ChaoticMusings

Anonymous wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

Okay...think I’ll weigh in on this. @ SF - it’s probably down to that dumbkompf boozehound, Holly, on another one of her tedious pissed-up bait & ban power trips again. And then collapsing on her pit before remembering to post your bopping in the Ban thread. She’s done the same to me a couple of times. Your fatal error was to once speak up (very mildly!) when she was doing her bait & ban bullshit around me. Your card was well and truly marked by her from that moment on. She hates being shown up for the craven imbecile she truly is, and she’s been simmering around you ever since. Lots of luck waiting for the dickwad otherwise known as Stoooie to take a stand and actually be proactive over this. If you’ve been paying attention, you’ll know that could take a while...! ;)

---

 Still smarting over your ban twinkle toes?

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

.SF. wrote:

---

A question - I made a post or two in your Boris Baby thread today, fairly innocuous if you'd care to have a look - and now appear to have been permanently banned from your site for it by one of your admin, including an IP ban, and with no reason given. Just wondering why - if you wouldn't mind letting me know!

---

        you like jd are both great posters, both ip banned for no real reason at all. i can't recall disagreeing with a single post of yours and you made interesting reading. imo, you are

too good for the dogs as was jd. the poster dr synee jumped before this poster was ip banned and the poster like you and jd posts interesting posts but in a different way to you and jd. imo the only other decent posters left on the dogs are ragga and budgie and like the other great poster ledg, it is only a matter of time before the hunk, boss guy bans their ip's as well. the bottom line is that it is the hunks site and what he says goes and hf may be next as she dislike the legend there, dean. take care, mate... x

---

 It's Dean and yes I know, I know everyone says that but usually to the wrong posts.

Read the first paragraph  like Dean had openly posted it , after that  he has to make a change and start this annoying style he adapts posting without full stops. It's why he defends Budgie and sf,  it doesn't go with the pretendy sycophantic nature to like Budgie.  Sadly this really is Dean so don't blame Lucian or Major.

Anonymous wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

.SF. wrote:

---

A question - I made a post or two in your Boris Baby thread today, fairly innocuous if you'd care to have a look - and now appear to have been permanently banned from your site for it by one of your admin, including an IP ban, and with no reason given. Just wondering why - if you wouldn't mind letting me know!

---

        you like jd are both great posters, both ip banned for no real reason at all. i can't recall disagreeing with a single post of yours and you made interesting reading. imo, you are

too good for the dogs as was jd. the poster dr synee jumped before this poster was ip banned and the poster like you and jd posts interesting posts but in a different way to you and jd. imo the only other decent posters left on the dogs are ragga and budgie and like the other great poster ledg, it is only a matter of time before the hunk, boss guy bans their ip's as well. the bottom line is that it is the hunks site and what he says goes and hf may be next as she dislike the legend there, dean. take care, mate... x

---

 It's Dean and yes I know, I know everyone says that but usually to the wrong posts.

Read the first paragraph  like Dean had openly posted it , after that  he has to make a change and start this annoying style he adapts posting without full stops. It's why he defends Budgie and sf,  it doesn't go with the pretendy sycophantic nature to like Budgie.  Sadly this really is Dean so don't blame Lucian or Major.

---

 Dean is an utter c**t - sorry for being so very diplomatic guesty.

John Doe wrote:

---

I am totally lost as to who the fuck is sniping at who. 

The anonymous posters who don't like the comatose canines why not join here?

The moderation is excellent and tbh it's very pleasant to be able agree to disagree with members (and mods) without all the usual childish shit-storm of tag-teaming from the usual 'chums' and the vindictive playground abuse.

Mind you that's why a few flounced from here - which says far more about them than I ever could. 

---

 Not a fan of any poster who left I'm guessing 

We all have different experiences. I'm not sure what you describe would be everyone's pov. Can't you leave  bygones be bygones JD,  no one on dogs who has left here is posting about you.  I posted with you on DS once and we got on so I don't dislike you AT ALL btw.

Anonymous wrote:

---

Vicks wrote:

---

I remember you from Retoasted.

The implication on Dogs seems to be that you've been around longer than you claim and possibly a PBU.

Bit unfair to keep us all in suspenders though, if they though you were a PBU, then they should have said who they thought you were.

---

 ge around everywhere for a newbie doesn’t he?

---

 I feel a Beach Boys song coming on!

Anonymous wrote:

---

John Doe wrote:

---

I am totally lost as to who the fuck is sniping at who. 

The anonymous posters who don't like the comatose canines why not join here?

The moderation is excellent and tbh it's very pleasant to be able agree to disagree with members (and mods) without all the usual childish shit-storm of tag-teaming from the usual 'chums' and the vindictive playground abuse.

Mind you that's why a few flounced from here - which says far more about them than I ever could. 

---

 Not a fan of any poster who left I'm guessing 

We all have different experiences. I'm not sure what you describe would be everyone's pov. Can't you leave  bygones be bygones JD,  no one on dogs who has left here is posting about you.  I posted with you on DS once and we got on so I don't dislike you AT ALL btw.

---

 Join here - it would be nice to see who you are and have a chat. 

Anonymous wrote:

---

Vicks wrote:

---

SF wrote:

---

Vicks wrote:

---

I remember you from Retoasted.

The implication on Dogs seems to be that you've been around longer than you claim and possibly a PBU.

Bit unfair to keep us all in suspenders though, if they though you were a PBU, then they should have said who they thought you were.

---

 Just for the record, I'm not, and never have been. But people will think what they want to think.

---

 It seems you've been 'Hung without a trial' as my Granda used to say.

Maybe they'll reconsider and you can go back but then again after the way you've been treated, maybe you don't want to go back.

Are you thinking of joining here?

---

 Thanks for the suggestion, but that wasn't really my intention. I put up the post to ask stooo the question, it's the only way I could think of doing it, and thanks by the way to the hosts for letting it on. He may not particularly care one way or the other, if so it's no big deal. And re your Grandad's saying - yes that does happen - I've learnt one thing while on Dogs, and that's the bizarre way a collective mindset operates.

---

 Yes when I was perma banned from Dogs a couple of years ago on the sly, Digs and Syl were kind enough to let me ask about it on here as well. I never did get a reply but hopefully you will.

Anonymous wrote:

---

Vicks wrote:

---

I remember you from Retoasted.

The implication on Dogs seems to be that you've been around longer than you claim and possibly a PBU.

Bit unfair to keep us all in suspenders though, if they though you were a PBU, then they should have said who they thought you were.

---

 ge around everywhere for a newbie doesn’t he?

---

 Two forums in two years is hardly excessive.

Vicks wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

Vicks wrote:

---

I remember you from Retoasted.

The implication on Dogs seems to be that you've been around longer than you claim and possibly a PBU.

Bit unfair to keep us all in suspenders though, if they though you were a PBU, then they should have said who they thought you were.

---

 ge around everywhere for a newbie doesn’t he?

---

 Two forums in two years is hardly excessive.

---

 Shit stirring across forums for a newbie is hardly innocent.