ChaoticMusings

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
ChaoticMusings -> The Whine Cellar -> Why does the admin allow nasty posts like this?
Post Info TOPIC: Why does the admin allow nasty posts like this?
Anonymous

Date:
Why does the admin allow nasty posts like this?
Permalink   
 

Judge for yourselves by the comment that was allowed through by admin on the dogs. 

 

 

Top

Re: Any Ideas Stooo

Postby Dean » Thu Feb 06, 2020 2:12 pm

Guest wrote:
Dean wrote:Have you been looking at some unsavoury sites, Jra?


Like the gang rape videos your friends pass around?


I’ve never been passed a gang rape video mate. Are you confused?
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 44235
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:02 pm
 


__________________
Syl


FIRM BUT FAIR.

Posts: 26409
Date:
Permalink   
 

Because it's a nasty forum.

__________________

How wonderful life is while you're in the world.
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

No one cares mate. 

Still banned?



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

Both Stoo and Keyser have said worse about Syl and Hobbit here and Stoo's was let through and Keysers is still there as are all his other crude or nasty posts. 

 

Nasty forum?  No, just a few nasty people  



__________________
dr synne


Musing at the Chaos

Posts: 889
Date:
Permalink   
 

Full context explains it better.

__________________

Le sock meister extraordinaire

AKA Keyser McAzpurr Seymour Cox Poncenby Smythe

(Not the Faulky Tribal Poncenby Smythes)
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

dr synne wrote:

Full context explains it better.

 Full context is that Deans a scuzzy lowlife banned from most forums for good reason. 



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

Guest makes a scurrilous claim.

Dean denies the claim.

End of story.  So what is the issue?



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

Anonymous wrote:

Both Stoo and Keyser have said worse about Syl and Hobbit here and Stoo's was let through and Keysers is still there as are all his other crude or nasty posts. 

 

Nasty forum?  No, just a few nasty people  

 It's weird people believe a word Stooo say .its like because  he owns Dogs no one question him.

When he said to Fletch are you calling me a liar he must of been taking the piss. But it woud have been so refreshing to see him post yes I am you lying git! lol



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

dr synne wrote:

Full context explains it better.

  Dean saying the girl  victim was lovely, no wonder they all wanted a go was taking trolling a step too far smh

The only poster with a brain is Avon who is trying to get stoo to give Fletch a normal avi but if Fletch comes back he is more likely to get a perma than his avi

 



__________________
dr synne


Musing at the Chaos

Posts: 889
Date:
Permalink   
 

Anonymous wrote:
dr synne wrote:

Full context explains it better.

 Full context is that Deans a scuzzy lowlife banned from most forums for good reason. 

 I'm kind of agreeing with you.



__________________

Le sock meister extraordinaire

AKA Keyser McAzpurr Seymour Cox Poncenby Smythe

(Not the Faulky Tribal Poncenby Smythes)
John Doe


Still Here!

Posts: 10372
Date:
Permalink   
 

Anonymous wrote:

Both Stoo and Keyser have said worse about Syl and Hobbit here and Stoo's was let through and Keysers is still there as are all his other crude or nasty posts. 

 

Nasty forum?  No, just a few nasty people  

 You are so very transparent it's not even funny. bored



__________________

Simple. You, you're the threads. But me, I'm the rope.

Gatehouse - The Shadow Line.
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

The last few posts have mentioned Fletch & Stooo. 

All I can say is that I was surprised to see Fletch given a one month ban given that the average ban length seems to be about 6 hours and then a day if it is repeated. 

I don't know much about Fletch but from what I see at a glance he is one of the "politically committed group" which I also group Cactus Jack, CannyDC, RollUp, Stooo into.  Reading their at times lengthy comments they do seem rather similar - left leaning anti-conservative minded I think. 

From experience I know Stooo takes his politically activism / viewpoint very seriously - so I can only assume there was some political disagreement betw. Stooo and Fletch that was taken personally that led to the lengthy ban.



__________________
dr synne


Musing at the Chaos

Posts: 889
Date:
Permalink   
 

dr synne wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
dr synne wrote:

Full context explains it better.

 Full context is that Deans a scuzzy lowlife banned from most forums for good reason. 

 I'm kind of agreeing with you.

 A fairly sick comment and not mitigated by his claim that he had assurances before viewing the video that it was not showing an actual rape.



__________________

Le sock meister extraordinaire

AKA Keyser McAzpurr Seymour Cox Poncenby Smythe

(Not the Faulky Tribal Poncenby Smythes)
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

Anonymous wrote:
dr synne wrote:

Full context explains it better.

  Dean saying the girl  victim was lovely, no wonder they all wanted a go was taking trolling a step too far smh

The only poster with a brain is Avon who is trying to get stoo to give Fletch a normal avi but if Fletch comes back he is more likely to get a perma than his avi

 

 Why assume it’s trolling? Many a true word is said in jest. He and Budgie have a very unfunny rapey vibe about them. None of the decent posters stick around when they’re posting. Only drunks like Raven and rollup enjoy posting with them. 



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

Anonymous wrote:

The last few posts have mentioned Fletch & Stooo. 

All I can say is that I was surprised to see Fletch given a one month ban given that the average ban length seems to be about 6 hours and then a day if it is repeated. 

I don't know much about Fletch but from what I see at a glance he is one of the "politically committed group" which I also group Cactus Jack, CannyDC, RollUp, Stooo into.  Reading their at times lengthy comments they do seem rather similar - left leaning anti-conservative minded I think. 

From experience I know Stooo takes his politically activism / viewpoint very seriously - so I can only assume there was some political disagreement betw. Stooo and Fletch that was taken personally that led to the lengthy ban.

Fletch has a major cringe factor, Sto said Fletch makes the female admin uncomfortable and to stop calling Stoo mate as hes not a mate. 



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

dr synne wrote:
dr synne wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
dr synne wrote:

Full context explains it better.

 Full context is that Deans a scuzzy lowlife banned from most forums for good reason. 

 I'm kind of agreeing with you.

 A fairly sick comment and not mitigated by his claim that he had assurances before viewing the video that it was not showing an actual rape.

 The obese shut in tries too hard to sound edgy. 



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

Anonymous wrote:

 

  Dean saying the girl  victim was lovely, no wonder they all wanted a go was taking trolling a step too far :

 Ha.  You must know his methods - he said it to wind people up and it certainly did. And judging by your post it still is. Priceless.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

John Doe wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Both Stoo and Keyser have said worse about Syl and Hobbit here and Stoo's was let through and Keysers is still there as are all his other crude or nasty posts. 

 

Nasty forum?  No, just a few nasty people  

 You are so very transparent it's not even funny. bored

 How so?  You say crude and nasty things about Hobbit and Vicks, as did Stoo about Syl as does Dean about women. Why are they nasty people and not you?. 



__________________
John Doe


Still Here!

Posts: 10372
Date:
Permalink   
 

Anonymous wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Both Stoo and Keyser have said worse about Syl and Hobbit here and Stoo's was let through and Keysers is still there as are all his other crude or nasty posts. 

 

Nasty forum?  No, just a few nasty people  

 You are so very transparent it's not even funny. bored

 How so?  You say crude and nasty things about Hobbit and Vicks, as did Stoo about Syl as does Dean about women. Why are they nasty people and not you?. 

Because years of people abusing mod 'power' to pick on someone got old very quickly.

Don't compare me to Stooo in any shape or form thanks - whoever you are.

Try lecturing me when you reveal your identity. bored



__________________

Simple. You, you're the threads. But me, I'm the rope.

Gatehouse - The Shadow Line.
dr synne


Musing at the Chaos

Posts: 889
Date:
Permalink   
 

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

 

  Dean saying the girl  victim was lovely, no wonder they all wanted a go was taking trolling a step too far :

 Ha.  You must know his methods - he said it to wind people up and it certainly did. And judging by your post it still is. Priceless.

 What of it. Stooping to any low to get a reaction is still saying more about the troll in question than the people who objected.

 

I might obect to a clown dancing through my garden beating himself off but my objection doesn't elevate him to anything more than a clown and a wanker.



__________________

Le sock meister extraordinaire

AKA Keyser McAzpurr Seymour Cox Poncenby Smythe

(Not the Faulky Tribal Poncenby Smythes)
1 2  >  Last»  | Page of 2  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
ChaoticMusings -> The Whine Cellar -> Why does the admin allow nasty posts like this?