ChaoticMusings

Digger · Admin

RE: The BBC...Lessons have been learned??

Magica · Go Outside

There's another one exposed now. Don't know the name yet. Ffs are they all bloody deviants?

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Thursday 18 May

A family member went to a BBC building to make a complaint about the behaviour of a BBC presenter, according to the corporation.

Friday 19 May

The family member made a 29-minute call to the BBC's audience services team, which then referred it to the BBC's corporate investigations team.

They decided the complaint didn't include an allegation of criminality, but did merit further investigation. It "was very serious", according to director general Tim Davie.

The investigations unit said they emailed the complainant to ask for more information so they could verify the claims, and carried out checks to verify the identity of the complainant.

Thursday 6 July

The Sun newspaper told the BBC via the corporate press office about allegations concerning Edwards. According to the BBC, the claims made by the Sun contained new allegations, which were different from those received by the investigations team.

The BBC said this was the first time Mr Davie or any executive directors were made aware of the case. They set up an incident management group to lead the response.

A senior manager spoke to the presenter about the allegations, and Edwards first learned of the allegations on this day, his wife said. The BBC said it was agreed that he shouldn't appear on air while the allegations were being investigated.

When later asked why the presenter was not spoken to sooner, Mr Davie said: "You don't take that complaint directly to the presenter unless it has been verified."

Timeline: How allegations against Huw Edwards unfolded - BBC News

Digger · Admin

Syl wrote:
Thursday 18 May
A family member went to a BBC building to make a complaint about the behaviour of a BBC presenter, according to the corporation.

Friday 19 May
The family member made a 29-minute call to the BBC's audience services team, which then referred it to the BBC's corporate investigations team.
They decided the complaint didn't include an allegation of criminality, but did merit further investigation. It "was very serious", according to director general Tim Davie.
The investigations unit said they emailed the complainant to ask for more information so they could verify the claims, and carried out checks to verify the identity of the complainant.

Thursday 6 July
The Sun newspaper told the BBC via the corporate press office about allegations concerning Edwards. According to the BBC, the claims made by the Sun contained new allegations, which were different from those received by the investigations team.
The BBC said this was the first time Mr Davie or any executive directors were made aware of the case. They set up an incident management group to lead the response.
A senior manager spoke to the presenter about the allegations, and Edwards first learned of the allegations on this day, his wife said. The BBC said it was agreed that he shouldn't appear on air while the allegations were being investigated.
When later asked why the presenter was not spoken to sooner, Mr Davie said: "You don't take that complaint directly to the presenter unless it has been verified."

Timeline: How allegations against Huw Edwards unfolded - BBC News

Is that the family member that the boy in question said was lying?

Digger · Admin

Magica wrote:
There's another one exposed now. Don't know the name yet. Ffs are they all bloody deviants?

It's been going on since men first grew balls. But it's the famous ones that get all the publicity. With the way social media manipulates, lies and whips up hyperbole, its best to get the facts because people have died being wrongly accused of stuff they didn't do.

You'd think this kind of behaviour would be dying out, but I don't think it ever will. It's hard wired into the brains of some men.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Thursday 18 May
A family member went to a BBC building to make a complaint about the behaviour of a BBC presenter, according to the corporation.

Friday 19 May
The family member made a 29-minute call to the BBC's audience services team, which then referred it to the BBC's corporate investigations team.
They decided the complaint didn't include an allegation of criminality, but did merit further investigation. It "was very serious", according to director general Tim Davie.
The investigations unit said they emailed the complainant to ask for more information so they could verify the claims, and carried out checks to verify the identity of the complainant.

Thursday 6 July
The Sun newspaper told the BBC via the corporate press office about allegations concerning Edwards. According to the BBC, the claims made by the Sun contained new allegations, which were different from those received by the investigations team.
The BBC said this was the first time Mr Davie or any executive directors were made aware of the case. They set up an incident management group to lead the response.
A senior manager spoke to the presenter about the allegations, and Edwards first learned of the allegations on this day, his wife said. The BBC said it was agreed that he shouldn't appear on air while the allegations were being investigated.
When later asked why the presenter was not spoken to sooner, Mr Davie said: "You don't take that complaint directly to the presenter unless it has been verified."

Timeline: How allegations against Huw Edwards unfolded - BBC News
Is that the family member that the boy in question said was lying?

His mother I believe.

And the boy, a 20 year old crack/coke addict according to his family, the one that was apparently called by Edwards, telling him to speak to his mother to drop this, can now afford one of the countries top lawyers to speak for him.

Magica · Go Outside

They didn't pay the lawyer, I reckon Huw did to drop the allegations!

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Magica wrote:
They didn't pay the lawyer, I reckon Huw did to drop the allegations!

I doubt the public will ever know...money talks, and the BBC and their top earners have lots of it...thanks to Joe Public.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Magica wrote:
There's another one exposed now. Don't know the name yet. Ffs are they all bloody deviants?

Is it Dan Wootton?

If anything reported about him lately is true, he is worse than the people he happily rips to shreds, including Phillip Schofield.

Magica · Go Outside

Syl wrote:
Magica wrote:
There's another one exposed now. Don't know the name yet. Ffs are they all bloody deviants?
Is it Dan Wootton?
If anything reported about him lately is true, he is worse than the people he happily rips to shreds, including Phillip Schofield.

Oh I don't know Syl. If it is him, what a bloody hypocrite!