ChaoticMusings

Anonymous wrote:

---

Syl wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

Syl wrote:

---

There is a lot of news on YouTube of Prince Harry and Kelly Clarkson having a heated row live on air, before she calls for security to escort him out of the building.
Not much in the news here though.

---

 I’ll have to look out for the Clarkson thing. 

Markle is taking a bashing every which way over her re-bottled wine, comparisons being made with ”Avaline” brand where even calorific values are disclosed. The comparison is that there is no comparison.

There is gossip that a named surrogate has come forward but nothing in the media.

---

 I don't believe for one minute she faked her pregnancies, but just imagine IF  a surrogate was proven to be telling the truth, can you just imagine what the fall out from that would be like?

---

 Markle was quick off the mark to comment on her twerking video for example so despite her claims of not reading SM/the media (I reckon Google is on constant refresh, someone so desperate for attention doesn’t check on what’s being said? yeah right) so I’m curious as to why neither of them have threatened legal action, at least, re the numerous surrogacy claims? Harry has claimed she was the most trolled (proven another fib) so he at least knows what’s being said.

---

 I bet they read everything that's ever said about them, if nothing else it'll boost their victim meter up a few notches.

Anonymous wrote:

---

Syl wrote:

---

There is a lot of news on YouTube of Prince Harry and Kelly Clarkson having a heated row live on air, before she calls for security to escort him out of the building.
Not much in the news here though.

---

 Possibly because it didn't happen? There's a lot of phoney news on YouTube.

---

 I think you are right. If I was Kelly Clarkson, I wouldn't be happy with being dragged into the Harry/Markle debacle.

Maddog wrote:

---

Syl wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

Syl wrote:

---

There is a lot of news on YouTube of Prince Harry and Kelly Clarkson having a heated row live on air, before she calls for security to escort him out of the building.
Not much in the news here though.

---

 Possibly because it didn't happen? There's a lot of phoney news on YouTube.

---

 I think you are right. If I was Kelly Clarkson, I wouldn't be happy with being dragged into the Harry/Markle debacle.

---

 I don't think it happened. I saw the stuff on YouTube but it was from sketchy sites. 

 

And Kelly is a gracious Texan like myself. We don't behave like that..😉

---

 Kelly Clarkson doesn't seem like a woman to insult her guests and have them thrown out of the studio.

To be fair, stuff like this, that definitely seems to be fabricated, does no one any favours. Doesn't YouTube have any way to control the content? 

Maybe they should start to vet the content people are putting up more closely.

Syl wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

Syl wrote:

---

There is a lot of news on YouTube of Prince Harry and Kelly Clarkson having a heated row live on air, before she calls for security to escort him out of the building.
Not much in the news here though.

---

 Possibly because it didn't happen? There's a lot of phoney news on YouTube.

---

 I think you are right. If I was Kelly Clarkson, I wouldn't be happy with being dragged into the Harry/Markle debacle.

---

 There is a lot of click-bait piffle on YouTube just as there is on Twitter and the likes. 

this on X.   I think, some of it might just happen.

 

The Inevitable Posthumous Rehabilitation of Meghan Markle, Victim. When Thomas Markle dies - and at 81, with heart problems and a lifetime of hard living, that day is no longer distant - the machinery will swing into motion with ruthless efficiency. Within hours of the obituary hitting the wires, the approved narrative will flood every sympathetic outlet from People magazine to the daily mails. And it will be brutal in its simplicity: Meghan Markle, wounded daughter, finally “free” to tell her truth about an abusive, manipulative, fame-hungry father who forced her to cut contact for the sake of her mental health and her young family.

The dead cannot sue. The dead cannot give interviews. The dead cannot pull out the birthday cards, the tuition checks, the decades of wedding photos, or the voicemail messages begging for a phone call that were never returned. That inconvenient evidence will be buried deeper than the man himself. We have seen the template before. It is the same one deployed against the Royal Family, against her half-siblings, against former staff, against childhood friends who dared speak out of turn. The pattern is merciless: total estrangement followed by strategic silence, then, at the moment the target is permanently neutralized, the floodgates open and the victimhood is retroactively weaponized. With the Palace it took years because they could still talk. With Thomas Markle, the timing will be surgical.

Expect the following, in order: 1A black-and-white childhood photo of Meghan sitting on her father’s lap, posted to Instagram or the Archewell website with a single broken-heart emoji and no caption. The comments will be restricted or disabled entirely.

2A tearful, softly lit interview (with any outlets that’ll entertain her lies ) in which she recounts, the “painful decision” she was forced to make because her father “sold her out” to the tabloids. The fact that he only spoke after two solid years of being iced out will be omitted.

3A carefully worded Archewell statement about “complex family trauma” and “protecting our children from toxic dynamics,” implying that a retired lighting director from California posed some ongoing threat to two toddlers living behind gates in Montecito.

4A flurry of supportive think-pieces from the usual quarters: “Why Meghan Had No Choice But to Go No-Contact,” “The Patriarchal Expectations Placed on Daughters of Narcissistic Fathers,” and the inevitable, will it be Oprah again for follow-up asking, with that trademark head tilt, “What is the truth you were never able to speak while he was alive?”

None of it will acknowledge the central, ugly fact: for the last seven years of his life, Thomas Markle’s crime was embarrassing a woman who had already decided he was an obstacle to the brand. He was too working-class, too white, too unpolished for the curated Sussex aesthetic. The staged paparazzi photos he foolishly agreed to before the wedding were merely the excuse, not the reason. Long before that, the invitations to visit the grandchildren never came. The medical emergencies were met with silence. The pleas for a simple phone call went unanswered.

And when he is gone, the final rewrite will be absolute. The man who worked multiple jobs to put his daughter through Northwestern, who lit her first school plays, who proudly walked her down the aisle when no one else could, will be reduced to a cautionary tale in the Duchess’s endless memoir of overcoming.

History is written by the living. Obituaries are written by the victorious. I repeat, BOOKMARK THIS! When the statement drops, when the single tear rolls down the perfectly lit cheek on camera, remember that the cruelest part is not that Meghan Markle will play the victim. The cruelest part is that her father will no longer be here to remind the world that, once upon a time, she was his little girl and he never stopped loving her, even when she decided loving him back was no longer convenient.

Magica wrote:

---

 Oh I believe this too.  I think he could die over this, then out will come her talons!

She will change the narrative to suit her, call him an abuser etc.  He can't answer for himself when he's gone.  The man who gave her everything.

I always thought he wasn't invited.to the wedding, she was ashamed of.him and he said he had a heart problem and couldn't go.

She's a nasty, narcissistic woman.  Nothing will surprise me when he's gone.I

 

Love your avi Digs 

---

 Too little too late as she has already shown the world her true colours, she’s known as a liar*. There’ll be the usual airhead fans defending her no doubt, a celeb here and there “worried about her MH” blah blah blah.

Her dad may not have a voice to defend himself but his other daughter has and I reckon she’ll have something to say.

* a sticky-fingered tea-leaf also going by stories of clothes being walked away with according to a few videos I’ve watched recently.

 

Magica wrote:

---

Digger wrote:

---

this on X.   I think, some of it might just happen.

 

The Inevitable Posthumous Rehabilitation of Meghan Markle, Victim. When Thomas Markle dies - and at 81, with heart problems and a lifetime of hard living, that day is no longer distant - the machinery will swing into motion with ruthless efficiency. Within hours of the obituary hitting the wires, the approved narrative will flood every sympathetic outlet from People magazine to the daily mails. And it will be brutal in its simplicity: Meghan Markle, wounded daughter, finally “free” to tell her truth about an abusive, manipulative, fame-hungry father who forced her to cut contact for the sake of her mental health and her young family.

The dead cannot sue. The dead cannot give interviews. The dead cannot pull out the birthday cards, the tuition checks, the decades of wedding photos, or the voicemail messages begging for a phone call that were never returned. That inconvenient evidence will be buried deeper than the man himself. We have seen the template before. It is the same one deployed against the Royal Family, against her half-siblings, against former staff, against childhood friends who dared speak out of turn. The pattern is merciless: total estrangement followed by strategic silence, then, at the moment the target is permanently neutralized, the floodgates open and the victimhood is retroactively weaponized. With the Palace it took years because they could still talk. With Thomas Markle, the timing will be surgical.

Expect the following, in order: 1A black-and-white childhood photo of Meghan sitting on her father’s lap, posted to Instagram or the Archewell website with a single broken-heart emoji and no caption. The comments will be restricted or disabled entirely.

2A tearful, softly lit interview (with any outlets that’ll entertain her lies ) in which she recounts, the “painful decision” she was forced to make because her father “sold her out” to the tabloids. The fact that he only spoke after two solid years of being iced out will be omitted.

3A carefully worded Archewell statement about “complex family trauma” and “protecting our children from toxic dynamics,” implying that a retired lighting director from California posed some ongoing threat to two toddlers living behind gates in Montecito.

4A flurry of supportive think-pieces from the usual quarters: “Why Meghan Had No Choice But to Go No-Contact,” “The Patriarchal Expectations Placed on Daughters of Narcissistic Fathers,” and the inevitable, will it be Oprah again for follow-up asking, with that trademark head tilt, “What is the truth you were never able to speak while he was alive?”

None of it will acknowledge the central, ugly fact: for the last seven years of his life, Thomas Markle’s crime was embarrassing a woman who had already decided he was an obstacle to the brand. He was too working-class, too white, too unpolished for the curated Sussex aesthetic. The staged paparazzi photos he foolishly agreed to before the wedding were merely the excuse, not the reason. Long before that, the invitations to visit the grandchildren never came. The medical emergencies were met with silence. The pleas for a simple phone call went unanswered.

And when he is gone, the final rewrite will be absolute. The man who worked multiple jobs to put his daughter through Northwestern, who lit her first school plays, who proudly walked her down the aisle when no one else could, will be reduced to a cautionary tale in the Duchess’s endless memoir of overcoming.

History is written by the living. Obituaries are written by the victorious. I repeat, BOOKMARK THIS! When the statement drops, when the single tear rolls down the perfectly lit cheek on camera, remember that the cruelest part is not that Meghan Markle will play the victim. The cruelest part is that her father will no longer be here to remind the world that, once upon a time, she was his little girl and he never stopped loving her, even when she decided loving him back was no longer convenient.

---

 Oh I believe this too.  I think he could die over this, then out will come her talons!

She will change the narrative to suit her, call him an abuser etc.  He can't answer for himself when he's gone.  The man who gave her everything.

I always thought he wasn't invited.to the wedding, she was ashamed of.him and he said he had a heart problem and couldn't go.

She's a nasty, narcissistic woman.  Nothing will surprise me when he's gone.I

 

Love your avi Digs 

---

 Thank you.   You'll all have to bear with me regarding moderating the forum right now as I'm still recovering from norovirus.   Right nasty it was too.

Digger wrote:

---

---

 Thank you.   You'll all have to bear with me regarding moderating the forum right now as I'm still recovering from norovirus.   Right nasty it was too.

---

 Best wishes from this anon, take it easy and hope you soon feel back to normal.