who blames everyone but yourself, for your own actions" 

 

---

 He’s no different to Legendary then. Have you noticed none of the female posters want to post alongside him either?

---

 Yep. 

I stated on another thread the misogynistic vibe is ever present on Dogs of late  and individuals I used to get on with seemed to have become increasingly more defensive and hostile.

I pointed out that the treatment Lady M was receiving was the epitome of misogyny with Legendary spamming menopausal video's instead of bothering to form sentences in response to her. 

Then there is the underlying current of racism she gets to enjoy from another poster who tag teams with McAz, a poster who drips condescension in his increasingly agenda driven posts that are ageist now aswell as misogynistic ! The posts about women of a certain age and their skin were certainly noted.

Why?

Because Aziz never used to feel the need to attempt to hurt women with such base empty trolling, the poster I remember was witty and intelligent. A tad full of himself yes and cutting at times..but rarely cruel. Whatever the reasoning for the creation that is McAz, the persona is deeply unlikeable and curiously created  for his own amusement.

Alot of women have fled in the face of such disrespectful treatment and who can blame them?

Female posters are willing to have a laugh and debate with these gentlemen,  why do they recoil and  prefer mocking them instead.??

It's sad to witness.

Georgia x wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

Text wrote:

---

Georgia x wrote:

---

Text wrote:

---

Georgia x wrote:

---

No one would dare say the word "unwhite" in polite company. It's the year 2020.

They would be viewed as a bigot with issues if they said it in impolite company now I consider it.

I don't know anything about this poster, the fates have kindly allowed me to avoid posting with the gentleman but his views are hopelessly woefully abhorrent .

 

 

---

 

It makes me laugh that both you and the author of this thread are outraged by Starbold's use of the word "unwhite". If you see some of the similar bigoted descriptions he uses for black and mixed raced people and gays and gypsies, you'd be speechless. He also uses vicious terms for women who have  babies with darker men, even if it's within marriage he calls them sluts & slags. Good job he has never heard of the kardashians - he'd have a series of strokes, 

 

Here is a selection of the terms he uses: >

"swabs, pongos, chogies, frisbees
turd burglar, shirtlifter, ponthook, limpo, carpet muncher,chinks, muziz, wogs, nignogs, coons, pakis,
liquorice all sorts, half-breeds, ********,  picaninnies, gyppos, ghettowallahs."

-- Edited by Text on Thursday 23rd of January 2020 11:25:59 AM

---

 I'm saddened it makes you laugh but the term shocked me tbh Text. The people I know would be aghast at such blatant racism. I stated  previously  I do not have much knowledge of the poster and was rather content in my ignorance, although I was not aware of it!

Those other terms you have highlighted in bold are beyond despicable and obviously the word and I concur the  term "unwhite" is tame in comparison..!

If those are the terms he freely uses on Dogs then he should be perma banned in no uncertain terms.

I'm speechless in all honesty..imagine the disgust and hurt if that language was used on the standard social media platforms. Such language learning if one can call it so, is so cruel and needlessly vicious..it defies belief. 

---

 I was being ironic, luv!! I was trying to say that term is nothing compared to many of the other nastier terms he likes to use.

The worst thing about him is that he likes to blame others when he gets banned. He refuses take responsibilty for his own bans cos he sees nowt wrong with the terms he uses.

I have NEVER asked any forum owner to ban him. He gets bans for his own actions, no one FORCES him to make hate speeches all day long.

 

Imagine the chats he had with his mother when he was small.

"mummy mummy mummy when I grow up, will i be a big brave soldier who takes responsibility for all the hate speeches  I make?"

"no dear, you will grow up to be a spineless coward who blames everyone but yourself, for your own actions" 

 

---

 He’s no different to Legendary then. Have you noticed none of the female posters want to post alongside him either?

---

 Yep. 

I stated on another thread the misogynistic vibe is ever present on Dogs of late  and individuals I used to get on with seemed to have become increasingly more defensive and hostile.

I pointed out that the treatment Lady M was receiving was the epitome of misogyny with Legendary spamming menopausal video's instead of bothering to form sentences in response to her. 

Then there is the underlying current of racism she gets to enjoy from another poster who tag teams with McAz, a poster who drips condescension in his increasingly agenda driven posts that are ageist now aswell as misogynistic ! The posts about women of a certain age and their skin were certainly noted.

Why?

Because Aziz never used to feel the need to attempt to hurt women with such base empty trolling, the poster I remember was witty and intelligent. A tad full of himself yes and cutting at times..but rarely cruel. Whatever the reasoning for the creation that is McAz, the persona is deeply unlikeable and curiously created  for his own amusement.

Alot of women have fled in the face of such disrespectful treatment and who can blame them?

Female posters are willing to have a laugh and debate with these gentlemen,  why do they recoil and  prefer mocking them instead.??

It's sad to witness.

-- Edited by Georgia x on Friday 24th of January 2020 12:38:02 AM

---

 Aziz has been different in each of his persona's...  and he's had many.   He'll try to deny it, of course.  Like he tries to deny he was Henry.   The thing about having all these forum personalities is that you have to have a very good memory to sustain the lies, or smoke screen.   And most people have very long memories on these forums and see right through him.   At the moment, he's cultivating what he believes to be a languid, edgy persona, pulling from long gone (?) others such as Trop and NAA.   In the past his tongue was attached to the arses of those two including Dean.   He's a male version of Ali.   I guess in his dotage, he's losing the capacity for intelligent interaction, sinking to sarcasm and obsequious passive aggressive bullying.  There's something of the toady about him. 

Anonymous wrote:

---

Ultimately no-one is that important to worry about.  Or at least that is the case if you're not interested in forming relationships beyond that of learning from each others experiences and knowledge. 

But it seems some forum members and past members have known each other for ten to fifteen years or maybe longer.  Some even seem to have met in real life.  Given such longevity then I can understand why some can get emotional.  We know someone left here because they couldn't stand someone here.  And we know several here can't stand some people over there. 

Isn't that enough?  Why expend energy demanding another forum should ban so and so - if you're not part of that forum.

---

We also get members who delete themselves in a fit of pique then get all Violet Elizabeth when they cop an IP ban.    Forumers, huh?