@drsynne, pls don't take this the wrong way but I don't wish to get involved so I won't be replying to your question.
I don't know the answer anyway, and I don't wish to speculate.
Can I make this crystal clear: when I mentioned ''sob stories'' yesterday, it was FLETCH - and fletch alone whom I was referring to. No one else. And it wasn't about any tragedy, just a regular sob story. Ta.
I am scrupulously fair by nature. If people are decent to me, I am completely decent to them. I have never deviated from that mantra.
Even when people are vile to me, I try as hard as possible to ignore their nastiness, for as long as possible, sometimes for months... before I finally speak out.
then how come this weekend you launched a tirade at SF who as far as I can see has kept away from you. i might not know your history with him/her but there doesnt seem to be anything there
signed a sf fan
SF starts on others first. Snide and shot stirring is his forte.
I think SF is finally seeing who the trolls are over there.
I am scrupulously fair by nature. If people are decent to me, I am completely decent to them. I have never deviated from that mantra.
Even when people are vile to me, I try as hard as possible to ignore their nastiness, for as long as possible, sometimes for months... before I finally speak out.
then how come this weekend you launched a tirade at SF who as far as I can see has kept away from you. i might not know your history with him/her but there doesnt seem to be anything there
signed a sf fan
SF starts on others first. Snide and shot stirring is his forte.
I think SF is finally seeing who the trolls are over there.
Why does everyone and their dog have to get involved when two or more people are squabbling over some specific past difference that only they know about?
Why do people claim to be scrupulously fair and then start talking about banjoboys and evil fukkers?
I am scrupulously fair by nature. If people are decent to me, I am completely decent to them. I have never deviated from that mantra.
Even when people are vile to me, I try as hard as possible to ignore their nastiness, for as long as possible, sometimes for months... before I finally speak out.
then how come this weekend you launched a tirade at SF who as far as I can see has kept away from you. i might not know your history with him/her but there doesnt seem to be anything there
signed a sf fan
SF starts on others first. Snide and shot stirring is his forte.
I think SF is finally seeing who the trolls are over there.
SF is one of the trolls.
Doesn’t come across as one
Then you are either very naive, or purposely turning a blind eye to the snide comments he makes, and the constant backing up of Dean.
SF is as much a troll, and bully, as the others, but he thinks he's covering it. He's not, it's very obvious.
Why does everyone and their dog have to get involved when two or more people are squabbling over some specific past difference that only they know about?
Why do people claim to be scrupulously fair and then start talking about banjoboys and evil fukkers?
I am scrupulously fair by nature. If people are decent to me, I am completely decent to them. I have never deviated from that mantra.
Even when people are vile to me, I try as hard as possible to ignore their nastiness, for as long as possible, sometimes for months... before I finally speak out.
then how come this weekend you launched a tirade at SF who as far as I can see has kept away from you. i might not know your history with him/her but there doesnt seem to be anything there
signed a sf fan
SF starts on others first. Snide and shot stirring is his forte.
I think SF is finally seeing who the trolls are over there.
SF is one of the trolls.
Doesn’t come across as one
Then you are either very naive, or purposely turning a blind eye to the snide comments he makes, and the constant backing up of Dean.
SF is as much a troll, and bully, as the others, but he thinks he's covering it. He's not, it's very obvious.
@drsynne, pls don't take this the wrong way but I don't wish to get involved so I won't be replying to your question. I don't know the answer anyway, and I don't wish to speculate.
Can I make this crystal clear: when I mentioned ''sob stories'' yesterday, it was FLETCH - and fletch alone whom I was referring to. No one else. And it wasn't about any tragedy, just a regular sob story. Ta.
No worries. They just keep referencing it but won't explain I don't want be someone who causes upset over some personal tragedy even if it is mistekenly.
I always think it's best to err on the side of caution if someone talks about a bereavement or ill health. Even the most repulsive people on forums had sad times in their lives, and unless we know them personally we don't know whether it's true or false.
If someone talks about a death and you don't believe them.....you can always keep quiet.
Normally yes, he claimed his mum was dead last week.
Yes indeed he did, Guest. It wasn't last week that he said it tho, I think it was a few weeks ago. The mod is quite used to his scheming ways, and she called him a liar to his face there & then. (I did not make any comment btw. I kept my thoughts to myself, which seemed the sensible thing to do.)
-- Edited by Text on Monday 16th of March 2020 06:49:35 PM
Why does everyone and their dog have to get involved when two or more people are squabbling over some specific past difference that only they know about?
Why do people claim to be scrupulously fair and then start talking about banjoboys and evil fukkers?
Oh that is me being kind …. and restrained. Trust me, anon.
If a person deliberately goes all out to annoy, irritate, upset, distress & does it continuously to certain targets, no words are too good for him.
Put your one-man pity party away.
I did say I would no longer talk about him but I'd just like to give a few examples to show what an evil lying fkker he is.
I wouldn't call someone a liar for no reason. Felchy provides PLENTY of reason to call him a lying fkker.
-- Edited by Text on Monday 16th of March 2020 07:03:06 PM
Why does everyone and their dog have to get involved when two or more people are squabbling over some specific past difference that only they know about?
Why do people claim to be scrupulously fair and then start talking about banjoboys and evil fukkers?
Oh that is me being kind …. and restrained. Trust me, anon.
If a person deliberately goes all out to annoy, irritate, upset, distress & does it continuously to certain targets, no words are too good for him.
Put your one-man pity party away.
I did say I would no longer talk about him but I'd just like to give a few examples to show what an evil lying fkker he is.
I wouldn't call someone a liar for no reason. Felchy provides PLENTY of reason to call him a lying fkker.
-- Edited by Text on Monday 16th of March 2020 07:03:06 PM
Restrained? YOU? You’ve been on a rampaging rantfest for days now here and there.
Why does everyone and their dog have to get involved when two or more people are squabbling over some specific past difference that only they know about?
Why do people claim to be scrupulously fair and then start talking about banjoboys and evil fukkers?
Oh that is me being kind …. and restrained. Trust me, anon.
If a person deliberately goes all out to annoy, irritate, upset, distress & does it continuously to certain targets, no words are too good for him.
Put your one-man pity party away.
I did say I would no longer talk about him but I'd just like to give a few examples to show what an evil lying fkker he is.
I wouldn't call someone a liar for no reason. Felchy provides PLENTY of reason to call him a lying fkker.
-- Edited by Text on Monday 16th of March 2020 07:03:06 PM
Restrained? YOU? You’ve been on a rampaging rantfest for days now here and there.
Why does everyone and their dog have to get involved when two or more people are squabbling over some specific past difference that only they know about?
Why do people claim to be scrupulously fair and then start talking about banjoboys and evil fukkers?
Take a butchers at the pile on just because someone dares to point out that some behaviours were excessive. Look at the Kafka-esque levels of hysteria and nuerosis
There's a pattern here whereby the dildo patrol can cross any line they please and yet the victims of that are held to some higher standard of behaviour. Why the fuck is that.
El Narco the necro can fuck himself - yes I know you're reading this sweetie, much love - but there's nothing too serious about it, too easily handled to be taken that seriously.
-- Edited by dr synne on Monday 16th of March 2020 07:36:21 PM
Why does everyone and their dog have to get involved when two or more people are squabbling over some specific past difference that only they know about?
Why do people claim to be scrupulously fair and then start talking about banjoboys and evil fukkers?
Take a butchers at the pile on just because someone dares to point out that some behaviours were excessive. Look at the Kafka-esque levels of hysteria and nuerosis
There's a pattern here whereby the dildo patrol can cross any line they please and yet the victims of that are held to some higher standard of behaviour. Why the fuck is that.
El Narco the necro can fuck himself - yes I know you're reading this sweetie, much love - but there's nothing too serious about it, too easily handled to be taken that seriously.
-- Edited by dr synne on Monday 16th of March 2020 07:36:21 PM
Some people are allowed to troll away to thrir hearts content, others aren't allowed to put a foot wrong if they are not as popular as other posters.
It's unfair and pretty much akin to the ethics of schoolchildren but sadly human nature is what it is. If there isn't really a justified reason to hate a poster that people want to troll they will simply make things up about them. Problem solved!
The only real way to judge who is honest and who is stirring the pot with startling aplomb is judge how a poster has treated you personally. Don't go by rumour or forum hearsay. Read the posts of people accused of being the worst trolls in human existence and if they are polite and normal you can pretty much tell this person is just being targeted.
If their posts are hostile, rude, and well just downright unpleasant, they probably are the malevolent trolls posters claim they are. But there is so much fiction on these forums it puts Jackanory to shame!
Felch has a habit of taking wild speculation and weird CT theories and pretending they are rock solid facts.
The worst lie of all, which made me despise him totally was when he recently claimed that I once made an account in his name in order to boost my forum membership count. At the time he said it, 2 other notorious bullying bastards were already having a go at me …….and felch being felch - well he just had to join in the pile-in didn't he? He never could resist that sort of thing.
I had notified him that there was an account in his name which I had deleted cos it had only made ONE measly post in many months. He said it wasn't him - and I believed him and shrugged and left it at that …. cos ANYONE who runs a forum knows full well that impostors keep trying to join, in the usernames of other people. I delete suspicious/fake looking usernames all the time. I explained all this to him painstakingly.
Guess what …. Felchy then claimed that I make accounts in the usernames of known people in FW in order to make my site look busy. Damned lie !! I'm not like that, plus I'd never get away with it anyway. My membership list is there for every member to see and inspect in minute detail. He is so incredibly thick …. I mean, if it had been me who made the account, why would I be the one to break the news that he had an account there?? Duhhhh! What an idiot! And if he'd never been a member how would he have a clue what goes on in there?
I would never DREAM of adding extra usernames belonging to members of other sites. Felchy knew it was a nasty thing he was accusing me of and he did it with sick pleasure, he wanted to make the pile-in nastier than it already was.
dr synne wrote:Take a butchers at the pile on just because someone dares to point out that some behaviours were excessive. Look at the Kafka-esque levels of hysteria and nuerosis
There's a pattern here whereby the dildo patrol can cross any line they please and yet the victims of that are held to some higher standard of behaviour. Why the fuck is that.
El Narco the necro can fuck himself - yes I know you're reading this sweetie, much love - but there's nothing too serious about it, too easily handled to be taken that seriously.
-- Edited by dr synne on Monday 16th of March 2020 07:36:21 PM
I didn't see the thread but I see it as long term members squabbling - there is a lot of squabbling that occurs.
I'm sorry that you feel that strongly against one of the forum members - but he has been honest in saying he sees it as a sort of game (when using names such as c... and nonce). You are not going to change it so you have to either put up with it and carry on, or ignore it, or endlessly argue or be witty in your responses or leave or spend less time there. Nobody owes anyone any favours. If someone is going to call me names or criticise me then I will only respond one or two times if I feel it is necessary and then leave it.
It is the Whine, and at least Text posts in her own name unlike you lot.
Nothing annoys these trolls more than the sight of people dismantling their lies. They try to shame you into shutting up - nice try!!
I ignore all weird or nasty anon posts - except if it works out in my favour to reply.
Thank you, Syl, for providing the means for me to have my say. I've finished replying to everyone now.
Do what you want Text, don’t be dictated to by a bunch of creeps. The Fletch one in particular turns my stomach. If you want to rant go ahead, they only want you on Dogs so they can gang up on you.
I have to say I hate Dean constantly calling Text c...ty. But what can you do? It's the forum that allows it. I think only Dean uses the term but no one seems to object and discussion goes on with everyone knowing the forum member it refers to.
I sometimes wonder why people use the term c..t all the time over on dogs but maybe it is a response to feminism - which goes on and on about the importance of the vagina as a symbol moving forward and battling against the use of the straight line, columns, towers which they see as representing the penis and the patriarchy. I think people use the term c..t here as well? People call each other dicks, in the modern progressive society they now also call each other cunts and twats. Or maybe I have spent too much time on dogs and in the whine.