ChaoticMusings

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Are we neare WW3 than any other time in recent history?
Syl


FIRM BUT FAIR.

Posts: 24019
Date:
RE: Are we neare WW3 than any other time in recent history?
Permalink   
 


Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:

I don't think Europe can rely on America for anything at the moment....not with that self-serving megalomaniac in charge.


 I don't think Europe needs America.

 

Why should we fund Europe's defense when they wont?.

 

Why is the American taxpayer supposed to pay to defend Europe and the American soldier should be bleeding?


 Because the UK, which is part of Europe, and America have always been allies. Trump seems to want to break this.

He has just said Zelenskyy doesn't want peace, and America wont put up with him much longer!!  



__________________

How wonderful life is while you're in the world.



Go Outside

Posts: 6994
Date:
Permalink   
 

Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:

I don't think Europe can rely on America for anything at the moment....not with that self-serving megalomaniac in charge.


 I don't think Europe needs America.

 

Why should we fund Europe's defense when they wont?.

 

Why is the American taxpayer supposed to pay to defend Europe and the American soldier should be bleeding?


 Because the UK, which is part of Europe, and America have always been allies. Trump seems to want to break this.

He has just said Zelenskyy doesn't want peace, and America wont put up with him much longer!!  


 We haven't always been allies. And besides, you're not under attack. 

 

You keep ignoring my question. Why doesn't Europe fund it's own defense. Why should Americans pay far more to defend Europe than some person in France or Germany?



__________________

The deity known as Maddog.



1000 Posts!?

Posts: 1302
Date:
Permalink   
 

Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:

I don't think Europe can rely on America for anything at the moment....not with that self-serving megalomaniac in charge.


 I don't think Europe needs America.

 

Why should we fund Europe's defense when they wont?.

 

Why is the American taxpayer supposed to pay to defend Europe and the American soldier should be bleeding?


 Why?

Because that's how America got global influence and power but obviously they no longer want that and are handing it all over to China.

Thanks America we are now seeing the construction of Eurasia that will dwarf Americas past hegemony.

Just Canadas leaving you is going to have huge impacts on the American economy despite you saying you need Canada for nothing.

Trump obviously doesn't agree with your assessment as he's willing to start a war with them to steal their country... must be pretty important.



-- Edited by jackb on Monday 3rd of March 2025 05:40:32 PM

__________________

Machines were mice and men were lions once upon a time. But now that it's the opposite it's twice upon a time.



1000 Posts!?

Posts: 1302
Date:
Permalink   
 

If America get kicked out or walk out of Europe they'll have to take a 100,000 trained killers home to mass unemployment and boredom or... they can use those troops to invade and dominate south America and they won't care about being alone then.

__________________

Machines were mice and men were lions once upon a time. But now that it's the opposite it's twice upon a time.



Go Outside

Posts: 6994
Date:
Permalink   
 

jackb wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:

I don't think Europe can rely on America for anything at the moment....not with that self-serving megalomaniac in charge.


 I don't think Europe needs America.

 

Why should we fund Europe's defense when they wont?.

 

Why is the American taxpayer supposed to pay to defend Europe and the American soldier should be bleeding?


 Why?

Because that's how America got global influence and power but obviously they no longer want that and are handing it all over to China.

Thanks America we are now seeing the construction of Eurasia that will dwarf Americas past hegemony.

Just Canadas leaving you is going to have huge impacts on the American economy despite you saying you need Canada for nothing.


 And what has that global influence got us?

 

36 trillion in debt

124%debt to GDP 

2 trillion in added debt just last year.

1 trillion in interest payments alone last year.

 

We should be trading with other countries, not paying for their national defense..



__________________

The deity known as Maddog.



1000 Posts!?

Posts: 1302
Date:
Permalink   
 

Maddog wrote:
jackb wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:

I don't think Europe can rely on America for anything at the moment....not with that self-serving megalomaniac in charge.


 I don't think Europe needs America.

 

Why should we fund Europe's defense when they wont?.

 

Why is the American taxpayer supposed to pay to defend Europe and the American soldier should be bleeding?


 Why?

Because that's how America got global influence and power but obviously they no longer want that and are handing it all over to China.

Thanks America we are now seeing the construction of Eurasia that will dwarf Americas past hegemony.

Just Canadas leaving you is going to have huge impacts on the American economy despite you saying you need Canada for nothing.


 And what has that global influence got us?

 

36 trillion in debt

124%debt to GDP 

2 trillion in added debt just last year.

1 trillion in interest payments alone last year.

 

We should be trading with other countries, not paying for their national defense..


 Your debts are through greed and incompetence.



__________________

Machines were mice and men were lions once upon a time. But now that it's the opposite it's twice upon a time.



Go Outside

Posts: 6994
Date:
Permalink   
 

jackb wrote:
Maddog wrote:
jackb wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:

I don't think Europe can rely on America for anything at the moment....not with that self-serving megalomaniac in charge.


 I don't think Europe needs America.

 

Why should we fund Europe's defense when they wont?.

 

Why is the American taxpayer supposed to pay to defend Europe and the American soldier should be bleeding?


 Why?

Because that's how America got global influence and power but obviously they no longer want that and are handing it all over to China.

Thanks America we are now seeing the construction of Eurasia that will dwarf Americas past hegemony.

Just Canadas leaving you is going to have huge impacts on the American economy despite you saying you need Canada for nothing.


 And what has that global influence got us?

 

36 trillion in debt

124%debt to GDP 

2 trillion in added debt just last year.

1 trillion in interest payments alone last year.

 

We should be trading with other countries, not paying for their national defense..


 Your debts are through greed and incompetence.


 Our debts are the result of spending too much money on stupid shit we can't afford..



__________________

The deity known as Maddog.

Syl


FIRM BUT FAIR.

Posts: 24019
Date:
Permalink   
 

Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:

I don't think Europe can rely on America for anything at the moment....not with that self-serving megalomaniac in charge.


 I don't think Europe needs America.

 

Why should we fund Europe's defense when they wont?.

 

Why is the American taxpayer supposed to pay to defend Europe and the American soldier should be bleeding?


 Because the UK, which is part of Europe, and America have always been allies. Trump seems to want to break this.

He has just said Zelenskyy doesn't want peace, and America wont put up with him much longer!!  


 We haven't always been allies. And besides, you're not under attack. 

 

You keep ignoring my question. Why doesn't Europe fund it's own defense. Why should Americans pay far more to defend Europe than some person in France or Germany?


 We are not under attack but Ukraine is, and Trump seems more interested in making deals with the enemy than defending a European country at war.

We help fund our own defence and we are set to give more, I have no idea what other countries give, probably a lot less. I guess some smaller countries can't afford to give as much.



__________________

How wonderful life is while you're in the world.



Go Outside

Posts: 6994
Date:
Permalink   
 

Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:

I don't think Europe can rely on America for anything at the moment....not with that self-serving megalomaniac in charge.


 I don't think Europe needs America.

 

Why should we fund Europe's defense when they wont?.

 

Why is the American taxpayer supposed to pay to defend Europe and the American soldier should be bleeding?


 Because the UK, which is part of Europe, and America have always been allies. Trump seems to want to break this.

He has just said Zelenskyy doesn't want peace, and America wont put up with him much longer!!  


 We haven't always been allies. And besides, you're not under attack. 

 

You keep ignoring my question. Why doesn't Europe fund it's own defense. Why should Americans pay far more to defend Europe than some person in France or Germany?


 We are not under attack but Ukraine is, and Trump seems more interested in making deals with the enemy than defending a European country at war.

We help fund our own defence and we are set to give more, I have no idea what other countries give, probably a lot less. I guess some smaller countries can't afford to give as much.


 Norway could pay a great deal more and they have profited nicely from the Russian oil embargo.

 

And why don't you have an idea what other countries have (or haven't) spent? 

 

The defense of Ukraine requires money and many of our allies haven't stepped up, outside of some bullshit about "standing" with them.

 

Words are cheap and they dont put Russian soldiers in body bags..

 

 



__________________

The deity known as Maddog.



Getting Gobby

Posts: 226
Date:
Permalink   
 

Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:

I don't think Europe can rely on America for anything at the moment....not with that self-serving megalomaniac in charge.


 I don't think Europe needs America.

 

Why should we fund Europe's defense when they wont?.

 

Why is the American taxpayer supposed to pay to defend Europe and the American soldier should be bleeding?


 You don't have to of course, but probably for the same reason you have no difficulty funding Israel - because it is in your geopolitical and strategic interests to do so.

There was a reason the US was instrumental in setting up NATO and it wasn't altruism. 

In any event, given the state of American finances it may well be that Zelenskyy is playing hardball himself. Both he and Putin know that it is in Trump's best interests for a quick win and why he and Vance got so frustrated recently when that got blocked.



__________________

Let mercy come and wash away what I've done 

Syl


FIRM BUT FAIR.

Posts: 24019
Date:
Permalink   
 

Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:

We are not under attack but Ukraine is, and Trump seems more interested in making deals with the enemy than defending a European country at war.

We help fund our own defence and we are set to give more, I have no idea what other countries give, probably a lot less. I guess some smaller countries can't afford to give as much.


 Norway could pay a great deal more and they have profited nicely from the Russian oil embargo.

And why don't you have an idea what other countries have (or haven't) spent? 

The defense of Ukraine requires money and many of our allies haven't stepped up, outside of some bullshit about "standing" with them.

Words are cheap and they dont put Russian soldiers in body bags..


  I'm not in charge of any countries budget, whether I know the figures or not is inconsequential.



__________________

How wonderful life is while you're in the world.



Go Outside

Posts: 6994
Date:
Permalink   
 

Barksdale wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:

I don't think Europe can rely on America for anything at the moment....not with that self-serving megalomaniac in charge.


 I don't think Europe needs America.

 

Why should we fund Europe's defense when they wont?.

 

Why is the American taxpayer supposed to pay to defend Europe and the American soldier should be bleeding?


 You don't have to of course, but probably for the same reason you have no difficulty funding Israel - because it is in your geopolitical and strategic interests to do so.

There was a reason the US was instrumental in setting up NATO and it wasn't altruism. 

In any event, given the state of American finances it may well be that Zelenskyy is playing hardball himself. Both he and Putin know that it is in Trump's best interests for a quick win and why he and Vance got so frustrated recently when that got blocked.


 The funding of our geopolitical interests are setting us on the same course as the Soviet Union. 

 

 

Imagine that power vacuum if that happens..



__________________

The deity known as Maddog.



Go Outside

Posts: 6994
Date:
Permalink   
 

Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:

We are not under attack but Ukraine is, and Trump seems more interested in making deals with the enemy than defending a European country at war.

We help fund our own defence and we are set to give more, I have no idea what other countries give, probably a lot less. I guess some smaller countries can't afford to give as much.


 Norway could pay a great deal more and they have profited nicely from the Russian oil embargo.

And why don't you have an idea what other countries have (or haven't) spent? 

The defense of Ukraine requires money and many of our allies haven't stepped up, outside of some bullshit about "standing" with them.

Words are cheap and they dont put Russian soldiers in body bags..


  I'm not in charge of any countries budget, whether I know the figures or not is inconsequential.


 I didnt say you were in charge.

 

Do you think other countries (especially those in the region) should meet their obligations? 



-- Edited by Maddog on Monday 3rd of March 2025 07:21:17 PM

__________________

The deity known as Maddog.



Getting Gobby

Posts: 226
Date:
Permalink   
 

Maddog wrote:
The funding of our geopolitical interests are setting us on the same course as the Soviet Union. 

Imagine that power vacuum if that happens..


 It's fascinating (well, in a "I hope we all don't die in a thermonuclear war" type of way") to watch this play out in real time.

Zelenskyy has put out a statement saying the end of the war "is very, very far away" to which Trump has angrily responded saying it was the worst statement he could have put out. I actually agree with Trump here as it seems Zelenskky is being deliberately provocative, presumably to try and gain more concessions.

I wonder who will blink first?



__________________

Let mercy come and wash away what I've done 

Syl


FIRM BUT FAIR.

Posts: 24019
Date:
Permalink   
 

Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:

We are not under attack but Ukraine is, and Trump seems more interested in making deals with the enemy than defending a European country at war.

We help fund our own defence and we are set to give more, I have no idea what other countries give, probably a lot less. I guess some smaller countries can't afford to give as much.


 Norway could pay a great deal more and they have profited nicely from the Russian oil embargo.

And why don't you have an idea what other countries have (or haven't) spent? 

The defense of Ukraine requires money and many of our allies haven't stepped up, outside of some bullshit about "standing" with them.

Words are cheap and they dont put Russian soldiers in body bags..


  I'm not in charge of any countries budget, whether I know the figures or not is inconsequential.


 I didnt say you were in charge.

 

Do you think other countries (especially those in the region) should meet their obligations? 



-- Edited by Maddog on Monday 3rd of March 2025 07:21:17 PM


 I think other countries should step up more, as we have done.

I certainly don't think any country should be pulling out.



__________________

How wonderful life is while you're in the world.



Go Outside

Posts: 6994
Date:
Permalink   
 

Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:

We are not under attack but Ukraine is, and Trump seems more interested in making deals with the enemy than defending a European country at war.

We help fund our own defence and we are set to give more, I have no idea what other countries give, probably a lot less. I guess some smaller countries can't afford to give as much.


 Norway could pay a great deal more and they have profited nicely from the Russian oil embargo.

And why don't you have an idea what other countries have (or haven't) spent? 

The defense of Ukraine requires money and many of our allies haven't stepped up, outside of some bullshit about "standing" with them.

Words are cheap and they dont put Russian soldiers in body bags..


  I'm not in charge of any countries budget, whether I know the figures or not is inconsequential.


 I didnt say you were in charge.

 

Do you think other countries (especially those in the region) should meet their obligations? 



-- Edited by Maddog on Monday 3rd of March 2025 07:21:17 PM


 I think other countries should step up more, as we have done.

I certainly don't think any country should be pulling out.


 It looks like you might be getting half your wish..

 

After decades of not meeting their obligations several countries are stepping up (still not all of them)..

 

Should have done it years ago and we probably wouldn't be here..



__________________

The deity known as Maddog.



Admin

Posts: 16883
Date:
Permalink   
 

Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:

We are not under attack but Ukraine is, and Trump seems more interested in making deals with the enemy than defending a European country at war.

We help fund our own defence and we are set to give more, I have no idea what other countries give, probably a lot less. I guess some smaller countries can't afford to give as much.


 Norway could pay a great deal more and they have profited nicely from the Russian oil embargo.

And why don't you have an idea what other countries have (or haven't) spent? 

The defense of Ukraine requires money and many of our allies haven't stepped up, outside of some bullshit about "standing" with them.

Words are cheap and they dont put Russian soldiers in body bags..


  I'm not in charge of any countries budget, whether I know the figures or not is inconsequential.


 I didnt say you were in charge.

 

Do you think other countries (especially those in the region) should meet their obligations? 



-- Edited by Maddog on Monday 3rd of March 2025 07:21:17 PM


 I think other countries should step up more, as we have done.

I certainly don't think any country should be pulling out.


 It looks like you might be getting half your wish..

 

After decades of not meeting their obligations several countries are stepping up (still not all of them)..

 

Should have done it years ago and we probably wouldn't be here..


 I agree.  The UK and Europe have never been so weak and lame.



__________________

 [04-10, 20:41] xtras:i dont think anyone in their right mind would have a crush on stoo

 



Go Outside

Posts: 6994
Date:
Permalink   
 

Digger wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:

We are not under attack but Ukraine is, and Trump seems more interested in making deals with the enemy than defending a European country at war.

We help fund our own defence and we are set to give more, I have no idea what other countries give, probably a lot less. I guess some smaller countries can't afford to give as much.


 Norway could pay a great deal more and they have profited nicely from the Russian oil embargo.

And why don't you have an idea what other countries have (or haven't) spent? 

The defense of Ukraine requires money and many of our allies haven't stepped up, outside of some bullshit about "standing" with them.

Words are cheap and they dont put Russian soldiers in body bags..


  I'm not in charge of any countries budget, whether I know the figures or not is inconsequential.


 I didnt say you were in charge.

 

Do you think other countries (especially those in the region) should meet their obligations? 



-- Edited by Maddog on Monday 3rd of March 2025 07:21:17 PM


 I think other countries should step up more, as we have done.

I certainly don't think any country should be pulling out.


 It looks like you might be getting half your wish..

 

After decades of not meeting their obligations several countries are stepping up (still not all of them)..

 

Should have done it years ago and we probably wouldn't be here..


 I agree.  The UK and Europe have never been so weak and lame.


 The UK has always met the NATO obligation of 2% of GDP being spent on defense. Most countries haven't..

 

Perhaps if someone had said "either meet the obligations you agreed to or we are kicking you out of the club", we wouldn't be here. 

 

Instead they were allowed to be slackers while the US taxpayer picked up the tab. 

 

What's worse, this isn't our backyard. If Europeans aren't interested in properly defending their region why should we? 

 

 

 

 

 

 



__________________

The deity known as Maddog.



Admin

Posts: 16883
Date:
Permalink   
 

Maddog wrote:
Digger wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:

We are not under attack but Ukraine is, and Trump seems more interested in making deals with the enemy than defending a European country at war.

We help fund our own defence and we are set to give more, I have no idea what other countries give, probably a lot less. I guess some smaller countries can't afford to give as much.


 Norway could pay a great deal more and they have profited nicely from the Russian oil embargo.

And why don't you have an idea what other countries have (or haven't) spent? 

The defense of Ukraine requires money and many of our allies haven't stepped up, outside of some bullshit about "standing" with them.

Words are cheap and they dont put Russian soldiers in body bags..


  I'm not in charge of any countries budget, whether I know the figures or not is inconsequential.


 I didnt say you were in charge.

 

Do you think other countries (especially those in the region) should meet their obligations? 



-- Edited by Maddog on Monday 3rd of March 2025 07:21:17 PM


 I think other countries should step up more, as we have done.

I certainly don't think any country should be pulling out.


 It looks like you might be getting half your wish..

 

After decades of not meeting their obligations several countries are stepping up (still not all of them)..

 

Should have done it years ago and we probably wouldn't be here..


 I agree.  The UK and Europe have never been so weak and lame.


 The UK has always met the NATO obligation of 2% of GDP being spent on defense. Most countries haven't..

 

Perhaps if someone had said "either meet the obligations you agreed to or we are kicking you out of the club", we wouldn't be here. 

 

Instead they were allowed to be slackers while the US taxpayer picked up the tab. 

 

What's worse, this isn't our backyard. If Europeans aren't interested in properly defending their region why should we? 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 I totally get that.



__________________

 [04-10, 20:41] xtras:i dont think anyone in their right mind would have a crush on stoo

 

Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 



Maddog wrote:
 

What's worse, this isn't our backyard. If Europeans aren't interested in properly defending their region why should we? 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

It's in the US's interests to support because, as you know, a stable Europe directly benefits the US and secures its influence in the region.

 

 



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5 6 79  >  Last»  | Page of 9  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.