ChaoticMusings

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

RE: Meghan's Moon Bump or is it?

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Maddog wrote:
I wonder how many RTAs in a high end Mercedes lead to death?

I know it's not a very high number.

If you really want to kill someone in that manner, it might take 50 crashes before you are successful..

I guess the lizard people got lucky on the first try..

Why are you channelling David Icke?

Maddog · Go Outside

Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
I wonder how many RTAs in a high end Mercedes lead to death?

I know it's not a very high number.

If you really want to kill someone in that manner, it might take 50 crashes before you are successful..

I guess the lizard people got lucky on the first try..
Why are you channelling David Icke?

Because we are discussing conspiracies about the royals. May was well discuss all of them.

Magica · Go Outside

Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
I wonder how many RTAs in a high end Mercedes lead to death?

I know it's not a very high number.

If you really want to kill someone in that manner, it might take 50 crashes before you are successful..

I guess the lizard people got lucky on the first try..
Why are you channelling David Icke?
Because we are discussing conspiracies about the royals. May was well discuss all of them.

I'm not a conspiracy theorists, I just believe Diana was murdered. That's it, my.opinion.

Maddog · Go Outside

If you don’t believe the accident happened as explained, you believe there was a conspiracy to kill her and cover it up.

If you believe that, you are a conspiracy theorist..

Magica · Go Outside

Maddog wrote:
If you don’t believe the accident happened as explained, you believe there was a conspiracy to kill her and cover it up.

If you believe that, you are a conspiracy theorist..

Just because I don't accept the story they gave out, doesn't make me a conspiracy theorists.I

I made up my own mind, not by what others may have said.

Date: Jun 26 10:59 PM, 2025

Magica wrote:
Maddog wrote:
If you don’t believe the accident happened as explained, you believe there was a conspiracy to kill her and cover it up.

If you believe that, you are a conspiracy theorist..
Just because I don't accept the story they gave out, doesn't make me a conspiracy theorists.I
I made up my own mind, not by what others may have said.

I can’t understand why if you think a certain way that that automatically makes you a conspirator, it’s bizarre. It’s almost like you’re being told you’re too thick to think for yourself…that if you agree with a few then you’ve just been ‘brain washed’. Look at 9/11 for instance.

Maddog · Go Outside

Magica wrote:
Maddog wrote:
If you don’t believe the accident happened as explained, you believe there was a conspiracy to kill her and cover it up.

If you believe that, you are a conspiracy theorist..
Just because I don't accept the story they gave out, doesn't make me a conspiracy theorists.I
I made up my own mind, not by what others may have said.

You believe her death was a conspiracy not an unfortunate accident.

Magica · Go Outside

Maddog wrote:
Magica wrote:
Maddog wrote:
If you don’t believe the accident happened as explained, you believe there was a conspiracy to kill her and cover it up.

If you believe that, you are a conspiracy theorist..
Just because I don't accept the story they gave out, doesn't make me a conspiracy theorists.I
I made up my own mind, not by what others may have said.
You believe her death was a conspiracy not an unfortunate accident.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

The words 'conspiracy theorist' are used as a demeaning term to anyone who doesn't accept the official finding, no matter how far-fetched the official finding may be.
It's lost it's affect...a bit like the work racist has. Once to be called a racist had some value, now it can be used as an insult to someone who simply points out cultural differences just as freely as to describe someone who is truly racist.

You could tell people who use those terms to just fuck off...but that's so common now, what's the point?

Magica · Go Outside

Syl wrote:
The words 'conspiracy theorist' are used as a demeaning term to anyone who doesn't accept the official finding, no matter how far-fetched the official finding may be.
It's lost it's affect...a bit like the work racist has. Once to be called a racist had some value, now it can be used as an insult to someone who simply points out cultural differences just as freely as to describe someone who is truly racist.

You could tell people who use those terms to just fuck off...but that's so common now, what's the point?

So true Syl x

Maddog · Go Outside

Syl wrote:
The words 'conspiracy theorist' are used as a demeaning term to anyone who doesn't accept the official finding, no matter how far-fetched the official finding may be.
It's lost it's affect...a bit like the work racist has. Once to be called a racist had some value, now it can be used as an insult to someone who simply points out cultural differences just as freely as to describe someone who is truly racist.

You could tell people who use those terms to just fuck off...but that's so common now, what's the point?

There are people that are prone to believe conspiracies over the findings or statements of officials or investigators..

Its an accurate term for people. It's no more demeaning than Christian or Agnostic..

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:
The words 'conspiracy theorist' are used as a demeaning term to anyone who doesn't accept the official finding, no matter how far-fetched the official finding may be.
It's lost it's affect...a bit like the work racist has. Once to be called a racist had some value, now it can be used as an insult to someone who simply points out cultural differences just as freely as to describe someone who is truly racist.

You could tell people who use those terms to just fuck off...but that's so common now, what's the point?
There are people that are prone to believe conspiracies over the findings or statements of officials or investigators..

Its an accurate term for people. It's no more demeaning than Christian or Agnostic..

Nah, you are comparing apples with oranges.

Maddog · Go Outside

The shock of Diana’s death also sparked countless conspiracy theories. Decades later, many have not given up the idea that Diana may have been the victim of a plot.

Unexpected events, such as deaths or accidents, are fertile breeding ground for conspiracy theories, which allow people to make sense of chaos by finding evidence, coincidences and someone to blame.

Celebrity deaths have inspired an entire genre of conspiracy theories, particularly the death of Princess Diana. While conspiracy theories about Diana’s death may hinge on different, specific details about the circumstances surrounding the fatal crash, many reach the same conclusion – that she was murdered by the royal family or the British authorities.

I study conspiracy theories to find out why people believe in them. One of the questions I ask is about the language of celebrity death conspiracy theories, and why it is so persuasive.

Conspiracy theories are empowering for people, allowing them to become DIY detectives. These “detectives” approach a case having already arrived at their conclusion. In celebrity deaths, this usually means murder by someone who seemingly benefits from the death.

theconversation.com/princess-diana-why-her-death-25-years-ago-has-sparked-so-many-conspiracy-theories-189088

Calling a conspiracy theory a conspiracy theory is exactly what you should call a conspiracy theory.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Maddog wrote:
The shock of Diana’s death also sparked countless conspiracy theories. Decades later, many have not given up the idea that Diana may have been the victim of a plot.

Unexpected events, such as deaths or accidents, are fertile breeding ground for conspiracy theories, which allow people to make sense of chaos by finding evidence, coincidences and someone to blame.

Celebrity deaths have inspired an entire genre of conspiracy theories, particularly the death of Princess Diana. While conspiracy theories about Diana’s death may hinge on different, specific details about the circumstances surrounding the fatal crash, many reach the same conclusion – that she was murdered by the royal family or the British authorities.

I study conspiracy theories to find out why people believe in them. One of the questions I ask is about the language of celebrity death conspiracy theories, and why it is so persuasive.

Conspiracy theories are empowering for people, allowing them to become DIY detectives. These “detectives” approach a case having already arrived at their conclusion. In celebrity deaths, this usually means murder by someone who seemingly benefits from the death.

theconversation.com/princess-diana-why-her-death-25-years-ago-has-sparked-so-many-conspiracy-theories-189088

Calling a conspiracy theory a conspiracy theory is exactly what you should call a conspiracy theory.

I am not denying the term, I am saying it's often used in a way to shut people up, like the word racist is.

Incidentally, have you not argued about the official verdict on JFK's death?

Date: Jun 27 6:52 PM, 2025

Anonymous wrote:
Magica wrote:
Maddog wrote:
If you don’t believe the accident happened as explained, you believe there was a conspiracy to kill her and cover it up.

If you believe that, you are a conspiracy theorist..
Just because I don't accept the story they gave out, doesn't make me a conspiracy theorists.I
I made up my own mind, not by what others may have said.
I can’t understand why if you think a certain way that that automatically makes you a conspirator, it’s bizarre. It’s almost like you’re being told you’re too thick to think for yourself…that if you agree with a few then you’ve just been ‘brain washed’. Look at 9/11 for instance.

It doesn't mean that though. If someone believes something was a conspiracy it doesn't mean that person is a conspirator.

Digger · Admin

Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Magica wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I feel that if the Secret Service had planned to kill her, having the resources they have, then a more fool-proof method would have been used. As it was it’s been claimed that if Diana had worn a seat belt then she might have had a chance of surviving the crash. It doesn’t sound like a professional attempt, to me anyway.
Seatbelt or not, she was meant to die, and die she did
Yes she did, and like I said before, an arranged RTA is a lot more feasible than being prodded by a poisoned brolly.
But surely a lot less feasible than a simple, non arranged, RTA?
Do you like going around in circles?
says you who can't stop replying
When people keep chipping in (like yourself) I always give them a courtesy of a reply.

Courtesy, my arse

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Magica wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I feel that if the Secret Service had planned to kill her, having the resources they have, then a more fool-proof method would have been used. As it was it’s been claimed that if Diana had worn a seat belt then she might have had a chance of surviving the crash. It doesn’t sound like a professional attempt, to me anyway.
Seatbelt or not, she was meant to die, and die she did
Yes she did, and like I said before, an arranged RTA is a lot more feasible than being prodded by a poisoned brolly.
But surely a lot less feasible than a simple, non arranged, RTA?
Do you like going around in circles?
says you who can't stop replying
When people keep chipping in (like yourself) I always give them a courtesy of a reply.
Courtesy, my arse

Please.... leave your arse out of this.

Digger · Admin

Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Magica wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I feel that if the Secret Service had planned to kill her, having the resources they have, then a more fool-proof method would have been used. As it was it’s been claimed that if Diana had worn a seat belt then she might have had a chance of surviving the crash. It doesn’t sound like a professional attempt, to me anyway.
Seatbelt or not, she was meant to die, and die she did
Yes she did, and like I said before, an arranged RTA is a lot more feasible than being prodded by a poisoned brolly.
But surely a lot less feasible than a simple, non arranged, RTA?
Do you like going around in circles?
says you who can't stop replying
When people keep chipping in (like yourself) I always give them a courtesy of a reply.
Courtesy, my arse
Please.... leave your arse out of this.

I rest my case

Date: Jun 27 7:51 PM, 2025

Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Digger wrote:
Syl wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Syl wrote:
Magica wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I feel that if the Secret Service had planned to kill her, having the resources they have, then a more fool-proof method would have been used. As it was it’s been claimed that if Diana had worn a seat belt then she might have had a chance of surviving the crash. It doesn’t sound like a professional attempt, to me anyway.
Seatbelt or not, she was meant to die, and die she did
Yes she did, and like I said before, an arranged RTA is a lot more feasible than being prodded by a poisoned brolly.
But surely a lot less feasible than a simple, non arranged, RTA?
Do you like going around in circles?
says you who can't stop replying
When people keep chipping in (like yourself) I always give them a courtesy of a reply.
Courtesy, my arse
Please.... leave your arse out of this.

Until you're fit enough to handle that duster eh?