ChaoticMusings

Twizzler wrote:

---

Fluffy asked to be deleted.

Her request was met.

Then a few days later, she realised she had been a bit rash in her decision to be deleted.

Admin decided at this time they would not let her back.

Fluffy then goes and rejoins Newsfix and starts badmouthing admin here.

She did the same here when she joined, badmouthing Hobbit and Vicky.

It is what she does, looking for sympathy from members of the new forum she joins.

It is her M.O.

She did not get banned.

 

 

---

 Exactly.  What is this mentality that stirs up trouble then asks for people to stop making trouble and leave her alone.  

No one is reading the message of the original post.  Instead they are continuing with their targeting of G-X. 

It is clear that G-X just interprets things differently but in general explains herself.  Some people need to vent to get things off their chest.  Don't confuse venting, a normal human behaviour, with some imagined evil.  Look into many families and there is bickering.  Don't turn that bickering into an excuse to make them out to be something else.  My own thoughts is that she might be a bit highly strung.  We don't need threads turning into "I don't like G-X, she is evil" repetitions. 

Digger wrote:

---

I approved this as it's clearly addressed to myself and members of this forum.  

All I can say is...I rest my case.

 

 

---

 The world is full of neurotic people and plenty will find their way onto forums. A known characteristic of neurotic personalities is that they manipulate others - and that seems to be a good example of it.

Anonymous wrote:

---

No one is reading the message of the original post.  Instead they are continuing with their targeting of G-X. 

It is clear that G-X just interprets things differently but in general explains herself.  Some people need to vent to get things off their chest.  Don't confuse venting, a normal human behaviour, with some imagined evil.  Look into many families and there is bickering.  Don't turn that bickering into an excuse to make them out to be something else.  My own thoughts is that she might be a bit highly strung.  Wedon't need threads turning into "I don't like G-X, she is evil" repetitions. 

---

 Exactly who is "we"? If we don't need this why did you post that pitiful OP? I know attention seeking as per. 

I will make just one post in here, and actually it's directly to Georgia in the hope she will read it.

Many of the negative posts that you were bombarded with on here were from the same few people.

Because this is an open section where guests can post anonymously, using proxies often, and it's an anything goes part of the forum.....you were allowed to be criticised in here, and I know you enjoyed the cut and thrust of it all, you gave back as good as you got.... it's where you spent the majority of your time when you were a member here.

The problem with this it was you v them....and they like you have long memories, often bringing up things that happened years ago. 

I know Digger and I both advised you to stay out of Whine, to post in the rest of the forum, which is a far nicer place where people own what they say.
I always found you a nice interesting poster, I enjoyed reading your posts greatly.
It didn't work out though...and you did leave of your own accord, you were never banned.
When you asked to be reinstated too much had gone on by then, and both Digger and myself felt it wasn't in the forums or your own best interest to come back.

Just to address a couple of other points....I do believe that Georgia didn't make at least two of the posts credited to her, though I have a good idea who did.

Georgia never tried to drive a wedge between me and Digger. We may have different opinions but that's down to us not her.
Every pm she sent me she duplicated so we both received exactly the same words.....she never spoke behind our backs one against the other, so whoever first suggested that, and the others who ran with it.....it didn't happen.

None of us know the mental health of the people we are responding to online, if people feel happy to keep knocking away at someone who has talked openly about their mental health issues that's up to them.
Probably the same people who are condemning the trolls who targeted Carolyn Flack are flexing their fingers to contradict everything I have written because the truth hurts....and after all, they can say what they like using a proxy hid in their own bedrooms....cowards.

Finally, when someone is being abused online, these are just words on a screen, written by strangers, probably unhappy people who have nothing better to do than pick fights with unknowns on the internet....I know it's easy to say 'just ignore', but many of us have been trolled and stalked online at one time or another, you either log of and join somewhere you feel happier, or carry on reading/responding t the same old tripe that's churned up year in year in year out, everyone has to make their own decisions on that.

Binny wrote:

---

Digger wrote:

---

I approved this as it's clearly addressed to myself and members of this forum.  

All I can say is...I rest my case.

 

 

---

 Is she seriously suggesting it was Stooo made that post about me? Really? 

Crank up that I want a forum war with Dogs a notch. 

---

 Hi Binny...No, that isn't what she is suggesting.

A post was made about me on Dogs, a smutty one, Stoo implied Fluffy had made it.

Only idiots believed she had.

A week or so later he used the exact same phrase to someone else, which was pretty clear he had made the original post himself.