ChaoticMusings

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

RE: Decision Time

Date: Feb 23 7:43 PM, 2020

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
As a guest and non-member of Dogs it has been my experience that I can never engage with a forum member on a specific subject beyond several responses because at some point a moderator comes in and stops approving my guest posts - normally at a point when the crux of the issue is being approached. I have been a guest poster on dogs for about six to seven months, having first heard mention of Dogs on Digital Spy.
So now I have a decision to make. Either join Dogs as a Forum Member, continue to post as a guest but not involve myself in any meaningful discussion, or to give Dogs up. If I decide to move on from DOgs then I would no longer need to whine or vent about Dogs on here - the Whine Cellar. As I have previously mentioned, I see Dogs and CM as part of an interlinked community. So its decision time.
Dogs moderators have their own favourite posters who they will step in to protect, or block critical guest posts against them. The favourites vary over time but special consideration will be given to anyone who sucks up (Marasaki being a good example). So if you do join up be a good boy, say nice things about admin, you might just be okay.
No different to here really. More than one poster says anything about a favourite and its apparently a pile on. "We don't allow pile ons here" unless it's against someone they don't like.
Dogs don't let people post about CM over there nor talk about IP banned members. If they did it would be a busy thread.

you wanna bet? There'll be parts of Dogs they keep closed to the hoi polloi

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
As a guest and non-member of Dogs it has been my experience that I can never engage with a forum member on a specific subject beyond several responses because at some point a moderator comes in and stops approving my guest posts - normally at a point when the crux of the issue is being approached. I have been a guest poster on dogs for about six to seven months, having first heard mention of Dogs on Digital Spy.
So now I have a decision to make. Either join Dogs as a Forum Member, continue to post as a guest but not involve myself in any meaningful discussion, or to give Dogs up. If I decide to move on from DOgs then I would no longer need to whine or vent about Dogs on here - the Whine Cellar. As I have previously mentioned, I see Dogs and CM as part of an interlinked community. So its decision time.
Dogs moderators have their own favourite posters who they will step in to protect, or block critical guest posts against them. The favourites vary over time but special consideration will be given to anyone who sucks up (Marasaki being a good example). So if you do join up be a good boy, say nice things about admin, you might just be okay.
No different to here really. More than one poster says anything about a favourite and its apparently a pile on. "We don't allow pile ons here" unless it's against someone they don't like.
Dogs don't let people post about CM over there nor talk about IP banned members. If they did it would be a busy thread.

Little fibber.
But by all means point out who you think has had their posts blocked or been allowed to be bullied on here. without intervention.

Wonder why Anonymous didn't pop back to answer.

Digger · Admin

Syl wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
As a guest and non-member of Dogs it has been my experience that I can never engage with a forum member on a specific subject beyond several responses because at some point a moderator comes in and stops approving my guest posts - normally at a point when the crux of the issue is being approached. I have been a guest poster on dogs for about six to seven months, having first heard mention of Dogs on Digital Spy.
So now I have a decision to make. Either join Dogs as a Forum Member, continue to post as a guest but not involve myself in any meaningful discussion, or to give Dogs up. If I decide to move on from DOgs then I would no longer need to whine or vent about Dogs on here - the Whine Cellar. As I have previously mentioned, I see Dogs and CM as part of an interlinked community. So its decision time.
Dogs moderators have their own favourite posters who they will step in to protect, or block critical guest posts against them. The favourites vary over time but special consideration will be given to anyone who sucks up (Marasaki being a good example). So if you do join up be a good boy, say nice things about admin, you might just be okay.
No different to here really. More than one poster says anything about a favourite and its apparently a pile on. "We don't allow pile ons here" unless it's against someone they don't like.
Dogs don't let people post about CM over there nor talk about IP banned members. If they did it would be a busy thread.

Little fibber.
But by all means point out who you think has had their posts blocked or been allowed to be bullied on here. without intervention.
Wonder why Anonymous didn't pop back to answer.

Too busy posting on Newsfix

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
As a guest and non-member of Dogs it has been my experience that I can never engage with a forum member on a specific subject beyond several responses because at some point a moderator comes in and stops approving my guest posts - normally at a point when the crux of the issue is being approached. I have been a guest poster on dogs for about six to seven months, having first heard mention of Dogs on Digital Spy.
So now I have a decision to make. Either join Dogs as a Forum Member, continue to post as a guest but not involve myself in any meaningful discussion, or to give Dogs up. If I decide to move on from DOgs then I would no longer need to whine or vent about Dogs on here - the Whine Cellar. As I have previously mentioned, I see Dogs and CM as part of an interlinked community. So its decision time.
Dogs moderators have their own favourite posters who they will step in to protect, or block critical guest posts against them. The favourites vary over time but special consideration will be given to anyone who sucks up (Marasaki being a good example). So if you do join up be a good boy, say nice things about admin, you might just be okay.
No different to here really. More than one poster says anything about a favourite and its apparently a pile on. "We don't allow pile ons here" unless it's against someone they don't like.
Dogs don't let people post about CM over there nor talk about IP banned members. If they did it would be a busy thread.

Little fibber.
But by all means point out who you think has had their posts blocked or been allowed to be bullied on here. without intervention.
Wonder why Anonymous didn't pop back to answer.
Too busy posting on Newsfix

Sounds more like a Dogs poster to me.

Digger · Admin

Queue the 'guest' posts