ChaoticMusings

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Back again.
Anonymous

Date:
RE: Back again.
Permalink   
 


Please ignore the anons that are just baiting.  They give all of us a bad name.  However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention. 



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

Anonymous wrote:

Please ignore the anons that are just baiting.  They give all of us a bad name.  However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention. 


 Don't worry, I'm sure your own reputation here will remain unblemished.



__________________


Musing at the Chaos

Posts: 889
Date:
Permalink   
 

Anonymous wrote:

Please ignore the anons that are just baiting.  They give all of us a bad name.  However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention. 


 But of course. They're only human.ragga



__________________

Le sock meister extraordinaire

AKA Keyser McAzpurr Seymour Cox Poncenby Smythe

(Not the Faulky Tribal Poncenby Smythes)

Syl


FIRM BUT FAIR.

Posts: 24055
Date:
Permalink   
 

Anonymous wrote:

Please ignore the anons that are just baiting.  They give all of us a bad name.  However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention. 


 nod



__________________

How wonderful life is while you're in the world.



Admin

Posts: 16896
Date:
Permalink   
 

dr synne wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Please ignore the anons that are just baiting.  They give all of us a bad name.  However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention. 


 But of course. They're only human.ragga


 One would hope



__________________

 [04-10, 20:41] xtras:i dont think anyone in their right mind would have a crush on stoo

 

Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Please ignore the anons that are just baiting.  They give all of us a bad name.  However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention. 


 Don't worry, I'm sure your own reputation here will remain unblemished.


 That is not the issue.  I would like people to read what is written rather than to just reject it because they have been conditioned to believe anything that comes from an Anon is corrupt (baiting, trolling, ulterior motive other than to engage discussion etc).



__________________


Musing at the Chaos

Posts: 889
Date:
Permalink   
 

Digger wrote:
dr synne wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Please ignore the anons that are just baiting.  They give all of us a bad name.  However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention. 


 But of course. They're only human.ragga


 One would hope


 lol



__________________

Le sock meister extraordinaire

AKA Keyser McAzpurr Seymour Cox Poncenby Smythe

(Not the Faulky Tribal Poncenby Smythes)



Still Here!

Posts: 10372
Date:
Permalink   
 

dr synne wrote:
Digger wrote:
dr synne wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Please ignore the anons that are just baiting.  They give all of us a bad name.  However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention. 


 But of course. They're only human.ragga


 One would hope


 lol


To prove you are genuine you should post a photo of you parading in skimpy black lingerie and high heels.

Bitch.



-- Edited by John Doe on Thursday 3rd of December 2020 04:37:09 PM

__________________

Simple. You, you're the threads. But me, I'm the rope.

Gatehouse - The Shadow Line.



Musing at the Chaos

Posts: 889
Date:
Permalink   
 

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Please ignore the anons that are just baiting.  They give all of us a bad name.  However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention. 


 Don't worry, I'm sure your own reputation here will remain unblemished.


 That is not the issue.  I would like people to read what is written rather than to just reject it because they have been conditioned to believe anything that comes from an Anon is corrupt (baiting, trolling, ulterior motive other than to engage discussion etc).


 That is a fair enough point, but, given the abuses the anon label can engender, is it not reasonable to at least expect an anon to give their name when they are genuine.



__________________

Le sock meister extraordinaire

AKA Keyser McAzpurr Seymour Cox Poncenby Smythe

(Not the Faulky Tribal Poncenby Smythes)

Syl


FIRM BUT FAIR.

Posts: 24055
Date:
Permalink   
 

A couple of 'Anons' are obviously cautious that their posts won't be approved if they put their usual usernames on. lol



__________________

How wonderful life is while you're in the world.

JP


Burning up the forum

Posts: 2675
Date:
Permalink   
 

dr synne wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Please ignore the anons that are just baiting.  They give all of us a bad name.  However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention. 


 Don't worry, I'm sure your own reputation here will remain unblemished.


 That is not the issue.  I would like people to read what is written rather than to just reject it because they have been conditioned to believe anything that comes from an Anon is corrupt (baiting, trolling, ulterior motive other than to engage discussion etc).


 That is a fair enough point, but, given the abuses the anon label can engender, is it not reasonable to at least expect an anon to give their name when they are genuine.


 I'm fond of any singular anon who may play at, good cop, bad cop. ;) lol

 



__________________
Syl


FIRM BUT FAIR.

Posts: 24055
Date:
Permalink   
 

Most anon posts get through no matter who they are, as long as they are not too pathetic.

__________________

How wonderful life is while you're in the world.



Admin

Posts: 16896
Date:
Permalink   
 

Syl wrote:

Most anon posts get through no matter who they are, as long as they are not too pathetic.


 They're not that 'anon' either.  They just think they are.



__________________

 [04-10, 20:41] xtras:i dont think anyone in their right mind would have a crush on stoo

 

Syl


FIRM BUT FAIR.

Posts: 24055
Date:
Permalink   
 

Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:

Most anon posts get through no matter who they are, as long as they are not too pathetic.


 They're not that 'anon' either.  They just think they are.


 I know, bless em. lol



__________________

How wonderful life is while you're in the world.



Musing at the Chaos

Posts: 889
Date:
Permalink   
 

John Doe wrote:
dr synne wrote:
Digger wrote:
dr synne wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Please ignore the anons that are just baiting.  They give all of us a bad name.  However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention. 


 But of course. They're only human.ragga


 One would hope


 lol


To prove you are genuine you should post a photo of you parading in skimpy black lingerie and high heels.

Bitch.



-- Edited by John Doe on Thursday 3rd of December 2020 04:37:09 PM


 I see the bromide trials weren't a success JDlol



__________________

Le sock meister extraordinaire

AKA Keyser McAzpurr Seymour Cox Poncenby Smythe

(Not the Faulky Tribal Poncenby Smythes)



Musing at the Chaos

Posts: 889
Date:
Permalink   
 

JP wrote:
dr synne wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Please ignore the anons that are just baiting.  They give all of us a bad name.  However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention. 


 Don't worry, I'm sure your own reputation here will remain unblemished.


 That is not the issue.  I would like people to read what is written rather than to just reject it because they have been conditioned to believe anything that comes from an Anon is corrupt (baiting, trolling, ulterior motive other than to engage discussion etc).


 That is a fair enough point, but, given the abuses the anon label can engender, is it not reasonable to at least expect an anon to give their name when they are genuine.


 I'm fond of any singular anon who may play at, good cop, bad cop. ;) lol

 


 Oooh roleplay....I'm game



__________________

Le sock meister extraordinaire

AKA Keyser McAzpurr Seymour Cox Poncenby Smythe

(Not the Faulky Tribal Poncenby Smythes)



Still Here!

Posts: 10372
Date:
Permalink   
 

dr synne wrote:
John Doe wrote:
dr synne wrote:
Digger wrote:
dr synne wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Please ignore the anons that are just baiting.  They give all of us a bad name.  However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention. 


 But of course. They're only human.ragga


 One would hope


 lol


To prove you are genuine you should post a photo of you parading in skimpy black lingerie and high heels.

Bitch.



-- Edited by John Doe on Thursday 3rd of December 2020 04:37:09 PM


 I see the bromide trials weren't a success JDlol


 lol



__________________

Simple. You, you're the threads. But me, I'm the rope.

Gatehouse - The Shadow Line.

JP


Burning up the forum

Posts: 2675
Date:
Permalink   
 

dr synne wrote:
JP wrote:
dr synne wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Please ignore the anons that are just baiting.  They give all of us a bad name.  However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention. 


 Don't worry, I'm sure your own reputation here will remain unblemished.


 That is not the issue.  I would like people to read what is written rather than to just reject it because they have been conditioned to believe anything that comes from an Anon is corrupt (baiting, trolling, ulterior motive other than to engage discussion etc).


 That is a fair enough point, but, given the abuses the anon label can engender, is it not reasonable to at least expect an anon to give their name when they are genuine.


 I'm fond of any singular anon who may play at, good cop, bad cop. ;) lol

 


 Oooh roleplay....I'm game


 Oh deer....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oh venison.. wouldn't have worked so well lol



__________________


Musing at the Chaos

Posts: 889
Date:
Permalink   
 

JP wrote:
dr synne wrote:
JP wrote:
dr synne wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Please ignore the anons that are just baiting.  They give all of us a bad name.  However they consider you important enough to try to attract your attention. 


 Don't worry, I'm sure your own reputation here will remain unblemished.


 That is not the issue.  I would like people to read what is written rather than to just reject it because they have been conditioned to believe anything that comes from an Anon is corrupt (baiting, trolling, ulterior motive other than to engage discussion etc).


 That is a fair enough point, but, given the abuses the anon label can engender, is it not reasonable to at least expect an anon to give their name when they are genuine.


 I'm fond of any singular anon who may play at, good cop, bad cop. ;) lol

 


 Oooh roleplay....I'm game


 Oh deer....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oh venison.. wouldn't have worked so well lol


 Nothing that looks like Bambi should be involved in such shenanigens



__________________

Le sock meister extraordinaire

AKA Keyser McAzpurr Seymour Cox Poncenby Smythe

(Not the Faulky Tribal Poncenby Smythes)

Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

lollollol



__________________
«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.