ChaoticMusings

Red Okktober wrote:

---

Magica wrote:

---

---

 It's hard to tell what is real anymore.

---

 It's called 'progress'!

---

 Then I want none of it. I prefer reality not AI rubbish.

Syl wrote:

---

I use Google AI and it's brilliant, it's like an all knowing instant encyclpedia.

But God help human kind when they think they are talking to a human being, and it's an artificially generated machine that can mimic human traits and emotions.
In the article Red posted about the lad who murdered his mother, I wonder who he thought he was in contact with?

---

 I think it's fair to give a balanced view, and I agree about Google AI - it summarises all of the search results in an instant and saves you having to trawl through them all. There are lots of other good things it can do as well, particularly in the medical field.

But there are massive negatives to it as well, as we have discussed in this thread. The problem for me is that those responsible for developing AI - scientists, governments etc, very rarely address those negatives and only talk about the good things it can do, and we only find out about the bad stuff when stories like the boy killing his mum with a hammer come to light.

There is also a lot of fear and distrust about what AI may do in the future - used by terrorists and rogue nations to kill, take people's jobs, advanced fake news that will be impossible to tell from real news etc. None of these things are being addressed by those responsible for promoting AI as the best thing ever.

Starmer said he wants !AI running through the veins of Britain' - which is a hugely dangerous and irresponsible concept given all the things that can and will go wrong.