ChaoticMusings

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

RE: The BBC...Lessons have been learned??

jackthelad · Musing at the Chaos

Magica wrote:
jackthelad wrote:
Magica wrote:
The 20 yr old went to the police with a lawyer to deny it. So the BBC presenter will get away with it.

I reckon the 20 yr old was bought off.
How many twenty year olds can afford a lawyer who is big enough to challenge the BBC?
A twenty year old crack head at that.
If it's all nonsense then there will be no picture of the presenter in his underwear.

True Jack, he wouldn't have the money for a lawyer, but maybe he was paid off by the presenter, and got the money that way.

Which is becoming a bit circular regarding evidence.

He needs to be asked how much the lawyer cost him and where did the money come from and it will be pretty easy for any investigator to prove the guy is a crack head too if that's true.

The parent needs to get the phone and hand it to an expert to retrieve whatever images may have now been deleted but then the kid is over 16 so can a parent take the phone legally?

The BBC may be getting off the hook here or maybe it never happened in the first place.

jackthelad · Musing at the Chaos

Be careful what you say here.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

The Sun newspaper, who broke the story, say they have seen the transactions.

The lads parents are calling the BBC liars, and it's reported the son, now 20, is estranged from his mother.

-- Edited by Syl on Monday 10th of July 2023 11:48:52 PM

jackthelad · Musing at the Chaos

The lawyer’s letter sent on behalf of the young person, who is being represented by a top law firm in central London, said: “For the avoidance of doubt, nothing inappropriate or unlawful has taken place between our client and the BBC personality, and the allegations reported in The Sun newspaper are rubbish.”

The denial of any illegal behaviour is understood to refer to the mother’s allegation that her child was only 17 when she claims payments began.

It is an offence under the Protection of Children Act 1978 to “make, distribute, possess or show” indecent images of anyone under the age of 18.

But the letter makes it more difficult for any police investigation to get off the ground, BBC sources acknowledged.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment/celebrity/bbc-sex-scandal-presenter-did-not-act-unlawfully-or-inappropriately/ar-AA1dGwhS?ocid=mailsignout&pc=U591&cvid=c2dd0aad8cbb4bccb04ffe0e2fd638b5&ei=12

Digger · Admin

Syl wrote:
The Sun newspaper, who broke the story, say they have seen the transactions.
The lads parents are calling the BBC liars, and it's reported the son, now 20, is estranged from his mother.

-- Edited by Syl on Monday 10th of July 2023 11:48:52 PM

I bet that 35 grand has all gone!

jackthelad · Musing at the Chaos

The BBC have made it about them and not the presenter.
By design?

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
The Sun newspaper, who broke the story, say they have seen the transactions.
The lads parents are calling the BBC liars, and it's reported the son, now 20, is estranged from his mother.

-- Edited by Syl on Monday 10th of July 2023 11:48:52 PM
I bet that 35 grand has all gone!

Lawyers don't come cheap.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

jackthelad wrote:
The BBC have made it about them and not the presenter.
By design?

Seems to now be a battle between the BBC and the Sun.

Magica · Go Outside

Syl wrote:
jackthelad wrote:
The BBC have made it about them and not the presenter.
By design?
Seems to now be a battle between the BBC and the Sun.

Everyone in the.press, the government knows who it is. He shouldn't be protected.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Magica wrote:
Syl wrote:
jackthelad wrote:
The BBC have made it about them and not the presenter.
By design?
Seems to now be a battle between the BBC and the Sun.
Everyone in the.press, the government knows who it is. He shouldn't be protected.

I agree, and I bet all the male presenters who names have been dragged into this as likely suspects agree too.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

The parents of this young man are now in a horrible position.

I can understand why the mother instigated all this though, and apparently, she has asked for no payment, which is to her credit.

The BBC have hired one of the countries top law firms, and the boys lawyer has described the mothers allegations as 'rubbish'.
I wonder who is paying for this kids lawyer? The BBC, the presenter himself...or has the boy invested his 35k wisely and gained enough to hire a top lawyer??

Digger · Admin

Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
The Sun newspaper, who broke the story, say they have seen the transactions.
The lads parents are calling the BBC liars, and it's reported the son, now 20, is estranged from his mother.

-- Edited by Syl on Monday 10th of July 2023 11:48:52 PM
I bet that 35 grand has all gone!
Lawyers don't come cheap.

They do if you're skint or a migrant. It's my bet that 35K is long spent.

jackthelad · Musing at the Chaos

Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
The Sun newspaper, who broke the story, say they have seen the transactions.
The lads parents are calling the BBC liars, and it's reported the son, now 20, is estranged from his mother.

-- Edited by Syl on Monday 10th of July 2023 11:48:52 PM
I bet that 35 grand has all gone!
Lawyers don't come cheap.
They do if you're skint or a migrant. It's my bet that 35K is long spent.

There's no legal aid in such a position.

Magica · Go Outside

I said on the other thread I have a good idea who it is now. Another male has come forward as this happened to him allegedly.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Magica wrote:
I said on the other thread I have a good idea who it is now. Another male has come forward as this happened to him allegedly.

It was a knocking bet that if one young lad was subjected to this sort of abuse, others would also be.

Predators don't just strike once.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

I wonder who will be the first to print the BBC presenters name...by now I think most people, given the pic that has been circulating online (though it's probably photoshopped) has a good idea who it could be.

This smacks of the John Leslie case...everyone knew it was him who was being accused of rape, no one actually mentioned his name for ages.

jackthelad · Musing at the Chaos

Did the 35 grand go through a bank?

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

"The recipient was now 20, she said, adding that the family had “begged” the BBC presenter to “stop sending the cash”.

The mother, who reportedly approached the Sun and made it clear they wanted no payment, said her child had gone from “a happy-go-lucky youngster to a ghost-like crack addict” in three years.

Her child showed her an online bank statement that had numerous deposits from the presenter, she said.

She added: “There were huge sums, hundreds or thousands of pounds at a time.

“One time he had sent £5,000 in one lump. The money had been in exchange for sexually explicit photographs of my child.”

BBC taking claims presenter paid teenager for sexual photos ‘very seriously’ | BBC | The Guardian

Maddog · Go Outside

Assuming all of this is true, I have to wonder how fucking stupid this presenter is.

So this starts allegedly starts in 2020.

It's not like he couldn't find a "toy" who was 18 that he wouldn't have had a paper trail leading back to, through payments online.

One, especially someone of means, can easily find what they need without messing around with a 17 year old.