Syl wrote:

---

Maddog wrote:

---

Syl wrote:

---

We don't decide when or if the truth is told, only the people who were there or involved in the cover ups know....the dead can't tell us can they.

We just have opinions.

---

 And that's how we keep conspiracy theories going. No matter what we are told, we can declare it to not be the truth.

 

Instead we make our own versions of the truth and decide any version that doesn't match ours isn't actually the truth.

 

 

---

 When people are called conspiracy theorists, it's just a way to demean their opinions, just as calling someone a racist when they are talking about very real immigration problems, is designed to do.

I don't think the majority of people who question these huge events are wanting the official verdicts to tally with their own. I think people look at both sides, read all the evidence available, and come to their own decision.

We all know governments lie and special agencies are trained in  acting covertly, it's how wars are won and lost, so bumping someone off should be a doddle. The three cases we mention, all the evidence points to assasinations.....in my opinion.

---

 Questioning is different than ignoring data. 

Yes we know that governments act covertly, as we eventually find out about their covert actions.

Speaking of the original topic, do you think the Andrew had Virginia killed? I mean that makes as much sense as his brother killing Di..

Syl wrote:

---

Maddog wrote:

---

Syl wrote:

---

Maddog wrote:

---

Syl wrote:

---

We don't decide when or if the truth is told, only the people who were there or involved in the cover ups know....the dead can't tell us can they.

We just have opinions.

---

 And that's how we keep conspiracy theories going. No matter what we are told, we can declare it to not be the truth.

 

Instead we make our own versions of the truth and decide any version that doesn't match ours isn't actually the truth.

 

 

---

 When people are called conspiracy theorists, it's just a way to demean their opinions, just as calling someone a racist when they are talking about very real immigration problems, is designed to do.

I don't think the majority of people who question these huge events are wanting the official verdicts to tally with their own. I think people look at both sides, read all the evidence available, and come to their own decision.

We all know governments lie and special agencies are trained in  acting covertly, it's how wars are won and lost, so bumping someone off should be a doddle. The three cases we mention, all the evidence points to assasinations.....in my opinion.

---

 Questioning is different than ignoring data. 

 

Yes we know that governments act covertly, as we eventually find out about their covert actions.

 

Speaking of the original topic, do you think the Andrew had Virginia killed? I mean that makes as much sense as his brother killing Di..

---

 Re Andrew, No, he makes a great job of damning himself without anyone elses help....it's all old news anyway.

And I dont for one minute think Charles had anything to do with Diana's death either....you are the one who mentioned him, and God forbid the late Queen,  earlier in the thread.

---

 Well, who else gave a shit about who Di was screwing and had the power to organize a convoluted and complex plan that required the silence of multiple people for decades now? 

The Russians?  They would have just used a waiter to slip something in her food.

I haven't paid attention to any of this in years. Who did her boyfriends daddy accuse?

I have an idea. Maybe Di knew about what Andrew was doing with Epstein and Andrew had her killed. Then, Andrew had Virginia killed because she was about to tell the world that Andrew killed Di. 

Just wait until Harry hears about all of this and has his uncle killed for murdering his mother..

Maddog wrote:

---

Syl wrote:

---

Maddog wrote:

---

Syl wrote:

---

Maddog wrote:

---

Syl wrote:

---

We don't decide when or if the truth is told, only the people who were there or involved in the cover ups know....the dead can't tell us can they.

We just have opinions.

---

 And that's how we keep conspiracy theories going. No matter what we are told, we can declare it to not be the truth.

 

Instead we make our own versions of the truth and decide any version that doesn't match ours isn't actually the truth.

 

 

---

 When people are called conspiracy theorists, it's just a way to demean their opinions, just as calling someone a racist when they are talking about very real immigration problems, is designed to do.

I don't think the majority of people who question these huge events are wanting the official verdicts to tally with their own. I think people look at both sides, read all the evidence available, and come to their own decision.

We all know governments lie and special agencies are trained in  acting covertly, it's how wars are won and lost, so bumping someone off should be a doddle. The three cases we mention, all the evidence points to assasinations.....in my opinion.

---

 Questioning is different than ignoring data. 

 

Yes we know that governments act covertly, as we eventually find out about their covert actions.

 

Speaking of the original topic, do you think the Andrew had Virginia killed? I mean that makes as much sense as his brother killing Di..

---

 Re Andrew, No, he makes a great job of damning himself without anyone elses help....it's all old news anyway.

And I dont for one minute think Charles had anything to do with Diana's death either....you are the one who mentioned him, and God forbid the late Queen,  earlier in the thread.

---

 Well, who else gave a shit about who Di was screwing and had the power to organize a convoluted and complex plan that required the silence of multiple people for decades now? 

 

The Russians?  They would have just used a waiter to slip something in her food.

 

I haven't paid attention to any of this in years. Who did her boyfriends daddy accuse?

 

I have an idea. Maybe Di knew about what Andrew was doing with Epstein and Andrew had her killed. Then, Andrew had Virginia killed because she was about to tell the world that Andrew killed Di. 

 

Just wait until Harry hears about all of this and has his uncle killed for murdering his mother..

 

---

Syl wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

Quite an interesting interview (ignore the click bait title), Piers actually calm throughout.

---

 

 Hoping Prince Andrew is now going to admit he slept with her and ask for redemption is beyond the realms of possibility.

He probably doesn't even remember her, she obviously did remember him because he was so high profile.

She accepted a 10 million pound payoff from him (which the late queen reportedly paid)  no one pays a person off so the case doesn't go to court...and then admit they did it anyway.

---

 He’s not the brightest bulb so I wouldn’t be surprised if he does.  This is the same bloke who did that interview against advice and then, it’s claimed, felt it went well. You can’t cure stupid Syl. 

Bet he’s clenching his cheeks at the publicity of her death.

Anonymous wrote:

---

Syl wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

Quite an interesting interview (ignore the click bait title), Piers actually calm throughout.

---

 

 Hoping Prince Andrew is now going to admit he slept with her and ask for redemption is beyond the realms of possibility.

He probably doesn't even remember her, she obviously did remember him because he was so high profile.

She accepted a 10 million pound payoff from him (which the late queen reportedly paid)  no one pays a person off so the case doesn't go to court...and then admit they did it anyway.

---

 He’s not the brightest bulb so I wouldn’t be surprised if he does.  This is the same bloke who did that interview against advice and then, it’s claimed, felt it went well. You can’t cure stupid Syl. 

Bet he’s clenching his cheeks at the publicity of her death.

---

Her suicide has probably put the kibosh on him returning to public life. He was beginning to worm himself back in, I doubt that'ii continue now.

Maddog wrote:

---

Syl wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

Quite an interesting interview (ignore the click bait title), Piers actually calm throughout.

---

 Hoping Prince Andrew is now going to admit he slept with her and ask for redemption is beyond the realms of possibility.

He probably doesn't even remember her, she obviously did remember him because he was so high profile.

She accepted a 10 million pound payoff from him (which the late queen reportedly paid)  no one pays a person off so the case doesn't go to court...and then admit they did it anyway.

---

 I hope he confesses before Harry has him killed and Markle murders Harry for his money..

---

 Is ridicule all you're left with?