They knew weeks ago that one of their presenters had been involved sexually with a 17 year old boy, paying him large sums of money to provide sexually explicit photos.
Yet the presenter remained on air, despite complaints from the teenager's family. Last week the presenter was calling up the family, begging them not to divulge his sordid past.
Yet the BBC didn't act till all this became public.
You would think the man in question would have made a statement by now.
He will be named before long....far better for him to volunteer some info, if only to save the men who are under suspicion any further embarrassment.
If you're a young man, not out if the closet, or worse yet, not even gay but sending pics for cash to a weirdo, you probably will deny it as much as possible.
Its going to turn his life upside down if he is named and shamed.
If you're a young man, not out if the closet, or worse yet, not even gay but sending pics for cash to a weirdo, you probably will deny it as much as possible.
Its going to turn his life upside down if he is named and shamed.
According to the mother, the lad spent all the money on crack cocaine and is ruining his life.
If this is the case, I can understand her going public.
It could also be the case that the lad did what he did to fund his habit.
His name may be protected....though given the interest in the case, I doubt it will be tbh.
More and more people are seeing the BBC as a cesspit of filth and debauchery funded by the public to the tune of billions!
Why has the BBC held back information from the public for over two months and who in their right minds would support the BBC holding an inquiry into itself with it's track record.