ChaoticMusings

 

 

 

"The title of Queen Camilla has not always been a fait accompli: when the Prince of Wales married Camilla Parker Bowles in 2005, it was initially made known that when he ascended to the throne, she would not take on the title of Queen Consort, instead being known as the Princess Consort. In 2020, Clarence House reaffirmed this: ‘The intention is for the Duchess to be known as Princess Consort when the Prince accedes to the throne. This was announced at the time of the marriage and there has been absolutely no change at all.’ 

 

"In February 2022, the late Queen Elizabeth II released a letter to mark the 70th anniversary of her accession. Part of this read, ‘And when, in the fullness of time, my son Charles becomes King, I know you will give him and his wife Camilla the same support that you have given me; and it is my sincere wish that, when that time comes, Camilla will be known as Queen Consort as she continues her own loyal service.’

 

 

 

Syl wrote:

---

 Something wrong with these people.

They seem to be playing some kind of childish games.

Is it the inbreeding or the sense of entitlement they have?

 

 

"The title of Queen Camilla has not always been a fait accompli: when the Prince of Wales married Camilla Parker Bowles in 2005, it was initially made known that when he ascended to the throne, she would not take on the title of Queen Consort, instead being known as the Princess Consort. In 2020, Clarence House reaffirmed this: ‘The intention is for the Duchess to be known as Princess Consort when the Prince accedes to the throne. This was announced at the time of the marriage and there has been absolutely no change at all.’ 

 

"In February 2022, the late Queen Elizabeth II released a letter to mark the 70th anniversary of her accession. Part of this read, ‘And when, in the fullness of time, my son Charles becomes King, I know you will give him and his wife Camilla the same support that you have given me; and it is my sincere wish that, when that time comes, Camilla will be known as Queen Consort as she continues her own loyal service.’

 

 

 

---

 

He has insulted the memory of the queen by going against her wishes.

I believe he intended Camilla to be queen from the moment Diana died. I wonder how Diana's sons feel....well, we all know how one of them feels about her, William is more restrained, but it cant be easy seeing the woman who ruined their mothers life being hailed as Queen.

I doubt the majority will accept her, but she will be crowned Queen when he is crowned King next month.

What is the highest ranking horse called.

That might be an appropriate title.

On a more serious note, I switch from being intrigued by this royal shit to thinking its a giant pile of the stuff that comes from a horses ass.

Maddog wrote:

---

What is the highest ranking horse called.

That might be an appropriate title.

On a more serious note, I switch from being intrigued by this royal shit to thinking its a giant pile of the stuff that comes from a horses ass.

---

 I think many Brits agree tbh, but they make for interesting reading.....compared to Trump or Biden they do anyway. 

Maddog wrote:

---

Syl wrote:

---

Maddog wrote:

---

What is the highest ranking horse called.

That might be an appropriate title.

On a more serious note, I switch from being intrigued by this royal shit to thinking its a giant pile of the stuff that comes from a horses ass.

---

 I think many Brits agree tbh, but they make for interesting reading.....compared to Trump or Biden they do anyway. 

---

 Agreed. 

 

But hopefully none of Trumps or Bidens kids become powerful because of their ancestry.  At least not officially.  

 

That's the thing many of us Americans can't handle. It's the complete opposite of a meritocracy.  

---

 Different history, different culture....we may look alike, but I think Brits and Americans are a different species.

Probably why you lot find us lot so fascinating.

Maddog wrote:

---

There is a strong contingent of royal watchers over here no doubt.

You have done an excellent job marketing that product. There are other royal families amd no one over here cares about them..

---

 I do remember we were fascinated with your Kennedys, especially Jackie, she was really admired over here.

Then years later, Melania got quite a lot of coverage...for her looks, her clothes, but mostly, why the heck was she with the Donald.

Nobody will ever replace THE queen.   She was our most loved monarch.  Charles is trying too hard to be woke and right on and it's doomed to failure because he'll be damned if he does and damned if he doesn't.  As for Camilla, she's the woman he's always loved and good luck to her.  By all accounts she's a lovely person.   What's the point in hanging onto the hatred for what happened all those years ago.  People makes mistakes and none of us can help where our hearts lie.   

 

Syl wrote:

---

Yes, they were always suited, and they do seem to think the world of each other....good for them.
Unfortunately, he seems to be under the illusion that foisting her as Queen onto the public is a good idea.
It isn't.

---

 Well, tough shit, I suppose.  She's going to be Queen and that's that.  I have a feeling Charles is sticking to that because he never did the right thing all those years ago and married her instead of Diana.