ChaoticMusings

I remember you from Retoasted.

The implication on Dogs seems to be that you've been around longer than you claim and possibly a PBU.

Bit unfair to keep us all in suspenders though, if they though you were a PBU, then they should have said who they thought you were.

SF wrote:

---

Vicks wrote:

---

I remember you from Retoasted.

The implication on Dogs seems to be that you've been around longer than you claim and possibly a PBU.

Bit unfair to keep us all in suspenders though, if they though you were a PBU, then they should have said who they thought you were.

---

 Just for the record, I'm not, and never have been. But people will think what they want to think.

---

 It seems you've been 'Hung without a trial' as my Granda used to say.

Maybe they'll reconsider and you can go back but then again after the way you've been treated, maybe you don't want to go back.

Are you thinking of joining here?

Vicks wrote:

---

SF wrote:

---

Vicks wrote:

---

I remember you from Retoasted.

The implication on Dogs seems to be that you've been around longer than you claim and possibly a PBU.

Bit unfair to keep us all in suspenders though, if they though you were a PBU, then they should have said who they thought you were.

---

 Just for the record, I'm not, and never have been. But people will think what they want to think.

---

 It seems you've been 'Hung without a trial' as my Granda used to say.

Maybe they'll reconsider and you can go back but then again after the way you've been treated, maybe you don't want to go back.

Are you thinking of joining here?

---

 Thanks for the suggestion, but that wasn't really my intention. I put up the post to ask stooo the question, it's the only way I could think of doing it, and thanks by the way to the hosts for letting it on. He may not particularly care one way or the other, if so it's no big deal. And re your Grandad's saying - yes that does happen - I've learnt one thing while on Dogs, and that's the bizarre way a collective mindset operates.

.SF. wrote:

---

A question - I made a post or two in your Boris Baby thread today, fairly innocuous if you'd care to have a look - and now appear to have been permanently banned from your site for it by one of your admin, including an IP ban, and with no reason given. Just wondering why - if you wouldn't mind letting me know!

---

If you were using a mobile to post then that's why the IP has been banned, admin didn't do it, it's random. On your ban notice it would've said to get in touch with the site administrator, you only had to click on that and email him and he would've unbanned your IP, instead of making a thread here.

 

Then again, you enjoy posting over here with your little shit stirring posts. We've all seen them. So transparent.

Rags is a good poster, we have had a few ups and downs and I haven't posted with her for ages, but imo she was always fair in her views, I liked her dry wit too.

Anonymous wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

.SF. wrote:

---

A question - I made a post or two in your Boris Baby thread today, fairly innocuous if you'd care to have a look - and now appear to have been permanently banned from your site for it by one of your admin, including an IP ban, and with no reason given. Just wondering why - if you wouldn't mind letting me know!

---

        you like jd are both great posters, both ip banned for no real reason at all. i can't recall disagreeing with a single post of yours and you made interesting reading. imo, you are

too good for the dogs as was jd. the poster dr synee jumped before this poster was ip banned and the poster like you and jd posts interesting posts but in a different way to you and jd. imo  the  only other decent posters left on the dogs are ragga and budgie and like the other great poster ledg, it is only a matter of time before the hunk, boss guy bans their ip's as well. the bottom line is that it is the hunks site and what he says goes and hf may be next as she dislike the legend there, dean. take care, mate... x

---

 

I'll give you raggs because she's ok, but fuck me, if you think budgie is 'decent' then that speaks volumes about you.

 

And SF is a snide little git, nothing decent about him either.

---

       i stand by what i said and not thug is going to change my mind. sf, just checked the dogs, stooo does not mention banning you, so it could be as some shite said ie your phone.  i thought you was a young woman but others are saying you are a man. for all i care i do not give crap if you are a man, woman, it is what you post that counts and you are very nice and not a snake like some. 

  abut budgie, nothing wrong with the gentle giant but if you try to treat him like shite, he won't just turn the other cheek and walk away. we are all different. i intially did not like jd very much when he posted a ..... on the dogs but here he is funny, and good informative posts at times with a bit of  smut, jokey type and if people say they don't like it, he is big enough to say sorry, and like budgie, jd, never known them to do anything nasty.  sf being a snide.... i strongly disagree as the only "snide" are zero as sf is baited, talked down to by the little group because sf has got what it takes for degenerates to be jealous her. imo, sf and budgie would make good admin as they are firm and uncompromising, 

Anonymous wrote:

---

.SF. wrote:

---

A question - I made a post or two in your Boris Baby thread today, fairly innocuous if you'd care to have a look - and now appear to have been permanently banned from your site for it by one of your admin, including an IP ban, and with no reason given. Just wondering why - if you wouldn't mind letting me know!

---

        you like jd are both great posters, both ip banned for no real reason at all. i can't recall disagreeing with a single post of yours and you made interesting reading. imo, you are

too good for the dogs as was jd. the poster dr synee jumped before this poster was ip banned and the poster like you and jd posts interesting posts but in a different way to you and jd. imo the only other decent posters left on the dogs are ragga and budgie and like the other great poster ledg, it is only a matter of time before the hunk, boss guy bans their ip's as well. the bottom line is that it is the hunks site and what he says goes and hf may be next as she dislike the legend there, dean. take care, mate... x

---

 Are you calling Stooo a hunk??  

 

Anonymous wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

.SF. wrote:

---

A question - I made a post or two in your Boris Baby thread today, fairly innocuous if you'd care to have a look - and now appear to have been permanently banned from your site for it by one of your admin, including an IP ban, and with no reason given. Just wondering why - if you wouldn't mind letting me know!

---

        you like jd are both great posters, both ip banned for no real reason at all. i can't recall disagreeing with a single post of yours and you made interesting reading. imo, you are

too good for the dogs as was jd. the poster dr synee jumped before this poster was ip banned and the poster like you and jd posts interesting posts but in a different way to you and jd. imo  the  only other decent posters left on the dogs are ragga and budgie and like the other great poster ledg, it is only a matter of time before the hunk, boss guy bans their ip's as well. the bottom line is that it is the hunks site and what he says goes and hf may be next as she dislike the legend there, dean. take care, mate... x

---

 

I'll give you raggs because she's ok, but fuck me, if you think budgie is 'decent' then that speaks volumes about you.

 

And SF is a snide little git, nothing decent about him either.

---

       i stand by what i said and not thug is going to change my mind. sf, just checked the dogs, stooo does not mention banning you, so it could be as some shite said ie your phone.  i thought you was a young woman but others are saying you are a man. for all i care i do not give crap if you are a man, woman, it is what you post that counts and you are very nice and not a snake like some. 

  abut budgie, nothing wrong with the gentle giant but if you try to treat him like shite, he won't just turn the other cheek and walk away. we are all different. i intially did not like jd very much when he posted a ..... on the dogs but here he is funny, and good informative posts at times with a bit of  smut, jokey type and if people say they don't like it, he is big enough to say sorry, and like budgie, jd, never known them to do anything nasty.  sf being a snide.... i strongly disagree as the only "snide" are zero as sf is baited, talked down to by the little group because sf has got what it takes for degenerates to be jealous her. imo, sf and budgie would make good admin as they are firm and uncompromising, 

---

No idea if you're Major or Lucian, or both, but your patter is getting very fucking tedious. The sycophantic gushing over the vilest of posters isn't gonna wash with the sane amongst us. 

Okay...think I’ll weigh in on this. @ SF - it’s probably down to that dumbkompf boozehound, Holly, on another one of her tedious pissed-up bait & ban power trips again. And then collapsing on her pit before remembering to post your bopping in the Ban thread. She’s done the same to me a couple of times. Your fatal error was to once speak up (very mildly!) when she was doing her bait & ban bullshit around me. Your card was well and truly marked by her from that moment on. She hates being shown up for the craven imbecile she truly is, and she’s been simmering around you ever since. Lots of luck waiting for the dickwad otherwise known as Stoooie to take a stand and actually be proactive over this. If you’ve been paying attention, you’ll know that could take a while...! ;)