ChaoticMusings

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

RE: Vam, can I ask you a question

Date: May 17 12:21 PM, 2020

Digger wrote:
Vam wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Vam wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Vam wrote:
John Doe wrote:
I am still waiting...
Really? What are you waiting for?
The poster to ask you the question.
We all are.
Hmmm...ok. But the fact that this thread had been quietly sliding down the main page, would imply that no one has been waiting for anything anymore.
Which is why it seems odd that you decided to re-up the thread. Were you hoping to stir up some shite by any chance? A bit like you were hoping to stir up some agg between Syl & me, by oh-so-innocently mentioning a certain ‘dress’ several times? To her credit, Syl serenely ignored your snide, as did I.

Still, I guess it beats sourcing & posting graphic & highly distressing images of terribly ill little girls, as a way to pass the time.
Syl knows I was joking because we have had a bit friendly banter over it on the main forum, (an alien concept well beyond you I know).
Because you are no longer Queen Bitch of the Comatose Canines you decided to have a pop at me.
I like reading you slag off Stooo on here because when I was on there you had your head so far up his arse you would not have been able to find your way out with a map and a fucking flashlight.

-- Edited by John Doe on Saturday 16th of May 2020 11:30:36 PM
Listen up, you seedy twisted little fucker - you may have finally found skirts to desperately cling to here, with your cloying neediness. But I’m not about to enable or nurture your neurosis.

I’m hardly a prolific poster here, which should be reason enough for you to keep me the hell out of your shitposting.
I've just seen this. We're not stupid on here, Vam. You started on JD then complain when he gives it back. The relentless bullying that took place on Dogs against him was way out of proportion to any forum 'crime' he committed. Any more posts insinuating that JD is a sexual deviant won't be allowed. I've seen the posts on Dogs where Fletch, Dean and others tried their best to goad him about looking at photos of 'pre-teen girls' when in fact the photo in question was of a 22 year old. That's the kind of vicious shit that Dogs is famous for, and having been at the receiving end of accusations of being a fantasist/fake/ etc, it won't wash here.
We don't mind giving you a voice on CM. But don't abuse it.

By you own admission you know they lie and yet you leave lies about a registered member and the Anon claiming to be Vam leaves a trail of nasty comments against one of your

members. Can you not delete the nasty posts? Just remove them and ban the anon Vam and don't post this message. Thanking you in advance.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

It is Vam posting, (yes, for once I checked) and she can be accountable for what she writes. However anything else based on the sordid lies about JD that circulated on Dogs wont be getting through, as Digger said.
I'm sure insults aplenty can be traded without bordering on being libellous.

Date: May 17 12:47 PM, 2020

Digger wrote:

Manolo Blahniks if you don't mind

Or was it Jimmy Choo's?

-- Edited by Digger on Sunday 17th of May 2020 10:43:41 AM

Coupla pairs of both & you can chuck some Loubi’s into the mix too

Orrrrrr....as is much much more likely these days, a pair of dung-encrusted wellies when I’m cleaning up around the business end of a horse.

(Christ - I’m homesick! )

Digger · Admin

Vam wrote:
Digger wrote:

Manolo Blahniks if you don't mind

Or was it Jimmy Choo's?

-- Edited by Digger on Sunday 17th of May 2020 10:43:41 AM
Coupla pairs of both & you can chuck some Loubi’s into the mix too
Orrrrrr....as is much much more likely these days, a pair of dung-encrusted wellies when I’m cleaning up around the business end of a horse.
(Christ - I’m homesick! )

Surely you can get a flight back by now. The UK is letting 'em in the droves.

Digger · Admin

Anonymous wrote:
Digger wrote:
Vam wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Vam wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Vam wrote:
John Doe wrote:
I am still waiting...
Really? What are you waiting for?
The poster to ask you the question.
We all are.
Hmmm...ok. But the fact that this thread had been quietly sliding down the main page, would imply that no one has been waiting for anything anymore.
Which is why it seems odd that you decided to re-up the thread. Were you hoping to stir up some shite by any chance? A bit like you were hoping to stir up some agg between Syl & me, by oh-so-innocently mentioning a certain ‘dress’ several times? To her credit, Syl serenely ignored your snide, as did I.

Still, I guess it beats sourcing & posting graphic & highly distressing images of terribly ill little girls, as a way to pass the time.
Syl knows I was joking because we have had a bit friendly banter over it on the main forum, (an alien concept well beyond you I know).
Because you are no longer Queen Bitch of the Comatose Canines you decided to have a pop at me.
I like reading you slag off Stooo on here because when I was on there you had your head so far up his arse you would not have been able to find your way out with a map and a fucking flashlight.

-- Edited by John Doe on Saturday 16th of May 2020 11:30:36 PM
Listen up, you seedy twisted little fucker - you may have finally found skirts to desperately cling to here, with your cloying neediness. But I’m not about to enable or nurture your neurosis.

I’m hardly a prolific poster here, which should be reason enough for you to keep me the hell out of your shitposting.
I've just seen this. We're not stupid on here, Vam. You started on JD then complain when he gives it back. The relentless bullying that took place on Dogs against him was way out of proportion to any forum 'crime' he committed. Any more posts insinuating that JD is a sexual deviant won't be allowed. I've seen the posts on Dogs where Fletch, Dean and others tried their best to goad him about looking at photos of 'pre-teen girls' when in fact the photo in question was of a 22 year old. That's the kind of vicious shit that Dogs is famous for, and having been at the receiving end of accusations of being a fantasist/fake/ etc, it won't wash here.
We don't mind giving you a voice on CM. But don't abuse it.

By you own admission you know they lie and yet you leave lies about a registered member and the Anon claiming to be Vam leaves a trail of nasty comments against one of your
members. Can you not delete the nasty posts? Just remove them and ban the anon Vam and don't post this message. Thanking you in advance.

Vam isn't hiding her IP. You are. Who the fuck are you? No? So fuck off.

Date: May 17 2:04 PM, 2020

@ Digger...nope, airport here is still on lockdown & likely to remain pretty much locked down until end of May.

Then there’s the problem of very few available flights doing long haul routes from here to Europe, where I’ll need to transit to finally head on home.

5 cancellations so far, but I'm feeling a bit of optimism about June!

Date: May 17 2:28 PM, 2020

Digger wrote:
I've just seen this. We're not stupid on here, Vam. You started on JD then complain when he gives it back. The relentless bullying that took place on Dogs against him was way out of proportion to any forum 'crime' he committed. Any more posts insinuating that JD is a sexual deviant won't be allowed. I've seen the posts on Dogs where Fletch, Dean and others tried their best to goad him about looking at photos of 'pre-teen girls' when in fact the photo in question was of a 22 year old. That's the kind of vicious shit that Dogs is famous for, and having been at the receiving end of accusations of being a fantasist/fake/ etc, it won't wash here.
We don't mind giving you a voice on CM. But don't abuse it.

... and I’ve just now seen your post, sorry

I hear you but, to be clear, I was never a part of the onslaughts he used to get over the road, Diggs. Nor did I ever question whatever sexual predilections he may/may not have. (imo) His retro ‘Carry On movies’ brand of smut is tedious & naff as fuck, & I mostly used to just scroll on by any of that.

The only caveat I would add is that I did sometimes wonder whether all the women who have posted how clingy & demanding he can be, could *all* be wrong about him.

My problem with him has always been his propensity to source the most graphic, stomach-churning, deeply distressing images imaginable, & then posting them in full technicolour glory. The image yesterday of that little girl‘s suffering really did upset me. It has stayed with me & I wish to fuck I could unsee it! He used to routinely get bollocked on Dogs for pulling stunts like that.

So yeah, I admit I was pissed off enough with him to react when I saw him pratting about by yanking up this thread. My apologies - I won’t prod at the poor sensitive ‘lad’ again.

Digger · Admin

Vam wrote:
Digger wrote:
I've just seen this. We're not stupid on here, Vam. You started on JD then complain when he gives it back. The relentless bullying that took place on Dogs against him was way out of proportion to any forum 'crime' he committed. Any more posts insinuating that JD is a sexual deviant won't be allowed. I've seen the posts on Dogs where Fletch, Dean and others tried their best to goad him about looking at photos of 'pre-teen girls' when in fact the photo in question was of a 22 year old. That's the kind of vicious shit that Dogs is famous for, and having been at the receiving end of accusations of being a fantasist/fake/ etc, it won't wash here.
We don't mind giving you a voice on CM. But don't abuse it.
... and I’ve just now seen your post, sorry
I hear you but, to be clear, I was never a part of the onslaughts he used to get over the road, Diggs. Nor did I ever question whatever sexual predilections he may/may not have. (imo) His retro ‘Carry On movies’ brand of smut is tedious & naff as fuck, & I mostly used to just scroll on by any of that.
The only caveat I would add is that I did sometimes wonder whether all the women who have posted how clingy & demanding he can be, could *all* be wrong about him.

My problem with him has always been his propensity to source the most graphic, stomach-churning, deeply distressing images imaginable, & then posting them in full technicolour glory. The image yesterday of that little girl‘s suffering really did upset me. It has stayed with me & I wish to fuck I could unsee it! He used to routinely get bollocked on Dogs for pulling stunts like that.
So yeah, I admit I was pissed off enough with him to react when I saw him pratting about by yanking up this thread. My apologies - I won’t prod at the poor sensitive ‘lad’ again.

Not everyone likes everyone, we get that. JD was pulled up about that photo. It's not fair to dredge up what happened in his personal life, regardless of whether it was plastered all over Dogs. And sadly, just by using the words needy and seedy, that generated some guest posts I had to delete.

John Doe · Still Here!

Vam wrote:
Digger wrote:
I've just seen this. We're not stupid on here, Vam. You started on JD then complain when he gives it back. The relentless bullying that took place on Dogs against him was way out of proportion to any forum 'crime' he committed. Any more posts insinuating that JD is a sexual deviant won't be allowed. I've seen the posts on Dogs where Fletch, Dean and others tried their best to goad him about looking at photos of 'pre-teen girls' when in fact the photo in question was of a 22 year old. That's the kind of vicious shit that Dogs is famous for, and having been at the receiving end of accusations of being a fantasist/fake/ etc, it won't wash here.
We don't mind giving you a voice on CM. But don't abuse it.
... and I’ve just now seen your post, sorry
I hear you but, to be clear, I was never a part of the onslaughts he used to get over the road, Diggs. Nor did I ever question whatever sexual predilections he may/may not have. (imo) His retro ‘Carry On movies’ brand of smut is tedious & naff as fuck, & I mostly used to just scroll on by any of that.
The only caveat I would add is that I did sometimes wonder whether all the women who have posted how clingy & demanding he can be, could *all* be wrong about him.

My problem with him has always been his propensity to source the most graphic, stomach-churning, deeply distressing images imaginable, & then posting them in full technicolour glory. The image yesterday of that little girl‘s suffering really did upset me. It has stayed with me & I wish to fuck I could unsee it! He used to routinely get bollocked on Dogs for pulling stunts like that.
So yeah, I admit I was pissed off enough with him to react when I saw him pratting about by yanking up this thread. My apologies - I won’t prod at the poor sensitive ‘lad’ again.

More blatant fucking lies from you.

You can't be like this in real life so why be so nasty for the sake of it?

The photo of the girl with smallpox was to show just how dangerous the anti-vaxxers really are and I put it in spoilers but it was grabbed by another member to cause trouble.

You really can't help yourself can you?

Oh and the fact that you are still allowed to even post your bile to me on here proves the mods are fair (too fair in my opinion if I was a mod I would have blocked your shit if it was aimed at another member here), you just wanted to spit venom at me for whatever reason, perhaps you were bored or missing Dogs.

So the notion I am 'protected' is absolutely laughable, no one else got the shit I have got in the past for nothing, I always tried to get on with people even though some of them were fucking vile.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

I tend to let people just get on with it, unless it's too personal, libellous, ridiculous or mind numbingly boring that is....Oh OK, maybe more mindnumbingly boring guest posts do get through than should.

We don't protect or favour certain posters either....some of the crap that has been said about Digger and myself has been allowed on, we are not precious.

JD, maybe that's your downfall....never try to get on with vile people, both on forums and real life....ignore them or treat them with the contempt they deserve.

Date: May 17 5:49 PM, 2020

John Doe wrote:
Vam wrote:
...
My problem with him has always been his propensity to source the most graphic, stomach-churning, deeply distressing images imaginable, & then posting them in full technicolour glory...
More blatant fucking lies from you.
You can't be like this in real life so why be so nasty for the sake of it?
The photo of the girl with smallpox was to show just how dangerous the anti-vaxxers really are and I put it in spoilers but it was grabbed by another member to cause trouble.

The dismembered shark was a doozy though.

John Doe · Still Here!

Anonymous wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Vam wrote:
...
My problem with him has always been his propensity to source the most graphic, stomach-churning, deeply distressing images imaginable, & then posting them in full technicolour glory...
More blatant fucking lies from you.
You can't be like this in real life so why be so nasty for the sake of it?
The photo of the girl with smallpox was to show just how dangerous the anti-vaxxers really are and I put it in spoilers but it was grabbed by another member to cause trouble.
The dismembered shark was a doozy though.

You mean the White shark conspecific predation event?

I truly love sharks (Carcharadon in particular) and that was natural if highly unusual behaviour.

Date: May 17 7:30 PM, 2020

Syl wrote:
I tend to let people just get on with it, unless it's too personal, libellous, ridiculous or mind numbingly boring that is....Oh OK, maybe more mindnumbingly boring guest posts do get through than should.

We don't protect or favour certain posters either....some of the crap that has been said about Digger and myself has been allowed on, we are not precious.
JD, maybe that's your downfall....never try to get on with vile people, both on forums and real life....ignore them or treat them with the contempt they deserve.

The only person banging on about ‘protection’ is the eternal victim up there I said he’s cloyingly needy & clingy. I didn’t say he’s protected here.

None of what I’ve said is a lie, irrespective of how much bleating he does.

Fact: Whether it’s images of morbidly obese blokes in women’s lingerie, or massively up close images of unspeakable creatures/insects/reptiles, & even desperately ill children/adults, he just seems to get off on posting grotesque images without even a passing thought of anyone’s phobias, levels of squeamishness or causing distress.

Oh & I‘m not vile - I’m....vocal

Digger · Admin

Vam wrote:
Syl wrote:
I tend to let people just get on with it, unless it's too personal, libellous, ridiculous or mind numbingly boring that is....Oh OK, maybe more mindnumbingly boring guest posts do get through than should.

We don't protect or favour certain posters either....some of the crap that has been said about Digger and myself has been allowed on, we are not precious.
JD, maybe that's your downfall....never try to get on with vile people, both on forums and real life....ignore them or treat them with the contempt they deserve.
The only person banging on about ‘protection’ is the eternal victim up there I said he’s cloyingly needy & clingy. I didn’t say he’s protected here.
None of what I’ve said is a lie, irrespective of how much bleating he does.
Fact: Whether it’s images of morbidly obese blokes in women’s lingerie, or massively up close images of unspeakable creatures/insects/reptiles, & even desperately ill children/adults, he just seems to get off on posting grotesque images without even a passing thought of anyone’s phobias, levels of squeamishness or causing distress.
Oh & I‘m not vile - I’m....vocal

Sure, creepy crawlies and microscopic bed bug photos are not everyone's cup of tea, I personally hate them. But the members here have a right to post, discuss and debate what they like. If I don't like those images I don't go into the thread they're on. He posted one photo of a child with smallpox in a misguided attempt to make a point...he got pulled up for it. Is this forum 'infraction' a reason for certain posters to dissect it to death ad nauseum? Would you prefer he got himself a gun, shut himself in a darkened room and took the only honourable way out? So, he's into dinosaurs and weird creatures. David Attenborough got a fucking Knighthood for it. So what?

I can tell you one thing. I'd rather a thousand JD's than one Dean or Edna or Purr. They're the real twisted, sleazy fucks. I was going to put Budgie in that list, but he's just a fat middle aged buffoon who doesn't get enough nookie from his missus.

Jobless Oddball · Boring Twat.

Digger wrote:
I was going to put Budgie in that list, but he's just a fat middle aged buffoon who doesn't get enough nookie from his missus.

How do you know?????????????????????????????????????????????????

Date: May 17 8:17 PM, 2020

@ Digger... gotta love the Attenborough analogy!

Sorry, but suffering kids/the elderly/animals - gets to me every time. I won’t even click on links to stuff like that.

It’s one thing to choose to watch an Attenborough documentary, when you know what to expect & what you’re gonna be seeing on your screen. It’s quite another to be sat reading a thread and then...bam!...outta the blue, a grotesque image appears to jar the senses (even when accompanied by some lame mealy-mouthed justification).

But hey, he’s the member here, not me. I just don’t appreciate him calling me a liar, but I've made my point. As you say, it‘s futile dragging it out - I’ll get my coat...

Digger · Admin

Jobless Oddball wrote:
Digger wrote:
I was going to put Budgie in that list, but he's just a fat middle aged buffoon who doesn't get enough nookie from his missus.
How do you know?????????????????????????????????????????????????

Because sex is like air. It's only important when you're not getting any. It's all he's ever talked about. That and your Mam

Date: May 17 8:22 PM, 2020

John Doe wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Vam wrote:
...
My problem with him has always been his propensity to source the most graphic, stomach-churning, deeply distressing images imaginable, & then posting them in full technicolour glory...
More blatant fucking lies from you.
You can't be like this in real life so why be so nasty for the sake of it?
The photo of the girl with smallpox was to show just how dangerous the anti-vaxxers really are and I put it in spoilers but it was grabbed by another member to cause trouble.
The dismembered shark was a doozy though.
You mean the White shark conspecific predation event?

Yes, I just wasn't sure how to spell it.

John Doe · Still Here!

Vam wrote:
Syl wrote:
I tend to let people just get on with it, unless it's too personal, libellous, ridiculous or mind numbingly boring that is....Oh OK, maybe more mindnumbingly boring guest posts do get through than should.

We don't protect or favour certain posters either....some of the crap that has been said about Digger and myself has been allowed on, we are not precious.
JD, maybe that's your downfall....never try to get on with vile people, both on forums and real life....ignore them or treat them with the contempt they deserve.
The only person banging on about ‘protection’ is the eternal victim up there I said he’s cloyingly needy & clingy. I didn’t say he’s protected here.
None of what I’ve said is a lie, irrespective of how much bleating he does.
Fact: Whether it’s images of morbidly obese blokes in women’s lingerie, or massively up close images of unspeakable creatures/insects/reptiles, & even desperately ill children/adults, he just seems to get off on posting grotesque images without even a passing thought of anyone’s phobias, levels of squeamishness or causing distress.
Oh & I‘m not vile - I’m....vocal

I am sure they would feel the same about you (to a spider/insect we are vast heat generating monsters), every animal is beautiful in it's own way not just the fluffy ones and has just as much right to live on the planet as we do.

You are getting your coat I see, typical you get your claws out, cause trouble, play the victim, do your very best to smear my name and once you are satisfied with your work you then fuck off.

You repeat the same pattern again and again, funny how you never mentioned all the other people posting in this thread but chose to target me.

You are so transparent your arse could be used as a bloody window.