ChaoticMusings

Maddog · Still Here!

RE: World News.

Maddog · Still Here!

Syl wrote:
Maddog wrote:
You don't need cooperation from other EU countries to deport illegal immigrants. You need a domestic law that authorizes it..

And what is the Online Safety Act?

-- Edited by Maddog on Monday 28th of September 2026 07:43:14 PM
We do deport illegals, just not enough and not quickly enough....and in the meantime we spend billions looking after them.
In spite of your country's more robust methods....you still have millions of illegals in your own country.

Estimates for the unauthorized immigrant population in the United States range from 11 million to 18.6 million, depending on the organization and estimation method used. Because undocumented populations are difficult to count directly, different research groups rely on varying demographic models and government survey data.

We do have millions.

But they also aren't really a problem. Even under democrats they aren't fed and housed, and are deported when caught.

Our problems stem more from lazy bastards born here..

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Maddog wrote:
Syl wrote:
Google....

"The Online Safety Act 2023 is a UK law designed to protect children and adults online by holding social media companies and search services legally responsible for user safety."
Are you going to tell me it hasn't led to arrests for people say pretty much what has been said on here?.

What happened to Graham Linehan?

I dont know who Graham Lineham is, enlighten us. I do know that the Online Safety Act is not used as you seem to think.

You may be getting confused with ...

"The Malicious Communications Act 1988 (Section 1)

This law covers letters, electronic messages, or online posts sent to another person that are indecent, grossly offensive, or convey a threat, with the specific purpose of causing distress or anxiety to the recipient.

4. The Public Order Act 1986 (Hate Speech)

If offensive language targets specific groups, it can be prosecuted under the Public Order Act 1986. It is a serious crime to publish or distribute threatening, abusive, or insulting material online if it is intended (or likely) to "stir up hatred" against people based on protected characteristics, such as race, religion, or sexual orientation. "

Maddog · Still Here!

He was discussed on here.

Anyway he was arrested at Heathrow over mean tweets.

I guess parliament has been able to craft laws addressing that plague infecting the UK..

Meanwhile, dealing with boat falls of immigrants that don't want to assimilate is too complex of an issue.

Unless money needs to be set aside to take care of them. That sort of legislation is within their powers..

Syl · FIRM BUT FAIR.

Well I just checked...he was charged under a law existing for almost 30 years.... "Protection from Harassment Act 1997" regarding his social media posts on X.

Like I said...stop making things up.

Maddog · Still Here!

Syl wrote:
Well I just checked...he was charged under a law existing for almost 30 years.... "Protection from Harassment Act 1997" regarding his social media posts on X.

Like I said...stop making things up.

Sounds like another law that needs to be worked on.

Or do you think his arrest and the 60,000 others over social media posts from the past 5 years are protecting you from what you need protected from?