ChaoticMusings

Date: Feb 7 2:37 PM, 2020

RE: Who would you not want to see here?

Digger · Admin

Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Goodwife was what a few on dogs hated- a younger women who dared to have an independent opinion who got on well with lads. There was a lot of anger jealousy and bile posted to her almost daily from the likes of Vam and Hobbit. Went on for over a year.

Nasty nickers too was vile and joined in with Mad Vam. they oddly seemed to resent the fact Goodwife had bigger boobs and often brought them up to try and body shame her on dogs. It’s the sort of thing you’d expect from Budgie or Dean not from one woman to another.

I doubt she’d join if one of the people that targeted her posts here even if they’re putting on an nice act. Plenty of people saw how they treated her.
Can't Goodwife speak for herself?
She probably got fed up.
It is probably draining being attacked for being yourself and not fitting in to the Dogs clique.
Hobbit is very threatened by women male posters like , Vam just enjoys the sport of it all. NN likes the camaraderie of being in a clique and also gets envious.
It's weird but Stooo seems to want an all male forum. Maybe he just wants an easy life but Dogs is a snore fest.
His post about Syl on here used the exact same words as the post he claimed Fluffy made.
He has outed himself as a liar and a drunken twat
'No Hands' is an real oddball who hates people for no reason unless they give her a bit of moistness - cue anonymous cowardly twats from SD.

How is this post any different from Stoo's post about Syl the other day? it's somehow not crude and nasty because it's here?
You could ask the same question on Dogs. The difference between here and Dogs is that we generally have no bias with guest posting. We let most things through, unless they break the few rules we have here. If our members want to bitch on the Whine about someone, they can. Just as guests like yourself are given a voice here too. Nobody on here has any loyalty to Stooo.

JD agreed that Stoo's post about Syl was pathetic but his own post was identical , he was just talking about a different woman.
JD was being a hypocrite and Syl was fair to call him on it.
JD was crude bout HF being "moist" , Stooo said the same about Syl. So why isn't JD bring pathetic then?
And what has "loyalty to Stoo" got to do with anything.
Facts are facts. You are not much different to Stoo really . Doubt this will make the board but why can't you admit things without twisting them

And of course, you don't have an agenda about JD, do you? Perhaps if you stop hiding behind a proxy like a snivelling coward you may be able to take the moral high ground. As it is, you're just a nobody guest troll hypocrite.

John Doe · Still Here!

Syl wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Goodwife was what a few on dogs hated- a younger women who dared to have an independent opinion who got on well with lads. There was a lot of anger jealousy and bile posted to her almost daily from the likes of Vam and Hobbit. Went on for over a year.

Nasty nickers too was vile and joined in with Mad Vam. they oddly seemed to resent the fact Goodwife had bigger boobs and often brought them up to try and body shame her on dogs. It’s the sort of thing you’d expect from Budgie or Dean not from one woman to another.

I doubt she’d join if one of the people that targeted her posts here even if they’re putting on an nice act. Plenty of people saw how they treated her.
Can't Goodwife speak for herself?
She probably got fed up.
It is probably draining being attacked for being yourself and not fitting in to the Dogs clique.
Hobbit is very threatened by women male posters like , Vam just enjoys the sport of it all. NN likes the camaraderie of being in a clique and also gets envious.
It's weird but Stooo seems to want an all male forum. Maybe he just wants an easy life but Dogs is a snore fest.
His post about Syl on here used the exact same words as the post he claimed Fluffy made.
He has outed himself as a liar and a drunken twat
'No Hands' is an real oddball who hates people for no reason unless they give her a bit of moistness - cue anonymous cowardly twats from SD.

JD, you cant condemn other people on other threads for being pathetically crude and then go on to use similar terms yourself.

Fair enough, I was a bit out of order with the language Syl.

But after all the shit she gave me for absolutely no reason whilst backing her buddies to the hilt it just annoys the hell out of me when anonymous twats (and yes it's not exactly hard to guess who they are) on here with an agenda against me make out she was is a saint.

Some might say she deserves to be criticised.

Stooo certainly fucking does - the man is a serial liar.

John Doe · Still Here!

Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Goodwife was what a few on dogs hated- a younger women who dared to have an independent opinion who got on well with lads. There was a lot of anger jealousy and bile posted to her almost daily from the likes of Vam and Hobbit. Went on for over a year.

Nasty nickers too was vile and joined in with Mad Vam. they oddly seemed to resent the fact Goodwife had bigger boobs and often brought them up to try and body shame her on dogs. It’s the sort of thing you’d expect from Budgie or Dean not from one woman to another.

I doubt she’d join if one of the people that targeted her posts here even if they’re putting on an nice act. Plenty of people saw how they treated her.
Can't Goodwife speak for herself?
She probably got fed up.
It is probably draining being attacked for being yourself and not fitting in to the Dogs clique.
Hobbit is very threatened by women male posters like , Vam just enjoys the sport of it all. NN likes the camaraderie of being in a clique and also gets envious.
It's weird but Stooo seems to want an all male forum. Maybe he just wants an easy life but Dogs is a snore fest.
His post about Syl on here used the exact same words as the post he claimed Fluffy made.
He has outed himself as a liar and a drunken twat
'No Hands' is an real oddball who hates people for no reason unless they give her a bit of moistness - cue anonymous cowardly twats from SD.

How is this post any different from Stoo's post about Syl the other day? it's somehow not crude and nasty because it's here?
You could ask the same question on Dogs. The difference between here and Dogs is that we generally have no bias with guest posting. We let most things through, unless they break the few rules we have here. If our members want to bitch on the Whine about someone, they can. Just as guests like yourself are given a voice here too. Nobody on here has any loyalty to Stooo.

JD agreed that Stoo's post about Syl was pathetic but his own post was identical , he was just talking about a different woman.
JD was being a hypocrite and Syl was fair to call him on it.
JD was crude bout HF being "moist" , Stooo said the same about Syl. So why isn't JD bring pathetic then?
And what has "loyalty to Stoo" got to do with anything.
Facts are facts. You are not much different to Stoo really . Doubt this will make the board but why can't you admit things without twisting them

And of course, you don't have an agenda about JD, do you? Perhaps if you stop hiding behind a proxy like a snivelling coward you may be able to take the moral high ground. As it is, you're just a nobody guest troll hypocrite.

Date: Feb 7 4:52 PM, 2020

Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Goodwife was what a few on dogs hated- a younger women who dared to have an independent opinion who got on well with lads. There was a lot of anger jealousy and bile posted to her almost daily from the likes of Vam and Hobbit. Went on for over a year.

Nasty nickers too was vile and joined in with Mad Vam. they oddly seemed to resent the fact Goodwife had bigger boobs and often brought them up to try and body shame her on dogs. It’s the sort of thing you’d expect from Budgie or Dean not from one woman to another.

I doubt she’d join if one of the people that targeted her posts here even if they’re putting on an nice act. Plenty of people saw how they treated her.
Can't Goodwife speak for herself?
She probably got fed up.
It is probably draining being attacked for being yourself and not fitting in to the Dogs clique.
Hobbit is very threatened by women male posters like , Vam just enjoys the sport of it all. NN likes the camaraderie of being in a clique and also gets envious.
It's weird but Stooo seems to want an all male forum. Maybe he just wants an easy life but Dogs is a snore fest.
His post about Syl on here used the exact same words as the post he claimed Fluffy made.
He has outed himself as a liar and a drunken twat
'No Hands' is an real oddball who hates people for no reason unless they give her a bit of moistness - cue anonymous cowardly twats from SD.

How is this post any different from Stoo's post about Syl the other day? it's somehow not crude and nasty because it's here?
You could ask the same question on Dogs. The difference between here and Dogs is that we generally have no bias with guest posting. We let most things through, unless they break the few rules we have here. If our members want to bitch on the Whine about someone, they can. Just as guests like yourself are given a voice here too. Nobody on here has any loyalty to Stooo.

JD agreed that Stoo's post about Syl was pathetic but his own post was identical , he was just talking about a different woman.
JD was being a hypocrite and Syl was fair to call him on it.
JD was crude bout HF being "moist" , Stooo said the same about Syl. So why isn't JD bring pathetic then?
And what has "loyalty to Stoo" got to do with anything.
Facts are facts. You are not much different to Stoo really . Doubt this will make the board but why can't you admit things without twisting them

And of course, you don't have an agenda about JD, do you? Perhaps if you stop hiding behind a proxy like a snivelling coward you may be able to take the moral high ground. As it is, you're just a nobody guest troll hypocrite.

That's pretty weak. Doesnt Keyser have an agenda with Hobbit?

But because he isn't a nobody snivelling guest he isn't a hypocrite?

How does that work. why even have the whine if you feel like that , your busy enough.

Digger · Admin

Anonymous wrote:

That's pretty weak. Doesnt Keyser have an agenda with Hobbit?
But because he isn't a nobody snivelling guest he isn't a hypocrite?
How does that work. why even have the whine if you feel like that , your busy enough.

You're going to tell us your dad is bigger than my dad next!

Who gives a shit if JD doesn't like Hobbit? I'm sure it's mutual. And who made you her mouth piece?

John Doe · Still Here!

Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

That's pretty weak. Doesnt Keyser have an agenda with Hobbit?
But because he isn't a nobody snivelling guest he isn't a hypocrite?
How does that work. why even have the whine if you feel like that , your busy enough.

You're going to tell us your dad is bigger than my dad next!

Who gives a shit if JD doesn't like Hobbit? I'm sure it's mutual. And who made you her mouth piece?

Date: Feb 7 5:37 PM, 2020

I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.

by **Rolluplostinspace** » Fri Feb 07, 2020 9:38 am

Major wrote:
HobbitFeet wrote:you want 6 hours for racism?

if not then shut the fuck up

It is NOT racism.

This is a free speech forum or have you forgotten

Stop stalking me, read that which I scribe not what is in your own mind.

I read that which Dean scribed about you and he was bang on the button, did you THREATEn him with a ban, NO NO NO.
You are vindictive and unfair,

Every time I post I expect you to appear.

IMHO you are a disgrace to moderation .

Who decided it's a free speech forum?
It's Stooos forum he pays out of his own pocket so he gets to decide what it is.
Why is that so hard to understand?

Digger · Admin

Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.

Is that you, Hobbit? Fess up!

Date: Feb 7 6:08 PM, 2020

Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.
Is that you, Hobbit? Fess up!

I see a member say something about Keyser on the DS thread, someone mentioned a poster called planets and the member said isn't that one of Kaysers victims and Hobbit said he doesn't have the right of reply here so she isn't going to approve guest posts

I just went to look.. here is the post. its not the 1st time either

Keyser is banned from here (IP banned too) he has absolutely no right of reply

for that reason it is unfair to discuss him as he can't defend himself

in passing like this it is fine, it is when one post then escalates and it goes on for pages that it becomes an issue, for this reason hit and run guest posts won't be approved whilst I'm here

Date: Feb 7 6:37 PM, 2020

Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.
Is that you, Hobbit? Fess up!

Some of the posts by Guests and a couple of members there are more than disgusting. No wonder Goodwife, Lady Musk, Bella, NN, Claire, SF, etc hardly post. Wait, long time absent users names returning soon? Socks, anyone?

JD, do not rise to the bait, even though admins allows it through to test you.

Date: Feb 7 6:58 PM, 2020

Anonymous wrote:
I see a member say something about Keyser on the DS thread, someone mentioned a poster called planets and the member said isn't that one of Kaysers victims and Hobbit said he doesn't have the right of reply here so she isn't going to approve guest posts

I think planets fell victim to someone else, a member here who doesn't post much in this bit of the forum. Easy to get him and Keyser confused though, they both use a similar MO.

Date: Feb 7 7:27 PM, 2020

Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.

Yea , that's why it's annoying to see Digger defend JD when he is being a hypocrite.

Seems like he wants a forum war but Hobbit is to mature to let that happen. Tbf Digger is i.p banned so can't read Dogs, maybe she will tell him to stop poking now she knows that.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.
Yea , that's why it's annoying to see Digger defend JD when he is being a hypocrite.
Seems like he wants a forum war but Hobbit is to mature to let that happen. Tbf Digger is i.p banned so can't read Dogs, maybe she will tell him to stop poking now she knows that.

Don't be stupid.

How can he want a forum war when he ignores most of the cowardly criticism about him by anonymous cowards?

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Anyway guests...and Banjo Boy.... this isn't Dogs where people pile onto one poster, even in the Whine, where all the crap is played out, we have standards.
So don't waste your time dragging up old news that has no place on here, it'll be binned
Ta. x

Digger · Admin

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.
Yea , that's why it's annoying to see Digger defend JD when he is being a hypocrite.
Seems like he wants a forum war but Hobbit is to mature to let that happen. Tbf Digger is i.p banned so can't read Dogs, maybe she will tell him to stop poking now she knows that.

JD doesn't seem to need anyone to defend him. He's doing OK, so far as I can see.

Date: Feb 7 8:00 PM, 2020

Syl wrote:
Anyway guests...and Banjo Boy.... this isn't Dogs where people pile onto one poster, even in the Whine, where all the crap is played out, we have standards.
So don't waste your time dragging up old news that has no place on here, it'll be binned
Ta. x

Old news to some not to others - fueled by warnings on Digital Spy from a few FM to others especially new members.

Date: Feb 7 8:04 PM, 2020

John Doe wrote:
Syl wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Goodwife was what a few on dogs hated- a younger women who dared to have an independent opinion who got on well with lads. There was a lot of anger jealousy and bile posted to her almost daily from the likes of Vam and Hobbit. Went on for over a year.

Nasty nickers too was vile and joined in with Mad Vam. they oddly seemed to resent the fact Goodwife had bigger boobs and often brought them up to try and body shame her on dogs. It’s the sort of thing you’d expect from Budgie or Dean not from one woman to another.

I doubt she’d join if one of the people that targeted her posts here even if they’re putting on an nice act. Plenty of people saw how they treated her.
Can't Goodwife speak for herself?
She probably got fed up.
It is probably draining being attacked for being yourself and not fitting in to the Dogs clique.
Hobbit is very threatened by women male posters like , Vam just enjoys the sport of it all. NN likes the camaraderie of being in a clique and also gets envious.
It's weird but Stooo seems to want an all male forum. Maybe he just wants an easy life but Dogs is a snore fest.
His post about Syl on here used the exact same words as the post he claimed Fluffy made.
He has outed himself as a liar and a drunken twat
'No Hands' is an real oddball who hates people for no reason unless they give her a bit of moistness - cue anonymous cowardly twats from SD.

JD, you cant condemn other people on other threads for being pathetically crude and then go on to use similar terms yourself.

Fair enough, I was a bit out of order with the language Syl.
But after all the shit she gave me for absolutely no reason whilst backing her buddies to the hilt it just annoys the hell out of me when anonymous twats (and yes it's not exactly hard to guess who they are) on here with an agenda against me make out she was is a saint.
Some might say she deserves to be criticised.
Stooo certainly fucking does - the man is a serial liar.

Can't argue with that and everyone deserves to be criticised.

But Stooo owns a forum so that makes him different.

Digger · Admin

Anonymous wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Syl wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Goodwife was what a few on dogs hated- a younger women who dared to have an independent opinion who got on well with lads. There was a lot of anger jealousy and bile posted to her almost daily from the likes of Vam and Hobbit. Went on for over a year.

Nasty nickers too was vile and joined in with Mad Vam. they oddly seemed to resent the fact Goodwife had bigger boobs and often brought them up to try and body shame her on dogs. It’s the sort of thing you’d expect from Budgie or Dean not from one woman to another.

I doubt she’d join if one of the people that targeted her posts here even if they’re putting on an nice act. Plenty of people saw how they treated her.
Can't Goodwife speak for herself?
She probably got fed up.
It is probably draining being attacked for being yourself and not fitting in to the Dogs clique.
Hobbit is very threatened by women male posters like , Vam just enjoys the sport of it all. NN likes the camaraderie of being in a clique and also gets envious.
It's weird but Stooo seems to want an all male forum. Maybe he just wants an easy life but Dogs is a snore fest.
His post about Syl on here used the exact same words as the post he claimed Fluffy made.
He has outed himself as a liar and a drunken twat
'No Hands' is an real oddball who hates people for no reason unless they give her a bit of moistness - cue anonymous cowardly twats from SD.

JD, you cant condemn other people on other threads for being pathetically crude and then go on to use similar terms yourself.

Fair enough, I was a bit out of order with the language Syl.
But after all the shit she gave me for absolutely no reason whilst backing her buddies to the hilt it just annoys the hell out of me when anonymous twats (and yes it's not exactly hard to guess who they are) on here with an agenda against me make out she was is a saint.
Some might say she deserves to be criticised.
Stooo certainly fucking does - the man is a serial liar.
Can't argue with that and everyone deserves to be criticised.
But Stooo owns a forum so that makes him different.

Really? How? Because you're all shit scared of a ban?

ChaoticMusings

Re: Are you patriotic?