ChaoticMusings

John Doe · Still Here!

Who would you not want to see here?

Date: Feb 7 8:32 PM, 2020

Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Syl wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Goodwife was what a few on dogs hated- a younger women who dared to have an independent opinion who got on well with lads. There was a lot of anger jealousy and bile posted to her almost daily from the likes of Vam and Hobbit. Went on for over a year.

Nasty nickers too was vile and joined in with Mad Vam. they oddly seemed to resent the fact Goodwife had bigger boobs and often brought them up to try and body shame her on dogs. It’s the sort of thing you’d expect from Budgie or Dean not from one woman to another.

I doubt she’d join if one of the people that targeted her posts here even if they’re putting on an nice act. Plenty of people saw how they treated her.
Can't Goodwife speak for herself?
She probably got fed up.
It is probably draining being attacked for being yourself and not fitting in to the Dogs clique.
Hobbit is very threatened by women male posters like , Vam just enjoys the sport of it all. NN likes the camaraderie of being in a clique and also gets envious.
It's weird but Stooo seems to want an all male forum. Maybe he just wants an easy life but Dogs is a snore fest.
His post about Syl on here used the exact same words as the post he claimed Fluffy made.
He has outed himself as a liar and a drunken twat
'No Hands' is an real oddball who hates people for no reason unless they give her a bit of moistness - cue anonymous cowardly twats from SD.

JD, you cant condemn other people on other threads for being pathetically crude and then go on to use similar terms yourself.

Fair enough, I was a bit out of order with the language Syl.
But after all the shit she gave me for absolutely no reason whilst backing her buddies to the hilt it just annoys the hell out of me when anonymous twats (and yes it's not exactly hard to guess who they are) on here with an agenda against me make out she was is a saint.
Some might say she deserves to be criticised.
Stooo certainly fucking does - the man is a serial liar.
Can't argue with that and everyone deserves to be criticised.
But Stooo owns a forum so that makes him different.
Really? How? Because you're all shit scared of a ban?

His forum, his rules.

It's the serial lying people don't like. When forums get too cliquey they all have the same opinions and rew srite forum history,

JD spoke his mind. He wasnt a sheep like the rest.

Date: Feb 7 8:51 PM, 2020

Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.
Yea , that's why it's annoying to see Digger defend JD when he is being a hypocrite.
Seems like he wants a forum war but Hobbit is to mature to let that happen. Tbf Digger is i.p banned so can't read Dogs, maybe she will tell him to stop poking now she knows that.

Don't be stupid.
How can he want a forum war when he ignores most of the cowardly criticism about him by anonymous cowards?

He has answered a fair few.

Hobbit refuses to discuss him but She must know he has a pop every time her name is mentioned.

Who is BG on here or Daisy? Just anons who happen to be members, they don't give away their old usernames. What makes them so different to anons if they are hiding their identity?

Digger · Admin

Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.
Yea , that's why it's annoying to see Digger defend JD when he is being a hypocrite.
Seems like he wants a forum war but Hobbit is to mature to let that happen. Tbf Digger is i.p banned so can't read Dogs, maybe she will tell him to stop poking now she knows that.

Don't be stupid.
How can he want a forum war when he ignores most of the cowardly criticism about him by anonymous cowards?

He has answered a fair few.
Hobbit refuses to discuss him but She must know he has a pop every time her name is mentioned.
Who is BG on here or Daisy? Just anons who happen to be members, they don't give away their old usernames. What makes them so different to anons if they are hiding their identity?

Wouldn't you like to know

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.
Yea , that's why it's annoying to see Digger defend JD when he is being a hypocrite.
Seems like he wants a forum war but Hobbit is to mature to let that happen. Tbf Digger is i.p banned so can't read Dogs, maybe she will tell him to stop poking now she knows that.

Don't be stupid.
How can he want a forum war when he ignores most of the cowardly criticism about him by anonymous cowards?

He has answered a fair few.
Hobbit refuses to discuss him but She must know he has a pop every time her name is mentioned.
Who is BG on here or Daisy? Just anons who happen to be members, they don't give away their old usernames. What makes them so different to anons if they are hiding their identity?

But at least when people post in their user name....even if they were known as someone else previously, they are putting their name by their posts. Anons could be anyone.

By the way, Daisy is no longer a member here.

Date: Feb 7 10:48 PM, 2020

Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.
Yea , that's why it's annoying to see Digger defend JD when he is being a hypocrite.
Seems like he wants a forum war but Hobbit is to mature to let that happen. Tbf Digger is i.p banned so can't read Dogs, maybe she will tell him to stop poking now she knows that.

Don't be stupid.
How can he want a forum war when he ignores most of the cowardly criticism about him by anonymous cowards?

He has answered a fair few.
Hobbit refuses to discuss him but She must know he has a pop every time her name is mentioned.
Who is BG on here or Daisy? Just anons who happen to be members, they don't give away their old usernames. What makes them so different to anons if they are hiding their identity?

But at least when people post in their user name....even if they were known as someone else previously, they are putting their name by their posts. Anons could be anyone.
By the way, Daisy is no longer a member here.

They might have to own their posts here but that's it. Infact they have been givrn a free pass to judge other people's pasts without anyone knowing their own.

It just seems unfair seeing JD and ×geogiax before she was banned have members bring up their past when they could be anyone. They are just anon members.

Date: Feb 7 10:53 PM, 2020

Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.
Yea , that's why it's annoying to see Digger defend JD when he is being a hypocrite.
Seems like he wants a forum war but Hobbit is to mature to let that happen. Tbf Digger is i.p banned so can't read Dogs, maybe she will tell him to stop poking now she knows that.

Don't be stupid.
How can he want a forum war when he ignores most of the cowardly criticism about him by anonymous cowards?

He has answered a fair few.
Hobbit refuses to discuss him but She must know he has a pop every time her name is mentioned.
Who is BG on here or Daisy? Just anons who happen to be members, they don't give away their old usernames. What makes them so different to anons if they are hiding their identity?

Wouldn't you like to know

..no.

BG sumtimes has pictures of Budgie as his avi.

His sig is from a chat log that's years old..by Budgie.

That's enough for me not to want to know more !

Digger · Admin

Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.
Yea , that's why it's annoying to see Digger defend JD when he is being a hypocrite.
Seems like he wants a forum war but Hobbit is to mature to let that happen. Tbf Digger is i.p banned so can't read Dogs, maybe she will tell him to stop poking now she knows that.

Don't be stupid.
How can he want a forum war when he ignores most of the cowardly criticism about him by anonymous cowards?

He has answered a fair few.
Hobbit refuses to discuss him but She must know he has a pop every time her name is mentioned.
Who is BG on here or Daisy? Just anons who happen to be members, they don't give away their old usernames. What makes them so different to anons if they are hiding their identity?

Wouldn't you like to know
..no.
BG sumtimes has pictures of Budgie as his avi.
His sig is from a chat log that's years old..by Budgie.
That's enough for me not to want to know more !

Well, there you go then.

BackGammon · Burning up the forum

Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.
Yea , that's why it's annoying to see Digger defend JD when he is being a hypocrite.
Seems like he wants a forum war but Hobbit is to mature to let that happen. Tbf Digger is i.p banned so can't read Dogs, maybe she will tell him to stop poking now she knows that.

Don't be stupid.
How can he want a forum war when he ignores most of the cowardly criticism about him by anonymous cowards?

He has answered a fair few.
Hobbit refuses to discuss him but She must know he has a pop every time her name is mentioned.
Who is BG on here or Daisy? Just anons who happen to be members, they don't give away their old usernames. What makes them so different to anons if they are hiding their identity?

Wouldn't you like to know

Wouldn't they just. I was invited here.

BackGammon · Burning up the forum

Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.
Yea , that's why it's annoying to see Digger defend JD when he is being a hypocrite.
Seems like he wants a forum war but Hobbit is to mature to let that happen. Tbf Digger is i.p banned so can't read Dogs, maybe she will tell him to stop poking now she knows that.

Don't be stupid.
How can he want a forum war when he ignores most of the cowardly criticism about him by anonymous cowards?

He has answered a fair few.
Hobbit refuses to discuss him but She must know he has a pop every time her name is mentioned.
Who is BG on here or Daisy? Just anons who happen to be members, they don't give away their old usernames. What makes them so different to anons if they are hiding their identity?

Wouldn't you like to know
..no.
BG sumtimes has pictures of Budgie as his avi.
His sig is from a chat log that's years old..by Budgie.
That's enough for me not to want to know more !

They were all gifts too.

BTW you trying to disguise your posting style is hilarious. I noticed you didn't include Digger's sig in your little rant the other day. :lesson:

As as a point of interest why am I being dragged into this conversation when I have nothing whatsoever to do with it? Just fuck right off back to dogs Where you truly belong.

BackGammon · Burning up the forum

Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.
Yea , that's why it's annoying to see Digger defend JD when he is being a hypocrite.
Seems like he wants a forum war but Hobbit is to mature to let that happen. Tbf Digger is i.p banned so can't read Dogs, maybe she will tell him to stop poking now she knows that.

Don't be stupid.
How can he want a forum war when he ignores most of the cowardly criticism about him by anonymous cowards?

He has answered a fair few.
Hobbit refuses to discuss him but She must know he has a pop every time her name is mentioned.
Who is BG on here or Daisy? Just anons who happen to be members, they don't give away their old usernames. What makes them so different to anons if they are hiding their identity?

But at least when people post in their user name....even if they were known as someone else previously, they are putting their name by their posts. Anons could be anyone.
By the way, Daisy is no longer a member here.

They might have to own their posts here but that's it. Infact they have been givrn a free pass to judge other people's pasts without anyone knowing their own.
It just seems unfair seeing JD and ×geogiax before she was banned have members bring up their past when they could be anyone. They are just anon members.

You do that alot

Date: Feb 8 1:32 PM, 2020

BackGammon wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.
Yea , that's why it's annoying to see Digger defend JD when he is being a hypocrite.
Seems like he wants a forum war but Hobbit is to mature to let that happen. Tbf Digger is i.p banned so can't read Dogs, maybe she will tell him to stop poking now she knows that.

Don't be stupid.
How can he want a forum war when he ignores most of the cowardly criticism about him by anonymous cowards?

He has answered a fair few.
Hobbit refuses to discuss him but She must know he has a pop every time her name is mentioned.
Who is BG on here or Daisy? Just anons who happen to be members, they don't give away their old usernames. What makes them so different to anons if they are hiding their identity?

Wouldn't you like to know
..no.
BG sumtimes has pictures of Budgie as his avi.
His sig is from a chat log that's years old..by Budgie.
That's enough for me not to want to know more !

They were all gifts too.
BTW you trying to disguise your posting style is hilarious. I noticed you didn't include Digger's sig in your little rant the other day. :lesson:
As as a point of interest why am I being dragged into this conversation when I have nothing whatsoever to do with it? Just fuck right off back to dogs Where you truly belong.

Your avi of Budgie is a gift.

That's not weird, At all

.Why keep making out you are to good for Dogs when your"re a sock account ? Members on Dogs aren't allowed to shit stir by haveing CM posters as their avi at least.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Thankfully CM does not have the same rules and regulations as Dogs.

BackGammon · Burning up the forum

Anonymous wrote:
BackGammon wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.
Yea , that's why it's annoying to see Digger defend JD when he is being a hypocrite.
Seems like he wants a forum war but Hobbit is to mature to let that happen. Tbf Digger is i.p banned so can't read Dogs, maybe she will tell him to stop poking now she knows that.

Don't be stupid.
How can he want a forum war when he ignores most of the cowardly criticism about him by anonymous cowards?

He has answered a fair few.
Hobbit refuses to discuss him but She must know he has a pop every time her name is mentioned.
Who is BG on here or Daisy? Just anons who happen to be members, they don't give away their old usernames. What makes them so different to anons if they are hiding their identity?

Wouldn't you like to know
..no.
BG sumtimes has pictures of Budgie as his avi.
His sig is from a chat log that's years old..by Budgie.
That's enough for me not to want to know more !

They were all gifts too.
BTW you trying to disguise your posting style is hilarious. I noticed you didn't include Digger's sig in your little rant the other day. :lesson:
As as a point of interest why am I being dragged into this conversation when I have nothing whatsoever to do with it? Just fuck right off back to dogs Where you truly belong.
Your avi of Budgie is a gift.
That's not weird, At all
.Why keep making out you are to good for Dogs when your"re a sock account ? Members on Dogs aren't allowed to shit stir by haveing CM posters as their avi at least.

Boo hoo sob,

Seriously laughing at your pitiful attempts at disguising your posting style.

-- Edited by BackGammon on Saturday 8th of February 2020 03:27:55 PM

BackGammon · Burning up the forum

Syl wrote:
Thankfully CM does not have the same rules and regulations as Dogs.

Or the dregs.

Twizzler · Burning up the forum

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.
Yea , that's why it's annoying to see Digger defend JD when he is being a hypocrite.
Seems like he wants a forum war but Hobbit is to mature to let that happen. Tbf Digger is i.p banned so can't read Dogs, maybe she will tell him to stop poking now she knows that.

How is he being a hypocrite?
seems to me Anon, that it is you that wants the forum war.

BackGammon · Burning up the forum

Twizzler wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.
Yea , that's why it's annoying to see Digger defend JD when he is being a hypocrite.
Seems like he wants a forum war but Hobbit is to mature to let that happen. Tbf Digger is i.p banned so can't read Dogs, maybe she will tell him to stop poking now she knows that.

How is he being a hypocrite?
seems to me Anon, that it is you that wants the forum war.

Agreed.

Date: Feb 8 4:49 PM, 2020

Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.

What a load of bollocks. Hobbit had been a total cunt to Keyser and several others for years. She and her shit mates have regularly tried to paint him as creepy or a danger to women based on the sum of fuck all. It’s a genuinely disgusting way to try and slur someone.

the real creepy one is Hobbit who tries to be all flirty and sexy with certain men yet fails miserably and ends up letting her anger out instead.

Anyonr who thinks old hands free Hobbs is a pal to JD is delusional.

Date: Feb 8 5:01 PM, 2020

Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.
Is that you, Hobbit? Fess up!

Some of the posts by Guests and a couple of members there are more than disgusting. No wonder Goodwife, Lady Musk, Bella, NN, Claire, SF, etc hardly post. Wait, long time absent users names returning soon? Socks, anyone?

JD, do not rise to the bait, even though admins allows it through to test you.

I wouldn’t include Shit Nickers on that list. She was/ is part of the coven and mean girls bully club on there although she does put on the fake nice act on like she did on Claire’s place.. Well until several members including Claire pointed out how nasty and what an arse she was to certain people on dogs. Not quite the innocent or nice person she tries so hard to portray.

the rest fair enough.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I don't know much about the connection between JD (aka Keyser apparently) and Hobbit. But on Dogs Hobbit has defended "Keyser" at the expense of criticism from some forum members and acts to shutdown debate on the matter given "Keyser" is not a member and unable to defend himself.
Is that you, Hobbit? Fess up!

Some of the posts by Guests and a couple of members there are more than disgusting. No wonder Goodwife, Lady Musk, Bella, NN, Claire, SF, etc hardly post. Wait, long time absent users names returning soon? Socks, anyone?

JD, do not rise to the bait, even though admins allows it through to test you.
I wouldn’t include Shit Nickers on that list. She was/ is part of the coven and mean girls bully club on there although she does put on the fake nice act on like she did on Claire’s place.. Well until several members including Claire pointed out how nasty and what an arse she was to certain people on dogs. Not quite the innocent or nice person she tries so hard to portray.

the rest fair enough.

Oh the irony.