ChaoticMusings

 

Sandy and Muick.

Digger wrote:

---

Vita wrote:

---

 

Sandy and Muick.

---

 Corgis have such lovely little faces.  But by all accounts they are snappy little fuckers.

---

 My Godmother had one, Dusty called after the singer.

Vicious wee git by all accounts.

Digger wrote:

---

Vita wrote:

---

 

Sandy and Muick.

---

 Corgis have such lovely little faces.  But by all accounts they are snappy little fuckers.

---

 They're herding dogs. Nipping is in their genes..

 

I would imagine that many of their issues are that they are the kind of dog that people who can't train dogs, would own. Because they are cute..

 

Also, as herding dogs, they make shitty lap dogs and will cause trouble when bored. They will need jobs to do..

Our dog came into the living room the other night with a washing up sponge in his mouth. He stood in the doorway eyeballing me until I stood up screaming DROP IT! Then he ran off into the back garden with me in pursuit wearing only tee shirt and flip flops. It was 2am and fucking freezing! The little bastard only dropped it when I got the garden hose out.

Maddog wrote:

---

Digger wrote:

---

Vita wrote:

---

 

Sandy and Muick.

---

 Corgis have such lovely little faces.  But by all accounts they are snappy little fuckers.

---

 They're herding dogs. Nipping is in their genes..

 

I would imagine that many of their issues are that they are the kind of dog that people who can't train dogs, would own. Because they are cute..

 

Also, as herding dogs, they make shitty lap dogs and will cause trouble when bored. They will need jobs to do..

---

 Corgis are amazing dogs very fast learners and very funny.    Mine never nipped anyone, apparently, according to all the royal family and staff, the royal dogs are just not trained and they piss and shit where they like and are snappy.  Probably bored.  Mine loved to learn new things   

Of 110 breeds ranked on the basis of intelligence, the Pembroke Welsh corgi took 11th place. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lots of funny pictures asking what a certain Prince got up to on Monday when he was...

Now, it's all coming out that Prince Andrew and Princess Diana worked in cahoots to try to knock Charles out of the succession.

Remember when Fergie got caught having her toes sucked? Allegedly, it was Diana who snitched on her and called the press telling them where Fergie was. The two fell out after Fergie wrote a book and recalled catching a verruca from Diana's shoes. Diana never spoke to her again.

Diana, it seems, held terrible grudges, and so did her brother, Charles. They were both vile to their father when their mother left him and he had the temerity to marry another woman. Her former private secretary, Patrick Jephson, relates she was utterly ruthless to her staff to the point she wanted some sacked and banished from Kensington Palace. I think she was caught in a trap partly of her own making. She learned too late that newspaper and the media have no off switch.

I dont believe there was anything between Diana and Andrew, though many people in their social group thought they would have made a better match than the stuffy, older brother she fell for, who unfortunately was always emotionally and physically involved with Camilla.

Don't you think a lot of these stories were made up, either to denigrate her, or Charles, depending on whose 'camp' you were in?

What cant be made up is when one or the other is talking straight to camera...as Diana did on quite a few occasions.

She admitted herself she was horrible to her stepmother, her and her brother especially, but they were young, their mother had left, and they felt Raine was taking their father from them.
In adulthood, they became much closer, so obviously Raine didn't carry on the battle...and Diana admitted she was wrong.

Syl wrote:

---

I dont believe there was anything between Diana and Andrew, though many people in their social group thought they would have made a better match than the stuffy, older brother she fell for, who unfortunately was always emotionally and physically involved with Camilla.

Don't you think a lot of these stories were made up, either to denigrate her, or Charles, depending on whose 'camp' you were in?

What cant be made up is when one or the other is talking straight to camera...as Diana did on quite a few occasions.

She admitted herself she was horrible to her stepmother, her and her brother especially, but they were young, their mother had left, and they felt Raine was taking their father from them.
In adulthood, they became much closer, so obviously Raine didn't carry on the battle...and Diana admitted she was wrong.

---

 It's not been suggested that they had a thing together.   Diana was hell bent on revenge, so if aiding Andrew boot him off the throne would do that?   

I guess there are those who go in bias against either of them, but I don't think they lie necessarily.  Diana herself was caught lying a good few times when people who were witness to certain events claim differently or that she was prone to exaggeration.   She spent five years with Hewitt, claimed she adored him, loved him to distraction, then dumped him via her aides.  Completely cut him dead.  The reason?   He wouldn't give up his career for her.    He was devastated and suicidal. Then he went on to spill the beans to the press, which, in the light of what Diana herself did regarding Charles, you can't blame him.

Some say that Diana felt betrayed and abandoned, but why should someone have to give up their career for another?   She didn't want to give up her lifestyle.