Considering the fact that Starmer was head of the CPS in the years Saville, the nationwide Muslim groomers, and now Fayed were acting out their vile crimes, all which were investigated by police and presented to the CPS....he seemed to be quite unaware of how many women and girls were being preyed upon by serial groomers and rapists.
None of these were deemed to be valid enough to face trial by the CPS.
"CPS twice did not prosecute Mohamed Al Fayed after police presented evidence"
"Evidence was shown in 2009 and 2015, but the CPS decided not to go ahead with the prosecution as there was not a ‘realistic prospect of conviction"
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer was head of the CPS as director of public prosecutions from 2008 to 2013, but a Downing Street spokesperson said he did not handle Mr Al Fayed’s case, adding it “did not cross his desk”.
Considering the fact that Starmer was head of the CPS in the years Saville, the nationwide Muslim groomers, and now Fayed were acting out their vile crimes, all which were investigated by police and presented to the CPS....he seemed to be quite unaware of how many women and girls were being preyed upon by serial groomers and rapists.
None of these were deemed to be valid enough to face trial by the CPS.
"CPS twice did not prosecute Mohamed Al Fayed after police presented evidence"
"Evidence was shown in 2009 and 2015, but the CPS decided not to go ahead with the prosecution as there was not a ‘realistic prospect of conviction"
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer was head of the CPS as director of public prosecutions from 2008 to 2013, but a Downing Street spokesperson said he did not handle Mr Al Fayed’s case, adding it “did not cross his desk”.
It's hard to believe that in such highly controversial cases of people in the public eye, he was unaware of what was going on.
And if that was the case, it seems he was as useless at that job as he is at the present one.
It's hard to believe that in such highly controversial cases of people in the public eye, he was unaware of what was going on. And if that was the case, it seems he was as useless at that job as he is at the present one.
Methinks he was the in the rich men, pat on the back circle.
It's hard to believe that in such highly controversial cases of people in the public eye, he was unaware of what was going on. And if that was the case, it seems he was as useless at that job as he is at the present one.
Methinks he was the in the rich men, pat on the back circle.
It will never be known, as no one will speak out.
The head of any organisation is responsible....the buck stops with them.
Starmer did then what he is doing now, passing the buck.