ChaoticMusings

Date: Jun 13 8:20 PM, 2025

RE: Meghan's Moon Bump or is it?

Date: Jun 14 3:24 PM, 2025

Anonymous wrote:
I can understand people who feel that Harry has been a bit traitorous to his family, but I think he was never comfortable with the prim and proper lifestyle the royals are meant to lead, and Meghan, especially with her being American, also wasn't a good fit for that, so it's no big surprise they decided to bugger off.

But they continue to demand recognition and respect of that “prim and proper” lifestyle, with no input, whilst behaving like a pair of chavs on a binge fuelled chara weekend.

Date: Jun 14 11:17 PM, 2025

Twerking: Looking forward to the rumoured South Park episode(s) “Respect Our Pregnancy”. Markle is upset and threatening legal action, again rumoured…apparently cushion/pillow falling out when twerking, numerous video re-takes etc.

I’m already looking forward to it.

Magica · Go Outside

Answer to anon, further up the page.

The reason I don't believe she was pregnant, being able to squat wearing high heels, legs together when big, and standing straight up.. Also when she squatted, the bump went in. The bump fell down a few times, swayed side to side, and never really looked pregnant to me. Now that twerking video makes me feel absolutely sure, she carried no babies.

Thats.just my opinion. Wrong or right.

Date: Jun 15 7:59 AM, 2025

Magica wrote:
Answer to anon, further up the page.

The reason I don't believe she was pregnant, being able to squat wearing high heels, legs together when big, and standing straight up.. Also when she squatted, the bump went in. The bump fell down a few times, swayed side to side, and never really looked pregnant to me. Now that twerking video makes me feel absolutely sure, she carried no babies.

Thats.just my opinion. Wrong or right.

The question is - why would she need to do something like that, as she's of an age where she's capable of bearing her own children? How about the family photos - have they borrowed someone else's kids, and if so why pretend?

Date: Jun 15 3:43 PM, 2025

It's not very likely is it. But everyone's entitled to their own opinion.

Date: Jun 15 4:09 PM, 2025

Conspiracy theories about the Royals are nothing new in fairness. A fair few people did suspect that Diana's tragic passing was no accident. Most people accept thats not what happened (the driver was drunk I think and the reporters were chasing the car relentlessly at high speed ). But at the time a nation was in mourning and so shocked and angry.

Vam · Musing at the Chaos

Anonymous wrote:
Conspiracy theories about the Royals are nothing new in fairness. A fair few people did suspect that Diana's tragic passing was no accident. Most people accept thats not what happened (the driver was drunk I think and the reporters were chasing the car relentlessly at high speed ). But at the time a nation was in mourning and so shocked and angry.

🙋🏻‍♀️ I could be way off base, and I hope I am, but I’ll ’fess up and admit I’m one of those people.

That’s because I believe there’s no way ‘The Firm’ could have ever countenanced the possibility that the mother of the future King of England would give birth to a child fathered by a Muslim.

-- Edited by Vam on Sunday 15th of June 2025 05:27:08 PM

Maddog · Go Outside

Anonymous wrote:
Conspiracy theories about the Royals are nothing new in fairness. A fair few people did suspect that Diana's tragic passing was no accident. Most people accept thats not what happened (the driver was drunk I think and the reporters were chasing the car relentlessly at high speed ). But at the time a nation was in mourning and so shocked and angry.

Don't forget that the queen was reptilian..

Magica · Go Outside

Anonymous wrote:
Magica wrote:
Answer to anon, further up the page.

The reason I don't believe she was pregnant, being able to squat wearing high heels, legs together when big, and standing straight up.. Also when she squatted, the bump went in. The bump fell down a few times, swayed side to side, and never really looked pregnant to me. Now that twerking video makes me feel absolutely sure, she carried no babies.

Thats.just my opinion. Wrong or right.
The question is - why would she need to do something like that, as she's of an age where she's capable of bearing her own children? How about the family photos - have they borrowed someone else's kids, and if so why pretend?

Because she can't have them allegedly. She was supposed to have had hysterectomy. Also she's five yrs older than she says. Pupils who were in her class have said.

I don't know why she lied. If she never have birth, if it was IVF or adopted even, they are not royal, therefore.not Prince of princess. They must come from her womb. Maybe that's why.

As I said it's just my opinion, I've always thought it. I could be totally wrong, many think I am. I would.like it proven once and for all tbh.

Magica · Go Outside

Vam wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Conspiracy theories about the Royals are nothing new in fairness. A fair few people did suspect that Diana's tragic passing was no accident. Most people accept thats not what happened (the driver was drunk I think and the reporters were chasing the car relentlessly at high speed ). But at the time a nation was in mourning and so shocked and angry.
🙋🏻‍♀️ I could be way off base, and I hope I am, but I’ll ’fess up and admit I’m one of those people.
That’s because I believe there’s no way ‘The Firm’ could have ever countenanced the possibility that the mother of the future King of England would give birth to a child fathered by a Muslim.

-- Edited by Vam on Sunday 15th of June 2025 05:27:08 PM

I agree, I think Diana was murdered, so many think it aswell.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

The most famous woman in the world was in a simple RTA....and the car or driver were never proven to be found.
The Dr who was first on the scene and says he spoke to her....was not called to give his evidence.
No paparazzi who were chasing the car that night gave evidence at the two inquests.
The CCTV in the tunnel was mysteriously not working on that fateful night.
Diana had said the weekend before that the next announcement she would make would shock everyone.
She had recently been called a 'Loose Cannon', by some government official, and was visibly upset when she was told that on camera.
Unexplained flash in the tunnel before the crash happened.
There are many more disputes about the official version of events, including the state of the driver, who was blamed for being drunk and driving too fast.

So I am also one of the many millions who believe Princess Diana was assassinated.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Anonymous wrote:
Conspiracy theories about the Royals are nothing new in fairness. A fair few people did suspect that Diana's tragic passing was no accident. Most people accept thats not what happened (the driver was drunk I think and the reporters were chasing the car relentlessly at high speed ). But at the time a nation was in mourning and so shocked and angry.

Shocked, angry, and not as gullible as many were.

Date: Jun 16 12:47 AM, 2025

Magica wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Magica wrote:
Answer to anon, further up the page.

The reason I don't believe she was pregnant, being able to squat wearing high heels, legs together when big, and standing straight up.. Also when she squatted, the bump went in. The bump fell down a few times, swayed side to side, and never really looked pregnant to me. Now that twerking video makes me feel absolutely sure, she carried no babies.

Thats.just my opinion. Wrong or right.
The question is - why would she need to do something like that, as she's of an age where she's capable of bearing her own children? How about the family photos - have they borrowed someone else's kids, and if so why pretend?
Because she can't have them allegedly. She was supposed to have had hysterectomy. Also she's five yrs older than she says. Pupils who were in her class have said.
I don't know why she lied. If she never have birth, if it was IVF or adopted even, they are not royal, therefore.not Prince of princess. They must come from her womb. Maybe that's why.
As I said it's just my opinion, I've always thought it. I could be totally wrong, many think I am. I would.like it proven once and for all tbh.

Yeah, I read somewhere that a family member had said she’d had a hysterectomy but who knows with that family as they all seem a little off to me. However, I hadn’t heard about her being older than she claims to be.

Her not giving birth and Diana’s death - both would involve a hell of a lot of people keeping shtum, mainly from the medical profession in both cases. I feel Diana’s death was simply a tragic accident, a combination of high speed, paparazzi and booze. I don’t think the French’s handling of the case helped in quelling doubts.

Date: Jun 16 6:28 AM, 2025

Some people need conspiracy theories. They're more exciting than mundane reality, and they offer an explanation for people who find it hard to accept that unfortunate random events do happen. Diana's death was a major event, and so some people wanted a major explanation for it. Also, remember, it was all fuelled by Al-Fayed.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Things happen, even the late Queen allegedly spoke about 'dark forces'.
Governments get up to all sorts, none of us know what's happening behind the scenes.
Remember the Russian spy who was assassinated from a prod off a poisoned umbrella tip whilst walking around London? It sounds far-fetched even now, and it happened in the 1970's.

Lots of strange events, when people are killed or commit suicide (remember David Kelly??) are put down to conspiracy theories when people question the official verdict.... it's one way to try to shut people up.

Digger · Admin

Syl wrote:
The most famous woman in the world was in a simple RTA....and the car or driver were never proven to be found.
The Dr who was first on the scene and says he spoke to her....was not called to give his evidence.
No paparazzi who were chasing the car that night gave evidence at the two inquests.
The CCTV in the tunnel was mysteriously not working on that fateful night.
Diana had said the weekend before that the next announcement she would make would shock everyone.
She had recently been called a 'Loose Cannon', by some government official, and was visibly upset when she was told that on camera.
Unexplained flash in the tunnel before the crash happened.
There are many more disputes about the official version of events, including the state of the driver, who was blamed for being drunk and driving too fast.

So I am also one of the many millions who believe Princess Diana was assassinated.

If she'd have been wearing a seat belt she would have survived. If someone wanted her dead, they wouldn't have used such a clumsy method as causing a car to crash.

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

If it was an assassination, she would have been dead seat belt or not.

Date: Jun 16 9:33 PM, 2025

I tend to agree with Digger especially now knowing she wasn't wearing her seat belt. She may have forgot or it came undone in the hectic car chase to get away. But what a mistake to make. One thing is for certain, the press hounded that women literally until the end of her life. She couldn't go anywhere without being mobbed. The paparazzi chasing her so relentlessly have blood on their hands certainly. I can believe elements of the crash were covered up to save face, but ultimately i think it was a horrible accident due to the dangerous and irrensponsible behaviour of those involved. I respect the opinion of those that think differently though as like Syl said we don't know half of what goes on. If she was pregnant..that would have displeased many. To put it mildly.

Date: Jun 17 7:31 AM, 2025

Syl wrote:

Lots of strange events, when people are killed or commit suicide (remember David Kelly??) are put down to conspiracy theories when people question the official verdict.... it's one way to try to shut people up.

And yet some conspiracy theories are just that - conspiracy theories, and it's right to call them that. The Diana one was started by an unstable al-Fayed who claimed that she was assassinated as a result of a plot by the Duke of Edinburgh and Diana's sister to have her eradicated because she was expecting the child of a Muslim. (he claimed she was pregnant at the time of her death, but the post-mortem revealed otherwise).

One explanation with his obsession with his theory was that it detracted from the reality that it was one of his own employees who was drunk and crashed the car that killed Diana and his son. His plot story was widely publicised at the time by the likes of the Express and other publications, and quickly gained traction from there.

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/dominic-lawson/dominic-lawson-the-only-conspiracy-over-diana-s-death-was-fayed-s-bid-to-manipulate-the-british-public-804548.html