What I did notice when I read the thread was that a guest remarked how disgusting the thread was....which it certainly was, so a mod was obviously online whilst the thread was active.
What I did notice when I read the thread was that a guest remarked how disgusting the thread was....which it certainly was, so a mod was obviously online whilst the thread was active.
I do wonder what people get out of trolling. If you troll explain why you do it, or do trolls not actually realise they are trolling?
Speaking of trolling, I read a thread last night on a forum which I'm sure most people know....three apologies for men, and a fourth jumping in for the thrill of it all, posting to one female poster with the crudest, nastiest, most pathetic language I think I have ever seen on forums, and I have been around a while.
I don't know why the woman allowed it to continue, I don't know why the mods allowed it to continue for so long (pages) I do know if so called men spoke to women like that in public in the real world they wouldn't last long.
I saw a bit of that, and though I hate to say it she played into their hands somewhat. No excuse for some of the language though and of course El Narco needs no excuse to channel his inner Peter Sutcliffe but I was surprised by the reaction of leg endry. In fairness the person she was after had the most polite responses of all. Obviously some secret has come to light and it's bringing out the worst in people.
I could have that all wrong as I don't know form or history of the people involved. Just saying how it appeared to me. I rather like the lady in question myself.
I'm not into victim blaming...and though obviously there is history involved with whatever started the argument off in the first place, it should have been between two people not four.
Two and then the other one....do what they do best, jumped in to grab the chance to demean a woman on a forum.
I do wonder what people get out of trolling. If you troll explain why you do it, or do trolls not actually realise they are trolling?
Speaking of trolling, I read a thread last night on a forum which I'm sure most people know....three apologies for men, and a fourth jumping in for the thrill of it all, posting to one female poster with the crudest, nastiest, most pathetic language I think I have ever seen on forums, and I have been around a while.
I don't know why the woman allowed it to continue, I don't know why the mods allowed it to continue for so long (pages) I do know if so called men spoke to women like that in public in the real world they wouldn't last long.
I saw a bit of that, and though I hate to say it she played into their hands somewhat. No excuse for some of the language though and of course El Narco needs no excuse to channel his inner Peter Sutcliffe but I was surprised by the reaction of leg endry. In fairness the person she was after had the most polite responses of all. Obviously some secret has come to light and it's bringing out the worst in people.
I could have that all wrong as I don't know form or history of the people involved. Just saying how it appeared to me. I rather like the lady in question myself.
I'm not into victim blaming...and though obviously there is history involved with whatever started the argument off in the first place, it should have been between two people not four.
Two and then the other one....do what they do best, jumped in to grab the chance to demean a woman on a forum.
Which forum was it and who were the persecutors and victim?
__________________
Simple. You, you're the threads. But me, I'm the rope.
I do wonder what people get out of trolling. If you troll explain why you do it, or do trolls not actually realise they are trolling?
Speaking of trolling, I read a thread last night on a forum which I'm sure most people know....three apologies for men, and a fourth jumping in for the thrill of it all, posting to one female poster with the crudest, nastiest, most pathetic language I think I have ever seen on forums, and I have been around a while.
I don't know why the woman allowed it to continue, I don't know why the mods allowed it to continue for so long (pages) I do know if so called men spoke to women like that in public in the real world they wouldn't last long.
I saw a bit of that, and though I hate to say it she played into their hands somewhat. No excuse for some of the language though and of course El Narco needs no excuse to channel his inner Peter Sutcliffe but I was surprised by the reaction of leg endry. In fairness the person she was after had the most polite responses of all. Obviously some secret has come to light and it's bringing out the worst in people.
I could have that all wrong as I don't know form or history of the people involved. Just saying how it appeared to me. I rather like the lady in question myself.
I'm not into victim blaming...and though obviously there is history involved with whatever started the argument off in the first place, it should have been between two people not four.
Two and then the other one....do what they do best, jumped in to grab the chance to demean a woman on a forum.
Which forum was it and who were the persecutors and victim?
I do wonder what people get out of trolling. If you troll explain why you do it, or do trolls not actually realise they are trolling?
Speaking of trolling, I read a thread last night on a forum which I'm sure most people know....three apologies for men, and a fourth jumping in for the thrill of it all, posting to one female poster with the crudest, nastiest, most pathetic language I think I have ever seen on forums, and I have been around a while.
I don't know why the woman allowed it to continue, I don't know why the mods allowed it to continue for so long (pages) I do know if so called men spoke to women like that in public in the real world they wouldn't last long.
I saw a bit of that, and though I hate to say it she played into their hands somewhat. No excuse for some of the language though and of course El Narco needs no excuse to channel his inner Peter Sutcliffe but I was surprised by the reaction of leg endry. In fairness the person she was after had the most polite responses of all. Obviously some secret has come to light and it's bringing out the worst in people.
I could have that all wrong as I don't know form or history of the people involved. Just saying how it appeared to me. I rather like the lady in question myself.
I'm not into victim blaming...and though obviously there is history involved with whatever started the argument off in the first place, it should have been between two people not four.
Two and then the other one....do what they do best, jumped in to grab the chance to demean a woman on a forum.
Which forum was it and who were the persecutors and victim?
Dogs
Victim Lady Murasaki
Persecuters: Deeny Legendary & Fletch !
Thanks Twiz.
__________________
Simple. You, you're the threads. But me, I'm the rope.
She started it, she always starts shite by following Dean and Fletch to nag and troll them. Not saying they werent out of order but she never Leaves them alone. Sad.
'She started it'.....isn't that how many domestic abusers explain their actions away too.
Three...then another one piles in, so FOUR so called men, hid behind their keyboards, ganging up and spewing out the foulest abuse on one woman on a forum.
I bet their wives or partners (if any of them have any) would be SO proud if they read that thread last night.
Pathetic.
Stop being so blinkered. First off, Fletch did nothing wrong, he mildly objected to her stalking him and singling him out him all the time. It was only Dean and Legendary who upped it when she still wouldn’t stfu. Rollup had a pop to, but nothing like the drama your making out. She trolls them all the time and then plays the delicate flower when they snap and give her a taste of her own shit. They’re twats but she’s no innocent. She is poison and always has been.
I do wonder what people get out of trolling. If you troll explain why you do it, or do trolls not actually realise they are trolling?
Speaking of trolling, I read a thread last night on a forum which I'm sure most people know....three apologies for men, and a fourth jumping in for the thrill of it all, posting to one female poster with the crudest, nastiest, most pathetic language I think I have ever seen on forums, and I have been around a while.
I don't know why the woman allowed it to continue, I don't know why the mods allowed it to continue for so long (pages) I do know if so called men spoke to women like that in public in the real world they wouldn't last long.
I saw a bit of that, and though I hate to say it she played into their hands somewhat. No excuse for some of the language though and of course El Narco needs no excuse to channel his inner Peter Sutcliffe but I was surprised by the reaction of leg endry. In fairness the person she was after had the most polite responses of all. Obviously some secret has come to light and it's bringing out the worst in people.
I could have that all wrong as I don't know form or history of the people involved. Just saying how it appeared to me. I rather like the lady in question myself.
I'm not into victim blaming...and though obviously there is history involved with whatever started the argument off in the first place, it should have been between two people not four.
Two and then the other one....do what they do best, jumped in to grab the chance to demean a woman on a forum.
it's kind of putting me off the place a bit now
Never mind. You'll soon be back stirring up shit again.
I do wonder what people get out of trolling. If you troll explain why you do it, or do trolls not actually realise they are trolling?
Speaking of trolling, I read a thread last night on a forum which I'm sure most people know....three apologies for men, and a fourth jumping in for the thrill of it all, posting to one female poster with the crudest, nastiest, most pathetic language I think I have ever seen on forums, and I have been around a while.
I don't know why the woman allowed it to continue, I don't know why the mods allowed it to continue for so long (pages) I do know if so called men spoke to women like that in public in the real world they wouldn't last long.
I saw a bit of that, and though I hate to say it she played into their hands somewhat. No excuse for some of the language though and of course El Narco needs no excuse to channel his inner Peter Sutcliffe but I was surprised by the reaction of leg endry. In fairness the person she was after had the most polite responses of all. Obviously some secret has come to light and it's bringing out the worst in people.
I could have that all wrong as I don't know form or history of the people involved. Just saying how it appeared to me. I rather like the lady in question myself.
I'm not into victim blaming...and though obviously there is history involved with whatever started the argument off in the first place, it should have been between two people not four.
Two and then the other one....do what they do best, jumped in to grab the chance to demean a woman on a forum.
Which forum was it and who were the persecutors and victim?
Dogs
Victim Lady Murasaki
Persecuters: Deeny Legendary & Fletch !
She wasn't actually a victim in all that. She knows full well what she's playing at, and it worked for her that time.
She started it, she always starts shite by following Dean and Fletch to nag and troll them. Not saying they werent out of order but she never Leaves them alone. Sad.
'She started it'.....isn't that how many domestic abusers explain their actions away too.
Three...then another one piles in, so FOUR so called men, hid behind their keyboards, ganging up and spewing out the foulest abuse on one woman on a forum.
I bet their wives or partners (if any of them have any) would be SO proud if they read that thread last night.
Pathetic.
Stop being so blinkered. First off, Fletch did nothing wrong, he mildly objected to her stalking him and singling him out him all the time. It was only Dean and Legendary who upped it when she still wouldn’t stfu. Rollup had a pop to, but nothing like the drama your making out. She trolls them all the time and then plays the delicate flower when they snap and give her a taste of her own shit. They’re twats but she’s no innocent. She is poison and always has been.
Four excuses for men put on the nastiest most misogynistic performance even a forum like Dogs hasn't often witnessed, and that's saying something....and you blame the lwoman.
She started it, she always starts shite by following Dean and Fletch to nag and troll them. Not saying they werent out of order but she never Leaves them alone. Sad.
'She started it'.....isn't that how many domestic abusers explain their actions away too.
Three...then another one piles in, so FOUR so called men, hid behind their keyboards, ganging up and spewing out the foulest abuse on one woman on a forum.
I bet their wives or partners (if any of them have any) would be SO proud if they read that thread last night.
Pathetic.
Stop being so blinkered. First off, Fletch did nothing wrong, he mildly objected to her stalking him and singling him out him all the time. It was only Dean and Legendary who upped it when she still wouldn’t stfu. Rollup had a pop to, but nothing like the drama your making out. She trolls them all the time and then plays the delicate flower when they snap and give her a taste of her own shit. They’re twats but she’s no innocent. She is poison and always has been.
Hello - Felch is sheer hypocrisy in action and always has been when he has not been perving over his chosen women as for Dean he need help and fast.
-- Edited by John Doe on Saturday 14th of March 2020 11:47:59 PM
__________________
Simple. You, you're the threads. But me, I'm the rope.
I have no idea who is perving over who or what the origional row was about, it was the ganging up, the repeated foul language, the nasty personal comments that was freely allowed to escalate, all against one woman on a forum.
Sad that people get away with that level of bullying ...sad too that some people obviously enjoy looking on....where is the decency?
Dont they have wives, daughters, mothers? If they do I wonder how they would feel if they were treated like that.
I have no idea who is perving over who or what the origional row was about, it was the ganging up, the repeated foul language, the nasty personal comments that was freely allowed to escalate, all against one woman on a forum. Sad that people get away with that level of bullying ...sad too that some people obviously enjoy looking on....where is the decency?
Dont they have wives, daughters, mothers? If they do I wonder how they would feel if they were treated like that.
Your answer in a nutshell.
No.
-- Edited by John Doe on Sunday 15th of March 2020 12:14:24 AM
__________________
Simple. You, you're the threads. But me, I'm the rope.
I do wonder what people get out of trolling. If you troll explain why you do it, or do trolls not actually realise they are trolling?
Speaking of trolling, I read a thread last night on a forum which I'm sure most people know....three apologies for men, and a fourth jumping in for the thrill of it all, posting to one female poster with the crudest, nastiest, most pathetic language I think I have ever seen on forums, and I have been around a while.
I don't know why the woman allowed it to continue, I don't know why the mods allowed it to continue for so long (pages) I do know if so called men spoke to women like that in public in the real world they wouldn't last long.
I saw a bit of that, and though I hate to say it she played into their hands somewhat. No excuse for some of the language though and of course El Narco needs no excuse to channel his inner Peter Sutcliffe but I was surprised by the reaction of leg endry. In fairness the person she was after had the most polite responses of all. Obviously some secret has come to light and it's bringing out the worst in people.
I could have that all wrong as I don't know form or history of the people involved. Just saying how it appeared to me. I rather like the lady in question myself.
I'm not into victim blaming...and though obviously there is history involved with whatever started the argument off in the first place, it should have been between two people not four.
Two and then the other one....do what they do best, jumped in to grab the chance to demean a woman on a forum.
Which forum was it and who were the persecutors and victim?
Dogs
Victim Lady Murasaki
Persecuters: Deeny Legendary & Fletch !
She wasn't actually a victim in all that. She knows full well what she's playing at, and it worked for her that time.
She asked Fletch a question. He told her to back off and she didn't. I agree Fletch really did nothing wrong. Except watching his buddies rip into her for their own reasons without saying look, there's no need for all this.
But there was nothing to warrant Legendary's OTT nastiness and Dean's just a casual but open racist troll and gets away with it. He knows "full well what he's playing at" calling her a "fat Indian slag " but that's OK with you obviously. Roll up just likes being a nasty bugger when he's had a few.
Legend very much believes in equality and has said many times he will talk to women as cunts if t just like he talks to men that he feels act like cunts. It's uncomfortable to actually witness this supposed equality because in real life men do tend to generally adopt a more restrained tone in their discourse with women. They have to in order for society to chug along nicely.
The place was set up to be a trolling forum. That's it's purpose, for posters to be allowed to be as vile as possible. Dean complains the forum is no longer entertaining but the truth is it's as close to its original premise as it has been in years. The owner wants it as vicious as possible ergo the return of Budgie etc ,not caring a jot about the feelings of his female Admin who had given up their free time to allow the bloody place to exist .
Now there is a blokey rather seedy vibe to the place as the hostility is just a bit too uncomfortable to read or be part of. The women have all fled. There is a point where you have to say enough is enough and the forum is no longer a space for women to talk unless they demure to owners and trolls alike as Poca does.
Put succinctly if you pander to their egos and titter politely at their patronising put downs a female is accepted. If she dares to speak up in protest the men collude and verbally rip her to pieces in the name of equality. Hobbit is disliked so much because she openly calls out their schoolyard diction and adolescent attitude so they whine and call her names. Holly doesn't, she accepts all the sinister muck for the most part or protests only in a very mild girly fashion so she is considered to be a "good egg" as Red called her.
The blokes there just fly off the handle at any female who is not subservient to them. It's rather odd but fascinating behaviour for such modern times. .! I don't include Fletch in this though, he was rather polite in the thread and is rarely if ever truly vicious to women. That is just my take on it.
I do wonder what people get out of trolling. If you troll explain why you do it, or do trolls not actually realise they are trolling?
Speaking of trolling, I read a thread last night on a forum which I'm sure most people know....three apologies for men, and a fourth jumping in for the thrill of it all, posting to one female poster with the crudest, nastiest, most pathetic language I think I have ever seen on forums, and I have been around a while.
I don't know why the woman allowed it to continue, I don't know why the mods allowed it to continue for so long (pages) I do know if so called men spoke to women like that in public in the real world they wouldn't last long.
I saw a bit of that, and though I hate to say it she played into their hands somewhat. No excuse for some of the language though and of course El Narco needs no excuse to channel his inner Peter Sutcliffe but I was surprised by the reaction of leg endry. In fairness the person she was after had the most polite responses of all. Obviously some secret has come to light and it's bringing out the worst in people.
I could have that all wrong as I don't know form or history of the people involved. Just saying how it appeared to me. I rather like the lady in question myself.
I'm not into victim blaming...and though obviously there is history involved with whatever started the argument off in the first place, it should have been between two people not four.
Two and then the other one....do what they do best, jumped in to grab the chance to demean a woman on a forum.
Which forum was it and who were the persecutors and victim?
Dogs
Victim Lady Murasaki
Persecuters: Deeny Legendary & Fletch !
She wasn't actually a victim in all that. She knows full well what she's playing at, and it worked for her that time.
She asked Fletch a question. He told her to back off and she didn't. I agree Fletch really did nothing wrong. Except watching his buddies rip into her for their own reasons without saying look, there's no need for all this.
But there was nothing to warrant Legendary's OTT nastiness and Dean's just a casual but open racist troll and gets away with it. He knows "full well what he's playing at" calling her a "fat Indian slag " but that's OK with you obviously. Roll up just likes being a nasty bugger when he's had a few.
Legend very much believes in equality and has said many times he will talk to women as cunts if t just like he talks to men that he feels act like cunts. It's uncomfortable to actually witness this supposed equality because in real life men do tend to generally adopt a more restrained tone in their discourse with women. They have to in order for society to chug along nicely.
The place was set up to be a trolling forum. That's it's purpose, for posters to be allowed to be as vile as possible. Dean complains the forum is no longer entertaining but the truth is it's as close to its original premise as it has been in years. The owner wants it as vicious as possible ergo the return of Budgie etc ,not caring a jot about the feelings of his female Admin who had given up their free time to allow the bloody place to exist .
Now there is a blokey rather seedy vibe to the place as the hostility is just a bit too uncomfortable to read or be part of. The women have all fled. There is a point where you have to say enough is enough and the forum is no longer a space for women to talk unless they demure to owners and trolls alike as Poca does.
Put succinctly if you pander to their egos and titter politely at their patronising put downs a female is accepted. If she dares to speak up in protest the men collude and verbally rip her to pieces in the name of equality. Hobbit is disliked so much because she openly calls out their schoolyard diction and adolescent attitude so they whine and call her names. Holly doesn't, she accepts all the sinister muck for the most part or protests only in a very mild girly fashion so she is considered to be a "good egg" as Red called her.
The blokes there just fly off the handle at any female who is not subservient to them. It's rather odd but fascinating behaviour for such modern times. .! I don't include Fletch in this though, he was rather polite in the thread and is rarely if ever truly vicious to women. That is just my take on it.
Feltch was a nasty little prick to me using one woman's mental illness to score cheap points against me and damage her further just like Deana, as for the others without mod protection from No Hands and Stoopid on Dogs they are jokes - I want them to join here on a level playing field to see how long they last.
__________________
Simple. You, you're the threads. But me, I'm the rope.
Dean is not welcome, Jack couldn't hack it, I dont remember much about Fletch, and Legendary, judging by what I read last night, is posting exactly where he belongs.....so No Ta, we dont need misogynistic creeps like that on here.
-- Edited by Syl on Sunday 15th of March 2020 12:46:37 AM
I do wonder what people get out of trolling. If you troll explain why you do it, or do trolls not actually realise they are trolling?
Speaking of trolling, I read a thread last night on a forum which I'm sure most people know....three apologies for men, and a fourth jumping in for the thrill of it all, posting to one female poster with the crudest, nastiest, most pathetic language I think I have ever seen on forums, and I have been around a while.
I don't know why the woman allowed it to continue, I don't know why the mods allowed it to continue for so long (pages) I do know if so called men spoke to women like that in public in the real world they wouldn't last long.
I saw a bit of that, and though I hate to say it she played into their hands somewhat. No excuse for some of the language though and of course El Narco needs no excuse to channel his inner Peter Sutcliffe but I was surprised by the reaction of leg endry. In fairness the person she was after had the most polite responses of all. Obviously some secret has come to light and it's bringing out the worst in people.
I could have that all wrong as I don't know form or history of the people involved. Just saying how it appeared to me. I rather like the lady in question myself.
I'm not into victim blaming...and though obviously there is history involved with whatever started the argument off in the first place, it should have been between two people not four.
Two and then the other one....do what they do best, jumped in to grab the chance to demean a woman on a forum.
Which forum was it and who were the persecutors and victim?
Dogs
Victim Lady Murasaki
Persecuters: Deeny Legendary & Fletch !
She wasn't actually a victim in all that. She knows full well what she's playing at, and it worked for her that time.
She asked Fletch a question. He told her to back off and she didn't. I agree Fletch really did nothing wrong. Except watching his buddies rip into her for their own reasons without saying look, there's no need for all this.
But there was nothing to warrant Legendary's OTT nastiness and Dean's just a casual but open racist troll and gets away with it. He knows "full well what he's playing at" calling her a "fat Indian slag " but that's OK with you obviously. Roll up just likes being a nasty bugger when he's had a few.
Legend very much believes in equality and has said many times he will talk to women as cunts if t just like he talks to men that he feels act like cunts. It's uncomfortable to actually witness this supposed equality because in real life men do tend to generally adopt a more restrained tone in their discourse with women. They have to in order for society to chug along nicely.
The place was set up to be a trolling forum. That's it's purpose, for posters to be allowed to be as vile as possible. Dean complains the forum is no longer entertaining but the truth is it's as close to its original premise as it has been in years. The owner wants it as vicious as possible ergo the return of Budgie etc ,not caring a jot about the feelings of his female Admin who had given up their free time to allow the bloody place to exist .
Now there is a blokey rather seedy vibe to the place as the hostility is just a bit too uncomfortable to read or be part of. The women have all fled. There is a point where you have to say enough is enough and the forum is no longer a space for women to talk unless they demure to owners and trolls alike as Poca does.
Put succinctly if you pander to their egos and titter politely at their patronising put downs a female is accepted. If she dares to speak up in protest the men collude and verbally rip her to pieces in the name of equality. Hobbit is disliked so much because she openly calls out their schoolyard diction and adolescent attitude so they whine and call her names. Holly doesn't, she accepts all the sinister muck for the most part or protests only in a very mild girly fashion so she is considered to be a "good egg" as Red called her.
The blokes there just fly off the handle at any female who is not subservient to them. It's rather odd but fascinating behaviour for such modern times. .! I don't include Fletch in this though, he was rather polite in the thread and is rarely if ever truly vicious to women. That is just my take on it.
Feltch was a nasty little prick to me using one woman's mental illness to score cheap points against me and damage her further just like Deana, as for the others without mod protection from No Hands and Stoopid on Dogs they are jokes - I want them to join here on a level playing field to see how long they last.
No ganging up against one lone person, whatever their gender or supposed justification, is adult behaviour and the sheer nastiness of the place is totally out of control. I don'the like hearing that you experienced such abuse.
But women are also are quite capable of ganging up mercilessly on a target, never stopping the most vile disgusting abuse more months upon months. Fletch has on occasion witnessed it, spoken out against the verbal abuse and received a perma ban for his trouble. For standing up for a stranger who was being victimised. It was very noble and frankly brave, to go against the baying mob over there.
Not every person is either entirely good or bad. We all have good and bad points. Life is all shades of grey.
If you had seen the thread he also was by far the most polite and blameless. The other men behaved disgracefully and that cannot be denied.
Dean is not welcome, Jack couldn't hack it, I dont remember much about Fletch, and Legendary, judging by what I read last night, is posting exactly where he belongs.....so No Ta, we dont need misogynistic creeps like that on here.
-- Edited by Syl on Sunday 15th of March 2020 12:46:37 AM
It was a rhetorical question Syl. XXX
__________________
Simple. You, you're the threads. But me, I'm the rope.